prolog2:
fool, I have other things to do in life than reading your very lengthy trash. I didn't read your nonsense, but I know your ilks, false logics and fake historians and claims based on nothing other than things air.

You proving my point again about facts and f@0ls.

If my writings are nonsense as you said I think you would warned a lot of respect of respect and commendation by pointing out how it is with evidences rather that cheaply claiming it is nonsense with substatiating your claim.


Always remember not to start what you can't finish.

And please always watch out for me whether or not I'm online before you spew you false and fake Edo supremacist claims.

I wouldn't have had any problems with Edo supremacist if the claim had been true, but it's unfortunately and sadly not.

TAO11:



You proving my point again about facts and f@0ls.

If my writings are nonsense as you said I think you would warned a lot of respect of respect and commendation by pointing out how it is with evidences rather that cheaply claiming it is nonsense with substatiating your claim.


Always remember not to start what you can't finish.

And please always watch out for me whether or not I'm online before you spew you false and fake Edo supremacist claims.

I wouldn't have had any problems with Edo supremacist if the claim had been true, but it's unfortunately and sadly not.

Go and read what I wrote once again, this time get your head out of your ass before reading.

prolog2:
fool, in which language must I tell you I didn't read your trash ? If you have proof of something then show, you dont need anybody's validation if you have real proof, not some 419 fake proof like all you have shown so far. Please direct me to bight of ife by the way. Also, where is ife republic ? As I said, all you do is write lengthy trash and no intelligent person would waste his time going through it just to debunk you point by point. If I were being paid to do it, I would consider. But doing this same thing once again without getting anything out of it ? Nope, I just cant waste my test and energy.

I should showed it?

Yes I have. But in the same breath you admitted that you will close your eyes if I do . hahaha

We don't need your validation, I'm only out here to burst you and people like you.

419 proof because it's coming from experts in the relevant fields and not from the Oba of Benin ryt ? hahaha.


You seem to have forgotten so quickly how you became apologetic after I showed you some proof to which you replied to the effect that:

Oh I'm sorry I didn't know.


And if you don't have the intellectual argument to address my points intelligently and with evidences (As you have admitted here), then stop making blank claims.

In relation to your statement about you been unwilling to waste your time and energy, then u say to you:

Don't start what you can finish ... in orders words

refraining from using lies to present your kingdom as superior to mine because people like me may be lurking around and ready to burst you.

You asked where is Ife republic, is this one of short-lived claims?

You are trying to say the word republic is the title deed for you kingdom's supremacy. Waoo. Let me ask them if u know the COUNTRY called BRITAIN REPUBLIC ... and if there is no such country should we conclude that Benin kingdom is greater than the British Empire... lame reasoning.

To shock you ... the COUNTRY called Benin Republic has more to do with Yorubas than it has anything to do with Edo (that's if it has anything to do with Edo oo).

The only 2 indeginous language there are Yoruba and Fon (a Yoruboid language).

prolog2:
Go and read what I wrote once again, this time get your head out of your ass before reading.

I just read it as you adviced and it reinforced my believe in my assertion about how f@0ls are affected by facts

prolog2:
Now answer this: where are ife arts which decorated ife palace before the Brits arrived ?

They are there in Ife. How would you know when you don't read.

One of them (Head of Olokun) is what was shown to Leo Frobenius in 1910 that his head almost scattered.

I read only the two first sentences.
Learn how to make short statements. People don't get paid to read you. Show me the art which was decorating ife palace, stop yapping, just show.
A wise man always makes sure he knows the answers before asking the questions.

TAO11:


I should showed it?

Yes I have. But in the same breath you admitted that you will close your eyes if I do . hahaha

We don't need your validation, I'm only out here to burst you and people like you.

419 proof because it's coming from experts in the relevant fields and not from the Oba of Benin ryt ? hahaha.


You seem to have forgotten so quickly how you became apologetic after I showed you some proof to which you replied to the effect that:

Oh I'm sorry I didn't know.


