Thooooo, each time I read the title of this thread....

Emmanystone:

You said you were a big girl and can take anything in one of your posts here.

***Anyways, moving on***

I've been a big boy too! Lol

vaxx:
it is not about who he seems to be supporting, it is what should be the truth.... who knows he might even have a different view... i realized the atheist folks stay away from the discussion... sure they will, who argue self evidence, who argue personal experience, only the great scientist budaa does. you will soon enter the Guinness book of record as the only scientist to ever prove axioms.... that is a great feet

You guys are doing great. There seems to be an innocent misunderstanding of BudaAtums brilliant argument due to poor environmental conditions.

budaatum:

I've been a big boy too! Lol

Lolzzz. What shd we go with then?

Emmanystone:

Lolzzz. What shd we go with then?

O, it's bad enough being detested for being an atheist so I'm non-gender specific on forums, and generally non-personal except for my pdas for my gnat I guess.

You just stick to buda.

ScienceWatch:
You guys are doing great. There seems to be an innocent misunderstanding of BudaAtums brilliant argument due to poor environmental conditions.

"innocent misunderstanding"!?! There is nothing innocent in deliberately being dishonest!

Don't make me come over there and kick your ass with your useless platitudes, loverboy. And stop giving him excuses for not seeing my point! He can't see it if he covers his eyes and you are not helping him by being dishonest!

budaatum:

O, it's bad enough being detested for being an atheist so I'm non-gender specific on forums, and generally non-personal except for my pdas for my gnat I guess.

You just stick to buda.

Okay then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5D5NKz7XTo

ScienceWatch:
You guys are doing great. There seems to be an innocent misunderstanding of BudaAtums brilliant argument due to poor environmental conditions.

lol , a kind of stomach cracking laugh. Which one is poor environmental condition again?

Delusion
Delusion
Delusion
All over the place. Lol.

Tollzara:
Delusion

Delusion

Delusion

All over the place. Lol.

I see that you were banned


No shaking. They cant stop the truth

3nim:


In summary, you can say that false hope is better than no hope.

We r talking about hope here u knw. It's a driving force, a motivation, a propeller, imagine a world without hope.It will be full of anarchy as pple will do whatever pleases them without focus, without target. I am done convincing folks here that God exists because u will do nothing but ask me to prove d unprovable(To a carnal mind). I will rather live my life believing there is a God only to realise afterwards that there is none than to live my life believing there is no God only to realise afterwards that there is God.

Ronpet777:

We r talking about hope here u knw. It's a driving force, a motivation, a propeller, imagine a world without hope.It will be full of anarchy as pple will do whatever pleases them without focus, without target. I am done convincing folks here that God exists because u will do nothing but ask me to prove d unprovable(To a carnal mind). I will rather live my life believing there is a God only to realise afterwards that there is none than to live my life believing there is no God only to realise afterwards that there is God.

Hope and faith are two different things.

Ronpet777:

We r talking about hope here u knw. It's a driving force, a motivation, a propeller, imagine a world without hope.It will be full of anarchy as pple will do whatever pleases them without focus, without target. I am done convincing folks here that God exists because u will do nothing but ask me to prove d unprovable(To a carnal mind). I will rather live my life believing there is a God only to realise afterwards that there is none than to live my life believing there is no God only to realise afterwards that there is God.

And that would be you believing for the fear of hell or eternal punishment.

superhumanist:

I see that you were banned

No shaking. They cant stop the truth

Hehehe. I came back "Dovey".

Tollzara:
Hehehe. I came back "Dovey".

Which one be "dovey" or "dough vee"?

3nim:



And that would be you believing for the fear of hell or eternal punishment.

Did u find any of that in d comment u quoted? Is it ur style to fabricate things?

superhumanist:



Hope and faith are two different things.

Of course they are,and there is a place for both of them.

They both work hand in hand. Faith is a product of hope. It is the substance of things hoped for, and the evidence of things not seen.

3nim:



And that would be you believing for the fear of hell or eternal punishment.

