HaneefahRN:


It is just so irritating. Anytime I see his name attached to a thread, I know it'll be a silly post aimed at degrading women in form of advice no one asked him for

Toks2008:


Only a jack ass will say all men or women cheat and only a miopic person will say their partners can't cheat on them...the only logical thing is to look at the situation realistically

A woman will only be a mumu if she breaks up a philandering hubby to start sleeping with another lady's husband or worse still sleeps with different men upandan because believe if or not this is what 90% of them do.

So take this hard truth now and save yourself from delusion.

SalomonKane:
Well you can ignore, like many do. I believe he is entitled to air his own opinion, even if it's degrading or not.

You have the choice of countering him though..

shaybebaby:

Still you haven't answered what the biblical stance is on your assertations that 90% of men will cheat.
If this is the case, then only one out of ten is on the position to demand strict adherence to God's word. The rest must keep schtum about divorce and let faithful men sermonise.

Toks2008:

Im responding to this particular post because it is void of the pepper seller remarks.

Now let me blow your mind up the roof...

Show me one place in the bible that is against polygamy.

If i may help out, the bible does not condemn polygamy or a man marrying as many wives as he would but only admonishes General overseers to be husbands of one wife... it is also clear from the bible that great men who were and stil friends of GOD were polygamous.

This is a clear sign that polygamy was never condemned in the bible suffix to say it is totally baseless for any lady to kill herself over the polygamous nature of man and only babies, teenagers,adolescents and few mature ladies in age will be crying fowl over a man cheating on them.

If you want me to present scriptures upon scriptures relating to polygamy let me know and i wil gladly do that.

ItsQuinn:
The New Testament teaches that, “Each man [should] have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband” (1 Cor. 7:2).

Toks2008:


This is not about using some logic or philosophy but the question is simple...is polygamy a sin?

Toks2008:

Im responding to this particular post because it is void of the pepper seller remarks.

Now let me blow your mind up the roof...

Show me one place in the bible that is against polygamy.

If i may help out, the bible does not condemn polygamy or a man marrying as many wives as he would but only admonishes General overseers to be husbands of one wife... it is also clear from the bible that great men who were and stil friends of GOD were polygamous.

This is a clear sign that polygamy was never condemned in the bible suffix to say it is totally baseless for any lady to kill herself over the polygamous nature of man and only babies, teenagers,adolescents and few mature ladies in age will be crying fowl over a man cheating on them.

If you want me to present scriptures upon scriptures relating to polygamy let me know and i wil gladly do that.

Toks2008:

Im responding to this particular post because it is void of the pepper seller remarks.

Now let me blow your mind up the roof...

Show me one place in the bible that is against polygamy.

If i may help out, the bible does not condemn polygamy or a man marrying as many wives as he would but only admonishes General overseers to be husbands of one wife... it is also clear from the bible that great men who were and stil friends of GOD were polygamous.

This is a clear sign that polygamy was never condemned in the bible suffix to say it is totally baseless for any lady to kill herself over the polygamous nature of man and only babies, teenagers,adolescents and few mature ladies in age will be crying fowl over a man cheating on them.

If you want me to present scriptures upon scriptures relating to polygamy let me know and i wil gladly do that.

shaybebaby:

But there lies the contradictions in the bible. It doesn't expressly condemn it however there is nothing claiming evolutionary predisposition to multiple partners in the bible.

To want many of the same thing has its roots in the 7 deadly sins. The motivation to marry more than one wife is sinful so by extension the act itself is.

However, your church does NOT allow the taking of more than wife. The first church was the Catholic Church where divorce was frowned upon and still is. They compiled the first copies of the bible even though it was in Latin, translated from Ancient Greek and Hebrew texts.

Translating it to English, the language of the masses was punishable by death. I digress anyways but if you are not a catholic, every other Christian denomination if an offshoot of church of the England.
Founded by Henry vii, it was done because the Roman Catholic Church denied him the right to dissolve his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in order to marry Anne Boleyn.

This was the origin of the Protestant movement, the KJV of the bible commissioned by the Church of England, the same version largely used in Africa.

So you see, your religion as you know it was founded on divorce. Henry divorced Catherine after he founded his own church which he presided over instead of the pope, married Anne who he later beheaded and married several times after.

In retrospect, divorce was more preferable than decapitation.

ItsQuinn:
I am not understanding

shaybebaby:

But there lies the contradictions in the bible. It doesn't expressly condemn it however there is nothing claiming evolutionary predisposition to multiple partners in the bible.

To want many of the same thing has its roots in the 7 deadly sins. The motivation to marry more than one wife is sinful so by extension the act itself is.

However, your church does NOT allow the taking of more than wife. The first church was the Catholic Church where divorce was frowned upon and still is. They compiled the first copies of the bible even though it was in Latin, translated from Ancient Greek and Hebrew texts.

Translating it to English, the language of the masses was punishable by death. I digress anyways but if you are not a catholic, every other Christian denomination if an offshoot of church of the England.
Founded by Henry viii, it was done because the Roman Catholic Church denied him the right to dissolve his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in order to marry Anne Boleyn.

This was the origin of the Protestant movement, the KJV of the bible commissioned by the Church of England, the same version largely used in Africa.

So you see, your religion as you know it was founded on divorce. Henry divorced Catherine after he founded his own church which he presided over instead of the pope, married Anne who he later beheaded and married several times after.

In retrospect, divorce was more preferable than decapitation.

shaybe:

Early Christianity was Roman Catholicism. Other groups were suppressed successfully.

The English bible which you all base your faith on exists because of the church on England.

The Church of England was founded to facilitate the divorce of the founder.

The English bible you know exists because of divorce.

I cannot comment about earlier Latin, Hebrew and Greek bibles.

But just stating how everyone came to be debating the contents of this book. Divorce!!

A historical fact.

Diydiva:
Yea Yea

Another piece that will come from twisting the bible to suit yourself.


May God help you Toks

R80:
Religion can be manipulated by anyone, it's a case of finding the right words to suit your goal. What about the fact that an adulterous spouse can bring AIDS to the bedroom what then forgive and forget?

Laveda:
No, it doesn't make sense.

Just see how you twisting the bible and making it go in line with your selfish thoughts, so a man is allowed to commit adultery and nothing will happen and when the woman does same? Hell will let loose..

This is total bullcrap!

I'm all for equity.

You are absolutely right

Laveda:
No, it doesn't make sense.

Just see how you twisting the bible and making it go in line with your selfish thoughts, so a man is allowed to commit adultery and nothing will happen and when the woman does same? Hell will let loose..

This is total bullcrap!

I'm all for equity.

Toks2008:


This write up will shake the marital world.

its toks2008 again. the heretic. let's see what lies and misinformation you spew out this time.

solasoulmusic:
In my case I will separate not divorce but if if is something that also caused me severe trauma where am being mistreated because of it I will consider divorce. The Bible teaches us to stick by our husbands but also says to the husbands love your wives and do right by them

CAPITAL YES! Read Romans 7:1-6