₦airaland Forum

SailorXY:
he, Shaw & Rojo get to tackle for the LB spot. I won't be surprised if he wins the spot tho, @ least Rojo too has a CB option.

Shaw has to sit tight or na sorry be him surname

coogar:
straws?
elampiro is clutching at a whole palm tree. his matter don pass straws.

Nihilist:
Do you even know WHY Chelsea has had to spend more?

Manyoo are the biggest spenders in the EPL after Chelsea and City.
Before the sugar daddies, you guys had used your money to buy the league repeatedly.

The only way to fight money is with money.

Na una start am

elampiro:
After Kagawa was gone and we were even playing 4-1-4-1

coogar:
elampiro that lied bold-faced that rooney didn't score any goal in the first half of 12/13 season just to support his weak argument?

that boy needs deliverance.

coogar:
but SAF already said the substitutions were because rooney was poor. he said in his book there's no way in hell he would substitute a fit & firing rooney - and whoscored backed SAF up when they rated rooney the poorest outfield player against west ham.

coogar:
in one of those matches against reading, rooney played as a RW and he scored 2 goals. so tell me how any of elampiro's theories even has any credibility?

elampiro:
Everything happened between February and April 2013.
Wing. Madrid away.
Dropped /midfield. Madrid home.
Midfield. Villa, Stoke...... WEST HAM??

9 substitutions to allow Kagawa, Giggs some minutes.

Tval:
Go back and read what made him post that link.

hensben:
Next time you shouldn't exaggerate it because most of your comrade like starboard n dopejemi(SK) takes your exaggeration as fact. You know this place is were they(dopejemi n starboard) get their football info.

Nihilist:
Mate What?

Tval:
You are confused. Seriously.

elampiro:
Rooney was unhappy appy that the position he scored 27
goals the previous season and the one he had 9
goals in 9 matches was being taken off him.

coogar:
so rooney scored 27 goals in one position in 11/12. he then scored 9 goals in the same position and he was angry? does that make any sense to you? why did rooney produce less goals in the same position where he scored 27 goals in the previous season?

you don't use logic in your argument.

elampiro:
Yes, they all copied and pasted from opta. Remember our argument about where Kagawa played against Newcastle. Opta and whoscored, plus daily mail were all wrong. Only Zonal Marking had a chart which was exact with Ferguson's detailed explanation of formation he deployed.

Nihilist:
Dude do I have to remind you of your own statements?
You said:
Man Utd has not spent quarter of what Chelshit spent since Abrahimovic bought Chleshit.

I have now proven that the difference in spending between Chelsea and Manyoo since 2003 is a lot closer than what people think.
In fact, since 2010 Manyoo actually have the highest netspend in the EPL.

Bros no be fight abeg. I know the in thing is to throwing bantz, but you guys do it in mean-spiritedness, and no humour.
Just take the lesson and keep it moving

coogar:
if he played behind welbeck/chicha in 11/12, why was rooney angry to play there in 12/13?

Nihilist:
Sinizia, Over the last 5 years, Manyoo has actually had the biggest net spend in the EPL

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-last-five-seasons/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-last-five-seasons

Nihilist:
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-2003-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-2003-to-date

elampiro:
Which facts? The charts that saw Ozil in the hole against Bayern? They saw Kagawa in the hole against Newcastle? They saw Kagawa in the hole against Swnasea?

Nihilist:
Manyoo has definitely spent more than a quarter of Chelsea has spent since Abramovich hit the scene.
In fact, the difference in netspend is only around 14million pounds per season.
That alone shows why such heavy spending was and still is required by Chelsea and City.....

coogar:
maybe i am the owner of those sites.
one would show him factual evidence of formation and where passes were received & elampiro would quote the opinion of a journalist. on what planet is opinion more truthful than facts?

hensben:
Bla bla bla...were in your post i quoted you mentioned 2005 huh, you ought to know mou have spend two seasons already... you are really a manure urinated fan.

elampiro:
This is another report stating Rooney did not play 10 against West Ham.

Now it coming out the interview Coogar submitted was given in October 2013 when Rooney was happy playing one of the two forwards positions under Moyes - number 10.

The problem is Coogar is relying on formation charts and I am relying on my memory.

hensben:
This is the problem with manure fan, they lack football knowledge but continue to dwell in their ignorance n rant/bark.

You said mou spent in his first season then i told you he sold players to sign; he signed willian n schurell then he sold mata n de bruyne, he sold luiz, he signed costa n fab, he sold schurell, he signed cuadrado, He sold cech then he signed begovic. #Kapish.

coogar:
you dunno elampiro!
agreeing with us would destroy a lot of his well-built lies in the past. there has been history concerning where rooney played in 11/12. only a stark illiterate would say CAM/ST are upfront. since when are attacking midfielders and strikers upfront?

this was rooney's interview with gary neville last season.

At the time, I probably agreed for him, and for the team I played there but, of course, I want to play up front. I think the manager knows I want to but can see I don't mind helping us get victories that way. But the manager, one of the first things he asked me was 'Where do you want to play? What's your favourite position?' and I obviously said 'striker.. If needed to I can play in midfield but the only position I don't want to play is wide right.' That's the one position I can't play in, I don't enjoy it

hensben:
Mou sold luiz for 50mil, schurell for 23mil, de bruyne for 20mil, mata for 37mil and still won epl n carlin cup.

coogar:
he brought a link that defeated his own argument. he said the writer assumed like us that rooney meant CF position when it should be in the hole.

his argument that rooney was taken out of his position didn't even hold up. rooney played 25 times out of the 27 league apps in the hole - so why was he angry if the hole was his preferred position?

elampiro loves distorting facts!

bigkesh:
In one year with Manchester United, Louis van Gaal
has spent more than Ajax have in their whole
history.......

Waiting for the excuses to roll in next season

coogar:
i doubt you read the article you quoted. the evidence is right there & yet you failed to see it. rooney wanted the CF position, not the hole position.



it was van persie's arrival that led to rooney being played out of position. this was what we were telling you earlier in the day & you refused to listen.



van persie's arrival threatened rooney. he felt he was undervalued & mistreated cos he was the one being asked to help in the midfield. in a nutshell, if we didn't sign RVP that summer, rooney would never have been asked to play in the midfield.


guardian sports is practically rehashing all what we told you in the afternoon.

elampiro:
All of them.

scheneidelin (pardon d spelling if wrong) . Might just be that we have another Hargreaves or something like that. We need some physical presence to blend our midfield.

Schweinsteiger = the image, his calibre, his experience.

Depay, free scoring winger. Dribbler.

Darmian, a natural right back.