Rilwayne001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rilwayne001's Profile › Rilwayne001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 (of 614 pages)
Fynestboi:Hello fynestboi, I've tried reaching the mods on education through mail but I'm yet to get any response. Kindly reconsider my ban please. ![]() |
The writer saw Jesus and what he recorded in the book are beginning to happen. But a blind Muslim won't know. The unfolding prophecies are enough proof that they could have come from a high source. Guess what? Majority of the prophecies are about Islam which will produce the Antichrist beast. That's an argument for another thread..Nonsense. You have the effrontery to ask why we should believe the writer saw Jesus?In the first place, the question should be, who was the writer and why should we believe him. We have to establish who wrote it first before we can ask what he saw. Besides, he said he saw things in spirit, otherwise, vision. Why should we believe? Why should we believe Mohammad saw angel Gabriel? Why should we believe it was even angel Gabriel he saw when it was warakah that didn't witness the encounter that told him the name of the entity?Hahahaha. I see what you are trying to do here, but seriously, you can't eat your cake and have it. Muhammad (PBUH) himself saw it and narrated what he saw. It's a different case in Revelations. That was his encounter with an angel which was recorded in the previous verses. Later verses show he met Jesus physically and not via vision, otherwise he won't have bowed. He was in spirit doesn't translate to mean he saw a vision. Understand English.Help me understand English please, what does it mean to be SEEING things in SPIRIT? He didn't say he saw things in spirit. He was simply in a spiritual mood. Praying is being in a spiritual mood.Verse 11 said he should write down what he SEE Stop copying Wikipedia cos it is not a Christian source.This is what I got from a Christian source: One day in about the year 95 A.D., a man named John had a vision from heaven. The book of Revelation is John's record of that vision (Revelation 1:9-11). http://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_Revelation.htm Revelation 1:9-18New International Version (NIV) John’s Vision of Christ 9 I, John, your brother and companion in the suffering and kingdom and patient endurance that are ours in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+1%3A9-18 |
Anyone seeing this long reply of yours now will think you have meaningful things stocked in it, when in fact it's all a repetition of garbage. alBHAGDADI:Tell us how it was documented and how I'm trying to force the same way for the Bible. I doubt you even know how what we have today as the Bible was compiled in about 400years after Jesus. How they decided to add books that suit their desire and throw away the ones that they don't like. The moment you start expecting Christian to conform to that standard is the moment you get confused about Christianity. First see Christianity as something else that is what it is and not in conformation to other religions.Why are you scared to attempt the 'problem with the gospel'? Here you are doing what you claiming on the other thread that you no more do - trying to discredit the Bible so that you won't have to face the truth therein. Muslims need to stop doing this and face the content.Is the writer know for certain? Was the book written less than 70years after Jesus? How does asking these^ questions make me shy away from the truth? I see that you've been reading Wikipedia as if it is a reliable source. Do you know you can edit Wikipedia?I made sure the Wikipedia page I quote had a substantial reference, this is different from just quoting a link blindly. You on the other hand you did bother to go through the link to check the reference beneath the page. In so far a Wikipedia article has a reference for every point in it, why should we disregard it? Reading the entire chapter should enable anyone know that it was years after his resurrection and ascension.Apparently. The dating by the early church doesn't mean it is hundred percent correct about the date.Interesting. What is correct then? Or better yet, what is your own believe pertaining to this? What about other books of the new testament? Moreover, it could be possible cos apostle John was the only one out of the 12 disciples that lived long. He wasn't killed like the others.Obviously. I believe the Wikipedia page you read had it that the early church knew it was Apostle John and that those that have doubts are the modern ones. Now tell me, which of these generations was close to the period?The early church is more likely to believe it was John the apostle, basically because the text names the writer as a “John” who lived on the island of Patmos due to “tribulation” and testimony to Jesus Christ, indicating he was in forced exile. Even so, at no where didn't it say it was John the apostle, which give rise for another question, ie which John? But, as with many biblical questions, the situation is complicated. The 3rd Century Bishop Dionysius, ruled out the apostle due to the book’s character, thought, language, construction, and rough Greek idioms and grammar which is what modern literary critics agree to. |
alBHAGDADI:Kindly tell, what Islamic ways and terms did I apply in my questions? Jesus Christ made the Statement himself when he spoke to apostle John on the island of Patmos were revelations of things to come were given to him by Jesus Christ. He appeared to John in a magnificent way.When did he appear to John and made the statement? Before or after crucifixion? Take note that Early Church tradition dates the book to AD 81–96; that is approximately 90years after Jesus. Even so, the writer of this book is still unknown for certain. Why then should we believe that the unknown writer of this book indeed saw Jesus? 2. The particular encounter in the verse you are referring to was not a vision of a witnessed reality. It was witnessed by John who saw and heard Jesus speak this words "I am the First and the Last".How can you say it was not in a vision when we have it written boldly in the first verse that 1 The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John , ?? Again in chapter 10: On the Lord’s Day I was in the Spirit, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet, 11 which said: “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: He was in the Spirit he said, what does it mean to SEE things in the SPIRIT? 3. It was written down during the lifetime of John and by him.You need to provide concrete prove for which John was it that wrote it and not just make unsubstantiated claim as you did above. Except of the 2nd century scholars that believe it to be john, modern scholars generally takes a different view, and many consider that nothing can be known about the author except that he was a Christian prophet. Some modern scholars characterise Revelation's author as a putative figure whom they call "John of Patmos". The bulk of traditional sources date the book to the reign of the emperor Domitian (AD 81–96), and the evidence tends to confirm this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Revelation#CITEREFBauckham1992 Read Revelations Chapter 1below is an excerptRevelations 1:17-1917 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and now look, I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.19 "Write, therefore, what you have seen, what is now and what will take place later.Before jumping to 17, verse 10 is very clear that he was seeing a vision as he was supposedly in the spirit. Stop making this seem like it happened in reality. |
