Please to the christians, please read it all and do your own researches..don't just come to nairaland after believing whatever you hear from the internet without any form of research and start insulting other people religions due to information you saw some where

Ibkhaleel01:
The xtian never change their nature...lies upon lies.... following conjectures from haters of Islam

They know they cant face us with the lies...but rather hide online and disgrace themselves here...


Lemme disgrace you


Virgins Matthew 19:29 says Christians will be given 100 wives to make love with:

"And every one that has forsaken houses, or brothers, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife (ἤ γυναῖκα), or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive a hundred times more, and shall inherit everlasting life."


Pulpit Commentary

Verse 29. - ....." Some manuscripts, followed by some modern editors, omit or wife, the omission being probably first made by some critical scribe, who deemed that a wife should never be left. The Lord enumerates the persons and objects upon which men's hearts are most commonly and firmly fixed. He begins and ends the list with material possessions - houses and lands, and between them introduces in gradation the most cherished members of the family circle. "Forsaking wife and children" may be understood as abstaining from marriage in order the better to serve God. For my Name's sake. In consequence of belief in Christ, rather than do despite to his grace, or in order to confess and follow him more completely........ An hundredfold. Some read "manifold," as in Luke 18:30. The spiritual relationship into which religion would introduce him largely compensates for the loss of earthly connections. He shall have brothers and sisters in the faith - hundreds who will show him the affection of father and mother, hundreds who will love him as well as wife and children. .......... The hope of future happiness is in itself sufficient to lighten and dissipate all earthly troubles, and to stimulate severest sacrifices."


This verse is a proof that the bible is altered according to scribes' own desires.

More and more we hear of ignorance from Christians who criticize Islam for claiming that Paradise will have physical pleasures in it similar to the ones that we have here on earth.  Personally, I've heard cheap comments before about the 70 Houris for men in Heaven and how the Prophet, peace be upon him, "promised Hot desert men" sex in Paradise.

Bashing is easy, and believe me, nothing is easier than bashing the gospel of porn bible for claiming that women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine", and that sisters can look lustfully at their biological brothers and wish to have sex with them in bed.  All of the quotes from the gospel of porn are locate at:  X-Rated Pornography in the Bible.

Note:  The exact number of 70 Houris is not mentioned in the Noble Quran.  It is only mentioned in the Hadiths (collections of the Sayings of Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him).  But Houris were mentioned in the Noble Quran.  So the number is most likely true, even though the Hadiths were collected centuries after the natural death of the Prophet.  In other words, the possibility of the Hadith being corrupt (most of the Bible is mostly corrupt), is slim because the Noble Quran supports the narration by mentioning the Houris as shown at the end of the article.  Please visit:  What parts of the Hadiths and Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why?

Now having said all of that, let us now get technical here. 

See this guy I said go to twitter to see the actual posts the nigga that posted it onNL only selected the light skinned girls maybe according to his preferences

compton11:
nigga check nairaland here.
They only post light skin girls

As I said before their justification of beauty is how less cloths the girl wear and how it arouse a mans lust,pure stupidity

Yusman316:

See this one. Where have u seen northern Muslim ladies doing beauty contest?

You southerners think that northern girls are as immoral and disgusting as you girls dude wake up

Tajbol4splend:



I'm talking of the core north

Plain stupidity you call out on herdsmens killing but you still supporting other people killing others, can you see the hypocrisy

NairalandSpy:
Just one rocket from Israel these beauties will turn to ashes.. Hahaha.
The fear of isreal is d beginning of wisdom.

Don't justify other people children with the behaviors of your sisters and female friends in your region not every one is immoral like you lot

Tajbol4splend:



Those girls also fvck before marriage, spare us the decent part

Every gender has their region in the mosque men and women do not mix during prayers so what exactly are you talking about

Heffalump:
As beautiful as they are, na the other room sure pass
Their men will always put them behind the mosque during prayers.

The author of this post only stole the light skinned girls pics from twitter if you wanna see more go on arewatwitter and stop making noise on NL

compton11:
Colorist set of people

Their definition of pretty arewa girls are always light skinned and how is this in Islam forum?

