Stevonics's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Stevonics's Profile › Stevonics's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 15 pages)
In all the articles NASA used for that lunar landing propaganda. Have they shown you how the take off from moon happened, you think one sixth of earth gravity is a joke to overcome. What equipment preparation do you have to attain the escape velocity in a strange land. Taking of from moon sounds so easy to you. Watch how they launch space craft out of earth. Moon is body with gravity and atmosphere. It requires same equipment. Guy Google, moon has atmosphere. truthCoder: |
Yes. It consist of hydrogen,helium and dust. larryUG: |
We are talking about 1961 technology which used tubes and shortwaves qwertyboss: |
If there is any lunar reflector it must have been dropped by an unmanned rover. they have started showing us pink aliens in Mars, very soon they will say man landed in Mars after several unmanned exploration. I repeat man has not entered moon and returned. truthCoder: |
If there is any lunar reflector it must have been dropped by an unmanned rover. they have started showing us pink aliens in Mars, very soon they will say man landed in Mars after several unmanned exploration. I repeat man has not entered moon and returned. truthCoder: |
I read materials and metallurgy in Futo, Electronics in Poly( to be frank with you some of the boys I mentored in electronics, when I had an eclub in poly are lecturing there, and they can challenge any professor (that is how it is with electronics). To what you posted. These guys did a paper work of going to moon, they are talking about the voice and data communication as at then. They tried to make it match the then technology. The craft itself need an advanced technology- Mechtronics and automations. Yes a good radio engineer can make such suggestion for voice and data relay to earth. But the core issue is propelling out of moon. You need exactly the equipments, materials and fuel you used on earth to do same in moon. Moon is not space but a body with gravity( one sixth of earth This is a conspiracy United States of America will live to defend. truthCoder: |
I read materials and metallurgy in Futo, Electronics in Poly( to be frank with you some of the boys I mentored in electronics, when I had an eclub in poly are lecturing there, and they can challenge any professor (that is how it is with electronics). To what you posted. These guys did a paper work of going to moon, they are talking about the voice and data communication as at then. They tried to make it match the then technology. The craft itself need an advanced technology- Mechtronics and automations. Yes a good radio engineer can make such suggestion for voice and data relay to earth. But the core issue is propelling out of moon. You need exactly the equipments, materials and fuel you used on earth to do same in moon. Moon is not space but a body with gravity( one sixth of earth This is a conspiracy United States of America will live to defend. quote author=truthCoder post=116438023] What did you study at FUTO? I will help you. This is an excerpt from an article on Forbes on this subject. The PLSS life support backpack contained a VHF band radio which transmitted voice and biosensor data from the spacesuit to the LEM communications system, and voice signals from the LEM to the suited astronaut. The LEM communications system, then communicated voice and bio sensor signals with Earth using S-band, a UHF frequency range widely used in space because of its ability to pass through Earth’s ionosphere without distortion or reflection. All voice communication was amplitude modulated, which is why it carried readily recognizable AM signal distortions and noise. The S-band transmitter that talked to Earth also acted as a transponder, responding to coded ranging signals from Earth which were used to accurately measure the distance from a ground station on Earth to the LEM. Voice and data could also be routed through the CSM in orbit, and there stored on the DSE recorder for later spooled delivery to Earth, though I don’t know that this was actually done with lunar EVA data. The VHF transceivers had two channels, and communications between the LEM and suited crewmen were “duplex,” meaning each could transmit simultaneously to the other. Ground transmissions, on the other hand, were “simplex,” and the characteristic Quindar tones were used to simplify single-channel (you talk, then I talk) communication. Communication between the LEM and astronauts performing EVA was facilitated by a small VHF antenna deployed by the first crewman down the ladder. On the surface, the crew deployed a large, umbrella like S-band antenna for beaming voice and data directly back to Earth without having to relay through the CSM and its high-gain antenna array. On later missions, of course, a somewhat smaller deployable S-band antenna was carried by the Lunar Roving Vehicle. Reference: https : // www.forbes. com /sites/quora/2018/02/20/how-did-neil-armstrong-communicate-with-earth-from-the-surface-of-the-moon/?sh=50e0c35e5979[/quote] |
