Seun:

It means that you should be allowed to say such things. That your right to say such things should be defended by the government. There's no value in freedom of speech if it's only limited to things that won't offend anybody. Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend. It is important because very often people are offended by the truth. And you can't have social progress if people aren't allowed to speak the truth.

BetaThings:




That is your own view and it is abhorent in Nigeria
Most of the views canvassed by people who think like you are not original. They are products of western indoctrination
Yet I cannot, as a researcher, go across Europe an say based on my studies the Holocaust did not take place, I would be jailed
So where is the capacity to tolerate dissent and offence

BTW What is the benefit in offending people?
What is the benefit in having moderators on Nairaland if it is nice to offend people

Let me ask you this
Can you go to the streets of Benin and insult the Oba?
Or Ojukwu in Awka?
Or Awo in Ikenne?

Or what would you do if somebody insulted your dad?
Applaud?

The needless provocation of people serves no useful end and it is alien to our culture
I can assure you that our society will witness less conflict if we respect ourselves
Courtesy, decency, fairness are values we cherish, there is no benefit in importing strange standards of morality that can only subtract from our society
I am not impressed by the tension between the liberals and conservatives in America and it can still undo that the country
By your position, you should be promoting strong values rather than chip away at the foundation of societal moral fabric

Akdegreat:
Seun said "Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend".

The respondent replied as though Seun said that "Freedom of speech is freedom to offend".

Akdegreat:
Seun said "Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend".

The respondent replied as though Seun said that "Freedom of speech is freedom to offend".

hopefulLandlord:


thank you, OP is just being dishonest

vedaxcool:

boy o boy, you felt like you were backed into a corner!

hopefulLandlord:


WatDeElIsdis?

Akdegreat:
Seun said "Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend".
The respondent replied as though Seun said that "Freedom of speech is freedom to offend".

vedaxcool:


Oga reframing the issue in what everyone can use their own 2 eyes to see is does not cut it at all, The respondent to seun claims is simply, if freedom to offen is part and parcel of freedom of speech why is he stocking nairaland with moderators? Of what use are they? If he actually believes what he posted then he should be quick to practice it, these are their words:

Seun: There's no value in freedom of speech if it's only limited to things that won't offend anybody. Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend.

Betathings: Yet I cannot, as a researcher, go across Europe an say based on my studies the Holocaust did not take place, I would be jailed
So where is the capacity to tolerate dissent and offence

BTW What is the benefit in offending people?
What is the benefit in having moderators on Nairaland if it is nice to offend people

HyDef:


Dude, what the frack are you saying?

No one would be jailed for claiming the holocaust didn't happen. They'd just be subject to public destruction. Same way racists aren't jailed. Someone can admit to being a member of the KKK, but that's not basis enough to jail such an individual. It's only in our flawed system where you can be arrested for such things. Kemi Olunloyo wouldn't have been arrested in any saner society.

Nairaland needs moderators because it's on the Internet. It's a forum and it has its rules. Think of it as a club. Clubs have rules. Moderators enforce those rules. Rules are to keep things civil. Nairaland would be one constant Flame War without mods. Anonymity makes everything worse.

If you want people online to be kept in line, you'll need rules, or you'll end up with 4chan.

vedaxcool:


Two question

Has anyone been jailed for holocaust denial?

Does nairaland rules restrict freedom of speech?

HyDef:


There are laws against Holocaust Denial. That I've learnt, so I rescind that point.

Yes, within reasonable limits. But that's basically same as every other Internet forum.

cooncudee:
it seems you missed his (seun's) reply, or you decidedly ignored it https://www.nairaland.com/3731598/why-these-muslim-countries-peaceful/1#55441875 I coundn't quote and bring it here because of the oath. op needs a crash course on what freedom of expression is. remember we are talking about the law here. how it is supposed to be, what the law says, and not what your holy book says or how you feel it should be

LightandDarkness:
So free speech should be limited?

vedaxcool:


huh did you not check his time of reply and the time this thread was started almost 18 hrs after he was responded to. And please ask him why he skipped the part that said why he is moderating this forum?
You post is bit incoherent.

vedaxcool:


Reply

cooncudee:
the mods are here to enforce the 22 rules up there. what the essence of having rules when you have no means of enforcing them. nd im sure you saw the reply.

oaroloye:
SHALOM!



