₦airaland Forum

johnydon22:
These are based on observed facts...

example: You are used to the notion of Cause and Effect but in a quantum field particles has been observed to pop in and out of existence without any influence or cause.

You are familiar with the first law of motion: A body at rest will continue at rest and a body in motion will continue in motion at a given direction and speed unless acted upon by an external force but in the quantum world subatomic particles has been found can be induced to speed up almost to the speed of light all by themselves without any external force added.

And also Quantum entanglement, Two particles at very long distance from each other behaving like it's just one particle in two places. . . Information are passed between them faster than the speed of light that when you make one particle spin at a given direction instantaneously the other does the same.

The laws of Physics you are familiar with in this macro state are all turned upside down, man still cannot place his hand on the quantum laws (how things should happen) that govern the microbile world.

I told someone the other day maybe we are used to how things should be done that we are always looking for 'how things should be done' therefore making some eventualities elusive to us, what if the only laws of the quantum state is 'there are no law' then we will spend eternity searching for laws that are not there.

well fingers crossed we can always not know what we'd find the more we look

Hmm...that's very interesting. Would it not be easier to say that the Laws of macro physics were just opinion in the first place? Why is there such huge personal investment in being right about them so much so that such an unnatural conclusion as correctness or uncorrectness according to scale is entertained? Is this not testament to how Academia draws its unnatural conclusions to save face? I have said and i maintain, that Quantum mechanics is a replacement for classical mechanics and the correct attitude is to call the old version of science, wrong and refrain from making the new science sacrosanct or they will yet go through many versions of mechanics most assuredly.

For one, Newton's Laws are figment of imagination because in nature, objective bodies are never at rest are they? How long will a peeled banana remain viable when left alone on your table? Also, motion in nature is never a straight line, it is a curve. Newton's first "law" is thus invalid! There is a lot to learn about what "motion" is, obviously.

What you quote as observed facts is quite interesting for nature's dynamics are always two-part--the subjective and objective. Now, I have yet to fully peruse the claims of quantum mechanics, but why is it a surprise that something comes into objective being from the subjective and then reverses? How is that different from heavenly bodies appearing out of space and later being swallowed up by space? How is that different from from clapping your hands and making a sound?
AH! The answer to that question is Consciousness. Academia has a vast amount to learn, or more appropriately, to unlearn.

Nature has not one set of principles for one affair, and a different set for another. She is consistent and that makes her awfully dependable, much unlike the fickleness of Man which it dares ascribe to nature like he does in his religions. If it were not so, no one would have been bold enough to assume a black hole in the centre of the galaxy, whereas every example of a galaxy, from planets with rings to suns tells you that a black hole most definitely does not centre a galaxy, but a big-ass sun.

johnydon22:
Floor still Open to more questions and topics for discussions.

Very well then. First of all don, love your work!

Exactly... the quantum world to me is a distinct universe of it's own. . . We might be looking for parallel universe outside this but maybe it is already staring at us in the form of the building blocks of ours.

Here are two parallel worlds.

-The macro world is a world where things are governed by the laws of physics.
-the quantum world is so different that it turns all the laws of Physics prevalent in this macro state upside down but yet is the foundation of the macro world.

Cause and effect doesn't tie the quantum world down but yet rules in the macro world.

Here is a state of ruling laws of physics that was build on a state that faults these laws.

It's a progression and evolution of nature, going from the lawless quantum spooky part accumulated to become a physical part that is driven by the physical laws of it's contents.

Upon what premise have these conclusions been drawn? Are they facts, opinion, or theory?

It would have been much more wholesome to indicate that the rectum is not designed for penetration any more than attempts should be made to penetrate a one-way valve in the wrong direction. The case against Sodomy is technical, not mora-ethical. Any other reason is hogwash.

People also don't forget that Sodomy is not entirely the purview of male-male "sexual" affairs. There are men who would swear on their mother's life that they are not "gay." Yet, they find the anus of the female partners an exotic holiday destination. As far as I am concerned, Sodomy is not a form of sexuality any more than masturbatin.g into the cup of one's hand can be regarded a form of sexuality. While I pass no judgement, it is necessary to indicate that it causes harm and that is a technical issue, not a moral one.