Please who ask you...you with your last 1k for account

richidinho:
We are not interested, their minds na terrorist own

Haha your definition of beauty is ladies in scanty dressing well dude go back to your region girls cos if you wanna talk beauty our ladies do not have to dress naked to show it

NgwaManNaija4LF:


No girl in Nigeria can challenge us in terms of beauty, your region have not won any beauty contestants in Nigeria.

Ugly girls.

Well see another hater with your goat looking appearance do you honestly think you arein any of these ladies spec nigga think!!!

Mastakija:
Dat one no concern me
Make dem separate us from dis animals na dat one be my own o
Shay beauty lama je ni

Tell him o...our ladies do not have to dress naked to be recognized for their beauty unlike girls in your region

andyblinks05:

I feel your pain. I bet your region can't boost of beautiful decent girls, I mean look at them not exposing their body but they are damn beautiful

Lol nigga don't hate they are way out of your league..go to all your ladies who dress nude as you prefer

RMoneyInTheBank:
It depends on your definition of beauty... Is the mind beautiful ? I am yet to see a girl who looks ugly after applying foundation on her face... Physically looking at their FACES, you may say some are beautiful...i am not asking them to go naked but merely showing the face ALONE cannot make me conclude that someone is physically beautiful... This is because the TRUE physical beauty any woman can possess is dependent on the SIZE of her breasts....oh yes...

When a woman dresses from head to toe, opening only her face full of foundation, one cannot physically Assess her beauty,

for example, one cannot tell if those arewa girls have bastard K legs, whether they have the acceptable size of breasts or not, whether they have the acceptable size of asses or not

I come in peace

See comment of a mad human being... Your kind of people is the reason why this world progression is slow. All because of you dimwitted people

HellAnus:
God bless Israel

Simplyleo will agree with me that Satan will punish all Palestinian terrorists and all tinubu urchins, Amin!

Dumb ass may your daughter act this way then you'll tell us how it feels

hammerDK:



U PEOPLE WILL JUST BE BRANDING AND CALLING PEOPLE NAMES FOR NO REASON.


I LIKE WOMEN NOT GIRLS.


YET U CALLED ME ALL MANNER OF NAMES FOR SIMPLY POINTING OUT THE OBVIOUS.


SHAME ON U AND COCOCANDY.


U BLACK MONKEYS ARE THE REASON WE NEVER PROGRESS.


INCAPABLE OF DISSENTING OPINION OR OPPOSITION VIEW, U THINK LIFE IS ONE WAY, I TELL U, UR ANCESTORS ALL GOT MARRIED BY THE AGE OF 15 YEARS OLD. EWU!

You speak like human nature is different for example let say if a senator son kill someone his father would try his best to handle it off key while the rules of any nation is either life in prisonment or death so including emotions in this doesn't make it factual
If your son is kidnapped even if you are the president who says he doesn't negotiate with terrorist you would still off-key pay the ransom and formulate a lie to tell people.
So emotions and the rules have various implications

kabillionaire:
People that talk like this, kidnap their children and you will see them paying that same day.

El-rufai of kaduna said, he will not negotiate with kidnappers even if they kidnap his son, meanwhile he has withdrawn his son from the public school he was enrolled.

Rambling of a ignorant man
Go and read on principle on martyrdom

helinues:
Then what is he waiting for?

He should go and meet the terrorist so that they can slaughter him and gain access to his paradise and the virgin girls...

And to say the man na professor is something troubling..

Professor of terrorist

See ur life this is a yoruba man

Queenlovely:
only an uneducated hausa man can do this.

an igbo man's pride will not allow him.

Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:

Talking about the hadith mentioned in the question requires a little detail from specialists in the study of hadith. It is not sufficient to give a general answer or an answer based only on one’s personal view of the matter. Therefore we hope that the questioner will learn and pay attention to the way in which we will trace different versions of the hadith, with different chains of narrators. Thus the facts about it will become clear, in sha Allah.

All versions of the hadith are based on the following chain of narrators:

‘Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr ibn Hazm, from ‘Amrah bint ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan, from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her). The isnaad ends with her and does not go back to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah upon him).

