₦airaland Forum

Floyd45:
i encountered the issue with some movies on that site. So here is what i did, i stopped downloading the links that have "".x265/25 in front of them.
Try downloading the regular ones..Web Dl or MKV without the x265 in front of the link or in between

You're correct, but Miracles from heaven web dl has same issues

boofydon:
I have downloaded at least 30 movies and had no problem with the quality. From my experience, the problem you are having may result from the software you used to download the movie. Did you use internet download manager?

I'm using ucweb browser(fast download version), which ones are you using or recommend?

Hi, anybody else having problems with fardadownload movies, 3 of the recent movies; Miracles from heaven, Neighbours 2 and Eddie the eagle didn't play properly.

Some part just freeze, while others jump forward. I've tried it on difft devices; PC, tablet even phone, but no joy. I might have to avoid d site, can't be wasting money to download movies I won't be able to watch. It affected 720p web format. Seems torrent is even more reliable.

SidL:
SidL's Treatise on Barriers to the Idea of Perpetual Motion



Misconceptions of Perpetual Motion and the Fallacies of Thermodynamic Laws
It is truly a strange world we live in. A world with many problems well known and acknowledged. More disturbing still, a world in which most of these problems are not even being given the benefit of attempts at solutions, because of Man-made Laws, which not only mentally prohibit such attempts, but also denigrate such attempts. It is said that these “Laws” cannot be broken—What Folly!
Yet, the very same group which conspired to draw up such…“mental legislations” on creative thinking breaks it own laws in its thinking every single day.

One of the problems we experience as a species, for which quality of life would be vastly improved if solved, is generation of power that is as sustainable as it is FREE of monetary charge. Some would call this concept “free-energy,” I would call it, “freely generated” 'energy'. Nothing in Nature is free, she requires no money, but she does 'barter'.

The laws of Thermodynamics, if I am not mistaken, were put together under the paradigm of what we now refer to as “Classical mechanics.” Today we now have “Quantum mechanics” in which Academia concedes vastly improved understanding of Natural Dynamics of Creation.
I find the Hubris involved as amusing as it is tragic, for the correct thing to have done is humbly tell the world:

“We concede that we were mistaken about theories that we called “Laws”, which we arrogantly regarded as sacrosanct. We apologise. Please take a look at our new and improved understandings even as we present them with caution and consideration that they will be further improved upon. These new understandings are not sacrosanct or free from perceptual errors. Please do not call them Laws and be open to the possibility that they are incorrect that we may not deny ourselves the possibility, and opportunity, of one day coming into comprehension of Ultimate Truths of Existence, which is our goal.”
Simple, short and sweet.

The problem ultimately with the Idea of Perpetual Motion and the “Laws” of Thermodynamics is the lack of understanding that this is a universe based on Unconditional Love.
Love is not an emotion and is not to be mistaken for selective affection or disaffection, or any of their idea-synonyms that we are all too familiar with. Emotions however are based on Love as are all things else.

From a purely 'scientific' standpoint, Love may be referred to as Balance or Equal Exchange or Unconditional and Equal Giving and Giving Back. In other words, this is a universe of motion that is always, Simultaneously and/or Sequentially, patently Two-Way in nature. This is a FACT, not an opinion or theory, for its premise is Painfully Obvious and all around, should you decide to SEE.

Two-way motion in nature may also be referred to as cycles. Not one single aspect or idea of the universe is continuous in nature despite all appearances to the contrary. It is entirely cyclical. As you know, cycles are repetitive, not continuous. Please disregard the fact that cycles can be so fast, that the simulate continuity for we are blessed to know the illusion of it. In a stop-motion optical universe of perpetrated illusions which deceive our senses most of the time, we know that the movie at the cinema is not continuous but a combination of cyclical optical projections which repeat at the rate of 20-30 hertz, albeit with a different image to each cycle. Stop-motion is stop-motion however way you slice it or label it.

