YoungLionken:
The school has no right for such action. It's time,we stepped out of this large circle of hypocrisy.

I just pray the victim gets voluntary help from any of the few human rights activists...

Ogadeeper:

I don't knw whether u are a working class or not, but If you were, just try and film ursef in the act of lov making then leak ursef. Then see if Ur boss or office ll pat u on the shoulder

BlueRayDick:


It's indeed a laughable reason, sincerely. Like I control whatever tag a blogger wants to adopt on a news concerning me?

If a school management thinks this way, how will the students now think?

Dextre:


Doesn't matter if they have right or not...it's what any schl would have done anywhere in the world. It's dem protecting there own name. What would follow in a civilised setting is a sue. The lady can sue the schl.

Dreambeat:
It is wrong and plainly stupid for Babcock university to expel the student.She is a victim here.This was sex between two consenting adults done outside the school premises and not during session so on what basis was she be expelled.

walexbiz:
I am not well acquainted with the law but I think it's absolutely wrong for Babcock university to have rusticated the lady for having sex outside the school campus. Here are my thoughts;

(1) The two actors are above 18 thus they are adults and they enjoyed a certain level of freedom as enshrined in the constitution.

(2) The act committed by the two actors was consensual, nobody was coarse into having sex

(3) The act itself was committed outside the premise of the lending institution, therefore, the school couldn't have been held responsible if anything has happened to the girl in the course of the act.

(4) From the video, it was obvious the lady was not aware the act was been recorded without her knowledge.

(5) Also does the school has the right to determine when their student should date? if no then I guess the school is overreacting to the private life of an adult.

(6) Anyway I would simply advise the lady to seek redress in the court of law. The actions of the management of the school shows they gave credence to the person who leaked the video online.

(7) This is a moral lesson for the girl that private act should be done in private places and not hospital.

omonikiba:
It is clearly stated in the student handbook that as a student of the school, you must not carry out any activity that will tarnish the image of the institution. As a new student, you sign a copy of the student handbook and submit, another copy is also given to you to read.

If you can't abide by the rules it's no point wasting your parent hard earned money. That case, no court can win it, because it is clearly stated in the handbook.

How on earth will you allow a guy video your se.x activities with him? Is that not crazy? I blame the girl, this guy has been expelled, you should have cut all ties with him, you can't run your vision with a visionless individual.

I feel for her, like she did it under duress or she was hypnotized.

Accounting is about 800k, ×3, plus the shame she's brought on her family, friends . I hope she won't kill herself.

Girls, please stop being the victims, the guy stylishly cropped his face off the video. Haaaa, wicked, he must have hynotized her. Or her village people are strong.

Ogadeeper:

If it were possible for her to seek redress up to the highest court in our land. Nothing can be done to upturn her expulsion/rustication.

AfroKnight:


The entity taking the fall is the university. This is a religious institution that has it’s name/reputation smeared in pórnography.

If you cannot understand the need for punitive measures and attendant disclaimers, then that’s alright.

DanXplore:


How is she a victim? Were they coerced into producing their s*x video? Sometimes the way you people reason sickens me. This issue would not have come to limelight if they they were not stvpid enough to record themselves.

pocohantas:
First, I will like to say this is not a judgmental post. That said;




Thank you

walexbiz:
I am not well acquainted with the law but I think it's absolutely wrong for Babcock university to have rusticated the lady for having sex outside the school campus. Here are my thoughts;

(1) The two actors are above 18 thus they are adults and they enjoyed a certain level of freedom as enshrined in the constitution.

(2) The act committed by the two actors was consensual, nobody was coarse into having sex

(3) The act itself was committed outside the premise of the lending institution, therefore, the school couldn't have been held responsible if anything has happened to the girl in the course of the act.

(4) From the video, it was obvious the lady was not aware the act was been recorded without her knowledge.

(5) Also does the school has the right to determine when their student should date? if no then I guess the school is overreacting to the private life of an adult.

(6) Anyway I would simply advise the lady to seek redress in the court of law. The actions of the management of the school shows they gave credence to the person who leaked the video online.

(7) This is a moral lesson for the girl that private act should be done in private places and not hospital.

studentofTruth:
Hypocrisy apart, the girl is a victim here.
She had sex with her boyfriend outside of the school premises during vacation. Granted, the act was recorded with her consent. But it was for private consumption and never meant to be released to the public.
The boyfriend, being stupid enough, leaked the video, which is obviously a crime against the girl. So, the boy victimized the girl.
Now, instead of the public, law enforcement institutions, and the school to seek justice for the victim, they turned against the victim!
This is crazy! The same people who should help the victim get justice for a crime committed against her are now the ones punishing the victim. What a country, what a people; everything is turned upside down!
For those who love hypocritical arguments, my questions are:
Does the school have a rule that says that their students cannot have consexual sex with their partners outside the school premises when they are on break?
Did she commit a crime by allowing her boyfriend record their time together?
Was she the person who released the video?
Did she sanction the public release of the video?
If the answers to these questions are in the negative, a victim is being punished — double victimization, a feature of a failed society!
A good lawyer can make the school vomit all the millions they have collected in tuitions and more, if the judge can't force the school to take her back!

lahizak:
Where you are wrong is that a school first and foremost supposed to protect the student and either you like it or not the girl is a victim. She may be stupid but she is a victim and as far as we are concerned, she did not break the rules of the school. Sex between adult outside a school is not a crime, is not like she steal or kill someone. A video meant for there eyes that got leaked is a violation of her privacy. And either you like it or not her action have no effect whatsoever on the school.
And how will you compare school institution, a place for teaching and learning to work place that pays you salary.



