baby124:

Well, I will never pay such an amount for my kids future to be destroyed because they act so sanctimonious. Why didn’t they expel Davido? Hypocritical institution.

show me David sex video

Hahaha don't be mad at them, educate them. Although I think expulsion was a tad too severe, they should have simply advised the girl to withdraw for the mere fact hat she did not leak the videos herself . Something similar happened in my university a few yers ago that was even much more viral than this case, I don't know if you can recall the 100 level Bisi girl that was videoed dancing naked. When her videos went viral, school management simply advised her to withdraw.

CsRockefeller:


Today, o found out two things;

1. There are lots of kids here
2. Lots of the older ones haven't worked in a corporate environment, they are not knowledgeable and stupid.

Like, is this even a debate? Ludicrous!!

unearthed:


Sue the school na.

In a few years time, you'll read this post again and see where you got it wrong.

You've not said anything

Badgers14:


Ok.. let's discuss religion for a bit here...

Just like Jesus said in the book of Mark...

He without sin should cast the first stone.

To all ye throwing stones at this students, their action perhaps immoral but not illegal.

Remember Jesus said do not judge!!! Who are we to put on a moral compass when we are sinners.

Again, recall the students are adults, the video was leaked by someone else. The university cannot control the actions of their students.

Jesus flogged people out of the temple!
Your reputation matters a lot! School chosed its reputation

BECOS THE WHITE MAN INVENTED CAMERA DOES NOT MEAN U RECORD EVERYTHING.

SEX IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT DONT NEED RECORDING, UNLESS U WANT TO TURN PORNSTARRR.

WEN U DO, DONT BLAME UR CO-ACTOR.

CsRockefeller:


The thing with ignorance is, it doesn't know how to keep quiet or avoid the spot light, it's always in a rush to live up to its name.

You may need to change your moniker because it shows in your comments.

The problem with stupidity is that you will not hesitate to display your nature and even disgrace yourself! It shows in all you do that you are who you are! Did you read the post I was responding to or you just jumped on my post to show just how you really are?

I suppported Babcock's decision at first. But with the new info that the activity took place outside the school, they were wrong to expel her.

DarkJeddi:
In other words,Babcock has a business to run and THIS is not good for business..

Exactly!
You have a problem with that?
Mind you, Babcock didn't stop her from going to other institutions... Just theirs

studentofTruth:


Was she the person who released the video? Was she the person who tagged Babcock to the video?
Did she sanction the release of the video?

Her crime was having sex when the school was on break

Do you know the person who released the video?

Do you know who tagged the school?

If yes, bring am come out!

Na her face dey there bros. Na she the school know. It's like you are not getting the point!

kelvindj98:
I suppported Babcock's decision at first. But with the new info that the activity took place outside the school, they were wrong to expel her.

I support Babcock sorely on moral grounds.

"OMO ta bi re oun ririn oru"

baby124:

She did not have sex in public. You are confusing the Unilag video with Babcock video. She had sex in her boyfriends private hospital room! Tell me again, why she’s being expelled? Don’t you have sex? Huh?

the bowl of contention her should not be d girl sueing d sch its d girl sueing d boy for good compensation even if this happened In America she has no case with d school rather d boy,so leave the sch out of it.in thier conduct and rules booklet u must be of good cert irrespective of ur location, the sch has d right to revoke ur contract if u are found wanting in character that will destroy d image of d sch,if the guy had won a Nobel prize in secret she would have been rewarded openly,but thus act is shameful and may kill d Schs reputation

LadyGCrueDKilaB:
Hahaha don't be mad at them, educate them. Although I think expulsion was a tad too severe, they should have simply advised the girl to withdraw for the mere fact hat she did not leak the videos herself . Something similar happened in my university a few yers ago that was even much more viral than this case, I don't know if you can recall the 100 level Bisi girl that was videoed dancing naked. When her videos went viral, school management simply advised her to withdraw.

I recall vividly.

Minjim:


I support Babcock sorely on moral grounds.

"OMO ta bi re oun ririn oru"

STOP CONDEMNING PEOPLE.