We are not going about these LGBT issues the right way. It will persist till we do.

SidL's Treatise on Barriers to the Idea of Perpetual Motion



Misconceptions of Perpetual Motion and the Fallacies of Thermodynamic Laws
It is truly a strange world we live in. A world with many problems well known and acknowledged. More disturbing still, a world in which most of these problems are not even being given the benefit of attempts at solutions, because of Man-made Laws, which not only mentally prohibit such attempts, but also denigrate such attempts. It is said that these “Laws” cannot be broken—What Folly!
Yet, the very same group which conspired to draw up such…“mental legislations” on creative thinking breaks it own laws in its thinking every single day.

One of the problems we experience as a species, for which quality of life would be vastly improved if solved, is generation of power that is as sustainable as it is FREE of monetary charge. Some would call this concept “free-energy,” I would call it, “freely generated” 'energy'. Nothing in Nature is free, she requires no money, but she does 'barter'.

The laws of Thermodynamics, if I am not mistaken, were put together under the paradigm of what we now refer to as “Classical mechanics.” Today we now have “Quantum mechanics” in which Academia concedes vastly improved understanding of Natural Dynamics of Creation.
I find the Hubris involved as amusing as it is tragic, for the correct thing to have done is humbly tell the world:

“We concede that we were mistaken about theories that we called “Laws”, which we arrogantly regarded as sacrosanct. We apologise. Please take a look at our new and improved understandings even as we present them with caution and consideration that they will be further improved upon. These new understandings are not sacrosanct or free from perceptual errors. Please do not call them Laws and be open to the possibility that they are incorrect that we may not deny ourselves the possibility, and opportunity, of one day coming into comprehension of Ultimate Truths of Existence, which is our goal.”
Simple, short and sweet.

The problem ultimately with the Idea of Perpetual Motion and the “Laws” of Thermodynamics is the lack of understanding that this is a universe based on Unconditional Love.
Love is not an emotion and is not to be mistaken for selective affection or disaffection, or any of their idea-synonyms that we are all too familiar with. Emotions however are based on Love as are all things else.

From a purely 'scientific' standpoint, Love may be referred to as Balance or Equal Exchange or Unconditional and Equal Giving and Giving Back. In other words, this is a universe of motion that is always, Simultaneously and/or Sequentially, patently Two-Way in nature. This is a FACT, not an opinion or theory, for its premise is Painfully Obvious and all around, should you decide to SEE.

Two-way motion in nature may also be referred to as cycles. Not one single aspect or idea of the universe is continuous in nature despite all appearances to the contrary. It is entirely cyclical. As you know, cycles are repetitive, not continuous. Please disregard the fact that cycles can be so fast, that the simulate continuity for we are blessed to know the illusion of it. In a stop-motion optical universe of perpetrated illusions which deceive our senses most of the time, we know that the movie at the cinema is not continuous but a combination of cyclical optical projections which repeat at the rate of 20-30 hertz, albeit with a different image to each cycle. Stop-motion is stop-motion however way you slice it or label it.

Cyclical repetitiveness is the sole reason why the thermodynamic series fall FLAT on their faces! Those laws are built on the premise that this is a continuous ONE-WAY universe and are therefore only as valid as the idea of ONE-WAY continuity. If I am close to truth in my assertion of the CYCLICAL Nature of this universe, then the Thermodynamic concept is thus a false. With all due respect, it is time to toss them in the bin of history where they belong……..or not.

Of perpetual motion, I will briefly say this. There is no such thing as perceptual motion. In this, I am of the opinion that Academia is correct but only to an extent, at most 50% as usual, for anyone who uses the senses to investigate is apt to see the objective half a cycle which correspond to the senses which are themselves an objective half of cycles. The other half of the cycle is ALWAYS invisible and in most cases too fast to be detected by the senses or instruments. One can see how false expectations of perpetuity is born since our senses rarely respond to the both halves of all cycles.