The hadith was taken from ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr by a number of narrators and their narrations are as follows:

1.

It was narrated by Yahya ibn Sa‘eed al-Ansaari. His version says: It was revealed in the Qur’an that ten definite breastfeedings are required (to establish the relationship of mahram), then it was also revealed that five definite breastfeedings are required.

This was narrated by Imam Muslim in his Saheeh (no. 1452) and others. We may note that this version does not say anything about the story of the goat or tame sheep eating any of the pages of the Holy Qur’an.

2.

It was narrated by Imam Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him). His version says: Among that which was revealed of the Qur’an was the ruling that those ten definite breastfeedings are required to establish the relationship of mahram, then that was abrogated and replaced with five definite breastfeedings. When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died, this was among the things that were recited in the Qur’an.

This was narrated by Maalik in al-Muwatta’ (Kitaab ar-Ridaa‘, hadith no. 17), and via him by Imam Muslim (1452) and others. We may note here that the report of Imam Maalik from ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr also does not include any mention of the story of the goat or tame sheep eating anything of the Mus-haf. Rather one sentence is added to it at the end: When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died, this was among the things that were recited in the Qur’an.

3.

It was narrated by Muhammad ibn Ishaaq. His version says: The verse of stoning and breastfeeding of an adult ten times was revealed, and it was written on a leaf that was kept beneath a bed in my [‘Aa’ishah’s] house. When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) fell sick, we were preoccupied with his situation, and a little animal of ours came in and ate it.

This was narrated by Imam Ahmad in al-Musnad (43/343), and Ibn Maajah in as-Sunan (no. 1944); the latter version says: When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.

As you can see, this version does mention the odd phrase that is additional to what was narrated by the two great imams, Yahya ibn Sa‘eed al-Ansaari and Maalik ibn Anas (may Allah have mercy on them both). This is what the questioner referred to in his question. In this version of the hadith it says that a tame sheep – which is a sheep that people feed in their homes – came in and ate the page that contained the verse of stoning and the verse of breastfeeding an adult.

This difference was sufficient for the scholars of hadith to rule that the version narrated by Muhammad ibn Ishaaq was da‘eef (weak), and that it was to be rejected and regarded as odd. In their view, the odd hadith is any hadith in which a trustworthy narrator differed with that which was narrated by other trustworthy narrators who were more accurate than him in the narration or were greater in number. This is a sound academic principle, because how can one narrator have additional wording in a hadith that others also narrated from the original narrators, when the latter are greater in number, more accurate in memory and narration, and of higher status in knowledge of hadith? Why didn’t they also narrate this additional or different material? Is there any other way to understand what happened, except by referring to that rule in order to know where some narrators differed in their narration and included some odd material in it? If that is not the case (and you do not want to refer to that rule), then how could this debater convince us that Muhammad ibn Ishaaq learned of the hadith of ‘Aa’ishah that which both Yahya ibn Sa‘eed al-Ansaari and Maalik ibn Anas had forgotten, when they were both leading scholars and senior figures in their field? In fact Sufyaan ath-Thawri (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Yahya ibn Sa‘eed al-Ansaari was, in the view of the people of Madinah, of a higher standard in the field of hadith than az-Zuhri. ‘Ali ibn al-Madeeni regarded him as one of the most authentic and trustworthy narrators of hadith, and one of those concerning whom one would have no sense of unease with their hadith at all. Ahmad ibn Hanbal said concerning him: He is one of the most accurate in narration. Wuhayb said: I came to Madinah and I did not see anyone but you might feel comfortable with some of what they narrated and have reservations about other reports of theirs, except Maalik and Yahya ibn Sa‘eed (i.e., all of their reports could be accepted without reservation).

See: Tahdheeb at-Tahdheeb (11/223)

So how about if we know that Muhammad ibn Ishaaq is criticised by some scholars of hadith, and there were some mistakes that were noted in his narrations, and it was noted that he differed in some of his narrations from the narration of some leading trustworthy scholars? We cannot accept the narration of such a person if it differs from the narration of other trustworthy narrators, and we do not accept from him any weird or odd wording that other trustworthy narrators did not narrate.

