₦airaland Forum

BeeBeeOoh:
What shall it a man to create a thread & still be the first to comment

Water ni

NgeneUkwenu:
Yeye man!!!

A silly TANoids will soon come here to tell us that OBJ is now the godfather of APC.

Yeye people.

SNCOQ3:
That's a shame. What are hiding?

Since you won't do the needful, I'll do you an undeserved favour by recommending a scholarly book that may save you from your lopsided view:

www.christianbook.com/the-case-for-the-resurrection-jesus/gary-habermas/9780825427886/pd/427886?event=AFF&p=1011693&

Why refer me to a book? can't you copy from that book and use it in addressing the OP?

"Eni-olorunfe"

FrancisTony:
Thanks,

But I don't need any quaranic quote here. Go to your section and create a thread.

Both religion & islam4muslims are my sections. I have the right to propagate my religion on either of the 2.

FrancisTony:
Nobody. I own any place where there's my family property.

Thanks

Good boy.

You have no problem so far you are not in support of Biafra.

Sai Buhari

kettykin:
[s] Go and note it, buhari can never rule Nigeria or even Arewa Republic.
It will be easier for people to stay in lagos and formulate political plans with out being in tune with realities in the rest of the country [/s]

You so wish.

Lets wait till next month then

SNCOQ3:
That is not for you to determine; Intellectual etiquette demands that you do.
The source and the author of the information is important for a well-rounded analysis. You should provide it if you're actually interested in a meaningful input.

It is culled from the bible.

Oya face the topic.

FrancisTony:
Oyo ke? God forbid

From golden roof to brown roof. Olorun maje

I be Lagosian.

And which mumu told you that lagos is part of Biafra?

kettykin:
With or without Biafra, can nigeria survive 2015 election in one piece


considering the fact that the same people responsible for the rot and rust of Nigeria are in APC and the real people that make nigeria what it really should be are in PDP .
If PDP looses that will signal the beginning of the end of Nigeria because militancy will resume and the APC that will rule is inept.
If APC looses as expected bokoharam will be become bigger and bigger extending their strikes in lagos and other APC control states

Sht up.

Nothing will happen should Apc win..these people are empty boasters.

FrancisTony:
Ode ni bobo yi sha.

better don't go back home, those at home are calling for fire. I can get you oyo state certificate of birth...i wont charge you much maybe 50k

teufelein:
our ancestors did not have the scientifical technological knowledge of atom bomb manufacturing, now we have many of our people that have the knowledge. you wait and see. the zoo nigeria is finished!

And you think we do not have all these sophisticated weapons dat are far more sophisticated dan the ones we used in unleasing the horror on your forefathers? have you forgotten that that coward that led you guys ran to ivory coast at the end of the day?

You guys better stop calling disaster on yaself

What your forefathers did that led to the death of over 3million people...you their grandchildren are now pestering in it...hmmm.

@Macelliot you knw i like you better come to yorubaland now as francistony did before we start unleashing our terror on anyone who tries to shout "biafra".

Nice thread my friend..here is that the Quran also say about forgiveness.

Surah Ash-Shura, Verse 40:
But [remember that an attempt at] requiting evil may, too, become an evil: hence, whoever par­dons [his foe] and makes peace, his reward rests with God - for, verily, He does not love evildoers.

Surah Al-Araf, Verse 199:
[b] Hold to forgiveness; command what is right; But turn away from the ignorant.

Surah Al-Qasas, Verse 54:
These it is that shall receive a twofold reward for having been patient in adversity, and having repelled evil with good, and having spent on others out of what We provided for them as sus­tenance,

Surah Fussilat, Verse 34:
But [since] good and evil cannot be equal, repel thou [evil] with something that is better and lo! he between whom and thyself was enmity [may then become] as though he had [always] been close [unto thee], a true friend!

GMB haters shall die of heart attack

SNCOQ3:
What's the title of the book and who's the author?

Thats not necessary.

Address the topic.

How come Luke, John, and Mark makes no mention of this powerful occurence? atleast they must have been witnesses of the earthquake, for it was not possible for them to have been absent from it; the opening of the graves and the resurrection of the dead men, and their walking about the city, is of greater importance than the earthquake. how come they didnt write anything about it?.

How about the army of saints that returned to life, and nobody know who they were, nor who it was that saw them, and that not a word more should be said upon the subject, nor these saints have anything to tell us!.

How come no old prophet prophesy about this powerful supernatural incident?.