So why then did I start this thread if I think thus? Well, look again. I said THE IDEA of perpetual motion. I did not say Perpetual Motion. Perpetual motion is as fallacious as the Laws of Thermodynamics are for the same reason of the error in premise that this is one-way continuous universe. This is not a continuous universe. It is a Two-Way Cyclical Universe. According to the Universal Law of Love, if a system does not give back to itself what that system gave to itself, it will not repeat, reincarnate, “continue or survive.” It will die. That is exactly why you spend a huge part of your income on fuel.

I found it much easier therefore to just say the “Idea of perpetual motion” because most are already familiar with the concept. The more correct term for perpetual motion therefore is “Cyclically Repetitive Motion” or CRM.
Therefore, For simplicity in explanation CRM = Perpetual Motion. I have thus corrected (In my humble arrogance of course) the Idea of Perpetual motion for what it truly is—CRM—since CRM is a FACT of nature that it is extremely difficult to deny or dispute even by the densest of minds. I hope I make sense.

As in all things, I could be mistaken of course. I must admit this. How else can I further evolve my understanding of the truth of LAWS of Nature? Note to myself (and you): Beware Hubris!

Moving along. All transactions in nature manifest this TWO-WAY principle and principles in nature are always universally applicable. They apply to all things, including human transactions which very often, due to free-will, attempt to thwart these unbreakable principles only to pay for such attempts in personal pain and suffering which most would refer to as the devil's doing.

Anticipating this argument, I already gave examples on my original post. Now I will amplify and make clear what happens when attempts are made to violate the principle of Universal Love. It will become further obvious also, why CRM is a FACT of nature and why the thermodynamic series simply lacks ground.

Perpetual Motion (CRM) in Nature:
Once upon a time there was just the equilibrium of bitterly cold dark space, nothing else was. Intelligence in equilibrium decided to know itself experientially by creating out of ITself, what IT was not not—Activity/Motion—that IT may subsequently experience what IT truly is, Equilibrium, and that by repeating this act, it could simulate its continuity “forever”.
IT gathered to Itself at one point, all of ITS widely dispersed self and became a hot, violent, highly motive particle of what we call objective matter.
Ah! now it knew Equilibrium by being activity and longed to experience that state of Equilibrium once again. Compression of subjective space (Equilibrium) into objectivity took a lot of effort. Once this effort was relaxed, that “particle or plasma” exploded back effortlessly, wave-like, into a state of expanded equilibrium. The... “big bang”, anybody? How is that different from orgasm? What good is the pleasure of sex if you coupled to your partner 24/7 without breaks to savour the experience?
Do you now comprehend the import of cycles in all things and the fallacy of one-way continuity upon which man-made laws are cooked? That “God” is Cycle-Junkie?

If a cycle of equilibrium to activity and activity back to equilibrium does not happen, it cannot be repeated. Am I clear? I must stop here, for I can write a book on more analogies that amplify my point that continuity is false. It is CRM which creates the appearance or illusion of continuity. Politicians and celebrities are the only breed of Humans who comprehend that appearances are not facts. So be it.

NEWS FLASH:
All heavenly bodies and being vortically recharged via their two two poles simultaneous to their equatorial discharge or novas. If it were not so, such bodies would not “continue” or would soon burn out. The academia whom many of you blindly memorise and quote their one-way sermons, always fail to tell you that each body in space has two holes at each pole for recharging their internal “plasma” batteries. Their satellite cameras always avoid taking pictures of them and google earth airbrushes those holes for your intellectual convenience of course. Now you know!

Entropy, one of the sub-premises of the Thermodynamic series is a very vivid figment of Human One-Way, selfish, greedy, thieving, competitive imagination. It is not much different from the vengeful-God-theory with which religions control multitudes.
In nature all down-hill flows are simultaneous and sequentially counter-balanced by up-hill flows, ALWAYS. This is painfully and patently obvious in most cases. Please let us do some real thinking and stop behaving the flash-drives which record and regurgitate data verbatim, hence the term “garbage in, garbage out.”