Cyclical repetitiveness is the sole reason why the thermodynamic series fall FLAT on their faces! Those laws are built on the premise that this is a continuous ONE-WAY universe and are therefore only as valid as the idea of ONE-WAY continuity. If I am close to truth in my assertion of the CYCLICAL Nature of this universe, then the Thermodynamic concept is thus a false. With all due respect, it is time to toss them in the bin of history where they belong……..or not.

Of perpetual motion, I will briefly say this. There is no such thing as perceptual motion. In this, I am of the opinion that Academia is correct but only to an extent, at most 50% as usual, for anyone who uses the senses to investigate is apt to see the objective half a cycle which correspond to the senses which are themselves an objective half of cycles. The other half of the cycle is ALWAYS invisible and in most cases too fast to be detected by the senses or instruments. One can see how false expectations of perpetuity is born since our senses rarely respond to the both halves of all cycles.

So why then did I start this thread if I think thus? Well, look again. I said THE IDEA of perpetual motion. I did not say Perpetual Motion. Perpetual motion is as fallacious as the Laws of Thermodynamics are for the same reason of the error in premise that this is one-way continuous universe. This is not a continuous universe. It is a Two-Way Cyclical Universe. According to the Universal Law of Love, if a system does not give back to itself what that system gave to itself, it will not repeat, reincarnate, “continue or survive.” It will die. That is exactly why you spend a huge part of your income on fuel.

I found it much easier therefore to just say the “Idea of perpetual motion” because most are already familiar with the concept. The more correct term for perpetual motion therefore is “Cyclically Repetitive Motion” or CRM.
Therefore, For simplicity in explanation CRM = Perpetual Motion. I have thus corrected (In my humble arrogance of course) the Idea of Perpetual motion for what it truly is—CRM—since CRM is a FACT of nature that it is extremely difficult to deny or dispute even by the densest of minds. I hope I make sense.

As in all things, I could be mistaken of course. I must admit this. How else can I further evolve my understanding of the truth of LAWS of Nature? Note to myself (and you): Beware Hubris!

Moving along. All transactions in nature manifest this TWO-WAY principle and principles in nature are always universally applicable. They apply to all things, including human transactions which very often, due to free-will, attempt to thwart these unbreakable principles only to pay for such attempts in personal pain and suffering which most would refer to as the devil's doing.

Anticipating this argument, I already gave examples on my original post. Now I will amplify and make clear what happens when attempts are made to violate the principle of Universal Love. It will become further obvious also, why CRM is a FACT of nature and why the thermodynamic series simply lacks ground.

Perpetual Motion (CRM) in Nature:
Once upon a time there was just the equilibrium of bitterly cold dark space, nothing else was. Intelligence in equilibrium decided to know itself experientially by creating out of ITself, what IT was not not—Activity/Motion—that IT may subsequently experience what IT truly is, Equilibrium, and that by repeating this act, it could simulate its continuity “forever”.
IT gathered to Itself at one point, all of ITS widely dispersed self and became a hot, violent, highly motive particle of what we call objective matter.
Ah! now it knew Equilibrium by being activity and longed to experience that state of Equilibrium once again. Compression of subjective space (Equilibrium) into objectivity took a lot of effort. Once this effort was relaxed, that “particle or plasma” exploded back effortlessly, wave-like, into a state of expanded equilibrium. The... “big bang”, anybody? How is that different from orgasm? What good is the pleasure of sex if you coupled to your partner 24/7 without breaks to savour the experience?
Do you now comprehend the import of cycles in all things and the fallacy of one-way continuity upon which man-made laws are cooked? That “God” is Cycle-Junkie?

If a cycle of equilibrium to activity and activity back to equilibrium does not happen, it cannot be repeated. Am I clear? I must stop here, for I can write a book on more analogies that amplify my point that continuity is false. It is CRM which creates the appearance or illusion of continuity. Politicians and celebrities are the only breed of Humans who comprehend that appearances are not facts. So be it.

