₦airaland Forum

United and overrated players. I have disgraced the albino Scholes, next is the over hyped giggs. Expert17 I am coming for Giggs

Expert17:
If you use Wikipedia, you wont have made the mistake that

After playing 17+ seasons in EPL, Paul Scholes created just 5 chances, made just 9826 passes, just 48 crosses, 763 passes forward

Jon Snow the copy & paste merchant go and Sue the premier league official site.

Expert17:
It was created for a reason

This guy is Jon Snow

Ephraim who called Arsenal a place has started again

Expert17:

Copy and Paste Fabregas Bench seat no here

Wikipedia copy and paste merchant .

Spillo1 really said you guys are Wikipedia Analyst

Expert17:
Manchester United

Premier League: 1995–96, 1996–97, 1998–99, 1999–2000, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09, 2010–11, 2012–13[144]
FA Cup: 1995–96, 1998–99, 2003–04[145]
Football League Cup: 2008–09, 2009–10[145]
FA Charity Shield/FA Community Shield: 1996, 1997, 2003, 2008, 2010[145]
UEFA Champions League: 1998–99, 2007–08[145]
Intercontinental Cup: 1999[145]
FIFA Club World Cup: 2008[145]
England U18

UEFA European Under-18 Championship: 1993[146]
Individual

Jimmy Murphy Young Player of the Year: 1992–93[147]
Premier League Player of the Month: January 2003, December 2003, October 2006, August 2010[144]
Premier League PFA Team of the Year: 2002–03,[148] 2006–07[149]
Premier League 10 Seasons Awards (1992–93 to 2001–02)
Domestic & Overall Team of the Decade
English Football Hall of Fame Inductee: 2008[13]
Premier League 20 Seasons Awards (1992–93 to 2011–12)
Fantasy Teams of the 20 Seasons (Panel & Public choice)
FWA Tribute Award: 2012[150]
FIFPro World XI Nominee: 2005, 2007[151]

Manage it

Are those stats from your albino peak season . Man is frustrated and confused he went to Wikipedia to do copy and paste . Take heart bro

Expert17:
Bakayoko and Silva are starting ahead of Fabregas in Monaco (Farmers league)

Is that why Scholes was receiving 0 votes . Nobody rated your albino when he was playing . What a phuckingg disgrace.

Expert17:
Who was Man utd best midfielder during Paul scholes playing days??

Xavi
Iniesta
Thiery Henry
Ferguson
Zidane
Modric
Deco
Ballack
PEP
Barcelona academy coaches
etc

All name Scholes as England best Midfielder, Nairalanders are calling Lampard

Your best midfielder was receiving 0 votes all through his nominations .

Expert17:
Bakayoko and Silva are starting ahead of Fabregas in French league 1 ............

At the age of 45, those players cant bench Scholes

All those are okoto meow . Your overrated albino has nothing on Fabregas. If we look at peak form fabregas has the best attacking stats of any midfielder in the league. 15goals and 13assist in 27 league games in 2010. Bring your albino stats

Expert17:
[s] You deserve beating, for this fake Statistics,.......You should know that its FAKE
After 499 games in EPL, you are saying Paul Scholes got

9826 Passes

5 chances created

44 Through balls

11438 touches

763 passes forward

48 crosses

.................What's the name of the WEED?? [/s]

Expert are you done crying ?

BlueRayDick:
What I'm saying is this ; an agent will not just walk up to u and tell u my player has a buy out clause of 20m with word of mouth, he will show u an evidence of such contract in place. You then carefully study it and look at it and see if his claim is correct or not.

It's just like going for a job interview where u are asked Ur current annual earnings. You may tell them 5m with a status car at the various stages of the interview and use it to bargain let's say 7m + an SUV. Before giving u the offer the company will definitely ask for Ur previous employment latter/ recent pay slip to confirm Ur claim. They don't just believe Ur claim na.

