₦airaland Forum

achorladey:
Hahahahaha you will exhaust all your ADJECTIVES tonight ooooo. Don't go anywhere just yet.

Titus 1:2 is readily available. How many hope do CHRISTIANS have. Oga CAPTIVATOR. I didn't cite Paul Grundy when you joined the discussion. Jumping from John to revelation now to Apostle Paul Grundy. Hahahahaha. TWO HOPES must reach its DESTINATION. Hahahahaha.

U didn't cite Paulgrundy but Borrow the idea from Paulgrundy , Silly human .

What I needed to know is if Paulgrundy version is correct or not .


This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Is he correct or wrong ?

CAPTIVATOR:
Nobody teach two hope, if you misinterpret references to destination as Same thing as one hope of everlasting life, thats your problem .

==
This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.
==

Do you agree with Paulgrundy ?

CAPTIVATOR: Nobody teach two hope, if you misinterpret references to destination as Same thing as one hope of everlasting life, thats your problem.

Achorladey: Hahahahaha. I can only LAUGH. You want to BACKTRACK on YOUR BELIEFS or WHAT? Go back to the SPIRITUAL FOOD you are GIVEN by the GB and stop looking at PAUL GRUNDY. Na start you still dey oooo and you don dey backtrack.

achorladey:
CAPTIVATOR: Nobody teach two hope, if you misinterpret references to destination as Same thing as one hope of everlasting life, thats your problem.

Achorladey: Hahahahaha. I can only LAUGH. You want to BACKTRACK on YOUR BELIEFS or WHAT? Go back to the SPIRITUAL FOOD you are GIVEN by the GB and stop looking at PAUL GRUNDY. Na start you still dey oooo and you don dey backtrack.

This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Do you agree with the above ?

CAPTIVATOR:
U didn't cite Paulgrundy but Borrow the idea from Paulgrundy , Silly human .

What I needed to know is if Paulgrundy version is correct or not .


This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Is he correct or wrong ?

That's the problem with those WHO loves ASSUMING and SPECULATIONS.

according to you I DIDN'T CITE PAUL GRUNDY. So you know and all of a SUDDEN the IDEA is from PAUL GRUNDY. Hahahahaha. How do YOU KNOW my IDEA is FROM PAUL GRUNDY? Hahahahahahah.

CAPTIVATOR:
This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Do you agree with the above ?

this must be Titus 1:2 becoming or evolving into Paul Grundy chapter 1:2

achorladey:
That's the problem with those WHO loves ASSUMING and SPECULATIONS.

according to you I DIDN'T CITE PAUL GRUNDY. So you know and all of a SUDDEN the IDEA is from PAUL GRUNDY. Hahahahaha. How do YOU KNOW my IDEA is FROM PAUL GRUNDY? Hahahahahahah.

Do u disagree with Paulgrundy ? Shame won't allow you talk


This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Correct or wrong ?

Jozzy4:
One Hope of Everlasting life for all .

Where will it be spent ? Will u risk that area ? . No! . Beautiful

Since you know the ONE HOPE is for all why bother me about DESTINATION?

Is there a way will I repeat this is TITUS 1:2 about DESTINATION or the ONE HOPE? I want to believe you are not comfortable just stating clearly that yes it's ONE HOPE and leaving it at that. But in hindsight you know the ORGANIZATION you are a MEMBER of teach OTHERWISE. Hahahahaha.

achorladey:
this must be Titus 1:2 becoming or evolving into Paul Grundy chapter 1:2

What's so hard in saying if it's correct or wrong . At least if it's wrong ,Just tell . If you feel it contradict Titus 1:2 say it!!!



This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Is he wrong or right ?

CAPTIVATOR:
Do u disagree with Paulgrundy ? Shame won't allow you talk


This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Correct or wrong ?

You will soon leave paul Grundy too and jump to something else. Just watch and see.


CAPTIVATOR: This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Achorladey: Is this the new Titus 1:2? Hahahahaha.

achorladey:
Since you know the ONE HOPE is for all why bother me about DESTINATION?

Is there a way will I repeat this is TITUS 1:2 about DESTINATION or the ONE HOPE? I want to believe you are not comfortable just stating clearly that yes it's ONE HOPE and leaving it at that. But in hindsight you know the ORGANIZATION you are a MEMBER of teach OTHERWISE. Hahahahaha.

Every Christian know their destination , when they state their hope they include their destination .

Okay let me ask you : Where will you spend your everlasting life ?

Do you agree with Paulgrundy submission ?

achorladey:
You will soon leave paul Grundy too and jump to something else. Just watch and see.


CAPTIVATOR: This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Achorladey: Is this the new Titus 1:2? Hahahahaha.

Does it contradict Titus 1:2 ?

CAPTIVATOR:
What's so hard in saying if it's correct or wrong . At least if it's wrong ,Just tell . If you feel it contradict Titus 1:2 say it!!!



This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Is he wrong or right ?

No vex oooooooo. I didn't bring Paul Grundy into the discussion. When you are tired of Paul Grundy carry it back to where it came from.


CAPTIVATOR: This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Achorladey: This must be the new Titus 1:2. Hahahahahaha.

CAPTIVATOR:
Does it contradict Titus 1:2 ?

Ask PAUL GRUNDY

achorladey:
No vex oooooooo. I didn't bring Paul Grundy into the discussion. When you are tired of Paul Grundy carry it back to where it came from.


CAPTIVATOR: This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.

Achorladey: This must be the new Titus 1:2. Hahahahahaha.

