Marry your cousins if you want to have deformed children


Ever heard of the phrase, “marry your cousin and have deformed children?” Oh well, do not take that as literally as it sounds. However, this piece is an effort to expose the cons of inbreeding with our close kins.

To some people, inbreeding is out rightly abnormal. To some others, it is abolished by religion. But who states what is normal and abnormal? If it is done by people of no religion, is there still a place of it being proscribed as they do not believe in the manual? Well well well, these are questions for the later. For now, let me tell you what might happen when you have children with your close kins, relatives or even cousins.

According to a research piece on www.jrank.org, a lot of genetic diseases are recessive. This means that only people who inherit two disease alleles develop the disease. An allele is a variant form of a gene. Some genes have a variety of different forms, which are located at the same position, or genetic locus, on a chromosome. Humans are called diploid organisms because they have two alleles at each genetic locus, with one allele inherited from each parent.

Continue reading Here https://everyevery.ng/marry-your-cousins-and-have-deformed-children/

Informative

Misskocsy:
Marry your cousins if you want to have deformed children


Ever heard of the phrase, “marry your cousin and have deformed children?” Oh well, do not take that as literally as it sounds. However, this piece is an effort to expose the cons of inbreeding with our close kins.

To some people, inbreeding is out rightly abnormal. To some others, it is abolished by religion. But who states what is normal and abnormal? If it is done by people of no religion, is there still a place of it being proscribed as they do not believe in the manual? Well well well, these are questions for the later. For now, let me tell you what might happen when you have children with your close kins, relatives or even cousins.

According to a research piece on www.jrank.org, a lot of genetic diseases are recessive. This means that only people who inherit two disease alleles develop the disease. An allele is a variant form of a gene. Some genes have a variety of different forms, which are located at the same position, or genetic locus, on a chromosome. Humans are called diploid organisms because they have two alleles at each genetic locus, with one allele inherited from each parent.

Continue reading Here https://everyevery.ng/marry-your-cousins-and-have-deformed-children/

I don't see deformity amongs the Jews and Arabs who marry their cousins neither have I seen among Fulanis who do too. Can you explain the reasons why? Fact being that this practice is very traditional with the examples I have made. Practiced since time immemorial, such practice should have come up with very evident proofs of this claim of yours among Arabs, Jews, Fulanis....examples am very sure of.

Well, marriage to cousins where never prohibited under the law of Moses. It's not just psychological OK for most culture.

In very simple terms:

Our genes are damaged from generation to generation.

And when we marry strangers the damage in our genes is covered/corrected by their genes because their own genes are damaged in places different from ours since we don't share the same gene pool.

Eg. My genes may contain an eye defect, meaning my child will be blind. But if I marry a stranger chances are her own genes have different defects (maybe she carries heart problems in her genes), so when we make a baby, her genes correct my genes' eye defect and our baby will be born with good eyes. While my genes will correct her own heart defects in her genes so our baby will be born with a good heart.

That's why we must marry strangers not our siblings or close relatives because when we marry our siblings or close relatives that correcting of flaws in genes doesn't happen since our genes are all related and damaged in the same exact places hence babies born to incest will be deformed usually.

When humanity began in Eden our genes were perfect hence the origins of the human race are incestuous. (Brother slept with sister).
But as the generations have progressed wear and tear have damaged our genes and incest will lead to crazy deformities.

The rich always marry their cousins.

Click here to see list of great people who married their cousins including royalties.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coupled_cousins

And their children weren't deformed.


Forbes even published a topic on why you should marry your cousin so that you can keep your wealth

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nealegodfrey/2016/07/17/for-love-and-money-keep-it-in-your-family-marry-your-cousin/

ubunja:
In very simple terms:

Our genes are damaged from generation to generation.

And when we marry strangers the damage in our genes is covered/corrected by their genes because their own genes are damaged in places different from ours since we don't share the same gene pool.

