nwabekeyi:
ignoramus, the sun is not part of space.

The distance between any terrestrial body like planets, stars, black holes and any form of matter defined matter is called “Space”.

The distance between sun to mercury to Venus to earth etc to other matters in other galaxies is called “space”. Sun is not space.

Ignorance is a disease

nwabekeyi:
Have you asked yourself why Venus is hotter than Mercury even as mercury is closer to the sun? It’s the same ideal gas equation.

Venus has a dense atmosphere with more number of atoms in it. This will create enough pressure that will allow temperature to also increase. Concentrated atoms of gas will create pressure that permits efficient transfer of heat. That’s why space is cold, it is almost empty, heat cannot be transferred because atoms of gases are too far apart.

This is Basic 1 chemistry, you can even learn this by yourself. It works the same way as boiling water, the atoms of water in the vapor close to the boiling water are concentrated enough to even burn your skin but they can’t do that when they all dispersed into the atmosphere even when each atom still remains that temperature. The will be too far apart, this whole explanation is in this equation PV=nRT

EMILO2STAY:
stop typing nonsense about venus. Go and take a look at what you call venus with a telescope before you come here to type what you been indoctrinated with

EMILO2STAY:
the insult you guys spew is just a defence mechanism but I will ignore it. I see you have found your voice again but I will silence you this time.

If you read you what you wrote you will see you contradict yourself.

Let me ask you again if space is cold and the thermosphere which is hot but not hot because its in a vacuum why is the sun hot? . Am waiting for your answer.

nwabekeyi:
sorry I have to insult you sometimes, just that your ignorance is mid-blowing.

Like I have answered this question severally but you don’t know how ideal das equation works. You skipped basic chemistry classes in school

nwabekeyi:
Im sure you don’t have a telescope ���

EMILO2STAY:
so you've not seen Venus but you believe venus is hot?? , wow this is american wonder. me the only Venus I know is a pagan goddess. if you say its a planet because NASA said so then good luck.

nwabekeyi:
Have you gotten a telescope and you didn’t see Venus?

EMILO2STAY:
see your mouth like explain this explain that. Can you by any way prove me wrong? I have already proved you wrong in the first three questions you posted and your here blabbing I Should answer all your question, why are you no longer counting scores. Now you just want me to explain this and that.

budaatum:

Not many are aware of this fact! He spent his time studying alchemy and trying to transmute dross to gold and eventual put his learning to good as Master of the Royal Mint.
https://www.royalmint.com/discover/uk-coins/sir-isaac-newton/

Rumour has it he may have been a Freemason.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies?wprov=sfla1

Truthwords:
That's True . Most of what we call science is from alchemy .

It traces back to ancient Egypt and Babylon . Kemet > Alchemy > Chemistry . It will shock you to know that some equipments you see today in a lab such as conical flask, burrete , pipette etc has origin in mystic covens where they were used to mix portions and spells .

budaatum:


Newton's Three Laws of Motion

Newton's three laws of motion may be stated as follows:

Every object in a state of uniform motion will remain in that state of motion unless an external force acts on it.

Force equals mass times acceleration [f(t)=m\,a(t)]

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

The first law, also called the law of inertia, was pioneered by Galileo. This was quite a conceptual leap because it was not possible in Galileo's time to observe a moving object without at least some frictional forces dragging against the motion. In fact, for over a thousand years before Galileo, educated individuals believed Aristotle's formulation that, wherever there is motion, there is an external force producing that motion.

The second law, $ f(t)=m\,a(t)$ , actually implies the first law, since when $ f(t)=0$ (no applied force), the acceleration $ a(t)$ is zero, implying a constant velocity $ v(t)$ . (The velocity is simply the integral with respect to time of $ a(t)={\dot v}(t)$ .)

Newton's third law implies conservation of momentum. It can also be seen as following from the second law: When one object ``pushes'' a second object at some (massless) point of contact using an applied force, there must be an equal and opposite force from the second object that cancels the applied force. Otherwise, there would be a nonzero net force on a massless point which, by the second law, would accelerate the point of contact by an infinite amount.

