ottawasenators:
Personal History appears post ITA,while uploading all your details.

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!

ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
PPR : July 9

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!


ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Thanks to everyone that has contributed on this platform. You won't know how much you are touching and changing lives ... Every info has been invaluable. Godspeed to everyone on this journey.. IT WILL SURELY END IN PRAISE

happytbaby:
My Dear Guitarlife; may I ask if you did a table to summarize all your funds? The VO might have erroneously missed it.

Review required does NOT indicate that something is wrong , it is something like a junior officer has reviewed and the senior officer is also required to review. If something is wrong; it will not be stated as 'review required', it will be clearly stated that funds available does not meet the requirement (something like that).

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!


ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Thanks to everyone that has contributed on this platform. You won't know how much you are touching and changing lives ... Every info has been invaluable. Godspeed to everyone on this journey.. IT WILL SURELY END IN PRAISE

TEECANN:


Hello,

If you look again at @Guitarlife's post, she said that even in spite of the omission of the 25% RSA balance from the POF computation by the VO, his/her POF still scaled through (obviously her POF was in excess of the required LICO for his/her family size category).

So, the GCMS note will still have reflected "review required" for POF i.e everything was OK inspite of the RSA sum being removed from the list of his/her funds to be assessed for POF purposes.

Just hazarding a guess here, we are not there, so we really can't say what happened at CIO, but reading recent PPR declarations (as recent as this last June 2018), folks here still said they used their 25% RSA to boost their POF and they got PPR. So,no shaking as far as I'm concerned, I think we are still good in relation to the usage of 25% RSA balance as part of POF.


It will end in praise IJN!

TEECANN:


Hello,

If you look again at @Guitarlife's post, she said that even in spite of the omission of the 25% RSA balance from the POF computation by the VO, his/her POF still scaled through (obviously her POF was in excess of the required LICO for his/her family size category).

So, the GCMS note will still have reflected "review required" for POF i.e everything was OK inspite of the RSA sum being removed from the list of his/her funds to be assessed for POF purposes.

Just hazarding a guess here, we are not there, so we really can't say what happened at CIO, but reading recent PPR declarations (as recent as this last June 2018), folks here still said they used their 25% RSA to boost their POF and they got PPR. So,no shaking as far as I'm concerned, I think we are still good in relation to the usage of 25% RSA balance as part of POF.


It will end in praise IJN!

Guitarlife:


Yes I did a tabulation.
I suspect the case analyst probably did not bother to check my RSA since I met the POF requirement already with my bank account statement.

Maybe if my fund in the account statement was short he could probably have checked the RSA too.

Cos I used stanbic statement and Crusaders pension statement and the only thing mention in my POF recommendation was stanbic statement nor reference to crusaders pension statement at all.

Also my funds did not stay up to 6 months o, altho I added a staff statement of account showing regular inflows .

Osaze007:


Congrats are you a single applicant

efueh:
I pm(ed) you both @Sunvick and @Wakanowdotcom. I am interested in your contact in Bayelsa asap.

dumprep:
You beat me to this question. Somehow, my brain was making me think that the recent heavy PPR rain is falling on couples.

Osaze007:


Congrats are you a single applicant

newbie18:




Yes guyz... I am a single/never married applicant

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!
ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Walegy:
Pls house, I have two accounts for Manitoba, with different username n password. Mistakenly I forgot to delete the account for the wrong details. But this morning I received ITA mail for both accounts. Pls am confused as I don't know what else to do.
(1) Can I delete account for the one of wrong detail and if yes, how do I do that.

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!


ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Thanks to everyone that has contributed on this platform. You won't know how much you are touching and changing lives ... Every info has been invaluable. Godspeed to everyone on this journey.. IT WILL SURELY END IN PRAISE

happytbaby:
Teecann; I think we have lost each other somewhere . I saw that quite alright, there was another person's post or something, that made me talk about the 'review required' issue. Yes, I know his fund is higher but I also know that they pick the amount you filled on the EAPR and note it on the GCMS . I was pointing out that it may be the reason the VO seemed to have backed it out.

Point is this; if you filled 26,000CAD (as amount available for relocation on your form) but then showed evidence of 40,000 CAD, they will not be proving that you have the 40,000. They will be interested in the amount you need, they will confirm that you have 26,000 and that the 26,000 meets the amount required for the number of family members, in which case the additional 14,000CAD may not enter your GCMS notes at all, I have reviewed notes for people and noted this. That is why I said he should check what he filled so that people can put their minds at rest that pension funds are okay.

Pension funds is a source of comfort to many people so when an issue comes up saying this might not be so again, it is important to thrash it out.

TEECANN:


wow! This is good to note, thank you @HappyTbaby, we are learning about this process everyday.

I get you better now and learnt something new.

In another scenario, if one quote CAD20,000 in ones e-APR and submit proof for CAD35,000 and part of this CAD20,000 has to computed from the RSA, I'm sure the needful will be done. That's the difference in @Guitarlife's case, he/she had excess so much that there wasn't a need to touch the RSA is satisfaction of the proving the figure quoted in the e-APR.

Thanks for sharing my good friend.


It will end in praise IJN!

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!


ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Thanks to everyone that has contributed on this platform. You won't know how much you are touching and changing lives ... Every info has been invaluable. Godspeed to everyone on this journey.. IT WILL SURELY END IN PRAISE

newbie18:
TESTIMONY TIME!!!


ITA : April 11
AOR : June 7
ADR : June 21 (Schedule A)
MEP/IP1 : June 22
ADR : June 30 (RPRF)
PPR : July 9

Thanks to everyone that has contributed on this platform. You won't know how much you are touching and changing lives ... Every info has been invaluable. Godspeed to everyone on this journey.. IT WILL SURELY END IN PRAISE

Walegy:
Pls house, I have two accounts for Manitoba, with different username n password. Mistakenly I forgot to delete the account for the wrong details. But this morning I received ITA mail for both accounts. Pls am confused as I don't know what else to do.
(1) Can I delete account for the one of wrong detail and if yes, how do I do that.

Attached are the snapshot of the invites with different username, kemola and kemola2 beneath each of them.

happytbaby:
Welicomu my Oga, maybe you can help with the Oga/Madam that has too many Manitoba invites seeing you used to be PNP Class Captain

Utonne:
Hi E-family.

Thank you guys for this amazing goldmine of a thread. Everyone here is amazing. Taking time out to attend to different people's needs. Y'all are amazing.

Please I'll be using 100% gift deed for my POF. I'll like to find out if I need an LOE and if I do can anyone please share an LOE sample use for 100% gift deed.

I have searched the thread but haven't come across any.

Thanks in advance.

happytbaby:
Welicomu my Oga, maybe you can help with the Oga/Madam that has too many Manitoba invites seeing you used to be PNP Class Captain

jholarharde:


you are really looking for trouble . why am I feeling as if newmum has gotten PPR since yesterday