Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,195,557 members, 7,958,735 topics. Date: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 09:54 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? (34999 Views)
Zamfara: Supreme Court Affirms Gov Lawal-Dare (PDP), Dismisses APC's Suit / 8 APC Campaign Council Members Defect To PDP; Meet Atiku (Video) / Celebration At Muhammad Matawalle's House Over Zamfara Supreme Court Victory (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by adanny01(m): 12:33pm On May 25, 2019 |
PaChukwudi44: I wont forget your ignorance in a bit. Last time, i called you out after you argued upandan about the CJN and you fell flat. Now you are still arguing blindly as usual. Unfortunately, it is you who is using emotions. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by PaChukwudi44(m): 12:34pm On May 25, 2019 |
The question is "Did PDP secure 25% of the valid votes cast in 2/3 of the LGA? 1 Like |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Inspiration2017: 12:35pm On May 25, 2019 |
Law Interpretation palaver For best Undergraduate Project Writing or best Postgraduate Thesis, contact +2348144582332 (nationally, continentally or intercontinentally - Call or WhatsApp +2348144582332). Drop your Project Topic or Thesis' title. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by cosymyman: 12:36pm On May 25, 2019 |
Ok |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by PaChukwudi44(m): 12:36pm On May 25, 2019 |
adanny01:You are the one arguing blindly.I said the CJN can only be removed by the NJC and that was exactly what happened. The PDP candidate will be issued certificate of return on monday.Suck on that |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by engineerboat(m): 12:38pm On May 25, 2019 |
ericsmith: Stop confusing yourself. Invalid votes is invalid and does not count on total valid votes which is used in calculating the actual winning percentage. Get a life Pele you will dey alright las las 1 Like |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by adanny01(m): 12:39pm On May 25, 2019 |
PaChukwudi44: I am bookmarking this statement, since you are beyond redemption. You will be ashamed of yourself soon. For starters, keep this one in memory
|
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by engineerboat(m): 12:40pm On May 25, 2019 |
adanny01: Counted valid votes will be used. Wasted. Invalid votes Is gone down the history lane Pele |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 12:44pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Supreme Court has voided those votes oga, so is no longer valid. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by udemzyudex(m): 12:50pm On May 25, 2019 |
adanny01: You lack common sense ,you should ask your self if APC was suppose to be in the ballot paper. Which means it's a wasted vote,they should have done exactly what Ameachi wanted to do in rivers but they were too dump to do so . |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by GALAXY2012: 12:59pm On May 25, 2019 |
FROM MATHEMATICS POINT OF CALCULATION, THE TOTAL VOTE CASTED FOR APC SHOULD BE DEDUCTED FROM THE TOTAL VOTE. HENCE, IT BECOMES 810,782 - 534,541= 276,241. THE 1/4 OF THE TOTAL VOTE CASTED WILL NOW BE 276,241/4= 69,060.25 IN CONCLUSION, PDP MEETS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL REQUIREMENT. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:02pm On May 25, 2019 |
OGHENAOGIE:Oga,pdp did not meet the requirement.you cannot cancel the votes of over 500,000 people who voted legitimately.globally,disenfranchisement is a serious offence |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:03pm On May 25, 2019 |
GALAXY2012:You cannot deduct votes.the electoral act has made sure of that.you can only take it away from but not destroy or nullified. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:07pm On May 25, 2019 |
udemzyudex:A court ruling originally allowed them to be on the ballot.again,the issue here is mainly about apc and her internal problems,it is a pre election issue therefore all votes cast on that election day exists but apc doesn't exist on the election day.500,000 votes scored by apc stands invalidated but part of total votes cast... |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:11pm On May 25, 2019 |
Osagyefo98:This is not igbotic issue so dont interfere.but however,voided or invalid votes are usually counted by inec as part of total votes cast.check inec spreadsheet before you argue.again,the constitutiin in section 179 talks of total votes cast which includes all valid,rejected votes.500k people wrongly voted for apc which were not on the ballot.the key word is that they voted.the votes cant be tampered with because the case was pre electiin case not an election petition case |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by OGHENAOGIE(m): 1:19pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1:d supreme court has ruled dat dos votes are invalid d second winner ll take over Apc shd wait till 2023... |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by OGHENAOGIE(m): 1:20pm On May 25, 2019 |
adanny01:continue dreamin...Apc sponsor my ass... |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 1:21pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: APC votes is a waste , maybe na Calabar issue...abi.. Is wasted and as such not valid in anyway. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:32pm On May 25, 2019 |