NEWS FLASH:
All heavenly bodies and being vortically recharged via their two two poles simultaneous to their equatorial discharge or novas. If it were not so, such bodies would not “continue” or would soon burn out. The academia whom many of you blindly memorise and quote their one-way sermons, always fail to tell you that each body in space has two holes at each pole for recharging their internal “plasma” batteries. Their satellite cameras always avoid taking pictures of them and google earth airbrushes those holes for your intellectual convenience of course. Now you know!

Entropy, one of the sub-premises of the Thermodynamic series is a very vivid figment of Human One-Way, selfish, greedy, thieving, competitive imagination. It is not much different from the vengeful-God-theory with which religions control multitudes.
In nature all down-hill flows are simultaneous and sequentially counter-balanced by up-hill flows, ALWAYS. This is painfully and patently obvious in most cases. Please let us do some real thinking and stop behaving the flash-drives which record and regurgitate data verbatim, hence the term “garbage in, garbage out.”

Rain:
The widely dispersed, highly voluminous gases which make up cold space are compressed into molten solids, which in this particular octave of concern, we refer to as liquid or water of highly reduced volume, but equal in potential pound for pound to highly voluminous gases. Solids are one visible half of the cycle and are not a natural state of being, and when the effort which compelled gases into the state of solidity is let-off even minutely, they return effortlessly to the original state of gaseous equilibrium. So much for “anti-matter.”

Intelligence in nature has set conditions up such that before evaporating molten solids (liquids) reach that ultimate state of equilibrium as inert gases, the cold of space freezes/crystallises the mass in its track. We call those clouds. The clouds stay there because weight-wise they are in equilibrium and will neither fall down nor fall up (rise), unless more clouds are added, then the fall...down.
And thus it is the principle of cyclical self-repetition is hatched and it is done without paying a dime to anyone, nor does it require input by anyone to consummate. So much for entropy.

This is called unconditional Love and one obvious example of “perpetual motion” in nature. Can any deny this? The earth give liquids back to “Heaven” as gases, and Heaven gives back those nearly invisible gases as rain. Everyone is happy! There is peace and prosperity for all who depend on water. You don't have to do anything to receive rain, including felling of trees to make newspapers to read all about those tree felling—the irony.

What happens when attempt is made to break this Law?

You fell the trees which are both water guzzlers and gas givers, or play with the little match of thermonuclear devices, and build nuclear power plants. Brrravo!
Deserts are thus formed, devoid of vegetation. The desert gives NOTHING to the sky and the sky simply gives NOTHING back, not out of spite, but simply because it has nothing to give. Can you see the law of Love still at work? I would call that Tough Love, but Love never the less it is. It reminds me of my fuel tank and engine which behave like the desert.

If you don’t give or set things up in such a harmonic way, you will get nothing back. This is elementary my dear Watson and a very human attitude. It is little wonder why most cannot see or think right past the Laws of thermodynamics which support the desert-behaviour simply because they are not taught to see that nature gives to and replenishes itself always, in all ways. And yet people who design devices which manifest the principle of unconditional love by giving back to itself for self-repetition are called FRAUDS, by individuals no less who have never lifted a screw driver in the last 10 years. How amusing. What travesty. What Folly!

Plants versus Humans:
In this harmonic cyclical relationship of gas exchange between Humans and Vegetation. What do you suppose happens if all the trees on this world suddenly vanished? Well, if we are lucky we will experience just hypoxia. At least then we can be sure of 'going out' with a euphoric smile on our faces.

Human affairs:
I go to my customer in the market to buy a loaf of bread which is usually 250 Naira. He/She looks around and discovers that the other sellers failed to place orders for their day's supply of bread, and then demands of me 350 Naira with a look that says “take it or leave it.” I am compelled to take it. It matters not to the seller that for the past year I have patronised just him/her because I desired a business relationship based on trust and mutual betterment. The seller has incurred my ill-will. Who do you suppose I will NOT buy my loaf from tomorrow? Who lost in the long run? Who outsmarted themselves? Think one-way and you loose, all the time.

