₦airaland Forum

realtem:
Madam abi na bros.... Abeg no vex, shey that last kingdom sha pick from season1.




Episode1 of vikings and im already sleeping like ponmo.

Maybe i was just feeling sleepy that day.... Dope ep1&2

spacetacular:
And I asked if such never existed before properties or a nature was added to it?

It's not our description that makes anything exist. Those things have already existed before we DISCOVERED them based on our perception.

Our perception is limited and is simply a produce of our skepticism but does scepticism negate prior existence before DISCOVERY?

yes your description doesn't make anything exist. But to prove to yourself or anyone else that something exists. You have to touch it's nature.

LightandDarkness:
How can you affirm the existence of something without knowledge or awareness of an aspect of it's nature. Something exists could mean everything exists and is not specific to anyone thing, to even justify the existence of a thing you must've observed something that made you think the thing exists-that would be a proposed quality, property, feature, functions-essentially something pertaining to it's nature.

yes, this is what i was saying @spacetacular

Goan watch stranger things... If you have not watched it, you are missing o...








Waiting till october for season 2

[quote author=spacetacular post=58355877][/quote]you're making a lot of sense.

.......Hence, by stating the realm in which something is existing/non-existing, we have discovered some of the props of that thing.












I hope i am making sense.

spacetacular:
This was your comment which I replied to :

By stating the realm/framework/world in which something exists, i think we have given a property/feature/nature of that thing or an hint of what the nature of what the thing might be.

That comment of yours showed me that you did not understand my comment based on ontology.

What I am driving at is that physical proof is not always required in order to show existence because not all existence is "physically" perceived!

i understood your comment 100% and i am not asking for physical proof of things existing in other realms.
But it is you who did not understand mine.





All i'm saying is things in different realms have different properties, right?
Now, God does not reside in the physical realm, right?
By acknowledging this, we have established that some properties of things in the physical realm does not apply to God. Hence, by stating the realm in which sth exist/does not exist........

MizMyColi:
Is the too much downloads that made the screen to break nau.

wow... This is an interesting discovery.... Tiri gbosa for you

spacetacular:
That is within the common framework of physical realism.

Not everything is physically perceived. This would then give credence to a soul / spirit or what a lot of people sometimes term as the sixth sense.

Let me make it simpler. Things existed outside our perception even before they were "physically" discovered and things also exist outside our physical perception even without being able to physically discover them.

It's like the question, when a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it does it make a sound?

Is the sound proof that the tree fell or there is sound regardless of the lack of human presence?

The sound is the human perception but even without that did the tree fall or not?

what(in my post) is within the framework of physical realism?



And what are you driving at?(no offence please)


You still remember my argument, right?



I agree with the boldened.

MizMyColi:
ehn ehn, why the tin nuh go spoil.

lol.... Spoilt battery and a broken face.

spacetacular:
Within the common framework of physical realism, the physical world as described by our current well-confirmed physical theories exist. Within the framework of Eucludean geometry, perfect circles and right triangles exist(but they do not exist in the physical world).

By stating the realm/framework/world in which something exists, i think we have given a property/feature/nature of that thing or an hint of what the nature of what the thing might be.

spacetacular:
Can you then say God does not exist because you cannot percieve him with your human senses?

No.

MizMyColi:
Ah! Oga o tiri gbosa for you then.
Biko which phone is that?

Na my school tab. E don spoil now sha

introvertme:
You have to b patient with it
Also
Try last kingdom

Madam abi na bros.... Abeg no vex, shey that last kingdom sha pick from season1.




Episode1 of vikings and im already sleeping like ponmo.

spacetacular:
You are repeating your error again Jack!

One does not need to "describe" your body to know you exist. Your existence can be in a comatose state yet you exist. You could be a vegetable or a tree. Yet you exist.

EXISTENCE IS SIMPLY A STATE OF BEING.

Nature then talks about your workings or characteristics.

Does a fly exist? You would answer yes without offering a description.

Does a fish exist? You would say yes without offering a description.

Same with trees and every other thing both animate and inanimate.

It's because we have a fore knowledge and are familiar with the nature of fishes,flies and humans... Thats probably why you won't need a description.

I think one has to touch the nature of something to prove to yourself/anybody else that that thing exists.

MizMyColi:


Na so
2gb.
Abeg which device on this earth fit download that one

Are you for real ?
Only my dh5 game is over 2gb.

introvertme:
yeah or season 3 sef

hmm... Thanks.

introvertme:
You have to b patient with it Also Try last kingdom

hmm... Patient till when(season 2?)

Abdstrakt:
Oga we should not use 4G to download heavy files again? So because we don't want our phones to get hot we should now spend 1year downloading a 5GB file via 2G?

Everything that gets hot will surely get cold.

LMAO

My phone will always overheat and i know it. There's no way i can own a mobile phone without playing games that require internet connection for long durations + charging

Is vikings a good show?

mrfoxx:
A Month Old infinix Note 3 x601

Super clean for sale 58k

or Swap with a Clean Samsung Note 3


serious buyers


contact in my signature

A new infinix note3 costs less than that. I hope you know that?

Nedville:
Yo.....where are the one piece fans..... surely even boruto would have finished before one piece ends..join the moving train....

i swear, that one piece too long.

Messi tax sentence lifted. He is to pay €250,000 fine.











Lol

spacetacular:
Amazon

Okay, thanks. I thought there were local retailers that sell these kinda books.

spacetacular:
We have a lot of common grounds sir affinity would show that we do a lot more than we both think. I love Bertrands works and his sound reasoning most times.

I have a few of his books such as
Why I Am Not a Christian and Religion & Science plus a few others. I read the history of western philosophy briefly (not completely) and that was about 4years ago and come to think of it I cannot fathom why I didn't finish it.

please where can i get hard copy of these books??

This is a hard one......

I'll go with Itachi Uchiha......

Hmm... Nice replies joshthefirst.

To the point and simple

whitebeard:
can't remember.

Arrrgghh.... This answer isn't sufficient for me to discern if you're a one piece fan.
So lemme ask directly, are you?

TLuzzie:
Hahahaha. I think it is the [color=darkgreen]Tami Tami No Mi[/color].

---

Do you follow ONE PIECE? Are you a fan?

lol Sure, i love one piece.


That's the same question i was asking the guy but in a coded way.

Whitebeard, which devil fruit did you eat?

Singapore1:
yes ..i have

Mehn, you be boss o

why are you passing message through here, let me recommend it by myself ..

sincerely, here is the only medium she has.