Blakjewelry:

I specifically mentioned the height which the meteorite exploded and remember I mentioned what if it had happened closer to the ground. the damage to buildings is as a result of shockwaves produced by the blast. also similar occurred close to Siberia in 1908 though it was not captured like the one of 2013, it happened closer to the ground though not too to close in remote forest area. the result was the trees closer to the center were scorched, they were left standing with their branches and tree top blown off, while trees further away was toasted fell to the ground the area is about 2000km. people faraway felt the heat and were throw off their feet. the Chinese have a recorded history of similar story that result to over 10000 death though the figure is been disputed by scholars.

if you are looking for pictures you can Google search them

Meteorites are meteor remenants. They don't explode.
You make extraordinary claims without backing them up with facts.. is that OK my friend?

Blakjewelry:

sorry to bust your bubble. fact check there several site that has been dug has the ancient city of Sodom and Gomorrah but non can be said to be the actually candidate so you posting some random picture as Sodom is wrong. this similar to that picture making the round as the skull of Goliath.

secondly balls of fire raining down will mash any building on impact, any house without direct hit will stand but won't have high concentration of sulfur like you propose.

thirdly those site would be thousand of years old, with thousands of years of weathering activities so how do expect to see pure sulfur as it is thousands of years ago.

like I told you no site has been universally accepted as sodom and Gomorrah. even some of sites dug didn't even tally with estimated date Bible gave

—————————————————————————

secondly balls of fire raining down will mash any building on impact, any house without direct hit will stand but won't have high concentration of sulfur like you propose.

Which one is "Ball of fire"?
"Ball of fire" cannot smash buildings anyway.

the ancient city of Sodom and Gomorrah but non can be said to be the actually candidate so you posting some random picture as Sodom is wrong.

Well, if the locals whose ancestors lived there for thousands of years say they are Sodom and Gomorrah what can you foreigners & skeptics do about it? Where on earth do you find locals who don't know their ancestral lands or the history?

Where did you see Goliath skull here. I post well researched stuff bro

thirdly those site would be thousand of years old, with thousands of years of weathering activities so how do expect to see pure sulfur as it is thousands of years ago.

Lumps of pure sulfur are embedded in the soil and buildings as shown in this "video of Sodom and Gomorrah":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLEJ1sZxjA4





Will post more pictures of Sodom and Gomorrah later.

OpenYourEyes1:


Debunked by whom? Scientists or Skeptics? Why don't they show the world the correct dating?
There are lots of other similar datings errors by the way ...lots of them.

By scientists.

What other dating errors?

OpenYourEyes1:


The lady who made the first discovery was also sack.
They are good at sacking people who reveal the truth.

That is not true, Mary Higby Schweitzer was never fired for her discovery.

OpenYourEyes1:

—————————————————————————






Which one is "Ball of fire"?
"Ball of fire" cannot smash buildings anyway.




Well, if the locals whose ancestors lived there for thousands of years say they are Sodom and Gomorrah what can you foreigners & skeptics do about it? Where on earth do you find locals who don't know their ancestral lands or the history?

Where did you see Goliath skull here. I post well researched stuff bro





Lumps of pure sulfur are embedded in the soil and buildings as shown in this "video of Sodom and Gomorrah":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLEJ1sZxjA4





Will post more pictures of Sodom and Gomorrah later.

do your research well, sites has been dug in the past each claiming to be original city yet still fail simple test of source of destruction or fail the time which the event seems to happened.

Lol @ local who don't know there history, the Israel claimed moses liberated them from Egypt with no such story in the Egyptian archives, the Yoruba believed oduduwa descend from the sky, the egbos believe they are from Israel, the ijaws have similar believe, the rest of the believe man is from Adam who originated from the garden of Eden whereas science has shown man originated from Africa should I go on?

and also simple physics will let you understand that as object falls they gather momentum except you are telling the fire sulfur and brimstone shower like like rain or snow.

OpenYourEyes1:


Meteorites are meteor remenants. They don't explode.
You make extraordinary claims without backing them up with facts.. is that OK my friend?

Lol you speak like you know what you are talking about. meteorites can cause airburst depending on the parent material and or factors. do your research very well, I am not a conspiracy theorist I believe in fact

Blakjewelry:
Lol you speak like you know what you are talking about. meteorites can cause airburst depending on the parent material and or factors. do your research very well, I am not a conspiracy theorist I believe in fact

I think you should go research more about Asteroid, Meteor and Meteorites . I am not good at embarrassing people.

LordReed:


That is not true, Mary Higby Schweitzer was never fired for her discovery.

She was actually fired at Montana state University after her first discovery on T-Rex soft-tissue in 1990... I guess they thought her finding was impossible or a lie. She eventually got a better job at North Carolina State University where she continued researching on T-Rex bone-bed at Montana. Again, around 2004/2005 she found soft-tissues on another T-Rex bone



Hope you don't expect this to be on Google.

