davien:
It's appalling to say the least the avoidance antics you'd employ when you say you vouch for something you believe in but can't defend..

Why are you so disrespectful of the WinnerO1's wishes?
Read my respectful responses to your questions and find no promises, no avoidance, no attempt to prove anything.

Based on your behaviour, I can see more clearly why Rekinomtla, Butterflyleo, Sonofthunder and many other highly respected Theists worldwide are joining forces to educate Theists, especially Christians of the urgent need to refrain from discussing their precious transcendental/spiritual realities with satanic atheists.

I have seen the shocked reaction of everyone that I gave a copy of the horrific Atheist Training Manual to.
WinnerO1 welcomed Butterflyleo's well timed move to post the horrific Atheist Training Manual as primary evidence of the atheists hidden agenda.

davien:
It's appalling to say the least the avoidance antics you'd employ when you say you vouch for something you believe in but can't defend..

Be ready for more of such lame and dishonest antics. They claim there is this undetectable realm, but some how they arw able to detect it. If they are able to detect / access it, then how does it become transcendental? These liars and myth believers don't think through their mythologies to see if it makes sense before spewing them.

davien:
Regardless if my questions were genuine, wouldn't your answer be factual if indeed there is a plausible way to be aware of beings and realities that are supposed to be completely undetected, either it is completely undetectable or is near-undetectable to be known, in which case it can't be called a transcendental realm and being..

Every time you respond the atmosphere changes. Now you defy the very laws of logic you pride your status on. How dare you minimize the power of genuine in an investigation of this magnitude. That is a deal breaker in the Domain governed by the LIGHT.

There are several plausible ways to experience the supernatural transcendental reality of Light or Dark. If you chose the LIGHT, based on your low level of readiness you will need a very good mentor to guide you.
If you chose the DARK, you will progress rapidly because you have already entered and are operating in the transcendental domain of darkness. If you don't know this then you are not as bright as you portray yourself. No offence meant.

Free tip : A warning is written in the Christian Holy doctrines about atheists swine, so don't be dissapointed when Christians no longer discuss their extremely precious experiences with atheist swine.

Atheists will adapt and turn to man made material objects to mock and insult. I highly recommend that atheists turn their mockery toward cheap Chinese goods.

Davien doesn't know who he's debating

hopefulLandlord:
Davien doesn't know who he's debating

He's in for a long display of madness.

What can rightfully deflect Daviens craving to mock and insult Theists. How can we satisfy Daviens ego driven need to criticize things that are beyond his mental abilities?

WinnerO1 or Butterflyleo or even Rekinomtla are well placed to impose a useful therapy while I can only humbly suggest that Davien examine and critique the carefully chosen pic of a knockoff Chinese product which has no transcendental spiritual components connected to its creation.

It would certainly be hugely educational for all concerned to note how skillfully Davien or even Dalaman critiques the products design, labeling, purpose and the customers need for this product etc.Remember to tell us which one is the fake product. A prize of 10 Likes and 3 Shares is guaranteed.

Please take your time sir.

dalaman:


He's in for a long display of madness.

I agree !

hopefulLandlord:
Davien doesn't know who he's debating

Thank you for helping me a while back with a software prob I had.
I see you did not write the topic on "How to effectively use the Nairaland app - for dummies.

You may be right about Davien, why don't you do the honors and introduce him ?

davien:
It's appalling to say the least the avoidance antics you'd employ when you say you vouch for something you believe in but can't defend..

You must be new around here. The ol' timers avoid that idiot. His insanity is of a different order.

budaatum:

You must be new around here. The ol' timers avoid that idiot. His insanity is of a different order.

Has it not been firmly establish that the INSANITY of atheists is observed every time they attack, mock and insult a God that never existed. What type of people consistently behave in such an appalling manner. This behaviour is common in the mental asylums of the world.

I don't care for the dishonest opinions of the ol atheism's ol'' timers.

budaatum:


Of course we are just unreasonable "dishonest Nigerian internet trolls". How else would we dare not allow those people you quoted to tell us how and what we think?! The thought that we have minds of our own and can use them is something you can't get your head around. After all, we are just unreasonable "dishonest Nigerian internet trolls"!

Thank you Budaatum. This is straight from the horses mouth as the British would say.
At face value your confession reveals much about the sad atheists dilemma. People behave according to what they believe, not what they don't believe.