The Bee and the Flower:
For one reason or the other, most likely due to Human “Wisdom,” a patch of land has flowers on it which can no longer produce nectar for the bees and such. The bees take note and de-prioritise that area. The flowers give nothing, they can receive nothing in return. It's nothing personal from the bees, its just that to them, time is honey. Period!

“Free” Energy:
And so it is today that many...well, “uneducated, unqualified” individuals who have been spared the indoctrination of and by one-way thinkers—who know NOTHING of the ways and processes of the source of creation and its scientific law of Love which is unconditional giving and giving back—are doing a good job of making effort to improve conditions of living. What do they get in return? Spite, denigration, name-calling. Pseudo this and Pseudo and that. What arrogance!
You believe you know it all and yet you cannot answer basic questions as to the why of suffering on an abundant world, nor why we are unable to simply get along and have no inkling that Karma, not the “devil” is Two-Way Universal Love in action.
When people attempt to answer those questions, you quote insipid, near well Idiotic One-Way Laws concocted based on human one-way selfish behaviour of take, take, take, give nothing back, telling yourselves that such is also how nature works. How is that any different from religious attitudes?
What is next in this theatre of utter and absolute absurdities, I wonder.
Is science not just another religion and its theories another form of theology? You tell me.

Back to the MoGens.

Let us look at the theory of why they are JUST one of many simple and promising techniques for moneyless power generation.

There are two motors of hypothetically equal ratings and outputs when used as generators instead of motors. One motor is used for motoring and its shaft is connected directly or via a pulley to the shaft of the second motor which will act as the generator. The output of the second motor is connected back to the input electrodes of the first motor. Intelligence only need the initialise motion and the rest is CRM or “perpetual motion”. How is that any different in principle from the rain cycle, or other examples aforementioned? Can you not see Universal Love here of harmonic exchange?

What would happen if you double the rating of the second motor acting as a generator? It means 50% of its output would be given back to the first motor and the other 50% available for use, to YOU. Triple it? Quadruple? Throw in better bearings and “Octuple” that?

There is much argument as to the fact that motors are not 100% efficient so power available for use in MoGens is “not much.” They are not happy that power has to be given back to the system and want it all for use without giving anything back in return—Typical! That is quite the One-Way attitude, yes? So be it.

The solutions to many our problems exists within us. It is time to bring it out and put an end to the incessant prattle of what is possible or not according Professor “Who”. If nature or well, “God” does it, so can you.
Be ye perfect, like “Your Father in Heaven is Perfect.” One of the truths of the Illuminate referred to as “Jesus” which escaped corruption.

Over to you.

Interesting reading, I like your take on 'free energy' devices and the hipocrisy in the science world, but I don't totally agree with some of your submission.

Concerning natural occuring cycles, like water cyle, nitrogen cycle even food chain cycle, they are not over 100% efficient talkless of being a 'free energy' devices. Note, free energy must supply energy to load while operating, must perpetual motion device will stop if you decide to tap energy from it while working.

A free energy device must provide more than 100% energy output compare to its input, most perpetual devices have 100% energy output.

However, don't get me wrong, I'm a possibility person, I strongly believe free energy devices are possible and may have truly been fabricated. Thus the problem I have with current scientific laws and there supporter is this, how can you say ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED WHEN YOU AREN'T OMNISCIENT

Therefore, I propose that all laws that impose limit to possibility should be restated by including ' blah blah cannot be done/or confirmed as at this time and researchers should keep an open mind'. It is puzzling and pathetic seeing scientist knocking out a free energy idea/device without fully testing it out.

The aspect where your cycle examples really matter is in relation with the global economic system. Natural cycle utilizes a 1 to 1 exchange ratio, for instance, plants gives Oxygen and takes in carbon dioxide in 1 to 1 ratio, ditto animal to plants. Same applies in other cycles, when one take and refuses to give back its due a state of imbalance is created. Balance is a principle, and will definitely impose itself on nature, this leads to drought in some areas and flooding others. However, if the imbalance continues so thus d chain reaction aggravating d bad conditions even more.