Hanbal ibn Ishaaq said: I heard Abu ‘Abdullah say: The narration of Ibn Ishaaq cannot be used as proof.

‘Abdullah ibn Ahmad said: He – i.e., Ahmad ibn Hanbal – did not use his reports as evidence when discussing what is Sunnah.

Ayyoob ibn Ishaaq said: I asked Ahmad ibn Hanbal: O Abu ‘Abdullah, if Ibn Ishaaq is the only narrator of the hadith, will you accept it? He said: No, by Allah, for I have seen him putting together the words of many narrators in a single hadith, and not separating the narration of one person from that of another.

Yahya ibn Ma‘een classed him as da‘eef in one report narrated from him. An-Nasaa’i said: He is not qawiy (strong). Ad-Daaraqutni said: The leading scholars differed concerning him, and he is not an authority; rather his narration may be taken into consideration (alongside others)

See: Tahdheeb at-Tahdheeb (9/45).

We have previously discussed Muhammad ibn Ishaaq in detail in fatwa no. 148009

What will make the matter clearer is the fact that al-Qaasim ibn Muhammad, like ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Bakr, narrated the hadith without the additional material of Muhammad ibn Ishaaq.

At-Tahhaawi narrated in Sharh Mushkil al-Athaar (11/486): Muhammad ibn Khuzaymah told us: al-Hajjaaj ibn Minhaal told us: Hammaad ibn Salamah told us, from ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan ibn al-Qaasim, from al-Qaasim ibn Muhammad, from ‘Amrah, that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: Among the things that were revealed in the Qur’an, then abrogated, was that the relationship of mahram cannot be established except by ten breastfeedings, then after that it was revealed: or five breastfeedings.

To sum up, the story of the sheep eating a page of the Holy Qur’an in the house of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) is da‘eef (weak) and is not proven.

Ibn Qutaybah ad-Daynoori (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The versions of the hadith narrated by Maalik are different to those narrated by Muhammad ibn Ishaaq, and Maalik is more accurate, according to the scholars of hadith, than Muhammad ibn Ishaaq.

End quote from Ta’weel Mukhtalif al-Hadith (p. 443)

The commentators on the Musnad of Imam Ahmad said:

Its isnaad is da‘eef because the only one who narrated it was Muhammad ibn Ishaaq, and its text contains something odd.

End quote from the Mu’sasat ar-Risaalah edn (43/343)

Al-Aloosi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

With regard to the additional material having been on a page that was kept with ‘Aa’ishah and was eaten by the tame sheep, it is a fabrication and lie of the heretics that this was lost as the result of being eaten by a tame sheep without being abrogated. This is what it says in al-Kashshaaf.

End quote from Rooh al-Ma‘aani (11/140)

Ibn Hazm (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

It was proven that the wording was abrogated, but the sheet on which it was written remained, as ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said – then it was eaten by the tame sheep; but no one needs it (that verse). Something similar may be said with regard to the verse on breastfeeding, and there is no difference between the two. The proof of that is that they memorised (the verse) as we have mentioned. So if it was confirmed as being part of the Qur’an, the fact that the sheep ate it would not have changed the fact that it was part of the Qur’an, based on the fact that they had memorised it.

Thus we may conclude with certainty that no two Muslims differ concerning the fact that Allah, may He be exalted, enjoined upon His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) the conveying of the message, and that he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) conveyed it as he had been instructed to do. … And we may conclude, with regard to the verses that were lost, that if the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) had been instructed to convey them, he would have done so, and if he had conveyed them they would have been memorised, and if they had been memorised then the death of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would not affect the matter at all, just as the fact that he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died did not affect anything else of what he had conveyed of the Qur’an.

End quote from al-Muhalla (12/177)

Al-Baaqilaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

There is no one on the face of the earth more ignorant than one who thinks that the Messenger and the Sahaabah were all careless with regard to the Qur’an and that they would not memorise it and learn it by heart, and that they would rely for confirming it on a sheet that was placed under the bed of ‘Aa’ishah only, a sheet that was thrown on the floor and disrespected, until the neighbourhood sheep came in and ate it, resulting in the loss of that sheet and whatever was written on it!

