Ola17:


It is quite obvious you are here for attention and not necessarily to learn.

Make we just leave am, dude needs to get elementary science right.
His foundation is really shaky

nwabekeyi:
I just think it’s a stupid question to use the force of magnetism to refute gravitational force.

These are two different forces entirely, basic physics knowledge would have prevented you from asking that question.

two different forces yet gravity is greater because it makes men, cars, ships, buildings and even planets to stick but a small magnet over powers it. And yet you call this science. You know nothing. That is why you can't say shit about it.

Incase you don't know Issac newton the mystic got his idea of gravity from the Jewish kabbalah. It didn't hold much water until Einstein came to his rescue with his theory of relativity but sagnac disgraced him and proved him wrong. Nikola Tesla condemned the theory and called Einstein a fraud.
And you believe this unproven shit with blind faith that is why you can't explain shit about it

EMILO2STAY:
you haven't proved gravity to me with all the science you studied.

On fake gravity!

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/science/13gravity.html

EMILO2STAY:
two different forces yet gravity is greater because it makes men, cars, ships, buildings and even planets to stick but a small magnet over powers it. And yet you call this science. You know nothing. That is why you can't say shit about it.

Incase you don't know Issac newton the mystic got his idea of gravity from the Jewish kabbalah. It didn't hold much water until Einstein came to his rescue with his theory of relativity but sagnac disgraced him and proved him. Nikola Tesla condemned the theory and called Einstein a fraud.
And you believe this unproven shit with blind faith that is why you can't explain shit about it

God abeg help me from this dullard. Good night

nwabekeyi:
God abeg help me from this dullard. Good night

yes God will truelly help you to be reasonable and knowledgeable.

Ola17:


It is quite obvious you are here for attention and not necessarily to learn.

fro your info, I came to teach not to learn because you guys don't know what you believe.

[quote author=EMILO2STAY post=83349280][/quote]Its not easy explaining things to a psycho.

Do you think a mad person will understand gravity?

Abeg leave Albert

EMILO2STAY:


Incase you don't know Issac newton the mystic got his idea of gravity from the Jewish kabbalah.

Not many are aware of this fact! He spent his time studying alchemy and trying to transmute dross to gold and eventual put his learning to good as Master of the Royal Mint.
https://www.royalmint.com/discover/uk-coins/sir-isaac-newton/

Rumour has it he may have been a Freemason.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies?wprov=sfla1

nwabekeyi:
Its not easy explaining things to a psycho.

Do you think a mad person will understand gravity?

Abeg leave Albert

lol two jonkies who came to teach what they don't understand but think of themselves intelligent, what a pity. Your science idols are frauds, atheistic and occultic. Go and do your research and come back to thank me.

EMILO2STAY:
lol two jonkies who came to teach what they don't understand but think of themselves intelligent, what a pity. Your science idols are frauds, atheistic and occultic. Go and do your research and come back to thank me.

teaching a dummy is difficult.

Teaching you is even harder. Lol

nwabekeyi:
teaching a dummy is difficult.

Teaching you is even harder. Lol

oga cover your face in shame and go to sleep. You learned something new from a dummy today what does that make you?

Reasonable

Ola17:
While embarking on interstate travels as a kid, I could swear that tall trees in the distance were following our vehicle as it moved. Not until it was explained to me that the illusion of movement by the trees was because they were usually at a distance and the road a little circular.

Things are not always what they seem to the unaided eyes

EMILO2STAY:

Ok explain this

""The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Despite the high temperature, an observer or object will experience cold temperatures in the thermosphere, because the extremely low density of gas (practically a hard vacuum) is insufficient for the molecules to conduct heat. A normal thermometer will read significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact""
How do we feel the heat of the sun which is 93million miles away in deep vacuum.

Heat is transfered by bodies thru two means

Conduction and convection

2metrelaurie:



Heat is transfered by bodies thru two means

Conduction and convection

I said how do we feel the heat of the sun.? How. If the satellites are not burning up because it is near vacuum in the hot thermosphere were a thermometer would read below zero. Then how come the sun which is 93million miles away in vacuum can be able to heat up the earth.??.

Horlufemi:


Typically question dodging.

You will not get an answer until you answer my question.

Then I ask the questions not you. All you're required to do is just explain.

That's one win for me since you dodged the question.

Me 1 : 0 You

Next question.