When an atheist says God doesn't exist, or denies him, or works hard to disprove His existence, he is behaving in a manner that is consistent with what he believes. Likewise, when an atheist speaks against God by accusing Him of immorality, then he is displaying his disdain for God. Christians often encounter such displays of contempt for God when atheists cite God-ordered Old Testament events that atheists believe are morally wrong. When they do this, they are demonstrating their scorn for God by accusing him of doing what is wrong, and therefore being wrong. Disdain, contempt, and scorn are all synonymous with hate.

Is there any truth in your confession that atheists are in fact lying internet trolls ?
If I remember correctly, many true Christians has also alluded to such bastardly behaviour. Read again the posts of highly esteemed and extremely enlightened gentlemen and brave women here. To name a few for the readers convenience, I am honoured to even mention their names

Here they they are in no particular order;
Rekinomtla, Ishilove, Sonofthunder, Anas09, Butterflyleo, Hopeful landlord, WinnerO1, Sonofthunder, Donnie, and others,

winner01:
Very accurate. Revealing that zombie syndrome in them.

You are spot on WinnerO1. ZOMBIE SYNDROME Mmmm, Your instant diagnosis and discovery of another mental illness among demented atheists is greatly appreciated.

Psychiatry must be celebrating right now because they can finally add another mental disease to their very long list. ZOMBIE SYNDROME Mmmm, who would have thought of that. My God, thank you. The truth shall set us free. FREE AT LAST !


POST OF THE MONTH
WinnerO1, because of the profound revelation embedded in your post, allow me to present to you on behalf all genuine truth seekers this converted award for;

POST OF THE MONTH

davien:
It's appalling to say the least the avoidance antics you'd employ when you say you vouch for something you believe in but can't defend..

As the stupid British would say, "The pot calling the best kettle black."
Sir, are you too stupid to not see that you are speaking about your very own avoidance tactics here?
You believe in crazy zombie atheism, daily you vouch for something you believe in, but can't defend. You have as yet provided no evidence that your NO-GOD even exist.
Your behaviour is beyond appalling sir.

Davien, kind sir. All I see, are evidence of an horrific Atheists Training Manual with criminally minded guys trolling religious internet forums to practise the Satanic lessons learnt from their horrific Atheists Training Manual.

On sc, don't go thinking my contempt is for some god. I am afterall an atheist, the sort who categorically states that your god is a figment of your imagination, so don't go imagining I have contempt for things that don't exist. Nor do I believe that things that don't exist can act, immorally or otherwise, nor do they merit scorn and disdain,

If I have contempt for anything at all, it is for you, Sciencewatch, and not for the gods you create in your head, except for the fact that you are responsible for creating them in your own image, which is what the contempt is for. It is also you that merits scorn and disdain.

Only fools would blame God for what you represent. You, are responsible for your own stupidity, sc, it has nothing to do with the gods.

ScienceWatch:
Thank you Budaatum. This is straight from the horses mouth as the British would say.
At face value your confession reveals much about the sad atheists dilemma. People behave according to what they believe, not what they don't believe.

When an atheist says God doesn't exist, or denies him, or works hard to disprove His existence, he is behaving in a manner that is consistent with what he believes. Likewise, when an atheist speaks against God by accusing Him of immorality, then he is displaying his disdain for God. Christians often encounter such displays of contempt for God when atheists cite God-ordered Old Testament events that atheists believe are morally wrong. When they do this, they are demonstrating their scorn for God by accusing him of doing what is wrong, and therefore being wrong. Disdain, contempt, and scorn are all synonymous with hate.

Is there any truth in your confession that atheists are in fact lying internet trolls ?
If I remember correctly, many true Christians has also alluded to such bastardly behaviour. Read again the posts of highly esteemed and extremely enlightened gentlemen and brave women here. To name a few for the readers convenience, I am honoured to even mention their names

Here they they are in no particular order;
Rekinomtla, Ishilove, Sonofthunder, Anas09, Butterflyleo, Hopeful landlord, WinnerO1, Sonofthunder, Donnie, and others,

budaatum:


If I have contempt for anything at all, it is for you, Sciencewatch, and not for the gods you create in your head, except for the fact that you are responsible for creating them in your own image, which is what the contempt is for. It is also you that merits scorn and disdain.

If there was any truth in what you say, I would encourage you to pour out you wretched contempt on me. But no your real target is the true creator God as is evidenced in the horrific Atheists Training manual that Butterflyleo timeously presented here as evidence on this very incredible topic posted by the highly esteemed WinnerO1.