In summary, Newton's laws boil down to f=ma. An enormous quantity of physical science has been developed by applying this simple mathematical law to different physical situations.

No, it doesn't shock me. Please speak for yourself! "When Israel was a child, I loved him and out of Egypt I called My son", is it written in Hosea 11:1 as those with eyes have read.

Truthwords:
Have you researched the fallen angels connections to science . go and read the book of enoch and wake da hell up . Are you aware that newton was a freemason ? . A lot of Christians have been listening to regular everyday doctrines , that's why you react when you read things like this . Go to play store , download the book of enoch and Jasher, read from beginning to the end and you will see where your science and tech comes from . Also do your research on scientists that talked about how they meet in a place to get inspired by satan who appears to them physically to invent most of the stuff you see . A lot of you are sleeping in watered down churches . Go to youtube search the god of technology by werks of ghettogospel ministries . May Yah open your eyes

budaatum:
I have the feeling Truthwords, that you are meeting buda for the first time. It does amuse me that you presume to know so much about me. I know someone who can show you how to do homework, if you are interested.

EMILO2STAY:
there are no flight paths straight across antarctica. Most new Zealand flights go straight to Dubai from south africa and then to Australia before touching down in new Zealand now this doesn't make sense on the globe earth map but Look it up in the azimuthal equidistant map aka flat earth map and see the reason why flights pass through dubai. If flight paths exist straight across antarctica at the bottom of the globe earth, then some of the easiest flight routes such as Santiago Chile to Sydney australia will be possible today but no such routes exist. So the saying that flights go straight over antarctica is wrong because there are no flight routes straight across antarctica.
So your claims are not true.

Horlufemi:


Here

https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=977781

https://www.prokerala.com/travel/flight-time/from-buenos-aires/to-sydney/

EMILO2STAY:
you should be dead by now instead of making desperate attempt at redeeming your shattered ego. Pride goes before a fall. You have proved nothing. The fact still remains that there are no flight path straight across antarctica. And there are no direct flight from argentina to australia. Even if there are, like I said before it is still possible to make it in 16hrs and above. Not 14hrs.

Horlufemi:


There was, it was cancelled.


According to flat Earth model it's impossible.

Emusan:


Well if I should choose btw a flat earth model and a spherical model, I'll go with flat earth. Though I don't subscribe to any.

wirinet:

Flat earth in the 21st century? After Megallan had circumnavigated the earth more than 500 years ago, satellites are beaming radio signals from the other side of the globe allowing you see pictures in real time, and millions of pictures of earth from probes sent from earth.

I still can't believe any one that has gotten past primary school still believes the earth is flat.

wirinet:
Flat earth in the 21st century? After Megallan had circumnavigated the earth more than 500 years ago,

satellites are beaming radio signals from the other side of the globe allowing you see pictures in real time, and millions of pictures of earth from probes sent from earth.

I still can't believe any one that has gotten past primary school still believes the earth is flat.

EMILO2STAY:
there aren't millions of photos of the earth. All you have is C. G. I. Think with your head in all the space videos you see on YouTube today, have you seen any so called satellite in space? It is claimed that there are thousands.

Thousands of satellites in space yet they give you photoshopped image of the earth.

How can you seriously believe you live on a ball that spins.

Emusan:


Circumnavigation can also be achieved on a flat earth model.

This is a pure lie....

No single ORIGINAL image of earth from space by any satellite....any image you see in this 21st century is still CGI, then ask yourself why?

The reason you still believe in spherical earth is because you refuse to apply common sense.

The greatest support idea for spherical earth is GRAVITY because they know that without GRAVITY the whole idea of spherical earth will shatter.

Now, why do they still talk about NO GRAVITY IN SPACE when the same Earth gravity HOLDS the moon in its orbit and the same sun Gravity passes across earth to hold other planets in their orbits?