alBHAGDADI:There's a mainly 3 problems that I want you to examine with this Revelations verse. 1. Did Jesus himself make this statement in reality or was it narrated as a vision? 2. Who narrated the vision and who wrote it down? 3. When was it written down and how was it compiled? |
Catfish Snake Snail Bush meat Pork. And my girlfriend doesn't eat FISH. I think she's related to mermaid. ![]() |
legitnow:Lawful? I doubt you have any active brain in your skull. |
Xway:There's nothing you fools can do than to come online and boast. |
crestedaguiyi:So you can further have the cause to call him anti-igbo because he will never visit the east? You guys don't ever understand what you want. |
Drummerboy15:No. But watch out: between now and tomorrow. |
FriendNG:You are a fake aboki if you don't know Gworo ![]() We still haven't found the certificate o, but they've gone to court to get the affidavit as well as police station for the police report. They are currently in the school to make complain. |
alBHAGDADI:Are you deliberately trying to mix things up in a bid to cover your escapism? Where and when did you refute anything on that thread? Did you bother to even click the link? For once, stop being a coward. Plus I got tired when our comments were getting blocked.I'm very sure they didn't remove any of your comment from the thread. You only made a single cowardice comment that day and then you disappeared. Stop attaching to this flimsy excuse please. My own thread is not long, just 3 comments space. Now, runaway since you can't attempt it.Same as mine that you ran away from for almost a year now. And your thread is not just a 3 comment space, it's a build up of about 7 points to be addressed. I will need quite a free time to do that and not just rush things when I don't have the time. Mine on the other hand raised only 1 or 2 validate point which take much of your time to address, and here you are finding stupid excuse to escape it. Whereas addressing it will be very useful in debating your thread. Infact, you need to address that thread first before we can have a conversation on your thread, else you will be giving me double work to do. |
jiorhemen:Thanks very much for this. |
alBHAGDADI:You know I could raise the same stupid excuse for your thread right Silly coward! I doubt you did summary in your secondary school, because if actually you did it won't be so hard for you to realize the points being raised. Of course you indeed get the points, your problem is you have no logical response to it. Should you try to reply, you will certainly to shooting yourself in the foot by exposing the lie your profess for what it is. You understand this quite well hence the more reason why you are running away from it, because your fraud will be exposed should your try to stay. The major point of the thread is clear, you don't have to start quoting every post to reply the point by point. Just where those that wrote the Bible get their information from, and what makes them authorities, and why should you think they are right? Simple as ABC |
alBHAGDADI:See mumu! When last did you see me engage in any discussion on this section? I've been busy. I promise to address your thread when I have the time. For now, there's no time. |
alBHAGDADI:The same excuse you alleged on the thread even after telling you that those posts were deleted because they were trying to derail the thread which is against nairaland rule. Simply say you can't address the point raised instead of clinching on to this shenanigan of an excuse. |
alBHAGDADI:Here is an upgrade of that thread. Remember you ran away from it with tail between your legs. |
alBHAGDADI:You got a very long thread right there. I will very well like to indulge you when I have the opportunity. Only that one will have to take your point one after the other and not everything at once so as not to confuse things. I'll be following the thread so as not to forget. |
Cannonleo:I truly appreciate this. |
Explorerx:It's not mine, it just happened we are answering the same name. And the more why I took it upon myself is that the brother is so down and troubled about it. Thanks for your prayer. |
lazygal:Aww, thank you very much my dear sister. It's actually indirectly my issue as it happened to a very close brother of mine. Thank you very much for you prayers, may Allah in His infinite mercy bless you and answer your prayers too. I truly appreciate your kind gesture. |
Empiree:He really needs it. https://www.nairaland.com/2172133/question-did-jesus-read-bible Newsynews^ |
Empiree:Thank God I didn't waste my MB ![]() |
newsynews:Well, I'm sorry but you are wrong. I didn't even bother to watch the video to ascertain your so called Bible truth. Perhaps you can help by pointing out the supposed truth so we can iron it out. Muslims ask for certain clarity in the Bible and boast that such can't be found therein. When shown to them beyond dispute, they resort to an Islamic tactic that sees them questioning the veracity of the Bible.You are actually right. I used to do that when I was ignorant i.e using the Bible to validate the Quran, but having gone through the Bible origin even deeper, my stance has changed ever since. I believe you can come and clear my doubt on that particular thread in my previous post. Trust me it would be easier addressing the topic of this OP. Where was this tactics when you lots love to pull verses wrongly to show that the Bible spoke of Mohammad?Now, where in the Quran does it expressly state that the Bible has been corrupted? I wonder why Muslims hold this notion. This is what has been used to deceive them from accepting the truth the book holds.This is irrelevant. |
newsynews:The problem I have now is not whether Jesus claim to be God or not, the problem I have now is the Bible. Once we can establish the veracity of the Bible, then we can discuss what's there in. But the question still stands anyway. |
tintingz:They will be going to the University Senate tomorrow to report. What we heard, however was that from previous situation as this, nothing was done on their part. Nevertheless we are giving it a try. |
salford1:Pyramids of Egypt were built by black Africans? Black African slaves, init? I doubt I'll ever visit most of those Arab countries too. I hate racism. I hate racist. |
sukkot:Our time is coming, when? I doubt it. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 (of 614 pages)