Eg. My genes may contain an eye defect, meaning my child will be blind. But if I marry a stranger chances are her own genes have different defects (maybe she carries heart problems in her genes), so when we make a baby, her genes correct my genes' eye defect and our baby will be born with good eyes. While my genes will correct her own heart defects in hew genes so our baby will be born with a good heart.

[b]That's why we must marry strangers not our siblings or close relatives ][/b]because when we marry our siblings or close relatives that correcting of flaws in genes doesn't happen since our genes are all related and damaged in the same exact places hence babies born to incest will be deformed usually.

When humanity began in Eden our genes were perfect hence the origins of the human race are incestuous. (Brother slept with sister).
But as the generations have progressed wear and tear have damaged our genes and incest will lead to crazy deformities.

YOU ARE NOT MAKING ANY SENSE WITH YOUR EXAMPLE, NO SENSE AT ALL,
BECAUSE OF THE SUBJECTIVITY IN THE SCIENCE OF GENETICS. YOU HAVE EMPHASIZED TO MARRYING A STRANGER AS A MUST, UNDERLINE MUST IN PREFERENCE TO CLOSE RELATIVES OF WHICH THE SUBJECT MATTER HERE IS COUSINS AND NOT SIBLINGS.

THROUGH OUT HUMAN HISTORY IN ITS PRACTICALITY, THE RESULTS OF CULTURES THAT HAVE BEEN MARRYING THEIR COUSINS HAS NEVER GIVEN ANY RISE IN DEFORMITIES FOUND ALARMING AMONG THE JEWS, ARABS AND EVEN THE FULANI TRIBES THAT HAVE BEEN MARRYING THEIR COUSINS, AS MY EVIDENT EXAMPLE.

FACT IS THAT, IT HAS PLAYED VERY WELL AMONG RACES, FAMILY TREES, IN MAINTAINING THEIR TRAITS WITHOUT CONTAMINATION FROM THE OUTSIDE. THE JEWS ARE MOST KNOWN FOR THIS. AND SECONDARILY IT IS ALSO, SO WITH MAINTAINING ROYALTY, INTELLECTUAL PROWESS, WEALTH E.T.C WITHIN A FAMILY TREE. I AM BEING OBJECTIVE AND NOT SENTIMENTAL, PLACING MY JUDGEMENT ON CULTURAL DIFFERENCES OF ONE MAN'S FOOD BEING ANOTHER MAN'S POISON.

Charleys:
The rich always marry their cousins.

Click here to see list of great people who married their cousins including royalties.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_coupled_cousins

And their children weren't deformed.


Forbes even published a topic on why you should marry your cousin so that you can keep your wealth

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nealegodfrey/2016/07/17/for-love-and-money-keep-it-in-your-family-marry-your-cousin/

Iloveu2:


YOU ARE NOT MAKING ANY SENSE WITH YOUR EXAMPLE, NO SENSE AT ALL,
BECAUSE OF THE SUBJECTIVITY IN THE SCIENCE OF GENETICS. YOU HAVE EMPHASIZED TO MARRYING A STRANGER AS A MUST, UNDERLINE MUST IN PREFERENCE TO CLOSE RELATIVES OF WHICH THE SUBJECT MATTER HERE IS COUSINS AND NOT SIBLINGS.

THROUGH OUT HUMAN HISTORY IN ITS PRACTICALITY, THE RESULTS OF CULTURES THAT HAVE BEEN MARRYING THEIR CULTURES HAS NEVER GIVEN ANY RISE IN DEFORMITIES FOUND ALARMING AMONG THE JEWS, ARABS AND EVEN THE FULANI TRIBES THAT HAVE BEEN MARRYING THEIR COUSINS, AS MY EVIDENT EXAMPLE.