IF SHE DID NOT MAKE VIDEO NOW, U WIL SAY SHE IS CHURCH GIRL AND VERY GOOD.

PEOPLE HAVE SEX, SHE VIDEO HER ONE AND EVERYBODY KNOW, DOES NOT MAKE HER WORST OF THEM ALL.

baby124:

The problem with stupidity is that you will not hesitate to display your nature and even disgrace yourself! It shows in all you do that you are who you are! Did you read the post I was responding to or you just jumped on my post to show just how you really are?

Okay

Whether they expel them or not d kool is more popular now n those kids are celebrity now....no thanks to blogger bloggers

osazsky:
the bowl of contention her should not be d girl sueing d sch its d girl sueing d boy for good compensation even if this happened In America she has no case with d school rather d boy,so leave the sch out of it.in thier conduct and rules booklet u must be of good character irrespective of ur location, the sch has d right to revoke ur contract if u are found wanting in character that will destroy d image of d sch,if the guy had won a Nobel prize in secret she would have been rewarded openly,but thus act is shameful and may kill d Schs reputation

Does the school booklet say she should not have sex or make a personal video in her private time and in the privacy of her own space? What nonsense! The video was obviously leaked against her consent so she’s the victim here and should not be further victimized by the institution.

Instead, all those involved in leaking the video and tagging it “Babcock” students should be expelled! She needs all the necessary emotional and psychological support right now! Not expulsion! That’s so wrong. I wish I was a lawyer, I would take this case up free of charge! Women need to stand up against the act of individuals and institutions victimizing victims. It needs to stop!

unearthed:


Oya find the person for Babcock na

That's Babcock's problem, not the girl.

If it goes To court, that's exactly what the judge will say to Babcock

hammerVJ:


STOP CONDEMNING PEOPLE.

IF SHE DID NOT MAKE VIDEO NOW, U WIL SAY SHE IS CHURCH GIRL AND VERY GOOD.

PEOPLE HAVE SEX, SHE VIDEO HER ONE AND EVERYBODY KNOW, DOES NOT MAKE HER WORST OF THEM ALL.

You want me to encourage her to do more?
So, to you, having a sex tape is not a condemnable act?
Would you advise or encourage ur sister to do same?
People just have to learn to deal with the consequences of their actions or inactions especially when they've been forewarned

lahizak:
Where you are wrong is that a school first and foremost supposed to protect the student and either you like it or not the girl is a victim. She may be stupid but she is a victim and as far as we are concerned, she did not break the rules of the school. Sex between adult outside a school is not a crime, is not like she steal or kill someone. A video meant for there eyes that got leaked is a violation of her privacy. And either you like it or not her action have no effect whatsoever on the school.
And how will you compare school institution, a place for teaching and learning to work place that pays you salary. So u saying if you and your guy have sex and stupidly make a video and it got leaked, ur office and any other association you know should disown u. Just 4 making a stupid mistake. Na wa oo

Support what?

LadyGCrueDKilaB:
The CEO of McDonald's recently got fired for having a (consensual) affair with an employee... Poco is total right. An organization reserves the right to terminate anyone that brings them to any form of disrepute in any way.

This is a different case altogether. It's against the company's rules — having an affair with a subordinate in the office.

I n this girl's case, she's being punished for having sex with her boyfriend outside when the school is on break.

hammerVJ:


STOP CONDEMNING PEOPLE.

IF SHE DID NOT MAKE VIDEO NOW, U WIL SAY SHE IS CHURCH GIRL AND VERY GOOD.

PEOPLE HAVE SEX, SHE VIDEO HER ONE AND EVERYBODY KNOW, DOES NOT MAKE HER WORST OF THEM ALL.

do u know if she agreed to make d video just to trend and make money on Twitter,the girl has been trending for over 24hrs do u know how much she has made at d detriment of backcork uni,backork should sue d girl,her parents,d boy and her pastor ASAP

studentofTruth:


This is a different case altogether. It's against the company's rules — having an affair with a subordinate in the office.

I n this girl's case, she's being punished for having sex with her boyfriend outside when the school is on break.

