INEC you collected N220 million for server and Buhari approved it pls INEC where is the SERVER? Pls produce the SERVER or the election is annul ASAP.

No more argument INEC should produce the SERVER and tell us where did they got the result to released or the election is declare null and void with no further delay.

switsylver:

If there was no server how come the electronic machines were used for accredition?

dont mind zombies

This INEC/APC defence s stupid. So what did the pdp and Atiku hacked into?!! Why was there a suit instituted against Atiku

Atiku/PDP are wallowing in hopelessness

tunjiajayi:


Ok
You should be a witness for Atiku

why? you think I support Atiku?

NOC1:


there is no result in card reader, card reader only have number of accredited voters.

am telling you now,,,, INEC told presiding officers to transmit result.... That is E-collation

But INEC Chairman publicly declared before the elections that the vote count would be done electronically, not manually.

If INEC truly has no server, but counted the votes manually, that automatically declared the result of the presidential election null, void and of no effect in law.

dehi:
am telling you now,,,, INEC told presiding officers to transmit result.... That is E-collation

how will it be done?

Lol comments here are kinda funny

Some people might get accredited and won't later vote
I remembered doing that in 2015

Accreditation is different from voting, accreditation will only forward the total number of those who come out and show interest in being to auntheticate them as the rightful owner of the smart card, and voting is another phase,
Number of total vote mist not be higher than total accredited but total accredited can be higher than total vote.

Only accreditation data is being sent to the server, voting isn't moreso, there is space for manual accreditation when there is problem with the machine.

What INEC is saying is that the don't have the result on the server but have total accredited I'm each council on the server

NOC1:


did you vote electronically?
you voted manually and your results were transmitted and collated manually.

You sound ignorance of the difference between voting and actual collation of votes.

If you voted manually, the collation of votes is done electronically and stored in a server.

michoim:
Atiku/PDP are wallowing in hopelessness

Produce the SERVER bro and shut da
f u c k. You are a thief that is why you are supporting the armed robbers INEC to collect N220M and declared Buhari as fake winner and came back to say no server bro you are a real corrupt human.

[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font][color=#990000][/color] hahahaha

TRIGITIS:
Atiku should take over from nnamdi kanu and stop distracting our president

Atiku will never be the president of Nigeria, he can only be the president of ipob.

Blackmail from a kindergarten.

TRIGITIS:
Atiku should take over from nnamdi kanu and stop distracting our president

Atiku will never be the president of Nigeria, he can only be the president of ipob.

Very childish and inconsequential individual your are.I don't need to see you in person to understand that you have nothing upstairs.I am suspecting your head is for fancy

kikake:


You sound ignorance of the difference between voting and actual collation of votes.

If you voted manually, the collation of votes is done electronically and stored in a server.

collation done lectronically, where?
after figures where added up in collation centres with calculators, have you been inside LGA collation centre before?
mu brother wakeup, everything is done on spread sheet.

Ahsad:
Lol comments here are kinda funny

Some people might get accredited and won't later vote
I remembered doing that in 2015

Accreditation is different from voting, accreditation will only forward the total number of those who come out and show interest in being to auntheticate them as the rightful owner of the smart card, and voting is another phase,
Number of total vote mist not be higher than total accredited but total accredited can be higher than total vote.

Only accreditation data is being sent to the server, voting isn't moreso, there is space for manual accreditation when there is problem with the machine.

What INEC is saying is that the don't have the result on the server but have total accredited I'm each council on the server

They said they don't have a server, not that they don't have data on the server.. Don't be clever by half. Come on, you're a full grown man!

jamace:
INEC Statement On Card Reader Demonstration

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Monday, 09th March 2015, met to consider field reports from the public demonstration of Smart Card Readers (SCRs) conducted in 12 states on Saturday, March 07th 2015. The states were Rivers and Delta (South-South), Kano and Kebbi (North-West), Anambra and Ebonyi (South East), Ekiti and Lagos (South West), Bauchi and Taraba (North East) as well as Niger and Nasarawa (North Central).

The Commission observed that its decision to deploy SCRs for the 2015 general elections have FOUR main objectives, namely:

(i) To verify Permanent Voter cards (PVCs) presented by voters at polling units and ensure that they are genuine, INEC-issued (not cloned) cards. From the reports on Saturday’s exercise, this objective was achieved 100 per cent.

(ii) To biometrically authenticate the person who presents a PVC at the polling unit and ensure that he/she is the legitimate holder of the card. In this regard, there were a few issues in some states during the public demonstration. Overall, 59% of voters who turned out for the demonstration had their fingerprints successfully authenticated. But the Commission, in agreement with registered political parties, had provided in the approved Guidelines for the conduct of the 2015 elections that where biometric authentication of a legitimate holder of a genuine PVC becomes challenging, there could be physical authentication of the person and completion of an Incident Form, to allow the person to vote.