Rain:
The widely dispersed, highly voluminous gases which make up cold space are compressed into molten solids, which in this particular octave of concern, we refer to as liquid or water of highly reduced volume, but equal in potential pound for pound to highly voluminous gases. Solids are one visible half of the cycle and are not a natural state of being, and when the effort which compelled gases into the state of solidity is let-off even minutely, they return effortlessly to the original state of gaseous equilibrium. So much for “anti-matter.”

Intelligence in nature has set conditions up such that before evaporating molten solids (liquids) reach that ultimate state of equilibrium as inert gases, the cold of space freezes/crystallises the mass in its track. We call those clouds. The clouds stay there because weight-wise they are in equilibrium and will neither fall down nor fall up (rise), unless more clouds are added, then the fall...down.
And thus it is the principle of cyclical self-repetition is hatched and it is done without paying a dime to anyone, nor does it require input by anyone to consummate. So much for entropy.

This is called unconditional Love and one obvious example of “perpetual motion” in nature. Can any deny this? The earth give liquids back to “Heaven” as gases, and Heaven gives back those nearly invisible gases as rain. Everyone is happy! There is peace and prosperity for all who depend on water. You don't have to do anything to receive rain, including felling of trees to make newspapers to read all about those tree felling—the irony.

What happens when attempt is made to break this Law?

You fell the trees which are both water guzzlers and gas givers, or play with the little match of thermonuclear devices, and build nuclear power plants. Brrravo!
Deserts are thus formed, devoid of vegetation. The desert gives NOTHING to the sky and the sky simply gives NOTHING back, not out of spite, but simply because it has nothing to give. Can you see the law of Love still at work? I would call that Tough Love, but Love never the less it is. It reminds me of my fuel tank and engine which behave like the desert.

If you don’t give or set things up in such a harmonic way, you will get nothing back. This is elementary my dear Watson and a very human attitude. It is little wonder why most cannot see or think right past the Laws of thermodynamics which support the desert-behaviour simply because they are not taught to see that nature gives to and replenishes itself always, in all ways. And yet people who design devices which manifest the principle of unconditional love by giving back to itself for self-repetition are called FRAUDS, by individuals no less who have never lifted a screw driver in the last 10 years. How amusing. What travesty. What Folly!

Plants versus Humans:
In this harmonic cyclical relationship of gas exchange between Humans and Vegetation. What do you suppose happens if all the trees on this world suddenly vanished? Well, if we are lucky we will experience just hypoxia. At least then we can be sure of 'going out' with a euphoric smile on our faces.

Human affairs:
I go to my customer in the market to buy a loaf of bread which is usually 250 Naira. He/She looks around and discovers that the other sellers failed to place orders for their day's supply of bread, and then demands of me 350 Naira with a look that says “take it or leave it.” I am compelled to take it. It matters not to the seller that for the past year I have patronised just him/her because I desired a business relationship based on trust and mutual betterment. The seller has incurred my ill-will. Who do you suppose I will NOT buy my loaf from tomorrow? Who lost in the long run? Who outsmarted themselves? Think one-way and you loose, all the time.

The Bee and the Flower:
For one reason or the other, most likely due to Human “Wisdom,” a patch of land has flowers on it which can no longer produce nectar for the bees and such. The bees take note and de-prioritise that area. The flowers give nothing, they can receive nothing in return. It's nothing personal from the bees, its just that to them, time is honey. Period!

“Free” Energy:
And so it is today that many...well, “uneducated, unqualified” individuals who have been spared the indoctrination of and by one-way thinkers—who know NOTHING of the ways and processes of the source of creation and its scientific law of Love which is unconditional giving and giving back—are doing a good job of making effort to improve conditions of living. What do they get in return? Spite, denigration, name-calling. Pseudo this and Pseudo and that. What arrogance!
You believe you know it all and yet you cannot answer basic questions as to the why of suffering on an abundant world, nor why we are unable to simply get along and have no inkling that Karma, not the “devil” is Two-Way Universal Love in action.
When people attempt to answer those questions, you quote insipid, near well Idiotic One-Way Laws concocted based on human one-way selfish behaviour of take, take, take, give nothing back, telling yourselves that such is also how nature works. How is that any different from religious attitudes?
What is next in this theatre of utter and absolute absurdities, I wonder.
Is science not just another religion and its theories another form of theology? You tell me.