Did you bother to check the school rules?

baby124:

Well, I will never pay such an amount for my kids future to be destroyed because they act so sanctimonious. Why didn’t they expel Davido? Hypocritical institution.

she's not the first to do something stupid neither was Davido. the main problem for Babcock here is the huge audience her action is generating which to them is a negative publicity and the first thing corporate institution do with negative publicity is to protect the brand at all cost.

Minjim:


Did you bother to check the school rules?

The school rules ban consensual sex off-premise?

Badgers14:


Ok.. let's discuss religion for a bit here...

Just like Jesus said in the book of Mark...

He without sin should cast the first stone.

To all ye throwing stones at this students, their action perhaps immoral but not illegal.

Remember Jesus said do not judge!!! Who are we to put on a moral compass when we are sinners.

Again, recall the students are adults, the video was leaked by someone else. The university cannot control the actions of their students.

I knew you’d come with the “do not judge” angle. It is one of the most misused lines from the gospel. “Do not judge“ is not a nullification of the role of Christians in correcting one another. It doesn’t say turn a blind eye to actions that negate the teachings of the Bible.

This short article best outlines my position on this topic of judgment:

https://www.compellingtruth.org/amp/do-not-judge.html

nihilistjnr:


That's Babcock's problem, not the girl.

If it goes To court, that's exactly what the judge will say to Babcock

I shudder to think you wrote that!

Babcock problem ke'?

Shebi na Babcock record them?

Bros mk she carry her cross biko

emae009:


she's not the first to do something stupid neither was Davido. the main problem for Babcock here is the huge audience her action is generating which to them is a negative publicity and the first thing corporate institution do with negative publicity is to protect the brand at all cost.

I REMEMBER A VIDOE OF DAVIDO BANGING SOME GIRL IN SOUTH AFRICA.

SOME AFTER SEX PICTURES OF HIM TOO.

Y BABCOCK NO WITHDRAW IS CERTIFICATE.

I AM DONE ON THIS ISSUE NOW, ONLY JOINED THIS EVENING AND ALREADY TIRED.

unearthed:


I shudder to think you wrote that!

Babcock problem ke'?

Shebi na Babcock record them?

Bros mk she carry her cross biko

I don't think you understand how litigation works.

emae009:


she's not the first to do something stupid neither was Davido. the main problem for Babcock here is the huge audience her action is generating which to them is a negative publicity and the first thing corporate institution do with negative publicity is to protect the brand at all cost.

U get sense walahi....

Na wetin dem dey fail to understand

NoSidonLook:
Well written

It's not even as if she wasn't aware that she was being recorded the whole time. The babe even adjusted her face so the camera can fully capture the act

the sex to me is not the stupid thing. It's the recording it in this era of sextape scandals flying up and down the internet

I've seen companies revoke their ambassadorial deals against celebrities that didn't even do as much as these

It's all about maintaining their brand.
They were within their rights
Sorry to the girl...But next time she'll think it through before going to a rehab centre to swallow the cum of a psycho

U watch the video, chai!

baby124:

Does the school booklet say she should not have sex or make a personal video in her private time and in the privacy of her own space? What nonsense! The video was obviously leaked against her consent so she’s the victim here and should not be further victimized by the institution.

Instead, all those involved in leaking the video and tagging it “Babcock” students should be expelled! She needs all the necessary emotional and psychological support right now! Not expulsion! That’s so wrong. I wish I was a lawyer, I would take this case up free of charge! Women need to stand up against the act of individuals and institutions victimizing victims. It needs to stop!

you know you don't need to be a lawyer to take up the case right... you can always pay one to do it

emae009:


she's not the first to do something stupid neither was Davido. the main problem for Babcock here is the huge audience her action is generating which to them is a negative publicity and the first thing corporate institution do with negative publicity is to protect the brand at all cost.

Indeed! They could have protected their brand by acting mature about it. Instead of a trigger happy response. They should have gone after those who leaked the video, all involved. Provide emotional support for the victim and at the worst, distance themselves from the video by making bloggers act responsibly when posting their content. What adults do in their free time and away from school should not be attributed to the school in any way.