A2. Flights over the south pole. Flights travel from South Africa to New Zealand by going over Antarctica. On a flat earth, this is impossible. You would fly off the disc of the earth. Yet these flights happen. Explain.

there are no flight paths straight across antarctica. Most new Zealand flights go straight to Dubai from south africa and then to Australia before touching down in new Zealand now this doesn't make sense on the globe earth map but Look it up in the azimuthal equidistant map aka flat earth map and see the reason why flights pass through dubai. If flight paths exist straight across antarctica at the bottom of the globe earth, then some of the easiest flight routes such as Santiago Chile to Sydney australia will be possible today but no such routes exist. So the saying that flights go straight over antarctica is wrong because there are no flight routes straight across antarctica.
So your claims are not true.

[quote author=Horlufemi post=83290128]

The question is clear as day. If you can't explain without asking that means you don't have enough knowledge on the subject matter. EXPLAIN don't ask me questions. I won't indulge you. I've been that road before, it doesn't work. Just EXPLAIN

2 for me 0 for you.

3rd

A3. Ship Movement. Shipping regularly sails due south, going around the "bottom" of the globe, and comes north again, without making a 180 degree turn. This is impossible on a flat earth, if you look at the map. You can't be pointing due south and then be pointing north again without making a turn, however gradual, of 180 degrees. Explain.[/qu]

first let me say if you can't indulge me then you do not know anything about the questions your asking, your asking blindly.
To give you an answer is not my problem but am also looking forward to see you disprove them. I have seen all your questions from horlufemi.WordPress.net were you get them from.
So don't be too quick to bring them up and count scores its childish. Now to your question.

There is no proof any where in the world that ships can move from the north, set their course due south move in a straight path and turn up north again without making a 180° "u" turn. It is absolutely false.

According to the united states geologic survey(U. S. G. S) the azimuthal equidistant maps (aka flat earth maps) are considered the most accurate in displaying continents and oceans. Because of there accuracy they are used for air and sea navigation.
The discrepancies between the reality of the flat earth and the myth of a globe have found many seafarers out of course as they travelled the south seas.
Samuel Rowbotham explains the dangers of the false charts based upon a globe model. And I quote "" in the southern hemisphere navigators to India have often fancied themselves east of the cape when still west and have been driven ashore on the African coast which according to their reckoning lay behind them. This misfortune happened to a fine frigate the challenger in 1845.
How come her Majesty's ship conqueror to be lost, perfectly navigated, being wrecked in calm weather not in a dark night or in a fog but in broad daylight and sunshine. In the former case upon the coast, in the latter, upon sunken rocks from being out of reckoning under circumstances until now have baffled every satisfactory explanation""

Rowbotham explains how the British ship challenger completed the circuit of the southern region indirectly to be sure, circumnavigated the antarctica. The approximate circumference of antarctica is supposed to be approximately 14,460statute miles on the globular earth model, however the challenger spent 3yrs and traversed nearly 69,000miles. That is a distance that would have her circle around antarctica over 4times if the earth is a globe. The 69,000miles journey around the circumference of the earth that is antarctica however is perfectly explained by a flat earth.
In 1773 captain James cook became the first modern explorer known to have reached the ice barrier, this expedition offered an exciting chance to find proof of the flat and globular earth model, because captain cook intended to sail completely around antarctica looking for an inlet through the ice wall or path. If the earth was a globe 25,000miles in equitorial circumference according to the heliocentrist claim, then a complete circumference of Antarctoca would be approximately 12,000miles, and if the earth is flat with antarctica surrounding the entire circumference a complete circumference would have to take over 50,000miles.
During three voyages lasting three years and 8day, captain cook and his crew sailed a total of 60,000 miles along the antarctic coastline never finding an inlet for path through or beyond the massive glacial walls.

Many antarctic explorers including clark Ross, Charles wilks using the globe earth projection maps wrote in their journals perplexed at how they routinely found themselves out of accordance with their charts stating that they found themselves an average of 12to 16miles out side their reckoning every day, later on further south increased to as much ad 29miles per day .

if this is the case with explorers and sea ferrer's, if it has been shown that the circumference at the southern latitude expands the further travelled. If it has been proven there is no way through or beyond the ice wall in antarctica then your claim of ships going straight forward from the north through the south and appearing back at the north without making a 180° turn is false.

Can someone explain the Bermuda triangle

[quote author=EMILO2STAY post=83359721][/quote]

Since you found my site.

Please explain them here. All I need is your total explanation.