Back to the MoGens.

Let us look at the theory of why they are JUST one of many simple and promising techniques for moneyless power generation.

There are two motors of hypothetically equal ratings and outputs when used as generators instead of motors. One motor is used for motoring and its shaft is connected directly or via a pulley to the shaft of the second motor which will act as the generator. The output of the second motor is connected back to the input electrodes of the first motor. Intelligence only need the initialise motion and the rest is CRM or “perpetual motion”. How is that any different in principle from the rain cycle, or other examples aforementioned? Can you not see Universal Love here of harmonic exchange?

What would happen if you double the rating of the second motor acting as a generator? It means 50% of its output would be given back to the first motor and the other 50% available for use, to YOU. Triple it? Quadruple? Throw in better bearings and “Octuple” that?

There is much argument as to the fact that motors are not 100% efficient so power available for use in MoGens is “not much.” They are not happy that power has to be given back to the system and want it all for use without giving anything back in return—Typical! That is quite the One-Way attitude, yes? So be it.

The solutions to many our problems exists within us. It is time to bring it out and put an end to the incessant prattle of what is possible or not according Professor “Who”. If nature or well, “God” does it, so can you.
Be ye perfect, like “Your Father in Heaven is Perfect.” One of the truths of the Illuminate referred to as “Jesus” which escaped corruption.

Over to you.

dorox:
The second video also proves nothing since there is no independent third party to verify that the components on the circuit board are actually what they are supposed to be. My guess is that the transformer is actually a battery in disguise.

Build one

samsard:
Sorry man, my brain is mixing things up. ZPM means Zero Point Module, its a fictional energy source in scifi; specially Star Gate universe.

Well, let's not wait till someone comes up with a 'ZPM' to help ourselves now shall we
Let's try other less 'futuristic' techniques to solving the 'Nepa' phenomenon.

I love sci-fi by the way--The intelligent ones, not the gory ones. Enjoy

dorox:
You should never be too quick to believe every claim you see online, they can easily be faked. Look at the pakistan video again, can you see that when he switched on the boiler-ring and the iron the light bulbs did not dim as one would expect if the setup is being powered by the alternator.

Of course, you are right. And yet my friend, you get the general idea
Did you see the second video in that post?

What's your take on all the Mo Gen videos, if you viewed them?

Blakjewelry:
zero point energy is the energy of vacuum, which in quantum field theory is not refer to as empty space rather the ground state of the field.
now why i refer to it as almost impractical is because trying to mimic total vacuum in lab is almost impossible for now . am typing from another persons phone so i have to be brief.

I guess we could categorise this theoretical technique into the general group of devices which generate power for free. But, Why restrict ourselves to a technique if it is still theoretical at this point?

samsard:
I didnt necessarily say that they are liars, some of them might actually be delusional. Anyway, get a real, working ZPM and you'll get attention.

And indeed they could be delusional...or not. Don't generalise all efforts as delusional. What is a ZPM?

samsard:
I dont trust youtube information, especially not coming from someone who has issues with the academia and thinks he/she know things no one else does. I've come across many of such people am now too experienced to fall for the pseudoscientific and the pseudoreligious stuff they peddle. I love sc-fi, but i recognise its nothing more than that, just sc-fi.

Now, now Samsard, name-calling is not a form of discourse. At best, it indicates fear of being wrong and there is nothing wrong with being mistaken as it assists in growth...which is a GOOD thing, yes? If there are things you disagree with, i challenge you to state your reasons categorically/clearly.

That you have come across such people is irrelevant, although I question the truth of that statement, my apologies. Have you ever attempted to replicate their discoveries? for such is how to dispel something as a lie, not by fiat statements that "they are liars."