And if you don't have the intellectual argument to address my points intelligently and with evidences (As you have admitted here), then stop making blank claims.

In relation to your statement about you been unwilling to waste your time and energy, then u say to you:

Don't start what you can finish ... in orders words

refraining from using lies to present your kingdom as superior to mine because people like me may be lurking around and ready to burst you.

You asked where is Ife republic, is this one of short-lived claims?

You are trying to say the word republic is the title deed for you kingdom's supremacy. Waoo. Let me ask them if u know the COUNTRY called BRITAIN REPUBLIC ... and if there is no such country should we conclude that Benin kingdom is greater than the British Empire... lame reasoning.

To shock you ... the COUNTRY called Benin Republic has more to do with Yorubas than it has anything to do with Edo (that's if it has anything to do with Edo oo).

The only 2 indeginous language there are Yoruba and Fon (a Yoruboid language).

TAO11:


They are there in Ife. How would you know when you don't read.

One of them (Head of Olokun) is what was shown to Leo Frobenius in 1910 that his head almost scattered.

my friend you seem confused, the "head of olokun" was dug up, it wasn't decorating any palace.

As I said, a wise man knows the answers before asking the questions.

prolog2:
I read only the two first sentences.
Learn how to make short statements. People don't get paid to read you. Show me the art which was decorating ife palace, stop yapping, just show.
A wise man always makes sure he knows the answers before asking the questions.

Only the first 2 sentence don't worry other smart people will read all.

Show You?

I want to believe you don't mean that I should go and LOOT them from Ife and ask for your address afterwards.

Because the video I attached for you has them already and the expert standing in front them stated clearly in that video that to see these beautiful things you need to come to Ife because several of them are in the country of their origin unlike their descendants, the Benin bronzes (that was looted during the Benin Massacre).

You ask for something and in the same breath you say I won't look at it ... c'mon where are u from?

prolog2:
As I said, a wise man knows the answers before asking the questions.

No content again? Your fuel don finish

prolog2:
my friend you seem confused, the "head of olokun" was dug up, it wasn't decorating any palace.

Olodo Frobenius didn't dig it up .

It has always been in the palace.

When Frobenis came to Ife for his excavation in 1910, "he was shown" the Head of Olokun.

Watch the video again i.e. back to lesson

TAO11:





No content again? Your fuel don finish

you have nothing to show because nothing was decorating ife palace. Since the digging up of those statues around ife, your oonis have been wearing hats imitating the "olokun head". You guys have nothing which is why you keep trying to claim what doesn't belong to you.

TAO11:



Olodo Frobenius didn't dig it up .

It has always been in the palace.

When Frobenis came to Ife for his excavation in 1910, "he was shown" the Head of Olokun.

Watch the video again i.e. back to lesson

Now why would you want to lie on this very known fact ? You have to limit your madness. Your "olokun head" was dug up, it was even written in newspapers when it was discovered. I can easily get documents on this in the internet. Or I could just go to the British museum and ask some specialists.

prolog2:
you have nothing to show because nothing was decorating ife palace. Since the digging up of those statues around ife, your oonis have been wearing hats imitating the "olokun head". You guys have nothing which is why you keep trying to claim what doesn't believing to you.

I mentioned to you already that bronze castings were already in Ife palace before Leo Frobenius came.

I gave you an example of the Head of Olokun which was shown to Leo Frobenius and which had his (Frobenius) head almost scattered.

You had erroneously thought it was Frobeneous that discovered all of them for the first time No that's false, and I have referred you back to lessons (the video) to confirm it and prove me wrong.

You seem already convinced in the falsehood that the Bronzes were know in modern times through Frobenius. Wrong, watch the video again

prolog2:
Now why would you want to lie on this very known fact ? You have to limit your madness. Your "olokun head" was dug up, it was even written in newspapers when it was discovered. I can easily get documents on this in the internet. Or I could just go to the British museum and ask some specialists.