But the global economy system is based on greed, one country takes more frm another and give less back the d other nation either by providing substandard goods/services or high profit margin, ditto corporate and individual buying and selling. With these system, someone is always exploited at the expense of the other, THUS THE BIRTH OF POVERTY!

The ideal exchange system doesn't have PROFIT or LOSS, thus there is BALANCE, and there cannot be POVERTY. The question is can we follow the path of nature, which will 100% eliminate poverty, or we will continue to be bounded by our SELFISH nature?

Same thing applies to free energy, because with it there will be REAL FREEDOM, but those who controls the world will never like that cause they'll lose the control. Therefore, if anyone creates d free energy device he'll have to fight them and the scientific system funded by them

Whichever way it is, we need solutions to FREE ENERGY BARRIER and POVERTY as well, keep in mind that free energy will gradually eliminate POVERTY!

BUT THE PROBLEM AS ALWAYS IS SELF!!!

Justinah4real:
Another one chance from stables of Lie lie mohamed, try it at your own peril.

It works sis, give it a try

Hahahaa!

It's only in Nigeria that people invent current technologies!

We should keep it up...

dorocent:
pls cn I knw how u did it... Asn abt d nyt plan

1st migrate to mtn pulse,

Then send 'Night' to 131, cost 25ngn for 500mb.
You can then browse from 12 to 3am.

I've forgetten d code for migrating to pulse.

To stop illegal deduction of ur balance after exhuasting the data bundle, send. 'Suspend' to 131, it'll halt all PAYGO charges

It works but instead of 12 to 4am they advertised, it is really 12 to 3am!

They taught me that early today..

GSteve001:
alright

Thanks Steve, it works!

GSteve001:
Send SUSPEND to 131. they won' touch ur airtime again.

Thanks, will try it and confirm if it works tomorrow

ladykilllar:
You were browsing after ur 500mb got exhausted, where do u expect mtn to remove money from? My own airtime?

Yes, from your airtime! Since you don't know the difference between the right and wrong thing. What stops mtn from restricting access to internet once the data is exhausted?

Doesn't matter anyway, we're nigerian; we suffer and smile. This won't happen anywhere where the people know their rights...

Morning N'landers, subscribed and used this plan earlier today. I had about 94ngn left. But after exhausting the 500mb, my balance deducted, they left 19ngn.

How can I stop this illegal deduction, is there any code to block this unholy charges? Someone should help me out, thanks

Oxytocin:
What makes you think it wouldn't take another millions of years for scientists to achieve another feat like they did this past 500 years??

There's no point pressing this argument further. If you believe and are convinced deep in our mind based on the acute curiousity, sheer determination and current breakthrough everywhere, that man wouldn't master interstellar travel in the next 1000yrs at maximum, then the delusion is yours...

tosyne55:
We are talking of the sun here ,the principal source of earth's energy,that which all other energy is gotten from and you are saying it's death will not anyway exterminate humans??that's delusional.
From your perspective, humans would have probably evacuated earth to another planet courtesy of advanced technology before the death of it's sun,so as not to be terminated along with earth.

Leaving earth means leaving it's solar system to maybe a planet in the ALPHA CENTAURI,a planet which is able to sustain human life. Now if for about 4.7 billion years, man hasn't even fully explored Mars,talkless of of it's solar system, what makes you think they would be able to explore another star system and find a planet in it which will be able to accommodate humans in the next 5 billion years??

What's delusional about my post? Yes, man would have definately left earth.

Now let me ask you a question, can you compare the advancement made in the last 500yrs to the begining of life on earth wch is in millions till 500yrs ago?

My friend, don't be fooled by current limits in science, because I can surely assure you, some current laws and principles wch imposed those limits will be modified and upgraded; new insights and discoveries will definately change them.

I repeat, 'earth as a planet will be finally consumed by sun, but humans will live on if they don't destroy themselves'!

Haha, how can anyone say the end of the sun will lead to human extinction...Naaaaah!

