sonofthunder:

hahahahaha... why don't we rather allow her find the fault in that though I'm sure there's no problem with that(that is, if I put myself in her shoes and utilise her GENIUS level IQ)
Lol.

sonofthunder:

It has everything to do with our discussion. My sister its all related (that's why I asked for you to allow me to keep it simple - I'm not good at typing epistles)

We can forget IQ scores for now as I anticipate an answer.

ScienceWatch:
3nim, I think that sonofthunder's concern is that many of those plastic dicks/penisses/Dongles could be illegal because it is longer than a mans arm. And with marriage now legal between two women, those 1.5meter long Dongles can seriously damage a women if her marriage partner has sex with her. I may be wrong as usual, what do you say Sonofthunder.

sonofthunder:

It has everything to do with our discussion. My sister its all related (that's why I asked for you to allow me to keep it simple - I'm not good at typing epistles)

We can forget IQ scores for now as I anticipate an answer.

3nim:


Well, you should keep in mind that these toys have been in existence before now....AND that before the legalization of same-sex marriage, the homosexual people had been doing their thing, using their toys and plastic dongles. The only thing new might be that it is now legal to get these people married, the way they want it. I don't think that the gay sex (or use of the instruments) was ever illegal.

If any woman suffers damage from one of these gadgets, I wouldn't actually blame the legalization of same-sex marriags.

3nim:

No wahala.
When you're ready, let me know what your question really is. Keep it simple or keep anticipating an answer.

sonofthunder:

sorry to interrupt but @ last paragraph, what then will you blame?

sonofthunder:

will you allow believers in God
serve him with their time, effort
and money in PEACE?
They wouldn't be selling
humans in this case just so
you know.

3nim:


Well, you should keep in mind that these toys have been in existence before now....AND that before the legalization of same-sex marriage, the homosexual people had been doing their thing, using their toys and plastic dongles. The only thing new might be that it is now legal to get these people married, the way they want it. I don't think that the gay sex (or use of the instruments) was ever illegal.

If any woman suffers damage from one of these gadgets, I wouldn't actually blame the legalization of same-sex marriags.

3nim:


The woman... the partner... the individual gay people, who would do what they desire to do, whether or not same-sex marriage is legal.

3nim:


If it doesn't affect me. Will you?

KingEbukasBlog:


I have read so many books ; I'm cognizant of many theological/ philosophical positions on God's existence and nature , religions and religious principles and beliefs ; I have argued with so many atheists in four years ; I have knowledge of many arguments on God's existence for/against ; I have developed my own definition of atheism and theism . I'll be fine homie

ScienceWatch:
"A wise man keeps it simple." says my unregistered motor mechanic.
Keep it simple Sir, Sonofthunder.
Have you noticed the solutions Atheistic genius offer suffering mankind? For example, A women is suffering from anxiety, depression, irrational fears, nightmares, fear of the dark, uncontrollable anger, etc, etc which is clearly symptoms of demonic possession.

Atheistic genius proudly offer the sufferer daily doses of dangerous mind altering drugs and a long stay in a frightening mental asylum.

Temptations to sin must come, BUT WOE TO THOSE THROUGH WHOM THEY COME.

KingEbukasBlog:
There are two challenges that have to be overcome before you can win 100,000 naira . Christmas day is around the corner and with the rate of increase in the prices of consumer goods , 100k to spare isn't a bad idea .

The rules are simple , the challenges may be simple or difficult (totally depends on your intellect ) . Here they are :

1. Provide one good argument ,reason or evidence that precludes the existence of God i.e your argument , reason or evidence makes it impossible for God to exist .

2. Refute my new definition of atheism . Click here for info .

Note that :

* The definition of God here is the separate conscious eternal entity that transcends the universe.

* Each overcome challenge nets you 50k naira (on the first 24 hours ).

* This runs for 120 hours ( ends on exactly 2:52 on December 24. 2017)

* At the end of every 24 hours , 10,000 naira will be deducted on each challenge . Eg

After 24 hours , challenge 1 and 2 will be 40k each
After 48 hours , challenge 1 and 2 will be 30k each
.
.
.
Between 96th and 120th hour , challenge 1 and 2 will be 10k each

Rules

1. You MUST take on the first challenge and succeed before moving onto the second . I have to concede that I can't refute your argument , reason or evidence in the first challenge

2. If you succeed in overcoming the first challenge you may not take on the second challenge .

3. Any argument that has been refuted before on this forum SHOULD NOT be mentioned . It is utterly gratuitous to reiterate debunked arguments .