I'll be glad you did

Yes there is proof you just couldn't find them. Your assignment is to find a sailor that deals with shipping (there are plenty everywhere check quora) and ask them directly. Even if I give you proof you still won't believe so do your research and ask people sail. That's the way.

You didn't address why you didn't need to turn 180 to point North again in your epistle of the large barrier. Your explanation was only trying to prove the flat Earth. You claimed it's false but didn't address it.

Example for your clarity. You were going due south of South America along the coast on the Western side

Please explain my other questions here. All I need is your total explanation. Or I can help you.

Please explain this about Polaris. Currently, the earth's axis points more or less directly at Polaris, the pole star in the northern hemisphere. At the north pole, Polaris is directly overhead. When you travel south, Polaris gets lower and lower to the horizon, until finally it disappears. It does not appear at all above the horizon for most southern observers. Kindly Explain.

EMILO2STAY:
I said how do we feel the heat of the sun.? How. If the satellites are not burning up because it is near vacuum in the hot thermosphere were a thermometer would read below zero. Then how come the sun which is 93million miles away in vacuum can be able to heat up the earth.??.

The sun heats the earth through radiation. Since there is no medium (like the gas in our atmosphere) in space, radiation is the primary way that heat travels in space. When the heat reaches the earth it warms the molecules of the atmosphere, and they warm other molecules and so on.

Horlufemi:


Since you found my site.

Please explain them here. All I need is your total explanation.

I'll be glad you did

Yes there is proof you just couldn't find them. Your assignment is to find a sailor that deals with shipping (there are plenty everywhere check quora) and ask them directly. Even if I give you proof you still won't believe so do your research and ask people sail. That's the way.

You didn't address why you didn't need to turn 180 to point North again in your epistle of the large barrier. Your explanation was only trying to prove the flat Earth. You claimed it's false but didn't address it.

Example for your clarity. You were going due south of South America along the coast on the Western side

Please explain my other questions here. All I need is your total explanation. Or I can help you.

Please explain this about Polaris. Currently, the earth's axis points more or less directly at Polaris, the pole star in the northern hemisphere. At the north pole, Polaris is directly overhead. When you travel south, Polaris gets lower and lower to the horizon, until finally it disappears. It does not appear at all above the horizon for most southern observers. Kindly Explain.

see your mouth like explain this explain that. Can you by any way prove me wrong? I have already proved you wrong in the first three questions you posted and your here blabbing I Should answer all your question, why are you no longer counting scores. Now you just want me to explain this and that.

2metrelaurie:


The sun heats the earth through radiation. Since there is no medium (like the gas in our atmosphere) in space, radiation is the primary way that heat travels in space. When the heat reaches the earth it warms the molecules of the atmosphere, and they warm other molecules and so on.

so the sun light in space is just radiation.,.,, so you're saying that the sun is not hot in space. So it is ordinary light that heats up molecules which heats up other molecules and so on. Then if this is the case how come touch lights do not heat up up molecules and heat up the environment like the sun light.
Also how come it is hotter at the equator or do we not have sun light at the northern and southern hemisphere or is that this molecules are present only at the equator.

EMILO2STAY:
so the sun light in space is just radiation.,.,, so you're saying that the sun is not hot in space. So it is ordinary light that heats up molecules which heats up other molecules and so on. Then if this is the case how come touch lights do not heat up up molecules and heat up the environment like the sun light.
Also how come it is hotter at the equator or do we not have sun light at the northern and southern hemisphere or is that this molecules are present only at the equator.

please can you answer my questions?

nwabekeyi:
please can you answer my questions?

oga i will try and do that this evening when I get back.

EMILO2STAY:
so the sun light in space is just radiation.,.,, so you're saying that the sun is not hot in space. So it is ordinary light that heats up molecules which heats up other molecules and so on. Then if this is the case how come touch lights do not heat up up molecules and heat up the environment like the sun light.
Also how come it is hotter at the equator or do we not have sun light at the northern and southern hemisphere or is that this molecules are present only at the equator.

I didnt say sun is radiation alone

The sun is a big ball of glowing gas

Its basically a nuclear reactor

Like every nuclear reactor is gives off Radiation , heat and Light

Light is an electromagnetic wave can travel through a vaccum like gamma ray , alpha and beta rays which reach the earth

2metrelaurie:



I didnt say sun is radiation alone

The sun is a big ball of glowing gas

Its basically a nuclear reactor

Like every nuclear reactor is gives off Radiation , heat and Light

Light is an electromagnetic wave can travel through a vaccum like gamma ray , alpha and beta rays which reach the earth

this is not the answer to the question. You still running around in circles.