Hello ... Leo Frobenius was shown the Head of Olokun among other bronzes in the Ife palace when he came to Ife.

Don't pretend to be going to the British Museum to ask when you have a British Museum documentary in front of you confirming what I'm saying to you.

Watch the video don't be scared

When I tell you to limit your madness, it is for your own good: https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=618380&partId=1

TAO11:



I mentioned to you already that bronze castings were already in Ife palace before Leo Frobenius came.

I gave you an example of the Head of Olokun which was shown to Leo Frobenius and which had his (Frobenius) head almost scattered.

You had erroneously thought it was Frobeneous that discovered all of them for the first time No that's false, and I have referred you back to lessons (the video) to confirm it and prove me wrong.

You seem already convinced in the falsehood that the Bronzes were know in modern times through Frobenius. Wrong, watch the video again

You are not more intelligent than a fool who lies on the color of the sky. You are a liar and you are very bad at it, but I guess in a country with an average IQ of 70, you have managed to fool some people with your more than obvious lies.

prolog2:
When I tell you to limit your madness, it is for your own good: https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=618380&partId=1

I swear you caused me to laugh uncontrolably.

"The Olokun Head" is not in the British Museum as you ignorantly think.

What is in the British Museum is called "The Head of Ife"

"The Olokun Head" is not one and the same thing as "The Head of Ife". Please go back to lesson.

You were only successful at exposing your ignorance publicly

prolog2:
You are not more intelligent than a fool who lies on the color of the sky. You are a liar and you are very bad at it, but I guess in a country with an average IQ of 70, you have managed to fool some people with your more than obvious lies.

"The Head of Ife" is what you have in the British Museum and not "Olokun Head"

The Olokun Head was shown to Leo Frobenius in Ife when he came, he didn't excavate it.

Olodo boy ...

The Britush Museum documentary below should help you with some education, I hope you will watch it this time and help yourself.

Pay attention to time 4:56 to 7:30 good luck


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa0st_aMjmA

The people in your video should write books with their accreditations, and with the stamp of the british museum, then I will take them seriously.
I don't actually care about my ignorance being exposed, nobody knows it all. I just read about what you refer to as olokun head and guess what, it was also dug up and is believed to be a fake, a copy. It seems your ancestors in the colonial era were already deep into the art of deception. You guys invented 419. By the way, I made no claims of your olokun head being in the british museum. You really need to go back to school and learn how to use your brain.

TAO11:



"The Head of Ife" is what you have in the British Museum and not "Olokun Head"

The Olokun Head was shown to Leo Frobenius in Ife when he came, he didn't excavate it.

Olodo boy ...

The Britush Museum documentary below should help you with some education, I hope you will watch it this time and help yourself.

Pay attention to time 4:56 to 7:30 good luck


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa0st_aMjmA

Hello prolog2,

I think you shouldn't run away.

You should do the honourable thing which is to apologize to the public for feeding them with a false and misleading information as this.

I know you must be really sorry again now.

It's really not your fault tho, I blame whoever has fed you with Benin supremacist falsehoods from a very young age. Hence the difficulty I have been having correcting it and freeing you from the grip and dungeon of delusion of grandeur.

There are many heads from Ife actually. Two prominent ones being "The Head of Ife" and the "Head of Olokun".

The Head of Olokun was SHOWN TO Frobenius in 1910, he didn't excavate it. It was in the palace alongside others.

Even The Head of Ife wasn't excavated by him, it was an accidental discovery resulting from digging of foundation for a house by a man in 1938/1939 (not very sure which).

I personally have seen another one of these heads in a U.S. museum which I took a picture of (see below).

Please be guided.

I don't think I mentionned the name Froebenius in any previous comment.
It seems you are once again talking to your invisible friends. Just like your invisible palace, all reports of your olokun head state that it was excavated. And even the ife head you put in the picture above states that this head was excavated ! Where are the imaginary things from your palace ? All I see are excavated things and a fool trying to tell lies.

