₦airaland Forum

I noticed something interesting, most women doing prostitution are women with tattoos, even when i watch some movies, the women who have sex more are women with tattoos, for those that like amateur porn, most of the women who video themselves having sex are mostly women with tattoos, even porn stars do have tattoos.

I will like to ask, do women who have tattoos promiscuous than women who do not have?

ask your mother

All women are promiscuous.

The ones you've seen so far.. have tattoos.

You don’t define people because of their appearance.

wetdick:
I noticed something interesting, most women doing prostitution are women with tattoos, even when i watch some movies, the women who have sex more are women with tattoos, for those that like amateur porn, most of the women who video themselves having sex are mostly women with tattoos, even porn stars do have tattoos.

I will like to ask, do women who have tattoos promiscuous than women who do not have?

Well, it all depends...In the olden days, i mean in the days of our parents and grand parents, tattoos wearing were a norm. They were an emblem of beauty..worn in their hands and legs...or even chests to please their husbands, though very moderately. Some would even wear a tattoo in the form of their husband's name, boldly written on the visible part of their body. Amazingly, they would still be met as virgin despite the tattoos on. They were never promiscuous.

On the other hand, the tattoos worn nowadays by most girls across the globe(USA is worse off) are an emblem of what I can call ''immorality'' Once you see them, you know exactly what they are up to, without mincing words. It's been abused by many. However, some of our ladies still wear it to enhance their natural beauty and that does not make them promiscuous.

OdikwaRisky:
ask your mother

op you struck a nerve in this one

OdikwaRisky:
ask your mother

Well...I asked her, she said i should ask your own mother.

awelekiti:
Well, it all depends...In the olden days, i mean in the days of our parents and grand parents, tattoos wearing were a norm. They were an emblem of beauty..worn in their hands and legs...or even chests to please their husbands, very moderately. Some would even wear a tattoo in the form of their husband's name, boldly written on the visible part of their body. Amazingly, they would still be met as virgin despite the tattoos on. They were never promiscuous.

On the other hand, the tattoos worn nowadays by most girls across the globe(USA is worse off) are an emblem of what I can call ''bestiality'' Once you see them, you know exactly what they are up to, without mincing words. However, some of our ladies still wear it to enhance their natural beauty and that does not make them promiscuous.

i see, but i noticed something, almost all the run girls, i have seen in the club have one tattoo or the other on their arm or on their back

In this part of the world, tattoos are usually a sign of waywardness so yes, promiscuous women are likelier to have tattoos.

Ranchhoddas:
In this part of the world, tattoos are usually a sign of waywardness so yes, promiscuous women are likelier to have tattoos.

i think maybe it is a worldwide thing to see tattooed women as promiscuous

It's a tramp stamp. A girl with tattoo has a higher chance of being a slut or a hoe. That's why men should watch out for the carousel riders. Many change after their prime and try to form nice but once you see that tattoo run for your live.

promiscuity is not prostitution but prostitution is a form of promiscuity.
there is a relationship between prostitutes and tattoos and some groups use it to mark out their girls.

In Nigeria having a tatoo as a female means you are promiscous.

Davash222:
You don’t define people because of their appearance.

Oh yes we do..i have never seen a banker carrying dreadlocks