If the thermosphere is very hot but a thermometer would read below zero because it is near vacum, then why do we feel the heat of the sun which is 93million miles away in deep vacuum.?

EMILO2STAY:
the answer to the question.

How do flat earthers explain:
1. Changes in the time of the rising and setting of the sun at different times of the year?
2. Differences in seasons between the northern and southern hemisphere?

EMILO2STAY:
this is not the answer to the question. You still running around in circles.

If the thermosphere is very hot but a thermometer would read below zero because it is near vacum, then why do we feel the heat of the sun which is 93million miles away in deep vacuum.?

Because the lower atmosphere isnt a " near vaccum "
Im done here

2metrelaurie:


Because the lower atmosphere isnt a " near vaccum "
Im done here

lol is it not magic? That a cold light will travel 93million miles and suddenly become hot when it gets to the earth.
That means the sun must be cold.

EMILO2STAY:
lol is it not magic? That a cold light will travel 93million miles and suddenly become hot when it gets to the earth.
That means the sun must be cold.

Idea gas equation explains this.
Dude stop embarrassing your generation.

Space is almost a vacuum and the total temperature is dependent on the number of molecule. Why did you fucking skip chemistry classes? Should I take ss1 class here again?

I will do it

Ideal gas equation PV=nRT where p is Pressure, V is volume, n is number of molecule and T is temperature.

From pressure and volume is directly proportional to number of molecule and temperature. The almost vacuum nature of space Means the gas molecules cannot mount enough pressure for temperature to significantly increase in that system.
The atoms of the gases are individually hot but they are not just hot enough to cause or make anything significantly increase in temperature.

Please go back to basic chemistry again. Stop embarrassing yourself. I have tried to save you but you can’t just help yourself. Your children will see this someday ok

You don’t know basic science, that’s why you are all confused about everything

EMILO2STAY:
lol is it not magic? That a cold light will travel 93million miles and suddenly become hot when it gets to the earth.
That means the sun must be cold.

Have you asked yourself why Venus is hotter than Mercury even as mercury is closer to the sun? It’s the same ideal gas equation.

Venus has a dense atmosphere with more number of atoms in it. This will create enough pressure that will allow temperature to also increase. Concentrated atoms of gas will create pressure that permits efficient transfer of heat. That’s why space is cold, it is almost empty, heat cannot be transferred because atoms of gases are too far apart.

This is Basic 1 chemistry, you can even learn this by yourself. It works the same way as boiling water, the atoms of water in the vapor close to the boiling water are concentrated enough to even burn your skin but they can’t do that when they all dispersed into the atmosphere even when each atom still remains that temperature. The will be too far apart, this whole explanation is in this equation PV=nRT

nwabekeyi:
Idea gas equation explains this.
Dude stop embarrassing your generation.

Space is almost a vacuum and the total temperature is dependent on the number of molecule. Why did you fucking skip chemistry classes? Should I take ss1 class here again?

I will do it

Ideal gas equation PV=nRT where p is Pressure, V is volume, n is number of molecule and T is temperature.

From pressure and volume is directly proportional to number of molecule and temperature. The almost vacuum nature of space Means the gas molecules cannot mount enough pressure for temperature to significantly increase in that system.
The atoms of the gases are individually hot but they are not just hot enough to cause or make anything significantly increase in temperature.

Please go back to basic chemistry again. Stop embarrassing yourself. I have tried to save you but you can’t just help yourself. Your children will see this someday ok

You don’t know basic science, that’s why you are all confused about everything

do you have any understanding? So the sun the sin is not hot in space. But they said the earths core is as hot as the surface of the sun. How do they know that when the sun is in a vacuum.

The only thing you guys know how to do is insult, it shows that there is lack of understanding in what you believe

EMILO2STAY:
do you have any understanding? So the sun the sin is not hot in space. But they said the earths core is as hot as the surface of the sun. How do they know that when the sun is in a vacuum.

The only thing you guys know how to do is insult, it shows that there is lack of understanding in what you believe

ignoramus, the sun is not part of space.

The distance between any terrestrial body like planets, stars, black holes and any form of matter defined matter is called “Space”.

The distance between sun to mercury to Venus to earth etc to other matters in other galaxies is called “space”. Sun is not space.

Ignorance is a disease