It is an actual fact that THE HOLOCAUST, which is the basis of the seizure of Palestine by Whites claiming to be Jews, NEVER HAPPENED.

There was no SIX-MILLION MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD Massacre:

IT IS A "BIG LIE."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acPfPG457cw


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mylBZHPw3_A


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwYnVJniTaI

How many Palestinian Men, Women, and Children have died, because there was no Freedom-of-Speech in Europe?

For those new to the idea that THE HOLOCAUST was a LIE, everything hinges on ONE question:

HOW WERE THE ALLEGED SIX MILLION BODIES DISPOSED-OF?

Everything unravels from there.

vedaxcool:


Why would you have rules if freedom speech is unlimited? Seem like seun you can't still get argument.

cooncudee:
and who said freedom of speech is unlimited.

There's no value in freedom of speech if it's only limited to things that won't offend anybody. Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend

does not mean freedom of speech is unlimited, do you have a problem comprehending that?!

vedaxcool:


Why would you have rules if freedom speech is unlimited? Seem like seun you can't still get argument.

vedaxcool:


Seu.n is that you? lol The question remains unanswered:

Seun:
Nairaland is a private space. We have the right to kick you out if you don't follow our rules, just as you have the right to kick a guest out of your house if s/he says something you don't like. Just as a mosque has the right to kick out a pastor who comes into the mosque to preach. But we will not attack you physically or try to murder or jail you just because you criticized or made fun of our beliefs. We have no right to do that.

Yes, there should be exceptions to freedom of speech. It should be illegal to call for violent acts against anybody. It should be illegal to deliberately lie against an innocent person to ruin that person's reputation, if a lawyer can prove that it was a deliberate lie. But it should not be illegal to insult or offend or provoke people. Nobody should have the right to not be insulted. No beliefs should have the privilege of not being criticised or mocked. People should be made to learn that, while they can't control what others say, they can and must control their reactions.

Seun:

Seun:
a

vedaxcool:


lolz so much laughter when you witness a grown man swallow his own word:talk about double speak with no shame whatsoever.

nairaland is a private forum controlled by who me? No you. It only follows that you practice what you preach .... if you really believe in this fairytale of freedom of speech you will atleast put it to practice in a place YOU have CONTROL over. Remember you used the same mouth of yours to claim freedom of speech in Europe is not perfect but yet lack the spine to practice it in a private forum owned by you. Such a shame. No one can take you seriously given how your words have no value whatsoever.

Mcowubaba:

You said no Belief should have the privilege of NOT being mocked or criticised, Isn't that Ironic since we can't criticise Muslims in their section, without us taking an Oath..

The Obviously have Privilege of not being criticised/mocked by other beliefs.

I know you will come up with how delicate and fanatic Muslims could be, that the could go on a Carnage, Jihad or holocaust...

Why should they be allowed to carry on with such mentality, that people fear them nd can't confront them nd their archiac Beliefs.

Here on Nairaland, Muslims mock Christians in their section, It's okay, that's freedom of Speech, Christian try to do the same, It's not Okay, you Christians will offend our muslim brothers to start killing people

I watched a 'funny' video clip of people impersonating Shekau (Boko Haram leader), can you believe that the used the Bible nd Bible verses, instead of Quran, the were obviously scared of the supposed 'backlash' the would get from Muslims

I will quote what Asari Dokubo once said 'Nobody has monopoly of violence'

vedaxcool:


https://www.nairaland.com/1195636/story-behind-avoid-getting-banned

Read the link above and you will shake your head at him even more. The link was the first instance of Christians pushing him to write rubbish on the Islam section