If humanity can manage to survive the current case of climate change, now add rapid advancement in our civilization that is currently going on. Even in 50 to 100yrs man will start travelling in space talkless of thousand, millions and heck, billions of years.

Straight to the point, the sun wouldn't exterminate life, yes it will end earth as a planet. However, the only thing that will exterminate humans is human! His greed, his inate and inbuilt problem from which every other evil emanates...SELF! It will be his own undoing, if he can't overcome it.

Interesting topic which is both simple and complex, just like life.

Now let's get in it, a scientist will tell you; you're the entire sum of your impulse, feelings, thoughts, received and sent sensory signals, knowlegde, imagination, believe etc. In other words, since the brain is d control unit of ur body(in computer term, the CPU) then you exist in that 'so called grey matter. Additional technologies may help you to rob a bank as you said, but the control is in that greyish 'gooish thing' wch is YOU!

For a thiest, your body and brain is a perfect clone and reflection of your soul in the physical(necessary to exist and live in this realm of existence), wch comprises your spirit and mind. The soul is conected to the body and if you were to be shot, that is the grey goo(kinda of like dat, lol) will terminate your physical existence and your soul will be free to move to the next realm.

As far as I am concerned, I kind of agree(believe) in both, maybe because both has limit(boundaries) and I hate limitations especially those imposed on humans by fellow humans.

In conclusion, i see you and me being above brain, body, soul and our wildest imaginations. I see LIMITLESSNESS, I see EVERYTHING....

Peace!

Haha, very funny.

First of all, science is the foundation of all knowledge, it powers and elevates every other field like arts, music, law, religion etc. Such a field is too serious to be super glamorious!


Without science, the world will be a terrible place, simply put WE'LL BE BACK IN STONE AGE!!!

Yeah, go figure

Lol, I feel you. Also check Star trek:DS9, Battlestar Galactica(one of the best sci fi series ever), Babylon 5, Firefly and the new ones like The Expanse.

Only ONE thing can happen, ABSOLUTE NEUTRALIZATION. Which obviously will lead to a MASSIVE EXPLOSION with a complete WIPING out of both entities from exsistence!

Teempakguy:
Yes, we Both agree, there is nothing as a best profession. but there is something as a grand profession. maybe not the exact best, but physics is arguably one of the better ones out there.

And besides, This is meant to be a Sermon. some people may in fact, not know which profession they want to go to. some may be thinking of a different profession. this article is for those on the fence. it's . . . sort of advertisement. surely, that can't be a bad thing. No?

I concur, besides we need more nigerians in science.

Teempakguy:
This is a "No true Scotsman" fallacy. first, you don't know if any great thinkers transcend an egoistic or limiting divide. second, even if they did, and Just some of them didn't, it is still not an excuse to label them as outsiders. there's nothing special about great thinkers. they are just like everyone else, and like everyone else, they want people to do what they do.

No physicist will Advice you to go and do another course when he realizes you have the intellectual potential to move physics forward. the more we are, the better.

They understand the game bcus they know that the greatest and only problem facing humanity is the problem of SELF. It's a double-edged sword; it helped cemented our place as the supreme specie on earth while at the same time it's curbing our advancement.

While great thinkers and inventors are also under the shackles of self, they transcend the limiting divide by SEEKING and APPLYING knowledge for the benefit of ALL and not just themselves, their family or only their profession or careers.

All I'm trying to say is there no such thing as a best or grand profession. Every action and result in every human endeavour forms a loop in a massive chain reaction wch result in NOW, a similar process results in TOMORROW!

I just laugh when I see people arguing that one profession or career is better than another, it's purely comical and vain.

How can any intelligent being say seeking knowledge is better than applying it and vice versa

It's like saying scientifically, energy is independent of matter and vice versa.
I guess the questions to people who support or are against the post are:

1. Why do we seek knowledge?

2. Why do we apply knowledge?

Great thinkers, problem-solvers and inventors transcend this egoistic and limiting divide; they understand the GAME!