Christian36:Bro, if manned moon landing was successful, there a lot of benefits and experimentations. See how they are using Antarctica. A moon station should be similar to an earth station and not space station. Because you need a propulsion to overcome gravity from such stations. You don't need such in space station, which serve best as control and monitoring unit. So to escape moon gravity, you need exactly all the equipments, materials and fuel you used on earth in moon to eject you first to space before you proceed to earth. The Technology and equipment were not there. No body had entered the moon. The mirror people are talking about is a Hubble Telescope which NASA even trained some Africans to go and repair when it had issues. One of my friend then in Futo was among. |
Christian36:Bro, if manned moon landing was successful, there a lot of benefits and experimentations. See how they are using Antarctica. A moon station should be similar to an earth station and not space station. Because you need a propulsion to overcome gravity from such stations. You don't need such in space station, which serve best as control and monitoring unit. So to escape moon gravity, you need exactly all the equipments, materials and fuel on moon to eject you first to space before you proceed to earth. The Technology and equipment were not there. No body have entered the moon. The mirror people are talking about is a Hubble Telescope. Which NASA even trained some Africans to go and repair when it had issues. One of my friend then in Futo was among. |
truthCoder:You must be a fool to believe that conspiracy. Please explain how to communicate from moon, at what frequency, short wave, amplitude, pulse, modulation, is it a line- of-sight. Where are the moon booster repeaters, the power and how can that bring them back. Mumu man. All the equipments on earth that sends a craft to space, are required in moon to send a craft to space and back to earth. That is not even enough, because your entry into moon can damage the craft. Why am I even replying stupid kids that refused to learn. |
ekineme:Bro, I love how civil you are. He was actually referring to me as a business registration agent, "the band wagon factor". I would not like to boast here. I have a book called The Boundary of Science. But non scientists believe any thing is possible with the likes of United States. The moon gravity is one sixth that of earth. You need refuelling and moon station to propel out. After using a space craft the walls gets weaker due to Ablative defects. The craft must have spent fuel to get to space first. To manoeuvre close to moon requires just electric/solar powered propulsion, moons gravity can trap you to its orbit if you don't have enough propelling force to escape back to your space station. Now if you intend to move into moon and land, you force your craft through moons centrifugal forces and get pulled by its gravity, the only safe landing will involve balloons (as simulated for mars). Getting to moon surface, you must have cruised your craft to Ablative defect, which either renders it useless or requires repairs. I remember when Challenger burst into flames due to this phenomenon during reentry to earth. Just imagine experiencing that into moon and you are not yet done (coming back) I love this your topic. We have brains in Nigeria. Some are not where they should be. |
Bros Futo made me. Engineering for a decade OyeofIkoTuN: |
Bro, any successful manned moon landing will have a multiple benefits to humanity. United States NASA have spent more on exploring universe with unmanned voyagers and Rovers. They are spending more to explore mars. So money is not the problem but taking off from moon. Just assume it was successful, we would have heard and updated our chemistry by adding composition of moon rooks, we would have heard of moon station. Bro any good engineer knows the the stages of technology. Space station-yes, Universe explorers-yes. But no such thing as moon station to enable relaunch: refuelling, propulsion, Ablative check correction, super computer speed, communication, earth GPS synchronising as at 1969. Christian36: |
It was a propaganda video to intimidate Russia. Someone said they succeeded. But no. As someone vast in electronics and it's developmental generations, I know the technology then cannot take them to moon and back. Mars would have been visited by man now. To elaborate later. The first successful global positioning system was achieved in 1978. Micro chips for super computers that can handle such distance communication and other automations came around 1974- even this was when the 74 series integrated circuit was invented before microprocessors. This claim by the United States had been debunked by experts who even argued the shadow formation of the said astronaut against a source of light used for the propaganda photo and video shooting. The reentry is what exposed the lies. Space stations do not require