People behave according to what they believe, not what they don't believe. When an atheist says God doesn't exist, or denies him, or works hard to disprove His existence, he is behaving in a manner that is consistent with what he believes. No matter what you say, no matter how much cheap psychology you use, YOU budaatum is a BELIEVER.
After examining all the insanity you regurgitate as logical thought, you still cannot demonstrate that God does not exist, you often say there is no evidence for God's existence or that the evidence presented is not sufficient.

Vaxx's and Butterflyleo, just to name a few, have conclusively established the fact that, evidence is a subjective concept since what may be evidence for you may not be evidence for me. Out off the kindness of their blessed hearts they laboured to help you by carefully explaining that evidence has validity based on a person's assumptions. Therefore, it is the assumptions that need to be examined, but to no avail rather it went in by one ear and out by the other.

Nevertheless, people behave according to what they believe, not what they don't believe. Second, whenever an atheist accuses God of immorality he is passing a condemning judgment upon God and displaying his moral contempt for Him. Therefore, in his contempt, he is revealing his hatred for the God he does not believe in.

So much off the point write up

tintingz:
Abeg quote me well and no dey give me stress

ooh i miss this .i was unable to read your have baked logic.

How did science demonstrate the Earth is not flat? Except you're one of those flat earthers.

Goal post shifting .but let me educate you a little. gravity created by the Earths spin is a scientific demonstration to validate the shape of the earth . Gravity would not be evenly distributed if the world wasn't circular.

How did historian was able to tell us Moses never existed in ancient Egypt?
Or Santa not in North Pole?

too much of goal post shifting men. how do we arrive here. i educate u earlier.but will not be doing it again .

You think something is just term myth with just spoken words?

Here will go making unnecessary assumption when u are desperate to pass a cheap point.

Yes, since Yahweh and Allah claim they are all-knowing and omini-benevolent how come they didn't know Satan will rebel and this will cause doom to humanity?

A lot of goal post shifting here.what is this. have you forgotten the topic of discussion ?

If they claim they answer prayers, how come thier worshipers suffers like every other people?

How come Christianity is so divided despite the holy book claim holy spirit will guide them right?

God is so powerful that we still argue if he exist or not.

pile of hot trash. just too much out of point,that i do not even know where to begin with.

Just demonstrate it with paradox.

Can't prove a negative is now term pseudo-logic.

A negative claim is a colloquialism for an affirmative claim that asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something. Claiming that it is impossible to prove a negative is a pseudologic, because there are many proofs that substantiate negative claims in mathematics, science, and economics, including Arrow's impossibility theorem. There can be multiple claims within a debate. Nevertheless, whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

reading wikipedia all alone is a bad habit of learning . go thru the wikipedia references to get a wider and deeper coverage of the topic. : we are talking of universal negative here. in philosophy they are classify into two. one name posteriori and the other name priori .let me give example of posteriori for you.: it is the universal negative that we refer to when we speak about disproving the existence of something.it is something that can be determined through experience.

For example, "GODS don't exist."

In order to prove this negative we would have to consider an infinite amount of evidence, all the swans that existed, all the swans that exist, and all the swans that will exist. Because we cannot consider this infinite set of evidence, proving the universal negative is impossible. The universal negative that we refer to when we speak about disproving the existence of something is something that can be determined through experience.

By simply try to observe, research, investigate, critical thinking etc. With this you can demonstrate how you came to your conclusion.

This can only be done when the premises is positive .

Lol, oga wetin I talk wetin you talk?
How can we prove the positive and negative if there is milk in the cup?

Educate yourself on non observational evidence .GOD evidence is non observation.

Theist, deist, panthiest etc all believe there's God/s but the problem here is these gods contradict in attributes and thier stories(verifiable factor) which beg the question if this God/s exist or just some imaginary man-made creation.

here comes the invariable question .You see, it is actually quite foolish. First it is asserted, that most of us believe so apart from atheist.Then the fact that everyone believe so, is used to negate what is being said.is that not abuse of logic, If we all says the same thing, the logical thing to assume is that there must be something to it. Not that everyone says the same thing, so therefore it must be false. How does that make sense? Where is the logic? In fact, you would expect all of us to say basically the same things, because all religions are different cultural expressions of the same Absolute Truth. Surely, the details may vary, but if all religions are differently conditioned expressions of the same truth, you'd expect they would mention the same basic principles.

Yes, since observations tells us people behave in contrary to what holy spider claim in the holy book, then this prove holy spider doesn't exist.

Gibberish . how do you measure and observe holy book/holy spider. demonstrate it?