As much as possible, I avoid debates on the theory of things and orient my pursuits towards the proving of things or at the very least, letting nature teach me what is FACT from theory or theology. I have just begun this thread and with time i will place here my...well, "theories" based on FACTS of nature. Please stay tuned and many thanks for your input

Blakjewelry:
zero point energy is the energy of vacuum, which in quantum field theory is not refer to as empty space rather the ground state of the field.
now why i refer to it as almost impractical is because trying to mimic total vacuum in lab is almost impossible for now . am typing from another persons phone so i have to be brief.

Hmm... I see. Very well, thanks.

dorox:
Zero - point energy, free energy and above unity energy are just somee of the many names given to the concept of a perpetual motion machine. Having such a machine is not possible since it contradicts the very foundation the law of thermodynamics is based upon such as the conservation of energy and entropy.
Every now and then you see someone with little or no formal science qualification claiming to have made a prototype zero - point energy device but are in need of partners/investor to help raise funds needed for them to develop the prototype to a comercial product. It is a big lie, a hoax designed to defraud any who is gullible enough to fall for their tricks.

Ah yes, the "Laws" of thermodynamics. Sigh. You know, I liken those "laws" to running a race with the laces from each shoe tied together. I find it interesting though that you have mentioned perpetual motion and invite you to please feel free to share your thoughts here if you'd like:
https://www.nairaland.com/3066765/idea-perpetual-motion-free-energy#44998561

Every now and then you see someone with little or no formal science qualification claiming to have made a prototype zero - point energy device but are in need of partners/investor to help raise funds needed for them to develop the prototype to a comercial product.

And yet, many inventions/discoveries which define our modern age were and will be discovered by such well, misqualified ones. I find that very ironic indeed. In fact, I dare say that very rarely does theory precede an invention. Inventions are the product of inspiration which at this time is completely out of the purview of modern science, most unfortunately. I would advise you though, if you'll have it, to be very weary of the mental attitude that only those who are qualified in certain ways may display creativity.

Your comment about big lies and hoaxes is both true and false. True in the sense that always are there charlatans to all endeavours. It is also false, because you have not bothered to LOOK. All you have done my friend is convince yourself according to memorised information that

Having such a machine is not possible since it contradicts the very foundation the law of thermodynamics is based upon such as the conservation of energy and entropy.

Is science/academia REALLY that afraid of being contradicted? Is that what this is all about--The fear of being wrong? Quite the Hubris I must say, but alas, therein lays no surprise at all.
Science has the most creative way (ironically) of correcting its own errors, it creates a new science. You have gone from Classical physics to Quantum physics. What's next, Zwantum physics?? The part of it all i personally find annoying is that it is all theory, with no basis or premise in nature whatsoever.

My my, it's all good.

CC Dorox @ https://www.nairaland.com/3104136/lets-talk-zero-point-energy#46019805

Perhaps it is time to de-criminalise all drugs. The "war" on drugs is costly and a waste of resource. It is the idea of "war on drugs" that make them so..."valuable." By the time a kilogram worth of cocaine becomes a hundred naira, the question as to why one cannot just go get high on 50 naira super glue will be asked.

It is making Taboos out of many nothings which create obsessions about those things, nothing more nothing less.

One would think the solution to many our problems is obvious, but we simply choose the hard way. It is well.

LoJ:
Hello my Brother,

it is my pleasure to read from you. It is truly better to have you around rather than far. I would have loved to contribute more on the topic of energy conservation which seems rather promising. But I don't have the expertise to.

I am pleased to read your posts. Have a nice day.

No worries on that one LoJ. You have spoken your truth on the matter and I can only ask that you live and be by it. Doing otherwise costs a lot in personal energy and originality, both of which are ultimately unsustainable.

Thanks for reading though. Have a nice day as well.

