Bolustical:
Did they get permission first from the INEC Chairman before they got the ones released from the imaginary server?

Is it that hard for Atiku to realise that the PDP excos, his advisers and lawyers are scamming him? Is it?

Jchi9876:
Mynd44 come hear your man with more zobo

Olanipekun na baba for interrogation

cimag:
It then means that there was a server used for the presidential election which INEC and APC have been denying.He's only asking for INEC's chairman's permission to open or encrypt it.Well,it's left for the tribunal to order INEC chairman to open the server and if he refuses,whatever figures supplied by the petition(Atiku)which he allegedly obtained from the contentious server should be used by the tribunal to determine the real winner of the election.If INEC's chairman refuses to grant his permission for the server to be opened,it means he's hiding something.Clear conscience fears no allegation or accusation.

9jatriot:


The quote below seems to have your answer. It may get to a stage where Atiku's boys will be the ones begging that there is no server so no one can accuse them of having hacked a non existent server.

Dreambeat:
Since you referred me to someone else's post.Can you tell me where he got the data from since you are sure it is not from INEC's server.

Deepthoughts:
If your source of praise was the aspect where the ICT admitted that using the method he employed,the server could have been access n possibly tempered with,then be reminded that INEC had at on set denied having any server at all!,so claiming it was possibly tempered with will be shooting themselves in the foot.if it's true INEC had no server then let the INEC chair grants the ICT expert permission as he stated to decrypt the information on the server,if the ICT expert fails then case close,can dare to throw that challenge to INEC chairman?.

Jchi9876:
Atiku's sperm has finished nothing is cumming out

Tuniski Johnnyessence, madridguy
Ngwenekwenu

Jchi9876:


An Information and Communications Technology expert witness, David Njoga, called by the Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, said on Friday, that he needed the permission of the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission to decrypt or read some documents he claimed to have been obtained from the commission’s server.

Njoga, who said he came from Kenya to testify in the case, said without the INEC chairman’s permission, he could not access the said server and decrypt the documents obtained from it.


The petitioners are challenging President Muhammadu Buhari’s victory at the February 23, 2019 poll.

Under cross-examination by respondents’ lawyers, the witness who testified as the petitioners’ 59th witness, had said the results being laid claim to as the authentic results of the last presidential election obtained from INEC server were published on www.factsdontlie.com by an anonymous INEC official.




He said he never knew the said INEC official but was able to use “scientific method” to trace the source of the data on the website to INEC’s server.

Under cross-examination by Buhari’s lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), the witness was confronted with some of the documents he claimed to have been downloaded from INEC’s server.

He was specifically shown his Exhibit A3, which was his acclaimed state-by-state list of voters accredited through the use of card readers during the February 23 poll.
Asked to open to Ekiti State and mention the surname, middle name and the first name of a person on the list, the witness said, “If you give me the INEC server key, I will decrypt it.

“This data is encrypted for security purpose.

“I can decrypt it but I am not authorised to decrypt this data.”

Asked by All Progressives Congress’ lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Njoga said it was only the INEC Chairman that could give the authorisation to access the server.


“It is the data owner, the chairman of INEC, that give an authorisation.

“This implies that, professionally, if the owner of the server provides access, I will be able to decrypt, and to confirm the source of the document.”

Asked how he was able to trace the data he analysed in his report when he had yet to gain access to the server, he said, “I am well trained in data sourcing.”


“I use the scientific method,” he said.

He was asked again if using his “scientific method” to source documents from the server “without authorisation, could also be used to tamper with the content of the said server.

He said “yes”.

Asked he said he was engaged to do the job, but was only paid for the logistics of the job.

https://punchng.com/atikus-witness-says-he-needs-inecs-permission-to-read-server-documents/

9jatriot:


The witness said he got it from anonymous sources, which means, I could have prepared an excel sheet, change some properties and put INEC here and there and then send to this witness since in that case I am anonymous.