Another example is morality, Yahweh claim he's the source of morality which makes it objective but in reality if we observe humanity and society morality is subjective.

If you tell me morality is objective, I can prove to you morality is subjective with demonstrations.

Gather all hypothesis, idea of Gods on one table, we do research about these Gods and thier origin then come out with a consensus agreement.

There's something called consensus decision-making.

If only theists have balls to do this.

But the fact that each religion has it own idea of God shows that thier God doesn't exist.


Religions are yet to give us evidence of each of their Gods or God in general.

Some claim God has children, some claim God is childless, some claim God has many hands, some claim God ran away, some claim God died and so many other "mumbo jumbo".

you actually making a whole lot off point discussion . All your write up is full of goal post shifting.I my self cannot conceive of no stronger evidence for a God/Creator than everything anyone has ever seen, touched, smelled, tasted, heard, or otherwise experienced. so which balls is more harder than this.

vaxx:
So much off the point write upooh i miss this .i was unable to read your have baked logic.
goal post shifting .but let me educate you a little. gravity created by the Earths spin is a scientific demonstration to validate the shape of the earth . Gravity would not be evenly distributed if the world wasn't circular.

How did historian was able to tell us Moses never existed in ancient Egypt?

Or Santa not in North Pole?too much of goal post shifting men. how do we arrive here. i educate u earlier.but will not be doing it again .

You think something is just term myth with just spoken words?Here will go .making unnecessary assumption when u are desperate to pass a chap point.

Yes, since Yahweh and Allah claim they are all-knowing and omini-benevolent how come they didn't know Satan will rebel and this will cause doom to humanity?A lot of goal post shifting here.what is this. have you forgotten the topic of discussion ?

If they claim they answer prayers, how come thier worshipers suffers like every other people?

How come Christianity is so divided despite the holy book claim holy spirit will guide them right?

God is so powerful that we still argue if he exist or not.pile of hot trash. just too much out of point,that i do not even know where to begin with.

Just demonstrate it with paradox.

Can't prove a negative is now term pseudo-logic.

A negative claim is a colloquialism for an affirmative claim that asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something. Claiming that it is impossible to prove a negative is a pseudologic, because there are many proofs that substantiate negative claims in mathematics, science, and economics, including Arrow's impossibility theorem. There can be multiple claims within a debate. Nevertheless, whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence
reading wikipedia all alone is a bad habit of learning . go thru the wikipedia references to get a wider and deeper coverage of the topic. : we are talking of universal negative here. in philosophy they are classify into two. one name posteriori and the other name priori .let me example A posteriori for you.: it is the universal negative that we refer to when we speak about disproving the existence of something.it is something that can be determined through experience.

For example, "GODS don't exist."

In order to prove this negative we would have to consider an infinite amount of evidence, all the swans that existed, all the swans that exist, and all the swans that will exist. Because we cannot consider this infinite set of evidence, proving the universal negative is impossible. The universal negative that we refer to when we speak about disproving the existence of something is something that can be determined through experience.



By simply try to observe, research, investigate, critical thinking etc. With this you can demonstrate how you came to your conclusion.
This can only be done when the premises is positive .

Lol, oga wetin I talk wetin you talk?

How can we prove the positive and negative if there is milk in the cup?
Educate yourself on non observational evidence .GOD evidence is non observation.

Theist, deist, panthiest etc all believe there's God/s but the problem here is these gods contradict in attributes and thier stories(verifiable factor) which beg the question if this God/s exist or just some imaginary man-made creation.
here comes the invariable question .You see, it is actually quite foolish. First it is asserted, that most of us believso apart from atheist.Then the fact that everyone believe so, is used to negate what is being said.is that abuse of logic, If we all says the same thing, the logical thing to assume is that there must be something to it. Not that everyone says the same thing, so therefore it must be false. How does that make sense? Where is the logic? In fact, you would expect all of us to say basically the same things, because all religions are different cultural expressions of the same Absolute Truth. Surely, the details may vary, but if all religions are differently conditioned expressions of the same truth, you'd expect they would mention the same basic principles.



Yes, since observations tells us people behave in contrary to what holy spider claim in the holy book, then this prove holy spider doesn't exist.
Gibberish . how do you measure and observe holy book/holy spider. demonstrate it?

Another example is morality, Yahweh claim he's the source of morality which makes it objective but in reality if we observe humanity and society morality is subjective.

If you tell me morality is objective, I can prove to you morality is subjective with demonstrations.

