Runninghare's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Runninghare's Profile › Runninghare's Posts
Some people may have forgotten the name, but Luigi Mangione is the 26‑year‑old American accused of stalking and fatally shooting UnitedHealth Group CEO Brian Thompson on a Manhattan sidewalk in December 2024. Prosecutors say he allegedly traveled to New York, checked into a hostel under a fake identity, and ambushed Thompson outside a Hilton hotel with a 3D‑printed “ghost gun” fitted with a silencer before fleeing on an e‑bike. A multi‑day manhunt followed, with police circulating surveillance footage of a suspect with distinctive bushy eyebrows until a McDonald’s worker in Altoona, Pennsylvania, recognized him and called 911. When officers arrested Mangione there, they reportedly found multiple fake IDs, a passport, ammunition and a weapon consistent with the one used in the attack, along with handwritten notes about his alleged motivations. A federal judge, Margaret Garnett, has now dismissed two key federal charges against him – including the ones that made him eligible for the death penalty. She ruled that, under current U.S. law and Supreme Court precedent, the stalking-related charges in his case cannot be treated as a “crime of violence” in the specific technical sense required to support those death‑penalty‑eligible counts. As a result, Mangione will not face the death penalty in the federal case, although he still faces other serious federal charges carrying up to life imprisonment, as well as separate state murder charges in New York. Prosecutors have not yet said whether they will appeal the ruling, and the judge has given them a deadline (late February 2026) to decide. For those who want to follow the latest, here is a detailed report from a major outlet with ongoing updates on the case: BBC News: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78egdg3r0po
|
maasoap:Ok. I get your point. |
ukaface:That's alright. |
ukaface:You mentioned that "nothing good comes out from Nigeria", and since you are Nigerian, I found that surprising. Are you saying you are not something good yourself? |
ukaface:Sorry, if I may ask, do you reside in Nigeria? |
maasoap:It is so disheartening to hear the way some of you speak.. |
Wallade:Do I need to? |
Wallade:trying to be "smart by half" |
drstranged:Spot on. |
CaptainJune:Proverbs 18:17 |
Although this news is a bit stale now, it still makes for a compelling read, especially in the context of Nigerians and our tendency to exaggerate claims that we are overly involved in crime. On 30 May 2025, five Bulgarian nationals were sentenced at Wood Green Crown Court for orchestrating the largest benefit fraud in England and Wales, cheating the system out of over £53 million in Universal Credit. The gang members, all Bulgarian Nationals—Galina Nikolova, Stoyan Stoyanov, Tsvetka Todorova, Gyunesh Ali, and Patritsia Paneva—received prison terms ranging from three to eight years after pleading guilty to charges of fraud and money laundering. Over a four-and-a-half-year period from October 2016 to May 2021, this organised crime group submitted thousands of fraudulent claims using both real and fake identities. They backed these claims with forged documents including fake tenancy agreements, counterfeit payslips, and falsified letters from landlords, employers, schools, and GPs. If a claim was rejected, they would simply try again until it was accepted. What’s interesting is how European countries kind of handle these crime cases without putting a big spotlight on entire nationalities. They try not to make the whole nation look bad, even when the crimes are serious. It’s basically their way of protecting their country’s image. This is pretty different from how Nigerians often get painted with a broad brush over crime, where people sometimes exaggerate and link the whole Nation to bad things and this disposition is sometimes even championed by Nigerians themselves. For reference, here is the official source: [https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/members-britains-biggest-benefit-fraud-gang-jailed-combined-total-more-25-years#:~:text=Bulgarian%20nationals%20Galina%20Nikolova%2C%2039](https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/members-britains-biggest-benefit-fraud-gang-jailed-combined-total-more-25-years#:~:text=Bulgarian%20nationals%20Galina%20Nikolova%2C%2039) |
The truth is, the U.S. has actually given Ukraine more aid than any other country since the war started—over €114 billion worth, combining military, financial, and humanitarian support. That’s almost double what the entire EU institutions have provided. So, when you hear people say the U.S. isn’t doing enough for Ukraine, it really makes you stop and think. Sure, public perception might be focused on politics or headlines, but the numbers tell a different story. The U.S. has been the biggest backer, especially when it comes to military aid, which Ukraine desperately needs to defend itself. Other countries like Germany and the UK have contributed, but nowhere near the same scale. Of course, it’s fair to question how effectively the aid is used and how sustainable this level of support can be in the long run. But let’s be honest—if anyone’s leading the charge here, it’s the U.S., and that’s something that sometimes gets lost in the noise. So next time someone talks about the U.S. “not supporting Ukraine enough,” feel free to pull out these figures.