OpenYourEyes1:


She was actually fired at Montana state University after her first discovery on T-Rex soft-tissue in 1990... I guess they thought her finding was impossible or a lie. She eventually got a better job at North Carolina State University where she continued researching on T-Rex bone-bed at Montana. Again, around 2004/2005 she found soft-tissues on another T-Rex bone



Hope you don't expect this to be on Google.

LoL! So where did you get this information from then?

OpenYourEyes1:


I think you should go research more about Asteroid, Meteor and Meteorites . I am not good at embarrassing people.

I will like for you to embarrass me. I can decide to pull articles to support my claim but most times I prefer you do the work yourself.

modified. on a second thought maybe because you do little online research on how they differ makes you think you know much. meteor are meteor no matter their origin. if you want to discuss their origin that is another topic altogether

LordReed:


LoL! So where did you get this information from then?

most of these guys are conspiracy theorist, imagine saying soft tissue was found in dinosaur that have been extinct for that long

Blakjewelry:

most of these guys are conspiracy theorist, imagine saying soft tissue was found in dinosaur that have been extinct for that long

Actually Mary Schweitzer's findings have been confirmed, she found soft tissue in dinosaur bones but it was an unusual find. Neither was she fired for publishing her discovery, the scientific community usually likes to test discoveries to destruction before it is adopted as scientific fact so they were highly skeptical of it at first. Now that it has been confirmed they are adopting her findings as fact now.

LordReed:


Actually Mary Schweitzer's findings have been confirmed, she found soft tissue in dinosaur bones but it was an unusual find. Neither was she fired for publishing her discovery, the scientific community usually likes to test discoveries to destruction before it is adopted as scientific fact so they were highly skeptical of it at first. Now that it has been confirmed they are adopting her findings as fact now.

thanks for the clarification I will check on it at my spare time

Blakjewelry:

I will like for you to embarrass me. I can decide to pull articles to support my claim but most times I prefer you do the work yourself.

modified. on a second thought maybe because you do little online research on how they differ makes you think you know much. meteor are meteor no matter their origin. if you want to discuss their origin that is another topic altogether

Was geography not taught in secondary school?

LordReed:


Actually Mary Schweitzer's findings have been confirmed, she found soft tissue in dinosaur bones but it was an unusual find. Neither was she fired for publishing her discovery, the scientific community usually likes to test discoveries to destruction before it is adopted as scientific fact so they were highly skeptical of it at first. Now that it has been confirmed they are adopting her findings as fact now.

Showing you proofs (even solid proofs) is a waste of time bro.

OpenYourEyes1:


Showing you proofs (even solid proofs) is a waste of time bro.

You don't have any proof.

aadoiza:

Give us proofs of these advanced weaponry and tech used then.

Interesting....A Muslim asking me about proofs for an event in the Bible? An alternate? Well, is it physical, spiritual or metaphysical proof you want? I can actually point you in the right direction but a serious truth seeker would have seen me mention the results of nuclear war..its unique ... search & learn more on its effects,google desert nuclear tests, Hiroshima & Nagasaki. Then go find the real research about Sodom &Gomorrah(It's on the net,some scientists actually went there). You'll have your proof if you're really serious. The phrase nothing good comes easy also applies to knowledge. It is easier to be told & end up fooled than search by oneself. Which one is you?

OpenYourEyes1:


Was geography not taught in secondary school?

yep but I bet you weren't taught that some meteor has their origin from the asteroid or kuiper bet s

OpenYourEyes1:


Meteorites are meteor remenants. They don't explode.
You make extraordinary claims without backing them up with facts.. is that OK my friend?

Both you and Blakjewelry are wrong.

However, Blakjewelry made the more horrible blunder.

Meteorites don't explode. And you, OpenYourEyes, meteorites are not meteor remnants. Rather, the meteorite is the remnant of a meteoroid that lands on earth.

BluntBoy:


Both you and Blakjewelry are wrong.

However, Blakjewelry made the more horrible blunder.

Meteorites don't explode. And you, OpenYourEyes, meteorites are not meteor remnants. Rather, the meteorite is the remnant of a meteoroid that lands on earth.

the Chelyabinsk meteor and Tunguska event are called what educate me

BluntBoy:


Both you and Blakjewelry are wrong.

However, Blakjewelry made the more horrible blunder.

Meteorites don't explode. And you, OpenYourEyes, meteorites are not meteor remnants. Rather, the meteorite is the remnant of a meteoroid that lands on earth.

Asteroids or Meteoriod don't land on earth without burning up in the atmosphere. The "burning up" is called meteor(meteor shower). Unburnt meteor falls on the ground as Meteorites.

Just as we have ICE melting into -> WATER , water into -> VAPOR, vapor to -> Water droplets

* Ice in this case is Asteroid. Ice particles are Meteoriod.