If Paulgrundy is not relevant to you, Does that mean it's WRONG ?

achorladey:
Ask PAUL GRUNDY

You should be able to tell, unless you don't even have a clue . A person who knows the truth about something can easily detect the lies .

If you know the truth about the one hope, Is Paul Grundy wrong or right ?

CAPTIVATOR:
Every Christian know their destination , when they state their hope they include their destination .

Okay let me ask you : Where will you spend your everlasting life ?

Do you agree with Paulgrundy submission ?

Every CHRISTIAN know their DESTINATION, Hahahahahahaha.

I told you will jump into SOMETHING ELSE. Perhaps let me copy what one of YOUR brother said........the EVERLASTING LIFE is based on NEW HEAVENS and NEW EARTH. Hahahahahaha. Abeg choose one for me. Hahahahahaha.

CAPTIVATOR:
You should be able to tell, unless you don't even have a clue . A person who knows the truth about something can easily detect the lies .

If you know the truth about the one hope, Is Paul Grundy wrong or right ?

it must be so difficult for you to ASK PAUL GRUNDY I guess.

The truth in Titus 1:2 is no longer TRUTH but FALSEHOOD abi? Hahahahaha. Na Paul Grundy will validate Titus 1:2. Hahahahaha.

achorladey:
Every CHRISTIAN know their DESTINATION, Hahahahahahaha.

I told you will jump into SOMETHING ELSE. Perhaps let me copy what one of YOUR brother said........the EVERLASTING LIFE is based on NEW HEAVENS and NEW EARTH. Hahahahahaha. Abeg choose one for me. Hahahahahaha.

What my brother Said is found in the scriptures, he didn't invent that , it's boldly written in 2Pet 3:13 . Shows he knows his Bible . Here you are shouting everlasting life up and down but you can't even pin point where you will spend it .

Even Jesus told his 11 disciples he will prepare a place for them in his Father's abode in heaven. To tell you destination is important in the discussion of everlasting life . That's why I call you intellectually lazy.

The person that gave you the idea u explains his one hope saying



This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.



Is it right ? Is it wrong ?

You don't know if he is wrong or right ? Definitely you don't understand the subject .

achorladey:
it must be so difficult for you to ASK PAUL GRUNDY I guess.

The truth in Titus 1:2 is no longer TRUTH but FALSEHOOD abi? Hahahahaha. Na Paul Grundy will validate Titus 1:2. Hahahahaha.

" This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven. "


Correct or wrong ??

CAPTIVATOR:
If Paulgrundy is not relevant to you, Does that mean it's WRONG ?

Ask Paul grundy. That should not be a difficult thing to do.

CAPTIVATOR:
, So you don't know what the one hope is to identify lies from truth ?

From your understanding of the subject, Is Paulgrundy right or wrong ?

It's no longer truth when you identify the lies in it. Lol

achorladey:
Ask Paul grundy. That should not be a difficult thing to do.

I don't need ask him, he believe he is correct that's why he publish it.

Now my question is: Is he ?

CAPTIVATOR:
" This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven. "


Correct or wrong ??

You see what you have become TRYING to defend your TWO hopes as TAUGHT by the GB of YOUR ORGANIZATION. Hahahahaha.

is the above in your post Titus 1:2?

CAPTIVATOR:
I don't need ask him, he believe he is correct that's why he publish it.

Now my question is: Is he ?

Ask him? Hahahahaha you really didn't move an inch with whatever you typed up there. Hahahahaha

achorladey:
You see what you have become TRYING to defend your TWO hopes as TAUGHT by the GB of YOUR ORGANIZATION. Hahahahaha.

is the above in your post Titus 1:2?

This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Correct or wrong ?

achorladey:
Ask him? Hahahahaha you really didn't move an inch with whatever you typed up there. Hahahahaha

He actually believe he is correct , Do you agree he is correct ?

CAPTIVATOR:
This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Correct or wrong ?

Is that Titus 1:2? Hahahahaha.

CAPTIVATOR:
" This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven. "


Correct or wrong ??

To cover up your 2 Hopes teaching because you are ashamed of it and know it isn't biblical you then divert to paul grundy.


Last last your gb say they will go to heaven to rule as kings and priests alongside jesus while you their followers will remain on earth forever under their rulership.


Shame wan kill una. Your gb says it's 2 Hopes you their follower is saying it's one hope but 2 different destinations one destination for anointed/ruling class/superior humans while the other destination is for non anointed/follower class/inferior humans.


All these things no one dey bible o.
To show us the everlasting life even the one hope is everlasting life in the bible verses you quoted has been difficult tasks for you guys o. I no fit laff.

CAPTIVATOR:
He actually believe he is correct , Do you agree he is correct ?

Still trying to divert attention from the fact that your beliefs are not seen anywhere in the bible.

CAPTIVATOR:
He actually believe he is correct , Do you agree he is correct ?

You know Paul Grundy ACTUALLY believe what he stated is CORRECT. Hahahahahaha. So I should VALIDATE it for you abi? Hahahahahaha.

achorladey:
Is that Titus 1:2? Hahahahaha.

This "one hope" is consistently stated to be a resurrection as spiritual beings to heaven.


Is the above against Titus 1:2 ?

Hairyrapunzel:
Still trying to divert attention from the fact that your beliefs are not seen anywhere in the bible.

CAPTIVATOR has time tonight. Only that this expressway where we dey NO DIVERSION. Captivator must show is the DESTINATION in Titus 1:2. The two DESTINATION that evolved into TWO HOPES.