|
strangest:It is painful when legitimates suffer with illegitimates... but... These people who sell substandard and falsified medicines are hired killers. Since 2018/2019... NAFDAC has employed and is employing many avenues to enlighten the public of SFs. They do Sensitization and awareness programs (NAFDAC and your Health) which is aired on NTA, Channels TV and TVC and radio – FRCN NAFDAC Consumer Safety Club, NAFDAC – NYSC Community Development Service, Consultative fora with stakeholders. Is this not enough to inform the sellers around these environs where substandard and falsified medicines are being sold to know that their business are also at risk of collateral damage when NAFDAC strikes. I heard that in 2019, when they came to just one location, they were attacked by the traders in Ogbo-Plumbing where the warehouse was. This is like a drug bust, information must be held tightly to the chest to increase the success of the raid. Understand also that, telling the Union, can lead to tipping off the guys who deal in this "wicked businesses". I still hope though, that this will be done with sooner than later so that legitimate business can continue making their legitimate money. |
bigpicture001:Alright. I appreciate you. |
bigpicture001:Are you on ground? When you say follow... do you have firsthand infor on combat positions, on military capabilities on economics etc. How did you get your projections on 2 years capitulation of the Russian position in this war? |
bigpicture001:Really... I am not so sure about this. How do you know about this... Can i see where you are quoting from? |
bigpicture001:Now you clarify your info-- He was impeached in the lower house and not impeached in the Senate. |
bigpicture001:Ok.. Now I get your point... So the whole of EU (44 countries) outperformed the US (a single country)... by what percentage. Edited... This is the more reason why, the US has a more powerful/bigger/huge bargaining chip... not the EU
|
bigpicture001:Based on your picture, US has given more |
bigpicture001:He was impeached... and the senate saved him? How does that correlate? |
bigpicture001:Well, I have an information here, that says differently. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303432/total-bilateral-aid-to-ukraine/ |
bigpicture001:If I may... Where did you get your information. |
maivd:I think you need more information. Your assertion seems less factual... The USA are the largest donors to the war, irrespective of how it seems. Their donations to the war was enough to sustain the war. If it wasn't true, they wouldn't have have the largest bargaining chip. It is easier to understand when they said they would stop funding and the whole of Europe began to convene for emergency meetings. Even Macron went ahead to double his country's defense budget. The amount of funding (cash and kind) US, brings to wars, is on a general, usually astronomical, to the point that they almost always have a say on proceedings. check out this post-- https://www.nairaland.com/8351520/total-bilateral-aid-allocations-ukraine |
Total bilateral aid allocations to Ukraine 2022-2024, by donor and type Published by Statista Research Department, Feb 24, 2025 From January 24, 2022, to December 31, 2024, the European Union (EU) institutions, such as the Commission and the EU Council, provided around 49 billion euros in bilateral financial, humanitarian, and military aid to Ukraine in view of the Russian invasion that started in February 2022. The highest value of allocations was recorded from the United States at over 114 billion euros. U.S. aid to Ukraine As of December 31, 2024, the value of U.S. bilateral aid allocations to Ukraine represented 0.53 percent of 2021 donor GDP. The U.S. donated the largest amount of bilateral military, financial, and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Generally, U.S. foreign aid to Ukraine has increased since 2015. Where does military aid to Ukraine come from? The U.S., Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), and Denmark were the largest suppliers of military aid to Ukraine. In monetary terms, the U.S. bilateral military assistance to the country reached approximately 64 billion euros as of December 31, 2024. As part of that aid, the U.S. transported over 7,700 air defense missiles and over 1,600 air defense systems to Ukraine and other European partners as of January 2025. Furthermore, the U.S. delivered the most units of M777 howitzer artillery to the country. Copied: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303432/total-bilateral-aid-to-ukraine/
|
WriterNig:https://www.nairaland.com/8077716/understanding-function-icc-against-current |
On April 29, 2024, Israel began to voice out the fears that the International Criminal Court were preparing to issue arrest warrants for their government officials on charges related to its war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. In actual sense, this was coming against the backdrop of South Africa, pushing for the case of genocide against the Palestinians situated in the Gaza strip, by the Nation of Israel. Although, most people don't know that there has bee an official investigation by the ICC into Israel for allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the occupied Palestinian territories since 2021. The first Question that comes to mind is? What right do the ICC have to bring up a case against Israel? To answer that, it is pertinent to note the Function of the ICC I wouldn't like to bore you with a lot of History, but here is an excerpt taking from Reuters The ICC was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors. It has 124 member