Gather all hypothesis, idea of Gods on one table, we do research about these Gods and thier origin then come out with a consensus agreement.

There's something called consensus decision-making.

If only theists have balls to do this.

But the fact that each religion has it own idea of God shows that thier God doesn't exist.


Religions are yet to give us evidence of each of their Gods or God in general.

Some claim God has children, some claim God is childless, some claim God has many hands, some claim God ran away, some claim God died and so many other "mumbo jumbo".you actually making a whole lot off point discussion . All your write up is full of goal post shifting.I my self cannot conceive of no stronger evidence for a God/Creator than everything anyone has ever seen, touched, smelled, tasted, heard, or otherwise experienced. so which balls is more harder than this.

Wow Vaxx ! Absolutely brilliant sir, I can only wish that I can explain these things as effectively like you always do.
Salute !!!

dalaman:


He's in for a long display of madness.

Correct.

As the WinnerO1 patiently asks, "Will anything serve as evidence of a God to atheists."
It please me to note that Theists may engage on the low logical level, but wisely refrain from opening the gates wider thereby controlling access to a holy domain that is obviously off limits to mocking atheists.

A warning is written in the Christian Holy doctrines about atheists swine, so don't be dissapointed when Christians no longer discuss their extremely precious experiences with atheist swine. Atheists will be forced to adapt and turn to man made material objects to mock and insult. I highly recommend that atheists turn their mockery toward cheap Chinese goods and pornography.

@vaxx,

First of all learn to break a quote properly, I can teach you how if you want.

Secondly, I can see alot of excuses in your response, again I will ask how does historian were able to tell some people/human figure doesn't exist in history? How are they able to prove the negative with demonstration and consensually agree with it?

davien:
I wouldn't know since I don't profess belief in any, what would be yours?

Lol.
Easy way out.
Let me rephrase his question "what would serve as evidence for a Supreme Creator/Designer to you?"

As for what could serve as my evidence, I gave some examples in the op. You can check it out

budaatum:
Atheism is not a "worldview", whatever that means, least I never said it was. It's not like we all go somewhere to be converted. Go read what atheists have to say for themselves on here and you'd find some of us just don't believe or accept the existence of gods and later found out such attitudes are called atheism. You'd also find out there's all different sorts of us. I for instance, have been described as a Christian Atheist, which sounds like an anathema to some atheists even though I'd categorically state that gods are the figments of the imagination that only exist in the minds of those who hold to the belief that they exist.

I never said my personal experience is evidence for anyone. I in fact said that I wouldn't be as stupid as to ask any atheist to take my word for it even if what I'm telling them managed to convince me! And I categorically stated how impossible it is to get you to accept my evidence as valid for the opposing position to your's that I hold. Atheist don't tend to believe stuff. If we did, we'd have been converted on someone like your's say so ages ago. But listen to us deride you left right and centre when we but just think you are trying to convert us!

You can rant and rave as much as you want, 01, that your intention of creating this thread is for a totally different purpose. But we all know that it's sole purpose is so you and your sort can go about claiming you and your god are better than we no-godders. It's your sole reason for existing on here and you can't all of a sudden try to make out that you are some new wine whilst remaining in a rather old and tired bottle especially when you taste exactly as you always have in the opening post of your thread.

I'm going to bother to repost what would possibly convert me here though I doubt it would make an iotic amount of difference.

Maybe you just don't want to understand.

This thread is not proof or evidence for anything. Its certainly not to show that I'm better than you "no-godders", why would I even want to do that.

Atheism is not a mere negation/rejection/lack of belief etc. It's a proposition and I tried to prove this point using the ideas of renowned atheists who seemed to be honest.
An atheist even said his dog lacks a belief in God, but most atheists are not like his dog. Maybe you should try to get his point.

I'm not here to fight you or strip you of your beliefs. I'm here to show that there's a can of worms in the other side to the story, to open the can and let people see for themselves since the other side does not like to discuss about the other side and its can of worms.

I guess this is why yourself and others like dalaman took this personal. I'm not the enemy, falsehood is.

dalaman:


You have NOT provided any evidence according to what you've said but somehow you know that no evidence provided will convince aNY atheist? The many many lies you tell yourselves so that you can sleep well at night.

EVIDENCE, EVIDENCE, EVIDENCE shouts dalaman to Winner01 wherever he goes even though he is completely unsuited for the lofty task of examining spiritual/transcendental truths. His horrific bible on material atheism, fondly known as the Atheists Training Manual certainly makes a mockery of any attempt he may feign.