So saying arsenal rely solely on what the agent interpreted is somehow unbelievable. Except the way football contract works is quite different from what we are made to underatsnd

In football only the agency representing the player and the club have access to the player contract. They are some terms made public as stated by the league rules e.g Spain has a mandatory buyout clause for all players which are made public while England doesn't. Basically we had an agreement with Suarez around summer for transfer and his agent gave us an inside tip of a clause in his contract that would work to our benefit after our initial bid was rejected and who better to trust than the agent representing the player, so we dived in thinking we were in control and being smart.

BlueRayDick:
You don't pin such things on agents. Arsenal have people who work in legal who understand the terms of contracts. Why do u rely on the agent's interpretation of a contract u want to buy a player out of?

Why didn't our legal look at the contract too before make ing such laughable offer?

See arsenal fumbled and loserpool ensured they mad us laughing stock by publicizing the offer.

Arsenal don't have the legal right to access Suarez contract papers. It's the information from the agent the club will follow. We took the matter to PFA who then looked at the clause and decided Liverpool interpretation was the correct one.

BlueRayDick:
Even you are still wrong.

It was actually not a buy-out clause, it was just a sum stated in his contract that will trigger discussions. The way it was supposed to work is this; once an offer in the excess of £40m is received, they were supposed to inform Suarez and open discussions.

As far as loserpool is concerned, the £1 is insulting and decided not to even open discussion with arsenal cos they assume nothing good will come out of the discussion


https://metro.co.uk/2019/07/05/arsenal-made-infamous-40m1-transfer-bid-luis-suarez-10118817/amp

I said it already the agent misinterpreted the clause and gave the club wrong information.

BlueRayDick:
What are you even saying? Everybody knows it's just like a normal bid process, when the seller pegs the minimum for £40m it is only normal for you as a prospective buyer to better that minimum asking price with something reasonable.

£1 in Suarez's case is not reasonable by all standards. Adding £1,000,000.00 to that wouldn't have made Arsenal bankrupt. Whoever sanctioned that bid be it Wenger or the board is to blame for the deal going south.

A vehicle was put up for bidding at a friend's workplace recently. The asking price was 1.4m, my friend wanted to bid 1.450m but I told him to do 1.470m to show seriousness. He did and won the bid. That's how u show seriousness in the market, not giving insulting offers

Why won't you people understand this is not a bid process or bargain example. A fixed buy out clause in a contract is not negotiable. It doesn't have to be reasonable they just had to fulfill what the contract demanded. If it was stated clearly in Suarez contract that any bid above 40million Suarez could leave the club then arsenal triggered the clause with the 40million + 1 pound simple as that. The agent gave Arsenal wrong interpretation of the contract clause.

Jodera:
I don't see any misinformation here.
Even if the agent says anything above the factual club could trigger it, why should a sane human being bring 1 pound.
Even locally, if you want to buy something from, let's say, all these roadside aboki. And you guys have bargained up to 1000 naira. And he just said you should top something to the 1000 naira, that he can't just accept 1000naira. Would you have topped #5 to the 1000#?
Inside that an insult to the aboki man as a business man?
How much more a club like Liverpool?

This is not the same thing. It's not a bargain. This a fixed contract clause. If an agent says my client has an escape clause in his contract that says pay anything above 100naira for example you will get him then a bid of 101naira the player is yours. This is nothing like the example you are giving. Have you seen clubs bargaining over a release clause.

Jodera:
like who does that??
Against a club as big as Liverpool sef.
Mehn, I disliked Wenger for that.
What the f**k is 1pound?

It's not an insult if it actually triggers a factual clause. Once that is triggered Liverpool could have been as insulted as they want it nothing would have happened. Suarez and his agent could've talked to Arsenal and finally transferred. Suarez agent is to be blamed for false information not the club.