Should there have been anything like WEIGHTLESSNESS at all, if gravity cut across the solar system

wirinet:

GGI by who? All the countries of the world? Even Nigeria is supposed to have a satellite in space taking pictures. So you are saying NASA, European space agency, Russian Space agency, Indian, Chinese, all other country's space agencies got together to create a CGI image of the earth to deceive everyone? When did CGI technology even start? We have been seeing pictures of the earth since the early 60s.

If we don't live in a spinning ball, how do you then explain sunrise and sunset? Weather patterns such as hurricanes and ocean current patterns?

Are you saying we should discard latitude and longitude means of location?

So what exactly is the physics of your flat earth? Does it have ends? Do new sun's rise every morning and set every night?

Why is the moon, the sun and all other celestial objects round and only the earth flat.

Are you insinuating that megallan also used CGI when he said he went round the world?

EMILO2STAY:
CGI by NASA. Robert Simmons himself admitted it. You can go to YouTube and verify this. NASA and all other space agencies work together or don't you know that all world leaders are connected by freemasonry? should it surprise you if they all come together to deceive the people, is it not what they have been doing all along?. . The moon landing was faked, That is a fact. It might surprise you if I tell you there are no satellites in a place called space its all a lie. What pictures of the earth have you Bennett seeing since the early 60s?

The earth is flat and stationary, with the sun and moon moving right over the flat earth. Most of your question I have addressed in my threads but let me give a very simple experiment to do to determine which is moving between the earth and the sun.

the shadow of an instrument like the sun dial will not bend if the earth is spinning and the sun is stationary. Now get a model of the globe earth and fix a stick on tip of it, then shine a light unto that globe and spin the globe. You will notice the shadow of the sick will not bend but move the light around that stick and you will notice the shadow moving. This is an undeniable proof the sun moves around over the earth.

Megallan went around the flat world not a globe he even used a flat map and not a globe earth map.

EMILO2STAY:
it will always be canceled. I have a friend who have tried severally to book the same flight but was never successful. You might check online and see one advertising about a nonstop, but try booking it, you will not be able.
Now why is the situation so. Because straight flights like that will expose the large expanse of land travelled and thereby raising eyebrows about the true distance between those places.

I don't want to keep going over this again. Before you debate a flat earther you should do a little research. Because the evidence ratio a flat earther has got compared to a globe earther is likeb 100:20.
All your questions I can answer but I don't have the time. Maybe I will do so little by little in my new thread.

EMILO2STAY:
you should be dead by now instead of making desperate attempt at redeeming your shattered ego. Pride goes before a fall. You have proved nothing. The fact still remains that there are no flight path straight across antarctica. And there are no direct flight from argentina to australia. Even if there are, like I said before it is still possible to make it in 16hrs and above. Not 14hrs.

wickedtuna:
Rather a harsh thing to say EMIL. As one who seeks knowledge,does death not herald the end of such sojourn?

Horlufemi:


That's exactly what someone who can't answer them would say. I'll like to meet you in person. Then place some bets like 500k each for each experiment then perform few experiments. The issue I would only have is that there's no know flat Earth model.

Flat Earth is more religion than actual science.

Then we need to perform the southern cross constellation experiment.

budaatum:
Here's some people who need educating!
https://www.nairaland.com/5534829/some-people-still-believe-planet#84127499

wirinet:

Please explain how one can circumnavigate a flat surface. When you circumnavigate to go in a straight line until you arrive at your point of departure.

Is that so? I asked is this CGI conspiracy being perpetuated by all governments on earth, all universities and all scientists?

Besides, you did not answer the question on how you can watch a live program from 6,000 miles away.

What are you yapping about? What do you mean by without GRAVITY? Are you now saying your flat earth hypothesis operates without gravity?

Who told you no gravity in space? Space itself is the creator of gravity. Gravity permeates space and time.

Please grab an elementary physic or even geography text book, so you can understand some basic terms.

Weightlessness simply means you cannot feel your weight. You become weightless if you fall down from a plane or even a lift. A better term is free fall.