P.S: I have finally discovered how the NL email system works. Will get to that as soon as Nepa allows. Cheers.

timifakay:
As long as Kainji dam remains and uncompleted project and never gets an upgrade, I'll never believe Nigeria is remotely ready to produce enough power. Also our upbringing in Nigeria is that "it's better to invest little to start up a venture and pay continuously throughout the lifetime of the venture than to invest a lot to start up and pay little or nothing as maintenance of such project" this to me is the reason we prefer to buy gen (cheap, which forever needs fuel than to set up solar array or windmill and only change batteries at the interval of years). Not forgetting our terrible maintenance culture which directly has an adverse effect on the practice.
As regards nuclear power plants, we are not matured enough to maintain such, we cannot even maintain state Secretariat and roads leading to them (which governors use daily) adequately. Darn Kainji has never seen a complete maintenance overhaul since 1968! Imagine it's a nuclear power plant.
Then lack of professionalism coupled with the trial and error of self decorated engineers/ cheap service seeking population results in people having nasty experiences because their hopes and expectations are far beyond the capability of their installation... Amongst other things

And perhaps therein lies most of our problems as a people. Without a doubt it really bites to be born into a country with such issues as simple power generation, and yet, it conceals a blessing in the sense that one would expect that practical solutions to power generation would come from among us, the sufferers, to relieve our own suffering. Una never tire for nepa and cost of fuel for loud generators??

Waiting for someone called 'government' to spend mammoth sums on a central power generation system simply does not work, self-evidently. This necessitates the need for power generation which is both decentralised as it is free...of charge. Nothing says free better than devices which power themselves.

This individual from Pakistan displays a twist to the MoGens in which the Motor part is a made entirely of an arrangement of magnets which spin in 'perpetuity'.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPi746_rSbY


Another example of a magnet motor:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHW6b1aFPfU?t=2m43s

One to even charge mobile devices


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkgpTeeaeMY

A bit of a quandary exists here because I have realised that this thread will be data intensive for most since I will of necessity be posting some youtube videos. Please view when you can.

Of all the 'free-energy' energy devices, I find the self-running motor-generators (MoGens) to be the most promising and free of requirements for a first class honours degree in quantum physics. There is much argument as to why it is supposedly not good enough, and yet, it works. Even in the scenario where it does not generate enough in power for home use, it by far surpasses solar panels and works all day.
And yet, many have demonstrated ability to generate A LOT of power for home use.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAseG7z_GQo

Blakjewelry:
In theory yes,but practically it almost improbable for now.it is very difficult to create a total or near total vacuum, at certain point even the material of the containing vessel will begin to evaporate.

Does this mean you understand zero-point energy as expressed by the OP? Why is a vacuum needed to create it?

LoJ:
Greetings and many thanks.

Well finally here I am in front of a computer with a REAL keypad. My apologies for such a late reply. I find your experiences very interesting. Thanks for sharing. I will refrain from conjecture as to meaning, plus I believe you are blessed with rather straight forward experiences as one on THE spiritual path.

After all is said and done, I am as pleased as I am surprised that you, and indeed all on this thread, are Nigerians. Sometimes, the status quo of typical Nigerian attitudes to all things "other worldly," for lack of better expression, leaves me exasperated so much so that I find it easier on me to just walk life alone. It's all good. Someday, Africa will see the light and know it for what it is, not what it is told and then expects it to be.

Remain well bro.

By no means whatsoever will I pretend to have read this thread from the beginning. But I am compelled to say that the idea of the trinity is a fact of nature and everywhere present in principle. Religion simply just has an unhealthy way of making woo-woo out of Truths so much so that those who can and should do the proving, dismiss it outright. Some examples of the trinity concept are mitosis or the recoil from discharge of a gun. Can that be denied??

Scientifically, action or activity emerges simultaneously from equilibrium and to equilibrium will they return.

action<----- Equilibrium------->re-action

Discharge<--Equilibrium------->re-coil

Male<-------Male-Female----->Female

Red<--------White----------->Blue

Hemisphere<---Equator--->Hemisphere

"God the Son"<---"God the Father-Mother--->"God the Daughter or holy spirit"

All actions and reactions are simultaneous equal and opposite. Both Emerge from Equilibrium and to Equilibrium will they return in 'sexual' union.

Principles in nature are universal, objectively and subjectively.

