₦airaland Forum

isthatso:
He swore an affidavit before a notary public but the notary public was not named...therefore legally that Affidavit is null and void.

Secondly the law says it is only the person who issued a certificate that can change the particulars of that certificate, so in any event the affidavit even if it were a valid document would have no legal consequence.

NGpatriot:
Even with all your gra gra, you sound just like another ignorant illiterate.

Dansuqi:
He had a sworn affidavit which is crucial

isthatso:
I;m not a PDP man but you have all these problems and you still voted for Lyon? have you not heard the man speak? You think that kind of person has any plans?

Divinalss:
English has nothing to do with governance and managing state funds. Him go speak ijaw and we go hear. .

fergie001:
So can you change your UNICAL cert by yourself because you have a sworn affidavit?

Answer please....

Divinalss:
English has nothing to do with governance and managing state funds. Him go speak ijaw and we go hear. .

isthatso:
This matter has been determined by the court, it is not their job

https://dailypost.ng/2014/12/31/let-apc-verify-buharis-credentials-not-duty-inec/


https://www.pulse.ng/news/politics/go-to-court-if-you-doubt-any-candidates-qualification-inec-chairman-tells-nigerians/7h0ydhz




There is a difference between screening and Authenticating!!! Screening simply means you presented the required documentation...that isINECs job. Authenticating that those documents are legit is not INEC's job and connot be. Because for example they may write to a school abroad that does not reply till after the election.

I keep telling you, you are a bloody illiterate.

fergie001:
Ask dansuqi, if he can simply go and change his waec or unical certificate by himself?

I know someone whom waec entered a wrong date of birth for. When she went to waec Owerri, she was told that she will swear an affidavit and some other requirements and bring same with her original certificate. They Then will make the changes themselves.

So dansuqi and every other person here knows that only that certification body has that power to.

My younger bro had his name misspelt in his BSc cert, he returned it to unilag for change.

Same a friend with NYSC. He returned it.

So leave them, they know.

Dansuqi:
The answer is that doing so doesn't amount to forgery.

fergie001:
You are correct.... Section 31 of the Electoral Act says so.....

isthatso:
issokay sorry eh


but you know it is this English that prevented your man from fulfilling your hopes of changing Bayelsa?

Dansuqi:
Am tired abeg.let us not cry more than lyon

Dansuqi:
You need to apologise to bayelsans in general.how dare you question their overwhelming choice? They must have considered that and compared him with diri and after seeing worse attributes in him chose lyon

Dansuqi:
You need to apologise to bayelsans in general.how dare you question their overwhelming choice? They must have considered that and compared him with diri and after seeing worse attributes in him chose lyon

NGpatriot:
Even with all your gra gra, you sound just like another ignorant illiterate.

NGpatriot:
DANDUQI AND FRIENDS READ





Even with all your gra gra, you sound just like another ignorant illiterate.

isthatso:
This matter has been determined by the court, it is not their job

https://dailypost.ng/2014/12/31/let-apc-verify-buharis-credentials-not-duty-inec/


https://www.pulse.ng/news/politics/go-to-court-if-you-doubt-any-candidates-qualification-inec-chairman-tells-nigerians/7h0ydhz




There is a difference between screening and Authenticating!!! Screening simply means you presented the required documentation...that isINECs job. Authenticating that those documents are legit is not INEC's job and connot be. Because for example they may write to a school abroad that does not reply till after the election.

I keep telling you, you are a bloody illiterate.

Abuja — The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will commence the verification of the credentials submitted by the political parties on behalf of their perspective candidates.

https://allafrica.com/stories/201412290126.html

NGpatriot:
[s][/s]





What's wrong with this illiterate? INEC screens and verify documents and they impose fines when false documents are submitted.

Elementary school learner..