Sai buhari

ojialo:
I've seen those pictures before now

Where?

nzeadachie:
SHAME ON YOU

Why insert the picture in between. providing the link would have been better. ihan

The book ascribed to Matthew says, 27, v. 45, "Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour." Ver. 51 "At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook and the rocks split" , 52 "The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life." 53 "They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people."


Such^^^ is the account which this dashing writer of the book of Matthew gives, but in which he is not supported by the writers of the other books.

The writer of the book ascribed to Mark, in detailing the circumstances of the crucifixion, makes no mention of any earthquake, nor of the rocks rending, nor of the graves opening, nor of the dead men walking out.

The writer of the book of Luke is silent also upon the same points. And as to the writer of the book of John, though he details all the circumstances of the crucifixion down to the burial of Christ, he says nothing about either the darkness- the veil of the temple- the earthquake- the rocks- the graves- nor the dead men.

Now, if it had been true that those things had happened, and if the writers of those books had lived at the time they did happen, and had been the persons they are said to be, namely, the four men called apostles, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, [b] it was not possible for them, as true historians, even without the aid of inspiration, not to have recorded them. The things, supposing them to have been facts, were of too much notoriety not to have been known, and of too much importance not to have been told. All these supposed apostles must have been witnesses of the earthquake, if there had been any; for it was not possible for them to have been absent from it; the opening of the graves and the resurrection of the dead men, and their walking about the city, is of greater importance than the earthquake. An earthquake is always possible and natural, and proves nothing but this opening of the graves is supernatural, and directly in point to their doctrine, their cause, and their apostleship. Had it been true, it would have filled up whole chapters of those books, and been the chosen theme and general chorus of all the writers; but instead of this, little and trivial things, and mere prattling conversations of, he said this, and he said that, are often tediously detailed, while this, most important of all, had it been true, is passed off in a slovenly manner by a single dash of the pen, and that by one writer only, and not so much as hinted at by the rest. [/b]

It is an easy thing to tell a lie, but it is difficult to support the lie after it is told. The writer of the book of Matthew should have told us who the saints were that came to life again, and went into the city, and what became of them afterward, and who it was that saw them- for he is not hardy enough to say he saw them himself; whether they came out naked, and all in natural buff, he-saints and she-saints; or whether they came full dressed, and where they got their dresses; whether they went to their former habitations, and reclaimed their wives, their husbands, and their property, and how they were received; whether they entered ejectments for the recovery of their possessions, or brought actions of crim. con. against the rival interlopers; whether they remained on earth, and followed their former occupation of preaching or working; or whether they died again, or went back to their graves alive, and buried themselves.

Strange, indeed, that an army of saints should return to life, and nobody know who they were, nor who it was that saw them, and that not a word more should be said upon the subject, nor these saints have anything to tell us! Had it been the prophets who (as we are told) had formerly prophesied of these things, they must have had a great deal to say. They could have told us everything and we should have had posthumous prophecies, with notes and commentaries upon the first, a little better at least than we have now. Had it been Moses and Aaron and Joshua and Samuel and David, not an unconverted Jew had remained in all Jerusalem. Had it been John the Baptist, and the saints of the time then present, everybody would have known them, and they would have out-preached and out-famed all the other apostles. But, instead of this, these saints were made to pop up, like Jonah's gourd in the night, for no purpose at all but to wither in the morning. Thus much for this part of the story...SMDH.

If four men are eye-witnesses and ear-witnesses to a scene,they will, without any concert between them, agree as to time and place when and where that scene happened. Their individual knowledge of the thing, each one knowing it for himself, renders concert totally unnecessary; the one will not say it was in a mountain in the country, and the other at a house in town: the one will not say it was at sunrise, and the other that it was dark. For in whatever place it was, at whatever time it was, they know it equally alike.

What a great thread

@OP Please tell us how democratic JonaTAN is in relation to what they did to TAMBUWAL.

barcanista:
bros, this 2015 we shall scruitinise the opposition whether their change is in consonance with their antecedents or not.

Cc Ngwakwe Ishilove Seun Obinoscopi lalasticala firefire tomakint agabai23

Bros. When are you going to address this thread www.nairaland.com/2154492/gospel-protection-according-saint-barcanista ?

Ivanspring:
No. I'm being realistic.

And what is realistic in your assertion?

Ivanspring:
Keep deceiving yourselves.

Even me wey no be politician no say apc CANNOT win the presidential election.

Smh.

Is this how low your level of thinking is?