The Trinity therefore, is the idea of the Son (red side of the spectrum) and the Daughter or "holy spirit" (blue side of the spectrum) which both emerge simultaneously from White Light of the Son-Daughter, and will rejoin in sexual union to re-attain their Equilibrium of Son-Daughterhood.

"God" the Father/Son<---"God" the Father-Mother--->"God" The Mother/Daughter.

Male<---------------------Hermaphrodite------------>Female

I could go on, but something tells me the above should suffice.

engrfaruq:
Reincarnation is the philosophical or religious concept that the soul or spirit, after biological death, can begin a new life in a new body.


Reincarnation theory is attracting so many followers recently and this may not be unconnected with the fact that people see it as a way of conquering the fear of death.


At least if you know you are coming back to the world, you will have some comfort and less fear of death.


So do you believe in reincarnation or not?

Indeed, it is a way of conquering the fear of death and also robbing religion of its relevance to the human species. Religion exists and thrives based on their fear-based doctrines of life beyond the body. Yet, one need not conjecture reincarnation to know it is a fact of nature, one only need experience the..."after life" while still "alive" to confirm these facts for self.

Please see this thread below, which by the way i need to get back to, I’ve been away for too long.

Cheers.

https://www.nairaland.com/3053240/aka-astral-projection-discussion

Alex2016:
Physicists in the house lets discuss about the potentials of zero=point energy. Does it really exist?
Can it be harnessed?
if so how?
What are the implications?

Hello Alex2016

I think I can contribute but I need to know first, your understanding of zero point energy.

thanks.

I opine that such a mindset as this individual’s is what “deserves” employment. Not the over-entitled school graduate's. Our world is built on inspiration in balanced partnership with intellect. Inspiration cannot be taught nor legislated. The sooner we recognise this, the sooner we will focus less on formal education, the happier we 'will' all be...or not.

I think my post on the thread below is also pertinent here. Especially the third paragraph.

https://www.nairaland.com/3119330/see-worlds-first-solar-powered#45958986

LGBT issues are a collective problem, not an individual one. It can only be fixed in light of such understanding.

Finger pointing and bigotry only ensure it stays in our faces. What we resist persists.

The current technology of solar cells is grossly inefficient for power generation. Indeed, that is why it is “allowed” and so “popular”, no joke intended.
The aircraft designers world over are very insincere and are hopefully fooling only themselves, in my opinion.

All electric vehicles, land and air need only have the ability to efficiently generate electricity while the are in motion to recharge batteries and simultaneously energise all electric engines. Solar cells at this point is not a viable method.
Such better systems of on-board power generation will necessitate a reduction in battery count, which is one of the most expensive and recurrent expenditure of all Electric vehicle usage, unless you insist on solar panels.

In land vehicles, magnets can be attached to the rim of the spinning wheel as the rotor. The stationary hub upon which the wheel is mounted can serve as the mounting for the stator windings of whatever ac/dc flavour is desired. The analogy to this is the out-runner brushless DC motor.

Electric aircraft such as the Airbus e-flite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_E-Fan can have a third electric engine which is wind or ram-air powered by the forward motion of the aircraft. Will it not suffice to generate surplus power to both charge smaller batteries (used only for taxing and a small part of the take-off run), as well as power the other engines once a minimum forward speed is reached? It is infinitely cheaper than solar cells.

I think so too. But there are problems to overcome before they will gain way here in Nigeria, I think. The list is long. The most poignant on that list however, is that there are interests in Nigeria which/who will not tolerate such a threat to the relevance of oil and gas.

I think in time, we will develop technologies to aid in cellular rejuvenation such that one can use their bodies for as long as they wish. Query why one would wish to be confined to one body “forever.” I suppose such concerns with immortality is based upon the premise that the person is the body--this is most unfortunate.

LoJ:
Hello My brother SidL ,

Hello LoJ,

Sent you an email and hope you got it since I've never sent an email on NL before. Cheers.

Alex2016:
Physicists in the house lets discuss about the potentials of zero=point energy. Does it really exist?
Can it be harnessed?
if so how?
What are the implications?

What do you define as zero-point energy?