(iii) The SCRs provide disaggregated data of accredited voters in male/female and elderly/youth categories – a disaggregation that is vital for research and planning purposes, but which INEC until now had been unable to achieve. The demonstration on Saturday fully served this objective.

(iv) The Smart Card Reader sends the data of all accredited voters to INEC’s central server, equipping the Commission to be able to audit figures subsequently filed by polling officials at the PU and, thereby, be able to determine if fraudulent alterations were made. The public demonstration also succeeded wholly in this regard.

The Commission nevertheless took a serious view of the high rate of the SCRs’ failure to authenticate voters’ fingerprints in some areas, particularly in Ebonyi State, and has decided to thoroughly investigate the cause; as well as repeat the public demonstration in that state. This demonstration will be conducted in the particular Registration Area involved in the last exercise, namely Izzi Unuhu (Abakaliki Local Government Area); as well as in Ibii/Oziza Registration Area (Afikpo North LGA). The repeat demonstration will be on Saturday, March 14th2015.

INEC is satisfied that the use of SCRs in the 2015 general elections will add tremendous transparency and credibility to the accreditation process on Election Day. The Commission hereby reassures the public that it will do everything necessary to ensure that the processes of the elections are seamless, free, fair, credible and peaceful.



Kayode Robert Idowu

Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman

10th March 2015.

Source: https://inecnigeria.org/news-all/inec-statement-on-card-reader-demonstration/

Conclusion: Smart Card readers work with the INEC server. Without central server, the smart card readers will not function and will be useless.
If the 2019 presidential elections was conducted with smart card readers then there is a server. In addition, I recall that INEC budgeted the sum of N220million for INEC server maintenance during the 2019 elections which was duly approved by the FG. So, INEC where is your server?

The server was stolen by APC.....lol
Naija is really entertaining.

Oladelepsy001:
Isn't it laughable? We didn't vote electronically and someone is busy relying on something called server.. the only solution is to push for e-voting.

Isn't it not just laughable but also ridiculous that same inev that provided a gadget which provided all personal data of any registered voter by reading the voters finger print is claiming that it had no server. I became a registered voter in 2011 and I didn't re register yet the card reader provided my details in 2019 after recognising my fingerprint. From where did my details emate if there was no server? Lame dumb silly old hags trting to twart justice.

krendo:



This is not the time to infer

Let Prof Yakubu come and tell under oat what the laid down process for the election was and what he thinks actually happened

From there we will know next steps

Under normal circumstances INEC should be co-operating with the courts, and not defending the outcomes of the process

The only reason INEC feel a duty to defend the 2019 election result is because they were the actual riggers of the election

Professor Yakubu will go to prison for criminal conspiracy to rig the elections and pervert justice if he does not take time. He has been caught pants down and the earlier he starts Co-operating the better for him!

Mahmoud wouldn't mind swearing under oat and go to jail for the sake of president Buhari.


Beside, Mahmoud must refund the hundreds of billion Naira he got for procurement of electronic materials for last election if he swears under oath that he collated millions of votes manually, without storing them anywhere through INEC server .

Funaki:

why? you think I support Atiku?

No because you said you witnessed electronic voting in your polling unit.
It doesn't matter who you support now

NOC1:


collation done lectronically, where?
after figures where added up in collation centres with calculators, have you been inside LGA collation centre before?
mu brother wakeup, everything is done on spread sheet.

Stop embarrassing yourself.. You can't accredit from the thin air.. There's a database some where that stores such data for which accreditation is done.. If they deny having such data on voting, it makes more sense than denying servers and databases exist.

The internet is there man, read, learn before you talk

So all the billions for training ad hoc staff on how to use the card readers for accreditations are waste.Even bet9ja and baba ijebu get server.Na im a whole inec no get server.That one na joke.

February 23 will soon be Nigerian democracy day.

tundemania:
The Independent National Electoral Commission on Thursday insisted that it had no electronic server being sought to be accessed and inspected by the Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential candidate in the February 23, 2019 presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

The commission had earlier denied the existence of such server in its reply filed on April 10, 2019 to oppose Atiku and PDP’s petition pending before the five-man tribunal.

The petitioners are by their petition challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress at the last presidential election.

INEC, Buhari and the APC who are the respondents to the petition and to the petitioners’ application for access to the server used for the election, on Thursday, asked the Justice Mohammed Garba-led panel to dismiss the petitioners’ request.

The three respondents, through their respective counsels, reminded the tribunal that the Court of Appeal had, on May 6, 2019 (before the petition was filed on May 18), dismissed a similar application filed by the petitioners.

Represented at the Thursday’s proceedings by its lead counsel, Mr. Yunus Usman (SAN), INEC said the application by the petitioners amounted to asking the commission to produce what it did not have.