Knowledge is based on the continous elapse of time; in which new information at any instance add to old kowledge accumulated till t-1.

This is nothing, in another millennium, fellow humans will look back and puke at our brutality and barbarism!

The difference between stone age, information and future ages is knowledge, it is the chord that ties and at the same time seperate you from your parents, grandparents and great grandparents.

We are linear beings, subjected to the powerful grip of time. If we ever conquer time, we will know everything and we will become Gods instantly.

Wouldn't that be nice?

This is a great news for the future of space voyages.

'Freeze' crewmen of a space ship, laugh ship(automated), ship reaches destination and 'defreeze' crew. Crewmen virtually never ages!

What a future!!

Beautiful creatures!

Nice hypothesis, trying to reconcile spirituality with science.

With time, more knowledge in metaphysis and pseudo-science will help in truly understanding the 'invisible realm', then man will be able to solve the core issue about existence and hence become more or less GODS!

obixcel:
Watched d documentary movie "Racing Extinction", it was so educating and enlightening and made me understand d concept of "climate change" like never before. At a point I was literary drawn to tears watching those dying species. You really need to watch it.

Yeah, welcome to the age of man!
The fact is so far the world depend on fuel for energy, we will continue to lose the race but i found the effect of livestocks on the climate interesting, the problem is im not ready to go veggie, are you?

AIs and computers are based on GIGO(gabbage in gabbage out, in other words, data in data out) system, designed by programmers. Softwares or programs are simply sets of instructions developed to converts data inputs to data output(actions) all based on the thoughts and experience of the software developer.

Thus, for an AI to become self aware, and consequently conscious, such AI must be given any knowledge capable of helping it make decision. However, such AI and its hardware must programmed with basic mean to interact with all its components, various means to observe its environment with various sensory devices available, and finally a basic 'learning code', which it can modify by itself and also from which it can 'ruminate and meditate' on its experience.

If such an AI is placed in an environment teaming human activities, but without anyone allowed to relate with it unless it initiates it first, and after a definite time, the AI does not ask or inquire of its 'name', what it is, who are the people and things it sees etc. Then it simply cannot be self aware, not to mention being conscious.

Anyway, due to some of the reasons explained above, its difficut to accept that an AI can become self aware. Though it'll be fun if they can; at least humans can have another being that will compete with them!

bright007:
who told you that a unicellular organism doesn't have intelligence?
please go and read about microorganisms and how they survive even in the extremest of enviromental conditions where you and I ( who claim to be intelligent can't survive)... then you will know they are intelligent

Nice ideas! Survival doesn't require intelligence, it however requires quick and prompt adaptation to changes.

HCpaul:
The major hinderance or limitations that Nigerians have towards technology ain't be used as an excuse to the barrier presented by the economic bug of our politics.

Although, technological advancement has shifted from individuality to team work. Meaning that todays inventions are accomplished by team effort.
But nevertheless, the required motive we lack as a country is the mindset of inventions and enterpreneurship. We brude upon knowledge but yet not an advocate of it. We underestimate the theoritical foundations and concepts of technology which will actually give rise to the development of prototype.
We have many scientist in the country but lack an inventor.
A country need a scientist, technology artifacts and inventors to be regarded as a technological oriented nation.
We lack industries, companies, pioneers, and revolution power.

Look at Japan, Korea, Germany and Iraq for example. Those countries was not better than Nigerians in terms of literacy and civilization, but are ready to develop their first institution in the inventions.
They was once almost wiped out, but they still took their stand to grow.
Today, the destiny of robots development is in the hand of the Japanese.

What we actually need is an individual personality ignited with the mindset of inventions.
It takes a group of inventors to develop an IT institution and industry.

Also, our institution has to be a research institution, and one must count invention as a serious business.


Let us go and learn about invention.
Currently, am someone that possess the innovative mindset of invention, but i lack the materialistic resources to execute them.
Am a multi-philantropist, who adopt all the precepts organized by the dear friend called knowledge.


Just pray for me.

I wish you all the best bro.