He never stated fear in his statement. That would be him believing because he has a choice and not one you wish him to have based on your assumptions of his choice.

butterflyl1on:


He never stated fear in his statement. That would be him believing because he has a choice and not one you wish him to have based on your assumptions of his choice.

Simple comprehension can be issues for some.

Ronpet777:

Did u find any of that in d comment u quoted? Is it ur style to fabricate things?

No not my style to fabricate things.
It's my style of summarising things.
I can understand how you wouldn't like my summaries.

If there were no consequence or reward for serving God, would you do it? If yes, why?

superhumanist:



Which one be "dovey" or "dough vee"?

Lol. I meant dove-like. I came back as a dove.

I typed it as "Dough Vee" in my signature to make it possible for me to give it different meanings at different times.

butterflyl1on:


He never stated fear in his statement. That would be him believing because he has a choice and not one you wish him to have based on your assumptions of his choice.

You're actually right....

butterflyl1on:


He never stated fear in his statement. That would be him believing because he has a choice and not one you wish him to have based on your assumptions of his choice.

You're actually right . I'm writing based on my assumptions.

3nim:


No not my style to fabricate things.
It's my style of summarising things.
I can understand how you wouldn't like my summaries.

If there were no consequence or reward for serving God, would you do it? If yes, why?

Well your summary was actually a fabrication because you assumed what he did not say and stated it as a statement and not a question which would have appeared different .

3nim:



And that would be you believing for the fear of hell or eternal punishment.

(no question mark anywhere there in that statement so it was a fabricated summary.

There are always consequences or rewards to everything whether we want them or not or whether we like them to be or not.

We do not wake up in the morning being constantly on the look out for rewards or consequences but we still get them based on the choices we make or the things we say or do.

A nice greeting would get us one back (be it expected or not)
A curse would get us either a curse back or a punch in the face (be it expected or not)

Rewards are not everything. Simply living right with God and loving right with God is everything as it would make a better, happier, more acceptable you here on earth be there an afterlife or none.

3nim:


No not my style to fabricate things.
It's my style of summarising things.
I can understand how you wouldn't like my summaries.

If there were no consequence or reward for serving God, would you do it? If yes, why?

OK, now I like this. I appreciate ur subtle style of getting facts.
Yes I will serve him, but yet it depends. To be honest and human with u, on d surface I won't serve a course that holds no reward. it's just natural to work towards a prize. But then, seeing d benefits of serving him here on earth without even d eternal reward is good enough to serve him. There is joy and happiness serving him.
Apart from d end reward, leaving without d weight of guilt, sin, malice, animosity is good enough a reason to go on and be fulfilled at d end of the day.

3nim:
Thooooo, each time I read the title of this thread....

You mean you can prove without leaving a doubt Seun exists as human?. I have been looking for someone who can do this.

superior1:


You mean you can prove without leaving a doubt Seun exists as human?. I have been looking for someone who can do this.

Still trolling with the same dead argument?

superhumanist:



Still trolling with the same dead argument?

Another subjective opinion of yours.....let me see, your next attempt will be an insult, right?

superior1:


Another subjective opinion of yours.....let me see, your next attempt will be an insult, right?

Yawn

superhumanist:




Yawn

Exactly what I thought.

Tell me seeing you cant prove the existence of Seun as a human and yet according to you believe he is, how are you different from Christians who believe the existence of God although their shreds of evidence are not persuasive enough for you.

Doesn't that make you and your fellow bandit of atheists hypocrites at best and pseudointellectual-comedians?

butterflyl1on:


Well your summary was actually a fabrication because you assumed what he did not say and stated it as a statement and not a question which would have appeared different .

(no question mark anywhere there in that statement so it was a fabricated summary.

There are always consequences or rewards to everything whether we want them or not or whether we like them to be or not.

We do not wake up in the morning being constantly on the look out for rewards or consequences but we still get them based on the choices we make or the things we say or do.

A nice greeting would get us one back (be it expected or not)
A curse would get us either a curse back or a punch in the face (be it expected or not)

Rewards are not everything. Simply living right with God and loving right with God is everything as it would make a better, happier, more acceptable you here on earth be there an afterlife or none.

That's a really good answer, I can't drag anything there.