TAO11:
Hello prolog2,

I think you shouldn't run away.

You should do the honourable thing which is to apologize to the public for feeding them with a false and misleading information as this.

I know you must be really sorry again now.

It's really not your fault tho, I blame whoever has fed you with Benin supremacist falsehoods from a very young age. Hence the difficulty I have been having correcting it and freeing you from the grip and dungeon of delusion of grandeur.

There are many heads from Ife actually. Two prominent ones being "The Head of Ife" and the "Head of Olokun".

The Head of Olokun was SHOWN TO Frobenius in 1910, he didn't excavate it. It was in the palace alongside others.

Even The Head of Ife wasn't excavated by him, it was an accidental discovery resulting from digging of foundation for a house by a man in 1938/1939 (not very sure which).

I personally have seen another one of these heads in a U.S. museum which I took a picture of (see below).

Please be guided.

tao, you seem to be missing the very clear point and on purpose. I don't give an f about your froebenius. The question was: show me the ife art which decorated ife palace before the brits arrived. And you have failed at that, instead you have been talking about stuff which were excavated including one which is believed by archeologists to be a fake. You seem to now want to change the point and make it about your froebenius and the current location of the excavated relics.

prolog2:
The people in your video should write books with their accreditations, and with the stamp of the british museum, then I will take them seriously.
I don't actually care about my ignorance being exposed, nobody knows it all. I just read about what you refer to as olokun head and guess what, it was also dug up and is believed to be a fake, a copy. It seems your ancestors in the colonial era were already deep into the art of deception. You guys invented 419. By the way, I made no claims of your olokun head being in the british museum. You really need to go back to school and learn how to use your brain.

It's true oo, I think they should write a book with a stamp of the British Museum lest they are conniving with Yorubas to marginalize your people and your history

That's the worst desperate come-back I've ever read in my life and I'm serious about that.

So, when you sent me videos of documentaries on Benin artefacts (which obviously is not a BOOK with Museum stamp) does it mean you didn't even trust the information you're sharing with on a public platform.

You said you don't care about being an ignorant person. Yes it's okay to be unaware of some things, but it's not okay to when you come out like you know it yet within you you know you don't.

It is not what I referred to as Olokun Head, it is what is called Olokun.

Regarding your statement that you read somewgere that tge Head of Olokun was also dug up and that it is fake, I hope your source is a book stamped by British Museum so that you should take it seriously.

But really the truth (which I know is really bitter for you at this point) is that the excavation at Ife was by Frobenius in 1910 and guess the Head of Olokun and other bronze castings were right there waiting for him at the palace.

Please don't be afraid to put forward your evidence that it was dug up and that it is fake. But I won't accept evidence from Oba of Benin's place sha oo.

About whether or not you thought Olokun Head was in the British Museum.

Of course you did. I know this because we were having a discussion about whether or not the Head of Olokun of Olokun was dug up by Leo Frobenius, then you went ahead to produce (as evidence) a write-up which shows a head (which you thought was Olokun head) and also shows the Head which you thought was Olokun Head to be in the British Museum.

How else could you have thought that the Head of Olokun was in the British Museum?

But unfortunately for you, it turned out that the head which you produced, which is in the British Museum is "The Head of Ife" and not the "Head of Olokun" which you thought it was.

And even the Head of Ife wasn't discovered by Frobenius in 1910 it was discovered later by an Ife resident accidentally in 1938/1939

prolog2:
I don't think I mentionned the name Froebenius in any previous comment.
It seems you are once again talking to your invisible friends. Just like your invisible palace, all reports of your olokun head state that it was excavated. And even the ife head you put in the picture above states that this head was excavated ! Where are the imaginary things from your palace ? All I see are excavated things and a fool trying to tell lies.

