obainojazz:
This Baily sef shouting like he wanna have stroke

elampiro:


Media hyped Arnold or you guys here. I have not seen media praise him even 20% as much as the praise he gets here which are championed by Patrickmuf and eph.

The same way you hyped Jones.

Lana1:
The same way you hyped Jones.

How?

Like saying Jones is the best defender in the EPL?

elampiro:

How?
Like saying Jones is the best defender in the EPL?

I'm shocked too

elampiro:


Media hyped Arnold or you guys here. I have not seen media praise him even 20% as much as the praise he gets here which are championed by Patrickmuf and eph.

You're just impossible...I have always maintained that TAA is poor defensively, Henderson does a lot of work to cover him. It's no surprise that Liverpool suffered in the absence of Henderson. In attack, TAA is just about the best RB, he is young though and will definitely improve the defensive aspect of his game.

Since you're good at digging old post, please go back in time to confirm what I wrote up there.

Roland17:


I have been preaching the gospel according to the [/b]book of Robertson[b] for a long while now. The guy is embarrassingly underrated in that Liverpool set up.

lol @ the bolded

Very Massively underrated, I tell you.

patrickmuf:
You're just impossible...I have always maintained that TAA is poor defensively, Henderson does a lot of work to cover him. It's no surprise that Liverpool suffered in the absence of Henderson. In attack, TAA is just about the best RB, he is young though and will definitely improve the defensive aspect of his game.

Since you're good at digging old post, please go back in time to confirm what I wrote up there.

I knew since yesterday that the bolded part will be the next excuse even though you guys claimed last week that it is the full backs that are the most important.

For your information, Henderson did not play in their last win over West Ham. He has missed starting 6 league matches this season. Only Dijk has played all 28 matches from start to finish. Anold and Robertson are next with 27 matches.

elampiro:


I knew since yesterday that the bolded part will be the next excuse even though you guys claimed last week that it is the full backs that are the most important.

For your information, Henderson did not play in their last win over West Ham. He has missed starting 6 league matches this season. Only Dijk has played all 28 matches from start to finish. Anold and Robertson are next with 27 matches.

Can we now conclude that LFC attack is shit and the front three is not as good as you have been claiming here?

All it took was one loss from Liverpool for some of you to come out with your agenda. Arnold is a beast of a player. Got Guinness world record for most assist by a defender in history last year and is on course to break that record again this year. He's not a beast defensively but he's not as bad defensively as guys here are making it seem. His contributions attacking wise overcompensates for whatever weakness he might have defensive wise.

I remember when both Liverpool fullbacks started getting recognition, Robertson was the one being discussed all over. Until Arnold started beasting.

He had a bad game yesterday, everyone has their off days. So dead the agenda abeg.

elampiro:


I knew since yesterday that the bolded part will be the next excuse even though you guys claimed last week that it is the full backs that are the most important.

For your information, Henderson did not play in their last win over West Ham. He has missed starting 6 league matches this season. Only Dijk has played all 28 matches from start to finish. Anold and Robertson are next with 27 matches.

Was it not you who claimed their midfield was subpar and that their attackers were their main creative force? Do you even remember the things you say to start with?

Lingard thanking y'all for the support

BenNash:
All it took was one loss from Liverpool for some of you to come out with your agenda. Arnold is a beast of a player. Got Guinness world record for most assist by a defender in history last year and is on course to break that record again this year. He's not a beast defensively but he's not as bad defensively as guys here are making it seem. His contributions attacking wise overcompensates for whatever weakness he might have defensive wise.

I remember when both Liverpool fullbacks started getting recognition, Robertson was the one being discussed all over. Until Arnold started beasting.

He had a bad game yesterday, everyone has their off days. So dead the agenda abeg.

bros, nobody is saying Arnold isn't good, or are we blaming him. Just saying all round, Robertson is a better fullback than him

No goal or assist from the full backs, see the way elampiro best front three are struggling against the bottom team.

So..

Trent Arnold is the best attacking RB,

while

Wan-Bissaka is the best defensive RB a.k.a Tackle Merchant

BenNash:
All it took was one loss from Liverpool for some of you to come out with your agenda. Arnold is a beast of a player. Got Guinness world record for most assist by a defender in history last year and is on course to break that record again this year. He's not a beast defensively but he's not as bad defensively as guys here are making it seem. His contributions attacking wise overcompensates for whatever weakness he might have defensive wise.

I remember when both Liverpool fullbacks started getting recognition, Robertson was the one being discussed all over. Until Arnold started beasting.

