tunjiajayi:


Woaah!
You voted electronically?

Bitchyouarejay!

NOC1:


did you vote electronically?
you voted manually and your results were transmitted and collated manually.

SouthSouth1914:
You don’t have the sever yet you boasted of doing electronic transmission which was budgeted for and the National Assembly approved..

Yakubu you need to do your explanations from jail period!

jamace:
PDP is not talking about voting electronically. One of the issues under contention includes number of accredited voters. The PDP is arguing that number of votes in some states did not tally with accredited voters hence the need to prove that through the server.

SillyMods:

Which figures in card reader?

Card reader was only used to read the voters card for accreditation and not for voting.

NOC1:


did you vote electronically?
you voted manually and your results were transmitted and collated manually.

NOC1:


did you vote electronically?
you voted manually and your results were transmitted and collated manually.

NOC1:

if results were transmitted to server, why will the returning officers fly to Abuja to announce and correct the results.

Oladelepsy001:
Isn't it laughable? We didn't vote electronically and someone is busy relying on something called server.. the only solution is to push for e-voting.

GoodGovernance:
Only a fool and compute illiterate will rely on a sever over and above the source document,which is the signed results sheet.

Atiku must have relied on a manipulated server to steal victory.

This case is definitely dead on arrival!

NOC1:

if results were transmitted to server, why will the returning officers fly to Abuja to announce and correct the results.

Oladelepsy001:
Isn't it laughable? We didn't vote electronically and someone is busy relying on something called server.. the only solution is to push for e-voting.

NOC1:

if results were transmitted to server, why will the returning officers fly to Abuja to announce and correct the results.

Esseite:
So where were the figures in card readers transmitted to?... as the corpers alleged to have transmitted those results.

krendo:


when they have no credible arguments they get racist and tribalistic

divide and rule wont work this time

Atiku and Buhari are both Hausa Fulani

All Nigerians are saying is justice must prevail. Our votes must count!

ada9ja:


Then cry olodo did u vote electronically ?

greggng:
You cannot give what you don't have. Asking Inec to produce a server is an exercise in futility..atiku go and rest ....

tunjiajayi:


The card readers were for verification!!!!!

Opinedecandid:
Shame on you, INEC

tunjiajayi:


Please get your facts right, they were solely to verify authencity of PVCs for the verification process.

Results were manually collated and transmitted.

Besides the electoral law even as ammended has not approved electronic voting.

You can verify this.

aewhydot:



Mr Archives, card readers captured accredited voters and not votes along party lines. Tankyu

tunjiajayi:


Please get your facts right, they were solely to verify authencity of PVCs for the verification process.

Results were manually collated and transmitted.

Besides the electoral law even as ammended has not approved electronic voting.

You can verify this.

NOC1:


there is no result in card reader, card reader only have number of accredited voters.

Phoenixback:


I was a PO during the last elections, there is what is called e-collation on the card readers which we did at the RACs after the voting process; the results of the various polling units were transmitted through this process....speaking from experience!!!

tundemania:
The Independent National Electoral Commission on Thursday insisted that it had no electronic server being sought to be accessed and inspected by the Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential candidate in the February 23, 2019 presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

The commission had earlier denied the existence of such server in its reply filed on April 10, 2019 to oppose Atiku and PDP’s petition pending before the five-man tribunal.

The petitioners are by their petition challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress at the last presidential election.

INEC, Buhari and the APC who are the respondents to the petition and to the petitioners’ application for access to the server used for the election, on Thursday, asked the Justice Mohammed Garba-led panel to dismiss the petitioners’ request.

The three respondents, through their respective counsels, reminded the tribunal that the Court of Appeal had, on May 6, 2019 (before the petition was filed on May 18), dismissed a similar application filed by the petitioners.

Represented at the Thursday’s proceedings by its lead counsel, Mr. Yunus Usman (SAN), INEC said the application by the petitioners amounted to asking the commission to produce what it did not have.

Urging the tribunal to dismiss the application, Usman said, “We attached as Exhibit 1, the enrolled order of this honourable court made on May 6, 2019 refusing all the prayers of the petitioners in this application.

“They said we should bring what we don’t have.”

INEC had declared Buhari and APC the winner of the February 23 election.

It said Buhari polled 15,191,847 votes to defeat his closest rival, Atiku, who polled 11,262,978 votes.

But Atiku and the PDP, in their petition filed on March 18 challenging the outcome of the poll, contended that “from the data” obtained from INEC’s server, “the true, actual and correct results” showed that they polled a total of 18,356,732 votes to defeat Buhari whom they said scored 16,741,430 votes.

By calculation, Atiku and PDP claimed to have defeated Buhari by 1,615,302 votes.

The petitioners, through their lead counsel, Dr. Livy Ozoukwu, subsequently filed an application on May 8, 2019, seeking an order of the tribunal permitting them to access and inspect the INEC’s server into which results and other data were allegedly transmitted during the February 23 poll.

A senior member of the petitioners’ legal team, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), moved the application on Thursday.

Uche urged the tribunal to grant the application in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality, saying it was necessary for his team to be able to maintain the petition.

He said, “The application in summary asks for access to and inspection of the server of the INEC and the smart card readers used in the conduct of the presidential election.

“We have addressed the issues in our counter-affidavit, written address and reply on points of law and we urge your lordships that the application be granted as prayed in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality.

“The application is necessary for the maintenance of this petition.”

Reacting first, INEC’s lead counsel, Usman, referred the tribunal to his client’s counter-affidavit filed on May 23 in opposition to the application.

He added that the Court of Appeal having earlier refused similar application, same should not be granted again.

The leader of Buhari’s legal team, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), also urged the tribunal to dismiss the application.

Source; https://maniagist.com/2019/06/13/atiku-pdp-asking-us-for-server-that-we-dont-have-inec-tells-tribunal/

NOC1:


did you vote electronically?
you voted manually and your results were transmitted and collated manually.

Phoenixback:


I was a PO during the last elections, there is what is called e-collation on the card readers which we did at the RACs after the voting process; the results of the various polling units were transmitted through this process....speaking from experience!!!

MT:


Sorry that DOES NOT make the computer you transmitted to to be called a SERVER. Server means a different thing entirely.

SillyMods:

Which figures in card reader?

Card reader was only used to read the voters card for accreditation and not for voting.