We wonder what it was that could have allegedly led the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to such negligence, helplessness and carelessness, when he had been entrusted with the religion and had been instructed to protect it and preserve it, and to appoint scribes to write it, as he had a large number of people who were skilled in the field of writing, whose main task was to write down the Qur’an that was revealed to him, and to write down covenants, deeds, trusts and other matters that might occur or be connected to the Messenger, especially since there was a need to keep a record of it.

The main task of the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was only to explain and protect the Qur’an, and protect the religion; he had no occupation or any other worldly concerns to distract him from that, except some efforts he might undertake to support and reinforce the religion, and to promote and explain the Qur’an. Otherwise, how could it be possible that all of these people and all of the Sahaabah would not be aware of the verses about breastfeeding and stoning, so that no one would know about them or refer to them, except ‘Aa’ishah alone?

Therefore, based on what we have described about how the Messenger was devoted to conveying the message, and the Sahaabah were keen to learn and memorise it, it is not possible that they could have lost something of the Book of Allah, may He be exalted, whether it was small or great; people of such calibre should be the greatest of people in memorising it and preserving what was revealed of it and what happened concerning it, such as the dates when it was revealed, the reasons for revelation, and what abrogated and was abrogated.

End quote from al-Intisaar li’l-Qur’an (1/412-418)

Whatever the case, what the Muslim is required to do is to constantly be aware and careful, so he should not believe everyone who makes some claim, and he should not follow every rumour, myth or story that is narrated here or there, especially in Internet chat rooms and forums, because they may be visited by knowledgeable and ignorant people alike, both speakers of truth and liars, sincere people and hateful hypocrites. Such matters require investigation and verification, by asking knowledgeable people and referring to authentic Islamic books; many such resources are widely available, praise be to Allah. Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. ones saying: ‘I have seen,’ while in fact he has not seen, or ‘I have heard,’ while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah)” [al-Isra’ 17:36].

Mikehot:
If goats could hijack your religion is it Islamic Terrorists that can't?

Sunan Ibn Majah 1944

It was narrated that 'Aishah said:

“The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.”

You say that because that is what vices tells you to... Have you ever try investigating or you just believe whatever other people tells you because your religion is different pls my friend research before drawing conclusions

zhike:


You are correct my friend, Muslim likes to kill people .

Haaa I am speechless..... Well what can be said about the ignorance and sheer stupidity of man.... The vow written in naira land was placed in order to prevent people like you from posting offensive things now you come out with some very offensive word well may God forgive you

Kholar211:
ok I'm going to have to deactivate my account. I'll gladly bare the consequences of losing my monika than to association myself with killers. Thanks

What is wrong with you... How will you just decide to write some thing like this just because you want to slander a religion... How disgusting are you

Phock2sweet:
what of aisha that mohammed used to lie with and lay his head on her private part sniffing her menstrual smell?

spits...dirty and disgusting MOhammed

fatymore:

Taalo ranise ko click

Please do elaborate on the lies and also on the cats and dogs.... Or are you just stating words due to your own ignorance

KingOKON:
.

It is a lie!
Where are all the "cats and rats" names?

Very conservative but sexy babes

Please do quote where it is written in any religion that violence is approved please!!!!

Comedian2019:

As far as the religion that teaches violence exists, nothing will change.

Media see them

AmuAwusa:
Mmmm....
I left Kaduna Road some hours ago. :I
Una see this side, middle belt and North na war zone.

You guys for down south no no say una dey enjoy.You see all those horrors in the media, na like 20% of the shiit going on here.

Nigeria is gone!Forget politics.

Mumu

Slimzjoe:



I don't know the right term to brand you. If you can't be happy for them, just hush up and mind your business. Why would you be wishing failure on them cos they decided to celebrate in this way.

I went through this Rites four years ago and will be graduating soon with 2.1. This did not in anyway change my focus.
Please have sense

You forgot d Igbo's