* Water/vapor (melted ice) is Meteor

* Water droplets are Meteorites.

OpenYourEyes1:



Asteroids or Meteoriod don't land on earth without burning up in the atmosphere. The "burning up" is called meteor(meteor shower). Unburnt meteor falls on the ground as Meteorites.

Just as we have ICE melting into -> WATER , water into -> VAPOR, vapor to -> Water droplets

* Ice in this case is Asteroid. Ice particles are Meteoriod.

* Water/vapor (melted ice) is Meteor

* Water droplets are Meteorites.

I no go school explain this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor

Blakjewelry:

I no go school explain this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor

Who say you no go school? We are learning from each other bro.

OpenYourEyes1:

Who say you no go school? We are learning from each other bro.

Lol OK what is your say about the wiki page

SKhanmi:


Interesting....A Muslim asking me about proofs for an event in the Bible? An alternate? Well, is it physical, spiritual or metaphysical proof you want? I can actually point you in the right direction but a serious truth seeker would have seen me mention the results of nuclear war..its unique ... search & learn more on its effects,google desert nuclear tests, Hiroshima & Nagasaki. Then go find the real research about Sodom &Gomorrah(It's on the net,some scientists actually went there). You'll have your proof if you're really serious. The phrase nothing good comes easy also applies to knowledge. It is easier to be told & end up fooled than search by oneself. Which one is you?

It's a pity you can't see beyond your nose just like your cohorts. Well, I was merely pointing out the double standard you and your cohorts always exhibit on here. One account doesn't make sense because there is no verifiable proof but then you mischievously guzzled a weirdly concocted account in the absence of one, and you want to be taken seriously? Perhaps you lot don't actually know what a verifiable proof is.

You read claims by people on the Internet and call them knowledge and you think you've become knowledgeable(!) You're just a bloody believer, skhanmi.

OpenYourEyes1:



Asteroids or Meteoriod don't land on earth without burning up in the atmosphere. The "burning up" is called meteor(meteor shower). Unburnt meteor falls on the ground as Meteorites.

Just as we have ICE melting into -> WATER , water into -> VAPOR, vapor to -> Water droplets

* Ice in this case is Asteroid. Ice particles are Meteoriod.

* Water/vapor (melted ice) is Meteor

* Water droplets are Meteorites.

You are still making the same mistake.

Meteoroid don't completely burn up all the time. When it heats up as it travels through the atmosphere, it produces impression of a star falling or shooting across the sky. This light phenomenon is called a meteor.

Meteor is not an object, it is just a phenomenon, known to ancient astronomers as "shooting star", or " falling star".

There is no star shooting across the sky nor is there a star hurtling down on earth. It is just a meteoroid burning up as it travels. Sometimes, the meteoroid may be large and does not totally burn up. It lands on land or in the sea. This remnant is what is called a meteorite.

Note: meteor is not an object. It is just a phenomenon.

aadoiza:



You read claims by people on the Internet and call them knowledge and you think you've become knowledgeable(!) You're just a bloody believer, skhanmi.

Cohort's? Wow. You obviously think am an atheist? Where do you stand sir?. Smh.

I never crosscarpet into Islamic threads.
Don't engage in verbal fisticuffs.
Nor make general assumptions.

Did you even try & find out ANYTHING? No?

Nuclear effects are not verifiable?! I give up then.

It won't be new if we slid into another dark age & later civilizations profess that H & N were destroyed by brimstone & fire.
Like anyone would love to tell them they are the runts of more advanced past civilizations. Humans capacity for self deceit is outstanding!.
Thanks for calling me a believer by the way. Everyone else thinks it's bloody ironic. There are better things than religions.

Truth is subjective. Keep that in mind & remember folks who resort to expletives to pass points probably have nothing else. To say.

Blakjewelry:

the Chelyabinsk meteor and Tunguska event are called what educate me

They were not exploding meteorites. Meteorites don't explode.

BluntBoy:

They were not exploding meteorites. Meteorites don't explode.

what are they then

BluntBoy:

They were not exploding meteorites. Meteorites don't explode.

what are they then

Blakjewelry:

what are they then

The Russian episode was a caused by a meteoroid that exploded in the atmosphere. Meteoroids that explode in the atmosphere are called bolides and are capable of generating shock waves that can smash windows.

The Russian episode was however a superbolide.

BluntBoy:


Both you and Blakjewelry are wrong.

However, Blakjewelry made the more horrible blunder.

Meteorites don't explode. And you, OpenYourEyes, meteorites are not meteor remnants. Rather, the meteorite is the remnant of a meteoroid that lands on earth.

Correction: A meteorite is a solid piece of debris from an object, such as a comet, asteroid, or meteoroid, that originates in outer space and survives its passage through the atmosphere to reach the surface of a planet or moon.