So u saying if you and your guy have sex and stupidly make a video and it got leaked, ur office and any other association you know should disown u. Just 4 making a stupid mistake. Na wa oo

armadeo:
Some of you will never have sense.

Just reading some comments here explains alot about my country.

Lawless people.

The school has rules and regulations and the rules were broken and punishment meted out.

Till now I am sure many dont know the names of the expelled students all they know is Babcock students and you expect the school not to respond harshly.

Continue rule breakers.

Badgers14:


The entity taking the fall is the student not the university.

These are grown adults that there lives is being shattered... the university cannot control the actions of their adults student.. it is impossible..

Recall, neither the adults in the video released the video..
So you are telling me universities should expel any of their adult students having consensual sex??

AfroKnight:


The entity taking the fall is the university. This is a religious institution that has it’s name/reputation smeared in pórnography.

If you cannot understand the need for punitive measures and attendant disclaimers, then that’s alright.

BlueRayDick:
Davido as a student of the so-called morally upright school was always seen smoking, dancing in sexually suggestive manner in music videos and at a time his pictures with a particular lady on bed was leaked.

Why didn't the school claim reputational damage then?

Abi smoking, drinking carrying olosho blosters their image while only making a sex tape damages their reputation?

Shey we get sense for dis country laidis?

unearthed:


Let me try to give answers to points you raised.

(1) It is not about the age of the actors in this play sir. It never was. Issue is the name if the institution has been tarnished by this singular act.

(2) Of course it eas consensual as they obviously both enjoyed it. But we do you know the girl or guys name? I believe we all know the name of the school abi

(3) Doesn't matter where the act was committed. If you work at a cooperate organization, try doing this and having your company name on regular porn sites with your face branded on it and see what happens.

(4) The lady obviously had full knowledge of the recording na bros. Why we dey wan defend her sef?

(5) Obviously no one has a right to determine whether they datw or not. But coincidentally, they have dragged the school into their messy affair.

(6) I bet you she won't win the case. Remember the school has rules which she is well aware of.

(7) I like you conclusion bro

KingAzubuike:
Someone breached their privacy and leaked their sextape in an ugly attempt to blackmail them and you say they deserved to be expelled? An incident that even occured outside the God forsaken school premises? So it's a crime for couples to have a sextape for their own viewing pleasure right? Sometimes I just wish a Tsar bomb could be dropped on this goddam country make everybody just die at once.

BlueRayDick:
Davido as a student of the so-called morally upright school was always seen smoking, dancing in sexually suggestive manner in music videos and at a time his pictures with a particular lady on bed was leaked.

Why didn't the school claim reputational damage then?

Abi smoking, drinking carrying olosho blosters their image while only making a sex tape damages their reputation?

Shey we get sense for dis country laidis?

Olabestonic001:
I think there are many 'teenage' mindsets here. It's obvious many of them don't understand what Reputational damage is. Do you guys all know that due to the activities of some Nigerians, we are all perceived in the wrong light outside our shores?

I tell you, if anyone of you is a 'bit' more matured, you'll understand brand management and will not support this stupidity! That girl was way too stupid. She wanted to be 'woke' and she has been awoken to reality. To her I say; "welcome to adulthood 101". The fact that you know how to have sex does not mean you are in any way matured; in fact, if you engage in it at the wrong time and wrong method, you'll be playing with a fire that can consume you.

As for those shouting, what 'will Jesus Christ have done', I tell you, He sure would have expelled her from the University and go and preach to her in her house later. He would have said; " neither do I condemn you, but, 'GO' (being expelled from the community that can bring her shame) and sin no more". Guys, JESUS isn't really that a morally loose LORD. No, HE can be firm (like using the whip on 'stupid' people in the Temple) or 'condemn children of pardition ' (Judas Iscariot?).

pocohantas:
First, I will like to say this is not a judgmental post. That said;




Thank you

studentofTruth:


Was the one who released the video?

Did she sanction the release of the video?

She's a victim and the right thing to do is to help the victim get justice, not punish her again!

pocohantas:


You don't teach me what REPUTATIONAL RISK is. I work in a Compliance Unit and I am tasked with ensuring conducts of staff meets the set standard. I would be the last person to look at things from religious lenses. I haven't been to a church since I was 19.

I stand by the post. Decisions like this are not taken with emotions, but what is best for the BRAND.