You don't have to mention Frobenius. It is necessary for me to refer to him and for the following reasons:

*He was the first person to conduct excavation in Ife

*When he came the Olokun Head alongside other castings was shown to him in Ife.

These two points are enough for an intelligent person to know that:

The Olokun Head was one of the bronze castings that has always been in the Ife Palace.


Invisible palace? I understand, you're lacking content.

Are you really dead-scared to show just one of your all reports that says Olokun Head was excavated?


I never claimed that no artifacts were excavated at Ife, that must be the result of your own hallucination.

I have mentioned repeatedly that even "The Head of Ife" in the British Museum was excavated in 1938/1939.

So, there is no surprise or contradiction that an Ife Head in a U.S museum was excavated.

What I have repeated instead was that the Olokun Head alongside other bronze castings have always been in the Ife Palace because the 1st person to conduct excavation at Ife was shown those castings when he arrived.

prolog2:
tao, you seem to be missing the very clear point and on purpose. I don't give an f about your froebenius. The question was: show me the ife art which decorated ife palace before the brits arrived. And you have failed at that, instead you have been talking about stuff which were excavated including one which is believed by archeologists to be a fake. You seem to now want to change the point and make it about your froebenius and the current location of the excavated relics.

I have addressed this already. But you're apparently just bitter that I could.

The Head of Olokun, The Obalufon Head alongside other bronze castings have been in the palace ever since.

The first excavator met them at the palace

Tao, you talk too much, just show the "ife art" which decorated "ife palace" before the brits arrived.
Make it short, post the documents of the relics, I mean verrifyable documents, not some 419 stuff like you and your people usually do.
Talking to you is one incredible waste of time. You kind of remind me of one augustin from beegeagles blog, an other idiot who talks too much.

I can now claim that I understand the expression: "Empty barrels make the loudest noise". But in this case it is "empty palaces make the loudest noise".

In fact most of these heads are not just for decoration purposes in the palace.

They have religious significance in relation to various shrines.

They are often moved back and forth the palace and their respective shrines for different religious observances

you can't use a thing which you haven't proven as argument.
You still haven't proven the existence of any bronze decorating ife palace before the brits arrived.
I was going to ask a second question but it seems you failed at the first one and won't even aknowledge your failure, instead you are trying to create your own fantastic logics in which you would be right.

TAO11:
In fact most of these heads are not just for decoration purposes in the palace.

They have religious significance in relation to various shrines.

They are often moved back and forth the palace and their respective shrines for different religious observances

prolog2:
Tao, you talk too much, just show the "ife art" which decorated "ife palace" before the brits arrived.
Make it short, post the documents of the relics, I mean verrifyable documents, not some 419 stuff like you and your people usually do.
Talking to you is one incredible waste of time. You kind of remind me of one augustin from beegeagles blog, an other idiot who talks too much.

I can now claim that I understand the expression: "Empty barrels make the loudest noise". But in this case it is "empty palaces make the loudest noise".

After telling you what you asked for several (while you couldnt reply me on your scholars that said they were excavated) ?

Again

The Olokun Head, The Obalufon Head alongside others .

Let's see what u'll say again.

I fell your pain tho

prolog2:
you can't use a thing which you haven't proven as argument.
You still haven't proven the existence of any bronze decorating ife palace before the brits arrived.
I was going to ask a second question but it seems you failed at the first one and won't even aknowledge your failure, instead you are trying to create your own fantastic logics in which you would be right.

Since you're blind.


Again The Olokun Head, The Obalufon Head.

Where are the documents, your olokun head is said everywhere to be excavated and even to be a fake. Where are the documents, you can't just be making unsubstantiated claims. Also, "among others" is not precised enough.

TAO11:



After telling you what you asked for several (while you couldnt reply me on your scholars that said they were excavated) ?

Again

The Olokun Head, The Obalufon Head alongside others .

Let's see what u'll say again.

I fell your pain tho