FACT IS THAT, IT HAS PLAYED VERY WELL AMONG RACES, FAMILY TREES, IN MAINTAINING THEIR TRAITS WITHOUT CONTAMINATION FROM THE OUTSIDE. THE JEWS ARE MOST KNOWN FOR THIS. AND SECONDARILY IT IS ALSO, SO WITH MAINTAINING ROYALTY, INTELLECTUAL PROWESS, WEALTH E.T.C WITHIN A FAMILY TREE. I AM BEING OBJECTIVE AND NOT SENTIMENTAL, PLACING MY JUDGEMENT ON CULTURAL DIFFERENCES OF ONE MAN'S FOOD BEING ANOTHER MAN'S POISON.

if I'm not making any sense to you it's okay. Leave it.

ubunja:
if I'm not making any sense to you it's okay. Leave it.

Ok

I must confess that I read something useful from this moniker for the first time.

ubunja:
In very simple terms:

Our genes are damaged from generation to generation.

And when we marry strangers the damage in our genes is covered/corrected by their genes because their own genes are damaged in places different from ours since we don't share the same gene pool.

Eg. My genes may contain an eye defect, meaning my child will be blind. But if I marry a stranger chances are her own genes have different defects (maybe she carries heart problems in her genes), so when we make a baby, her genes correct my genes' eye defect and our baby will be born with good eyes. While my genes will correct her own heart defects in hew genes so our baby will be born with a good heart.

That's why we must marry strangers not our siblings or close relatives because when we marry our siblings or close relatives that correcting of flaws in genes doesn't happen since our genes are all related and damaged in the same exact places hence babies born to incest will be deformed usually.

When humanity began in Eden our genes were perfect hence the origins of the human race are incestuous. (Brother slept with sister).
But as the generations have progressed wear and tear have damaged our genes and incest will lead to crazy deformities.

Grayjoy:
I must confess that I read something useful from this moniker for the first time.

You should read my writeups more. I wrote about this January last year:

 UBUNJA's MISEDUCATION: Why Sex With Your Sister Makes Disabled Babies 

Here:
https://www.nairaland.com/4284944/ubunjas-miseducation-why-sex-sister

ubunja:


You should read my writeups more. I wrote about this January last year:

 UBUNJA's MISEDUCATION: Why Sex With Your Sister Makes Disabled Babies 

Here:
https://www.nairaland.com/4284944/ubunjas-miseducation-why-sex-sister 

Homie we ain't talking about sisters, we're talking about cousins here.

I rarely read posts made by this moniker, I just scroll down without reading whenever a comment is made by the moniker and if it's a post, I simply ignore the post, although I may have made one or two comments on your posts before but I can't really remember. I read this one cause I was a bit preoccupied so I overscrolled and the moniker went up, after reading then I scrolled down only to behold this moniker, and that post made me understood what OP was trying to say.

ubunja:


You should read my writeups more. I wrote about this January last year:

 UBUNJA's MISEDUCATION: Why Sex With Your Sister Makes Disabled Babies 

Here:
https://www.nairaland.com/4284944/ubunjas-miseducation-why-sex-sister 

Charleys:


Homie we ain't talking about sisters, we're talking about cousins here.

I know. The basic science of the dangers of incest remains the same for immediate family as it is for relatives. The risks just get less and less. But they remain.

Iloveu2:


I don't see deformity amongs the Jews and Arabs who marry their cousins neither have I seen among Fulanis who do too. Can you explain the reasons why? Fact being that this practice is very traditional with the examples I have made. Practiced since time immemorial, such practice should have come up with very evident proofs of this claim of yours among Arabs, Jews, Fulanis....examples am very sure of.

The Rothschild family is a good example of what you just said, even the British royal family also.

Iloveu2:


I don't see deformity amongs the Jews and Arabs who marry their cousins neither have I seen among Fulanis who do too. Can you explain the reasons why? Fact being that this practice is very traditional with the examples I have made. Practiced since time immemorial, such practice should have come up with very evident proofs of this claim of yours among Arabs, Jews, Fulanis....examples am very sure of.

if these cultures did get deformed offspring I doubt they would allow them to live or they would show it to the world. In any case take this phrase to google: "Inbreeding Deformities". Then scroll the images