much technology and energy for reentry even though you need GPS to return to a desired earth station. But taking off from moon for reentry requires you to overcome moon gravity (no matter how small) and you need a moon station, extra energy to propel the already used craft ( considering the Ablative nature of the material). You need extra energy also to overcome earth's centrifugal forces, if not you end up as an earth satellite. They also have to maintain earth landing target by synchronising their reentry speed with earth GPS. Technology is progressive, if United States achieved that, by now moon would have been a better launch station to other planets. What is achievable now is space mission. And sending unmanned voyagers and rovers to tour the universe by the aid of communication facilities in space. Some even get lost in the vast universe, may be after sending feedback pictures. This modification is for those that cannot read to the end of this wonderful argument. My points are: 1. Moon has atmosphere that has gases and dust. 2. Moon has gravity one sixth of earth. 3. A lot of equipment are put in place to launch, connect and control both manned and unmanned spacecrafts out of earth. These gives it the propulsion, direction, control and feedback (even for manned craft.) 4. You need to launch out same way out of the moon. At least to break away from its gravity. 5. Entry into moon will definitely create an Ablative defect on the craft outer layer if not damaging the craft. 6. When we talk about communication, not just about voice which some claimed was shortwave or the then Morse code data, which cannot convey large bandwidth of digital information needed to take feedbacks and sustain connection with space and earth stations. 7. In all the articles NASA sponsored to cover these propaganda. The take off from moon was not mentioned. The take off from moon should be an interesting topic in physics and astronomy. Update: Go to https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news and read about Apollo 17 that happened more than a decade after the manned moon landing claim of 1961. NASA 2013 LADEE project with a robot proved that moon has atmosphere which they admitted was against their assumption. How can NASA send a man to moon in 1961 and kept battling to understand the moon atmosphere between 1972 (Apollo 17 and 2013. Such practice goes against every known scientific experimentation/exploration procedure which they are following in Mars exploration. |
Contents. Introduction. 1. Getting Started for Online Business. 2. Create a Digital Content. 3. Monetizing Digital Content. 4. Affiliate Marketing. 5. Working as a Freelance. 6. Domaining. 7. Dropshipping and Product Customizing. 8. Trading Foreign Exchange (Forex). 9. Earning Cryptocurrency. Get this ebook from stevonics. com and start earning online.
|
dominic17:this should have been the first question. Who voted him?. As if he got an appointment. One Nigeria and democracy will make Igbos take over Lagos and Abuja by 2050. |
Chidex50:do not mind that fool. i do not think he is a graduate. |
Adolfhitler001:2.2 employs ode like you that see only grades in university education |
Adolfhitler001:graduates do not reason like you. Only non graduates make mockery with grades. |
I created a blog, directed a Domain Name to it. Apart from the Adsense Approval i got, i have Hosted my Digital Contents (E-books) for sell. stevonics dot com Get these done at low cost. |
The Content: 1. Getting Started for Online Business 2. Create a Digital Content. 3. Monetizing Digital Content. 4. Affiliate Marketing. 5. Working as a Freelance. 6. Domaining. 7. Dropshipping and Product Customizing. 8. Trading Foreign Exchange (Forex). 9. Earning Cryptocurrency. Join free Business Mentorship when you pay the token to download this manual at stevonics dot com Please your Feed Back is needed. |
There was never any scientifically agreed uniform method to calculate intelligence. But a lot of attempts had been made. Read more from: DEVELOPING INTELLIGENCE and ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN INTELLIGENCE at stevonics dot com |
blazesam:Obi had been a restless robot. |
. |
Picture or! |
stevonics: |
Sell anything remaining and give me my share |
hahaha kids, as if he knows me. Forex and stock trading had been in existence for professional elites before metaquote brought it to internet and kids rushed it. just learn. AutoRedux: |
Guyman01:you said the truth. |
Learn what you don't know. Forex trading is a profession. high level economics by studying economic statistics AutoRedux: |
what about keeping the money in your trading account and take small trades to grow your account. better than banking. Makowonda: |
guy, any venture that you cannot predict the outcome from the beginning is gambling. as we remain humans and not God to foresee the future. we all need calculated risk management to survive in any business. some have fueled their vehicle and could not get passengers, that money is gone. think of other scenarios. dalass: |