Geeoriginal:
Yours and lamgrees are most reasonable responses so far. The judgement did not prove that the documents didn't belong to him. According to page 16 of the posted judgement, the JSCs only reasoned that since the candidate was changing name incessantly, he must be fraudulent. To me, this is an opinion that was not proven. I am not a lawyer, but if there is no law that stipulates the number of times you can change your names, no crime has been committed. He can only be said to have committed a crime if any of those documents don't belong to him or if any was fraudulently obtained, the fact that was not proven.
That a fraud was committed should not be based on opinion but fact.
I also felt strongly that the court should not take away the right of the people to choose their leaders based on error of someone.
Though, the Imo judgment was deemed faulty, but the judgement says, Hope scored the highest number of votes.
Our electoral act needs urgent and serious revisit to address these issues. The Zamfara governor score less than 25% of votes casted, but he is the governor today. Those judgments are against and punish the people of the land and not just the candidates.

Geeoriginal:
Yours and lamgrees are most reasonable responses so far. The judgement did not prove that the documents didn't belong to him. According to page 16 of the posted judgement, the JSCs only reasoned that since the candidate was changing name incessantly, he must be fraudulent. To me, this is an opinion that was not proven. I am not a lawyer, but if there is no law that stipulates the number of times you can change your names, no crime has been committed. He can only be said to have committed a crime if any of those documents don't belong to him or if any was fraudulently obtained, the fact that was not proven.
That a fraud was committed should not be based on opinion but fact.
I also felt strongly that the court should not take away the right of the people to choose their leaders based on error of someone.
Though, the Imo judgment was deemed faulty, but the judgement says, Hope scored the highest number of votes.
Our electoral act needs urgent and serious revisit to address these issues. The Zamfara governor score less than 25% of votes casted, but he is the governor today. Those judgments are against and punish the people of the land and not just the candidates.

NGpatriot:
If Ihedioha is trying to base his appeal on your lies or the fact that Hope was not APC's rightful candidate in that election, he's on a long thing because Hope was placed on that ballot by INEC via a court order.

INEC conducted that election with Hope's name on the ballot and the PDP and Ihedioha did not challenge Hope's name on the ballot before and after the election, they did not even raise the issue during the appeals so why is that cluelessness part of any appeal after the fact.

Dansuqi:
So that is the only evidence that can prove or satisfy the clause beyond reasonable doubt?

fergie001:
For all those who have poured all manner of invectives on a Senior Jurist, Justice Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili (JSC) CFR, and maligned the integrity of learned Jurists that chaired the panel on the ill-fated Lyon/Degi Mandate.

Ecclesiastes 10: 10 said something important “If the iron be blunt, and he does not whet the edge, then must he put to more strength: but wisdom is profitable to direct”..

Unbiased lawyers in the house can help us digest.

Dansuqi:
He had a sworn affidavit which is crucial

Dansuqi:
The answer is that doing so doesn't amount to forgery.

fergie001:
For all those who have poured all manner of invectives on a Senior Jurist, Justice Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili (JSC) CFR, and maligned the integrity of learned Jurists that chaired the panel on the ill-fated Lyon/Degi Mandate.

Ecclesiastes 10: 10 said something important “If the iron be blunt, and he does not whet the edge, then must he put to more strength: but wisdom is profitable to direct”..

Unbiased lawyers in the house can help us digest.

Dansuqi:
Lawyers in the house,christiannorth,duwdu,ejimatic,zoedew

Divinalss:
Was it not the same Supreme Court that nullified the Bauchi state election in 1999 because the running mate of Adamu Muazu wasn't qualified to partake in that election, why didn't they adopt their judgement in 1999?? My brother if you are not in Bayelsa don't talk. Bayelsans are in deep pains. Bayelsa has been a pdp state since 1999 but we dumped partisan politics and we voted massively for Lyon. The blood of the old people who protested for their pension to be paid and got beaten by Dickson will visit this useless justices. ... Dickson spent 10billion naira to secure this judgement.

Some LGA's in Bayelsa are owing 12 months salary ..There are no street lights in yenagoa not to talk of other towns, poor electricity supply, no water, salaries are not paid in Time.
Pdp only won Dickson's LGA where there was massive electoral fraud and that of Diri's. Infact APC got 40% in Diri's LGA.

It may interest you to know that yenagoa is one way in one way out.. There are no roads not to talk of good roads. Right now some workers have been paid and others are not because sterling bank has seized some part of the state allocation claiming that the govt is owing them money.

My brothers a lot has been happening in Bayelsa for the past 8years my people have never had it so tough despite the fact that Dickson received more than N1.7 trillion in 8 years.