OGHENAOGIE:Guy,behave mature and stop being politically hypocritical.why pretend to be neutral when you are a closet pdp supporter? Its disgusting.stop that and come out fully like a real man. The supreme court is wise.it said the runner up will be sworn in if it fulfills the constitutional requirement bordering on spread.this case is a pre election case involving apc alone,votes that were cast on election day is a part of an election petition case.only a tribunal can fully talk about votes cast during an election firstly before ending at the apex court. Those votes cast for apc have been taken away from apc but it is not nullified.the grounds for nullifying votes are clearly slept out in the electoral act and this was not what was brought before the court.the for apc votes are now rejected votes and part of total votes cast.section 179 of the constitution talks about votes cast not valid or invalid votes. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by mushystuff: 1:37pm On May 25, 2019 |
ihatesycophant: Those who actually passed through school and honestly earned their grades remain civil in their engagements. They don't start throwing insults even when they disagree with an opinion. For your information: mushystuff: |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by tinsel: 1:40pm On May 25, 2019 |
Stakeholders:I agree with you. The court said total votes cast. The problem with pdp is they always want to get to power through the back door. They are not even ashamed that they are trying to rule Zamfara with this kind of mandate. Why are they afraid of new election? |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by tinsel: 1:44pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1:Hmmm. Can some body check if inec includes both valid and invalid votes as total number of votes cast? |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:45pm On May 25, 2019 |
Osagyefo98:Invalid votes count as part of total votes cast,your too blinded by tribalism to know this anyway. Vthe issue before the supreme court is what happened at apc primaries not what happened during the elections.what happened during the polls are within the jilurisdiction of a tribunal not the supreme court.please be guided.that something is a waste doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.wasted votes are same as thumbprinting for three parties on a ballot.it is invalid but will be recorded |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 1:50pm On May 25, 2019 |
tinsel:Yes they do.someone even posted s spreadsheet in this thread about that.any ballot paper that was thumbpronted automatically becomes a vote cast.if you have participated in elections,you will know all this. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by udemzyudex(m): 2:02pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: What is the supreme court ruling on this case? |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 2:05pm On May 25, 2019 |
udemzyudex:Swear in the runner up if he meets the requirements or two third spread.that requirement is now inec job to interpret.the case is a pre election matter,votes cast on election are election petition matter and only a tribunal has original jurisdiction.the party to the case were apc not voters.it is just like money seized From looters.it is no longer theirs as it never was originally but the money is now part of total fg money,it still exists |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by udemzyudex(m): 2:15pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Only a tribunal has original jurisdiction? If this is so,why did Osun APC went to court of appeal? And why is Osun PDP going to the supreme court? You said the 2/3 spread is now the job of INEC to interpret,when you take away all APC vote ,you will have PDP and other parties that contested. The question is did PDP vote meet the 2/3 requirements? |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Bimpe29: 2:18pm On May 25, 2019 |
mushystuff:Spot on. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by rhektor(m): 2:20pm On May 25, 2019 |
dizon: If those votes are invalid then the margin of void votes is greater than counted votes, technically what played out in Osun should also play out here unless there is a different rule for Osun State |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Bimpe29: 2:20pm On May 25, 2019 |
This is really analytical and it does gladden my heart to know that APC has shot itself in the leg and paved way for PDP's resurrection. dizon: |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by PHILipu1(m): 2:23pm On May 25, 2019 |
OGHENAOGIE:OK,agreed that they are invalid or voided. And now that the total invalid votes in the election is higher than the difference between the PDP candidate and the nearest candidate, is that not a ground for re run? |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 2:24pm On May 25, 2019 |
udemzyudex:You are not getting me.in an election petition case,it starts from a tribunal not a high court or appellate court.you must start from tribunal and end up at the supreme court.you just cant go to higher court except you are appealing like apc in osun did.that was after the tribunal ruled against them. You can only take away the votes of apc from apc which the course did,you can also say those votes are not valid but you cannot nullify this votes.that is not a pre election matter.those votes are legitimate.they fulfilled all voting requirements under the electoral act.those votes are same as thumbprinting for two or more parties.it will count for no party but will still count in the net total |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)
Kaduna Government Regrets Killings/Kidnappings, Reacts To El-Rufai's Old Video / View Of BIAFRA From An EDO Perceptive / Faces Of Fulani Herdsmen Arrested In Benue Yesterday (Photos)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 60 |