Urging the tribunal to dismiss the application, Usman said, “We attached as Exhibit 1, the enrolled order of this honourable court made on May 6, 2019 refusing all the prayers of the petitioners in this application.

“They said we should bring what we don’t have.”

INEC had declared Buhari and APC the winner of the February 23 election.

It said Buhari polled 15,191,847 votes to defeat his closest rival, Atiku, who polled 11,262,978 votes.

But Atiku and the PDP, in their petition filed on March 18 challenging the outcome of the poll, contended that “from the data” obtained from INEC’s server, “the true, actual and correct results” showed that they polled a total of 18,356,732 votes to defeat Buhari whom they said scored 16,741,430 votes.

By calculation, Atiku and PDP claimed to have defeated Buhari by 1,615,302 votes.

The petitioners, through their lead counsel, Dr. Livy Ozoukwu, subsequently filed an application on May 8, 2019, seeking an order of the tribunal permitting them to access and inspect the INEC’s server into which results and other data were allegedly transmitted during the February 23 poll.

A senior member of the petitioners’ legal team, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), moved the application on Thursday.

Uche urged the tribunal to grant the application in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality, saying it was necessary for his team to be able to maintain the petition.

He said, “The application in summary asks for access to and inspection of the server of the INEC and the smart card readers used in the conduct of the presidential election.

“We have addressed the issues in our counter-affidavit, written address and reply on points of law and we urge your lordships that the application be granted as prayed in the interest of justice, transparency and neutrality.

“The application is necessary for the maintenance of this petition.”

Reacting first, INEC’s lead counsel, Usman, referred the tribunal to his client’s counter-affidavit filed on May 23 in opposition to the application.

He added that the Court of Appeal having earlier refused similar application, same should not be granted again.

The leader of Buhari’s legal team, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), also urged the tribunal to dismiss the application.

Source; https://maniagist.com/2019/06/13/atiku-pdp-asking-us-for-server-that-we-dont-have-inec-tells-tribunal/

krendo:



This is not the time to infer

Let Prof Yakubu come and tell under oat what the laid down process for the election was and what he thinks actually happened

From there we will know next steps

Under normal circumstances INEC should be co-operating with the courts, and not defending the outcomes of the process

The only reason INEC feel a duty to defend the 2019 election result is because they were the actual riggers of the election

Professor Yakubu will go to prison for criminal conspiracy to rig the elections and pervert justice if he does not take time. He has been caught pants down and the earlier he starts Co-operating the better for him!

Bros u go get HBP ooo. The election has been won and lost. Even in your dreams if Atiku had won u will disagree. There was no way Atiku was winning. He's only trying to save face and YOU please get used to the fact that elections has long been concluded

new2012:


Stop embarrassing yourself.. You can't accredit from the thin air.. There's a database some where that stores such data for which accreditation is done.. If they deny having such data on voting, it makes more sense than denying servers and databases exist.

The internet is there man, read, learn before you talk

they are talking server for voting not accreditation.

greggng:
You cannot give what you don't have. Asking Inec to produce a server is an exercise in futility..atiku go and rest ....

ur mumu has been configured to 4g. continue

tunjiajayi:


No because you said you witnessed electronic voting in your polling unit.
It doesn't matter who you support now

e-collation, not electronic voting. They just copied and pasted the result sheet on card reader and sent to "server"

NOC1:

they are talking server for voting not accreditation.

Please stop talking so it will be assumed that you're wise. You keep spilling junks that undermine your intellect.

They have a server for accreditation and another was supposed to be for voting which they don't have right? Come on, listen to yourself, appraise your thoughts before you spill them.

But on the link below Festus Keyamo made mention of an inec server which the current electoral body is denying

http://pointblanknews.com/pbn/news/apc-wants-pdp-probed-over-access-to-inec-server/

adekolaelect:
Hummm the chief justice of Biafra land has spoken but you forget to know our existing electoral law does not recognise electronics voting .sorry frustrated wailers always reason upside down .

can't u make ur point known without insult as a young man?

Even if the results were transmitted to cloud ( inec doesn't own servers in the cloud) they should give PDP access to view the server or whatever storage they used.

PDP should rephrase the request from server to storage. Even if they used tape, let them produce it.

[quote author=NOC1 post=79300746]
if results were transmitted to server, why will the returning officers fly to Abuja to announce and correct the results. [/quote TO MAKE ROOM FOR MANIPULATIONS. I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO RETURNED HOME THAT SAME DAY AFTER THE ELECTION COS THERE WAS NO NETWORK FOR ME AND OTHERS TO TRANSMIT THE RESULT. WE HAD TO WAIT UNTIL THAT WAS DONE BEFORE THEY COULD FREE US.