states. So the ICC will only be able to prosecute Nationals of aggressor states (either member states of the ICC or other actors against member states) not against STATES. Inadvertently, only Netayanhu and some select officials of the nation of Israel are compromised. It is also pertinent to note that there is a warrant against Putin for war crimes for illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine, and this arrest warrant for Putin was issued in March 2023. Member countries of the ICC include; Afghanistan Albania Andorra Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria B Bangladesh Barbados Belgium Belize Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso C Cabo Verde Cambodia Canada Central African Republic Chad Chile Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic D Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic E Ecuador El Salvador Estonia F Fiji Finland France G Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guyana H Honduras Hungary I Iceland Ireland Italy J Japan Jordan K Kenya Kiribati L Latvia Lesotho Liberia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg M Madagascar Malawi Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritius Mexico Mongolia Montenegro N Namibia Nauru Netherlands New Zealand Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway P Panama Paraguay Peru Poland Portugal R Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova Romania S Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain State of Palestine Suriname Sweden Switzerland T Tajikistan Timor-Leste Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia U Uganda United Kingdom United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay V Vanuatu Venezuela Z Zambia Finally, it will interest you to note that Israel is not a member of the court and does not recognise its jurisdiction, but the Palestinian territories were admitted as a member state in 2015 as seen in the list above. #BeInformed #FactsoverSentiments |
omoadeleye:SMH |
Eunoiaa:Hmm |
It is a bit.. Any addition? |
Ifeanyi Ubah, the flamboyant businessman and Senator, casts a long shadow in the chronicles of AMCON's debt recovery efforts. His company, Capital Oil and Gas Limited, once stood as a mountain of unpaid loans, estimated at a staggering N135 billion. This figure, however, became a battleground, with accusations and counter-accusations swirling around its true nature. In 2018, AMCON, the government's debt recovery agency, dragged Ubah and Capital Oil to court, accusing them of making false claims about the value of assets transferred to settle the debt. The agency also alleged that Ubah obstructed their efforts to sell a prime property in Lagos, further hindering debt repayment. Ubah, however, vehemently denied the charges, claiming AMCON overinflated the debt and engaged in unfair practices. He argued that the assets transferred were worth far less than claimed, and that AMCON's actions were politically motivated. The legal battle raged for years, with twists and turns aplenty. In 2023, a dramatic turn of events saw AMCON abruptly withdraw the case against Ubah. While the reasons for this remain unclear, some speculate it may be linked to ongoing investigations into AMCON's own practices. Despite the withdrawal, the question of Ubah's true debt to AMCON remains a shadowy figure in the landscape of Nigerian business and politics. While the N135 billion figure once loomed large, its validity and the ultimate resolution of the saga remain shrouded in uncertainty. Ifeanyi Ubah's debt profile, therefore, is a story not yet fully written. It's a tale of astronomical figures, legal battles, and accusations, leaving behind a lingering question: where does the truth lie in this complex web of debt and power? #StraighTrend #Uncanny
|
Let me shed light on Senator Sani Musa's complex debt picture. Musa's name frequently pops up in AMCON's files, painting a portrait of a businessman entangled in a web of outstanding debts. First, we have the Peoples Leasing Company (PLC), where Musa served as Chairman and CEO. AMCON acquired the company in 2011 due to its staggering N240 billion debt pile, with Musa personally guaranteeing a chunk of it. Whispers suggest Musa's influence shielded PLC from repayment pressure before the acquisition, leading to the ballooning debt. Next comes the N48 billion loan Musa received from Union Bank for his Manganese Exploration and Processing Company (MEPC). This loan, granted in 2008, remains unpaid, prompting AMCON to swoop in as a creditor in 2011. The saga doesn't end there. MEPC's assets, including a mining concession in Ebonyi State, have been seized by AMCON, adding another layer to Musa's debt labyrinth. Beyond AMCON, Musa's name surfaces in other debt sagas. Reports link him to unpaid debts owed to Zenith Bank and Access Bank, further complicating the picture. However, Musa, through his representatives, has consistently refuted the allegations, claiming they are politically motivated attacks. He insists he's actively working to resolve his outstanding debts and has made significant progress. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in the murky waters of Nigerian business. While Musa's claims deserve consideration, the sheer volume of debt attached to his name raises serious questions. AMCON's involvement and asset seizures add further weight to the concerns. The aim of this missive is to present the facts and let readers draw their own conclusions. Sani Musa's debt profile remains a complex puzzle, riddled with unanswered questions. Whether he emerges clean from this financial quagmire, only time will tell. #StraighTrend #Uncanny
|