Jchi9876:


He did not need INEC chairman when they cooked up results on a non existent server why does he need the chairman's permission now

If u look at the said website they created th3 results showed there was 1million plus votes for other candidates but Atiku's tendered results did not show that

Deepthoughts:
what I know for certain about the INEC server is that,the law does not permit the electronic transfer of elections results,but INEC had n used the server fraudulently in other to monitor n know the elections results upfront n then rejig the results to make sure buhari/Apc emerge victorious before publicly announcing the results, INEC/Apc thought since the law forbids the electronic transfer of elections results no one would care n they could easily get away their criminal collaborations but they have been suprised n now desperately trying to cover their shameful deeds, it's up to the judges in their consciences to decide whether it's right for public institutions to engage in clandestine criminality to serve some parochial interest or to maintain the highest level of integrity n public trust at all times.[/s]

cimag:
It then means that there was a server used for the presidential election which INEC and APC have been denying.He's only asking for INEC's chairman's permission to open or encrypt it.Well,it's left for the tribunal to order INEC chairman to open the server and if he refuses,whatever figures supplied by the petition(Atiku)which he allegedly obtained from the contentious server should be used by the tribunal to determine the real winner of the election.If INEC's chairman refuses to grant his permission for the server to be opened,it means he's hiding something.Clear conscience fears no allegation or accusation.

Jchi9876:
Atiku's sperm has finished nothing is cumming out

Tuniski Johnnyessence, madridguy
Ngwenekwenu

MrMcJay:


Can you authorise opening something that is not your own?

Deepthoughts:
what I know for certain about the INEC server is that,the law does not permit the electronic transfer of elections results,but INEC had n used the server fraudulently in other to monitor n know the elections results upfront n then rejig the results to make sure buhari/Apc emerge victorious before publicly announcing the results, INEC/Apc thought since the law forbids the electronic transfer of elections results no one would care n they could easily get away their criminal collaborations but they have been suprised n now desperately trying to cover their shameful deeds, it's up to the judges in their consciences to decide whether it's right for public institutions to engage in clandestine criminality to serve some parochial interest or to maintain the highest level of integrity n public trust at all times.

Deepthoughts:
Ok,but just to finally nail him,why can't the INEC chair just grant the goddamn permission,I will gladly do that if I'm clean,how about you man?.

driand:


Chai! Chai!! Chai!!!

Atiku has been scammed.... How did he get to work with people of this nature?

Turning against him just when their testimony matters...

Chai!!!


I hate this country...

Dreambeat:
The witness knows where he got it from.He called the person a whistle blower in INEC hence he prefers to keep the identity of the person anonymous.You don't expect him to reveal the person do you? It is the duty of the defendant to prove him wrong not you, except you are part of the defendant

Under cross-examination by Buhari’s lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), the witness was confronted with some of the documents he claimed to have been downloaded from INEC’s server.

He was specifically shown his Exhibit A3, which was his acclaimed state-by-state list of voters accredited through the use of card readers during the February 23 poll.
Asked to open to Ekiti State and mention the surname, middle name and the first name of a person on the list, the witness said, “If you give me the INEC server key, I will decrypt it.

He was asked again if using his “scientific method” to source documents from the server “without authorisation, could also be used to tamper with the content of the said server.

tuniski:

That is the prerogative of the Tribunal. Yes they can order the inspection of INEC server.

Deepthoughts:
If your source of praise was the aspect where the ICT admitted that using the method he employed,the server could have been access n possibly tempered with,then be reminded that INEC had at on set denied having any server at all!,so claiming it was possibly tempered with will be shooting themselves in the foot.if it's true INEC had no server then let the INEC chair grants the ICT expert permission as he stated to decrypt the information on the server,if the ICT expert fails then case close,can dare to throw that challenge to INEC chairman?.

MrMcJay:


The witness requested for permission of the Inec Chairman, not the Tribunal. The Tribunal can't give an order which neither of the parties requested for.

kitaatita:
Please is it possible for a petitioner to tell the Tribunal, 'I don't want to continue with this case. I made a mistake to believe my team when they told me that I won.'

aewhydot:


Bros u r not a learner I hope?
He said the data obtained was not from INEC server

kayzat:





Just read what you wrote again? Tribunal should rule base on data from unverified source.

Welldone