4. Your argument , reason , evidence should well presented , sound and cogent .
It should show how it precludes the existence of God

5. If you are interested in participating , please begin with 'challenge accepted' and then proceed with your argument .

Goodluck !

** Questions to elucidate on what to note or the rules can be asked for clarity .

gabe:
lol, 4 years? that's a long time to be talking trash.

gabe:
lol, 4 years? that's a long time to be talking trash.

PrecisionFx:






"1. Provide one good argument ,reason or evidence that precludes the existence of God i.e your argument , reason or evidence makes it impossible for God to exist.


U can also answer it as well as per ur religion or God .
Offer proof too.

ScienceWatch:
Why did you not take up the fair and ground breaking challenge ? I know the world was waiting with baited breath.
All I saw was Atheists on the run.

I can see the prophet of modern Atheism Richard Dawkins say to Harris, "THE END IS HERE."

ScienceWatch:
"A wise man keeps it simple." says my unregistered motor mechanic.
Keep it simple Sir, Sonofthunder.
Have you noticed the solutions Atheistic genius offer suffering mankind? For example, A women is suffering from anxiety, depression, irrational fears, nightmares, fear of the dark, uncontrollable anger, etc, etc which is clearly symptoms of demonic possession.

Atheistic genius proudly offer the sufferer daily doses of dangerous mind altering drugs and a long stay in a frightening mental asylum.

Temptations to sin must come, BUT WOE TO THOSE THROUGH WHOM THEY COME.

PrecisionFx:





"""A women is suffering from anxiety, depression, irrational fears, nightmares, fear of the dark, uncontrollable anger, etc, etc which is clearly symptoms of demonic possession""""


U are lost sir. .

KingEbukasBlog:
Hold on ... I'm coming

KingEbukasBlog:


I have read so many books ; I'm cognizant of many theological/ philosophical positions on God's existence and nature , religions and religious principles and beliefs ; I have argued with so many atheists in four years ; I have knowledge of many arguments on God's existence for/against ; I have developed my own definition of atheism and theism . I'll be fine homie

CAPSLOCKED:


SAD TO BRING THIS TO YOUR NOTICE, BUT YOUR DEFINITIONS ARE WORTHLESS AND NOBODY CARES.

sonofthunder:

on what basis are they worthless sir?

sonofthunder:

on what basis are they worthless sir?

CAPSLOCKED:




SAD TO BRING THIS TO YOUR NOTICE,
BUT YOUR DEFINITIONS ARE WORTHLESS AND NOBODY CARES.

dalaman:


Which lies?

There are noticeable challenges to the identification of Yeshu as Jesus. The two individuals often cited as being representations of Jesus are Yeshu ben Pandera/ben Pappos, and Yeshu the Pharisee. The Talmud mentions Yeshu ben Pandera's stepfather, Pappos ben Yehuda, as being among those martyred with Rabbi Akiva,[3] who was executed at the climax of the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE.[4][5] Furthermore, Yeshu the Pharisee is described as being a student of the second-century BCE nasi Joshua ben Perachiah, as well as being among the exiled Pharisees returning to Israel following their persecution[6][7] by John Hyrcanus.[8] These events would place the lifetime of either Yeshu decades before, or decades after, the birth and death of Jesus.[9][10]

The first Christian censorship of the Talmud happened in the year 521.[11] However, far better documented censorship began during the disputations of the Middle Ages. Advocates for the Catholic Church alleged that the Talmud contained blasphemous references to Jesus and his mother, Mary. Jewish apologists during the disputations said there were no references to Jesus in the Talmud, and claimed Joshua and its derivations was a common Jewish name, that they referred to other individuals. The disputations led to many of the references being removed (censored) from subsequent editions of the Talmud.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud

JackBizzle:



I'm sure you have nothing to say about the pastor from your church who beat his wife to death.

KingEbukasBlog:


I've shown them how unreasonable their definitions are . The problem is that they don't understand that those definitions are actually unreasonable . No matter how I explain , they don't get it . So I thought the money would motivate them , yet I got nothing

----------------------------
Disprove my own na - No

Oya I've shown you how unreasonable yours is - Eh , leave it like that

This is basically what they've been telling me for two months or so since I publicized my definition

KingEbukasBlog:


"Judge not , that you may not be judged"

KingEbukasBlog:

"Judge not , that you may not be judged"