There certainly are tons of verifible evidence that truly did prove God's existence, but would the materialistic atheist be able to accept it, given that his slyly constructed presuppositions are in opposition to the existence of God?

In other words, given that the atheist has a pre arranged sly presuppositional base that there is no God, then in order for him to accept a proof for God's existence, he would have to change his falsely constructed presuppositional base. This he won't do because his beloved ego and delusional status is at risk and would involve a major paradigm shift in the belief structure of the atheist. Therefore, an atheist is presuppositionally hostile to any proofs for God's existence and prefers to be imprisoned in the Matrix. He deludes himself to be objective about such attempted proofs.

budaatum:
On What Could Possibly Serve As Evidence To Convert Buda

I read it and it makes sense. It will be your personal experience, it will be mocked and ridiculed. Your god would be called petty wanting to prove anything to you. he'll be called wicked for not proving to others. But I understand you.

Now try to understand that this thread is the only trying to prove that whatever evidence you provide (for those who ask you) can be rationalized or mocked if it can't be rationalized.

UyiIredia:
As usual, atheists vs Christians. Me I need more atheists vs Muslims. At least the Christians don't bomb like Boko Haram. Their religious madness is of a different type.

No. That's not why the thread was created.

PrecisionFx:
Christianity is fake

Infinite knowledge

tintingz:
@vaxx,

First of all learn to break a quote properly, I can teach you how if you want.

Secondly, I can see alot of excuses in your response, again I will ask how does historian were able to tell some people/human figure doesn't exist in history? How are they able to prove the negative with demonstration and consensually agree with it?

My God ! What a cowardly low blow. What a cheap shot !
You dare to crit Vaxx's grammer while ignoring his incredible factual contributions. You claim to see a lot of excuses. If you had any respect for his valuable time you would list those imaginary excuses for him.

ScienceWatch:
My God ! What a cowardly low blow. What a cheap shot !
You dare to crit Vaxx's grammer while ignoring his incredible factual contributions. You claim to see a lot of excuses. If you had any respect for his valuable time you would list those imaginary excuses for him.

Who criticized his grammar?

I said he didn't break his quote properly, maybe you don't understand, he didn't arrange his response properly, responding to his post is a stress.

What he just have to do is insert [quote]......[/quoté] to break my posts!

PrecisionFx:
Christianity is fake

Your satanic atheism has LOST its two thousand year battle to eradicated Christianity. Have you noticed that your secret Atheists Training Manual is now distributed to schools and churches by the thousands for comic relief ?

CHRISTIANITY WINS EVERY BATTLE NO MATTER THE ODDS STACKED AGAINST IT.

Are you on Psychotropic drugs when you post this dried horse manure ?

tintingz:
Who criticized his grammar?

I said he didn't break his quote properly, maybe you don't understand, he didn't arrange his response properly, responding to his post is a stress.

What he just have to do is insert

Thanks for clarifying your meaning. My apologies to you. My point still stands though, do the right thing to Vaxx because he is sincere, unbiased and brilliant. From my perspective he labours to uplift.

Learn to ignore the petty when dealing with lofty matters of hidden truth.

ScienceWatch:
Your satanic atheism has LOST its two thousand year battle to eradicated Christianity. Have you noticed that your secret Atheists Training Manual is now distributed to schools and churches by the thousands for comic relief ?

CHRISTIANITY WINS EVERY BATTLE NO MATTER THE ODDS STACKED AGAINST IT.

Are you on Psychotropic drugs when you post this dried horse manure ?

Loooooooooooooool, It can only be Bipolar illness.

First of all I am not an Atheist so stop being stupid unnecessarily.


"" CHRISTIANITY WINS EVERY BATTLE NO MATTER THE ODDS STACKED AGAINST IT.
""

Christianity is dead in Europe (where it originated).

Christianity is dead in America, One of its strongest strongholds.

Christianity is non-existent in Israel, The supposed people who Jesus was their brother .

I don't need to fight Christianity, Nobody needs to. It's lies have caught up wit it and thus it's dying across board.

rekinomtla:
There's nothing that can convinced a dogmatic anti-theist atheist that God exists. This is the kind of atheist who has been thoroughly brainwashed by anti-religous propaganda. He/she considers religion to be the biggest "problem" today and often (always) dishonesty links and blames religion for the actions of theists.

I agree sir. WinnerO1 has added another mental disease to the already long list of atheisms miseries. He calls it Zombie syndrome.