He had a bad game yesterday, everyone has their off days. So dead the agenda abeg.

The first thing you check on a defender CV is his defending attributes....... The rest are just added packages.....

He is bad defensively...... Below average........u can't trust him to man mark any attacker along the right back axis

GloryIsaac:
So..

Trent Arnold is the best attacking RB,

while

Wan-Bissaka is the best defensive RB a.k.a Tackle Merchant

Hv said this more than 10 times here..... Absolutely correct

eph12:
No goal or assist from the full backs, see the way elampiro best front three are struggling against the bottom team.

Him no sabi ball...

patrickmuf:
Him no sabi ball...

Him sabi, but him no too sabi

eph12:

Him sabi, but him no too sabi

eph12:

Can we now conclude that LFC attack is shit and the front three is not as good as you have been claiming here?

I never had any theory that the front three were singled out in Spain. But you made us think that Liverpool failed to score in Spain because their fullbacks were tamed.

patrickmuf:
Was it not you who claimed their midfield was subpar and that their attackers were their main creative force? Do you even remember the things you say to start with?

I still stand by my words that our midfield is more creative. I did not say their midfield was subpar. I still also stand that Henderson absence is not the reason they lost. Their attack is the most creative. Even Rooney, Ronaldo and Tevez always lost to one small team every season

Expert17:


The first thing you check on a defender CV is his defending attributes....... The rest are just added packages.....

He is bad defensively...... Below average........u can't trust him to man mark any attacker along the right back axis

Not for full backs. Bissaka is a beast defensively. Arnold is a beast attacking wise. But very few people will pick Bissaka over Arnold. The game is changing. Many teams will convert full time wingers to full backs. There's a reason for that. And Arnold is not bad defensively abeg. He's okay defensive wise.

List those defenders in the EPL you think are good defensively let's compare their defensive stats to Arnold's. Y'all believe because of Arnold is that good attacking wise he has to be terrible defensively. How will you say Arnold is below average defensively?

elampiro:


I never had any theory that the front three were singled out in Spain. But you made us think that Liverpool failed to score in Spain because their fullbacks were tamed.

Your theory has always been that the front 3 does not need the midfielders or defenders to function

BenNash:


Not for full backs. Bissaka is a beast defensively. Arnold is a beast attacking wise. But very few people will pick Bissaka over Arnold. The game is changing. Many teams will convert full time wingers to full backs. There's a reason for that. And Arnold is not bad defensively abeg. He's okay defensive wise.

Why was Arnold benched in their game against Barcelona at Camp nou

Assist and goals is just plus on a defenders CV....... Unless you are playing 3-5-2 formation.....,

U can't judge an attacker base on his defensive attributes... .... Can we say, Lingard is Man utd best attacker defensively??

Expert17:



U can't judge an attacker base on his defensive attributes... .... Can we say, Lingard is Man utd best attacker defensively??

This doesn't make sense at all.

Expert17:


Why was Arnold benched in their game against Barcelona at Camp nou

Assist and goals is just plus on a defenders CV....... Unless you are playing 3-5-2 formation.....,

U can't judge an attacker base on his defensive attributes... .... Can we say, Lingard is Man utd best attacker defensively??

List the full backs you think are good defensive wise. Let's compare their defensive stats with Arnold's.

BenNash:


List the full backs you think are good defensive wise. Let's compare their defensive stats with Arnold's.

Ricardo perriera of Liecester

Wan bissaka

BenNash:


This doesn't make sense at all.

So it doesn't make sense to say, Trent is the best RB, because u are neglecting his defensive lapses

Expert17:


Ricardo perriera of Liecester

Wan bissaka

Really? Only those two?

eph12:
No goal or assist from the full backs, see the way elampiro best front three are struggling against the bottom team.

Salah, Mane and Firminho has scored 40 EPL goals this season and the total Assists received from Arnold and Robertson is less than 10 as at the last time I checked around January.

Expert17:


So it doesn't make sense to say, Trent is the best RB, because u are neglecting his defensive lapses

Chaii. Na me Bleep up Sha.
How don't you see that your anology of lingard doesn't make sense at all?

BenNash:


Chaii. Na me Bleep up Sha.
How don't you see that your anology of lingard doesn't make sense at all?

It doesn't make sense that is why, there is a laughing emoji beside my statement......

If u are saying we can't judge an attacker using his defensive attributes.....Lingard in this case.....


Am also saying

We can't judge a defender using his attacking attributes.....Trent in this case.