Jodera:
lol, seems you've forgotten.
Suarez was desperate to come to arsenal then. We needed a striker also. He even told one of our players then to find a house for him.
Even tho, Liverpool didn't want to sell to us, he was so desperate that he wants to come to us, cos of that Liverpool had no choice than to give in. So they said his release clause was 40million pounds. Arsenal brought the £40m then, but they insisted arsenal "top" something to it, that they can't sell at exactly £40m to trigger it.
I guess a 40.5m pounds will do or £41m.
But wenger, in his infinite wisdom and stinginess just added a pound, making it [/b]40m and 1pound[b].
That angered everyone at Liverpool that dey have to cut off the deal.
Just that singular act made us lose Suarez in the summer of 2013, which would have made him donning an arsenal shirt

Blame Suarez agent for the mis information not the club. His agent said anything above 40million would trigger the clause. The problem was it was not a factual clause but misinformation towards Arsenal by Suarez' agent. He specifically told them anything more than 40m would trigger the clause, even one pound, but it did not.

Expert17:
No coach will pick Fabregas over Scholes.

Scholes every time he was nominated for balon dor .

2000 = 0 votes

2001 = 0 votes

2003 = 0 votes

2004 = 0 votes

2007 = 0 votes

Retirement really helped his career to unbelievable heights.

Expert17:
To help you further ....

Mention the different positions in midfield??

Paul scholes and Cesc fabregas play the same area in the midfield

Expert you better defend your overrated Albino better Man never won United player of the year even once despite staying up to a century at your useless club.

Expert17:


Dont disgrace yourself with this comparison you wanna start

Typical scummy

Expert17:
You want me to mention Alex song, Fabregas or Xhaka baa

Life of a scummy I repeat . .

shazam47:
was Sanchez and özil not justifying their pay during their contract saga with the club ?

How much did we pay Sanchez that was not a reflection of his quality then? It's your kind that want to turn us into West Ham with this una yeye mentality. We are complaining of not having enough quality players yet your kind want us to sell the only ones we have.

Expert17:
Watching some Paul Scholes games

My no 1 midfield player of all time.

499 Games in EPL (321 WINS, 72 LOSSES)
107 Goals (NO PK)
55 Assist

718 total games with 155 goals.


My toughest opponent? Scholes of Manchester. He is the complete midfielder. Scholes is undoubtedly the greatest midfielder of his generation... There is no doubt for me that he [Paul Scholes] is still in a class of his own. He's almost untouchable in what he does. I never tire of watching him play. You rarely come across the complete footballer, but Scholes is as close to it as you can get. One of my regrets is that the opportunity to play alongside him never presented itself during my career.
Zinedine Zidane

Life of a scummy .

shazam47:
abeg leave am, özil and Sanchez matter never teach am lesson say these guy's are only looking for their retirement benefits.

You are sounding like a dummy. Is Aubameyang not performing for Arsenal and justifying his wages. Where this one come from

Jodera:
Wenger latter years was terror.
The wan wey vex me pass na us really missing out on Suarez.
That's where really my football dislike for him started. Coupled with the way our players took losing as norms, and only start fighting like champions when top 4 is in danger.

What are you blaming Wenger for regarding Suarez?

iamoyindamola:
We can get young players Jesus,dembele,jovic etc
We have young martinelli and nketiah also goals will come out if we replace ozil and xhaka

We should replace one of the best strikers in the world with scrubs....no thank you. You guys will never learn.

iamoyindamola:
Oga he is not the only one built to score, with proper management of the funds plus sales of players we should be up and running.
If he's not willing to commit why are we keeping him think na

Baba if we sell Aubameyang this season who should we buy to replace his goals?

shazam47:
hey guys, happy Sunday to my fellow gunners in this wonderful thread, so I want to talk about this abumeyang situation, am I the only one who feels that the club should sell him off already since he is not ready to commit his long term future to the club.

I hate the way the media has exalted him like he is some kind of Ronaldo incarnate, yes he scores alot of goals for us but apart from those goals he is just average, van persie came and left , Sanchez also came and left now its his turn, someone will still replace him, he is not the first neither will he be the last.

what the club needs right now during this rebuilding period is a United and commited team that is ready to fight for the barge and not for their pockets.

Are you guys even ok at all. So we should keep selling our best players instead of Keeping them and building a dominant team. So if we sell Aubameyang now who will replace his goals?

Cc Amoto94, Thorvikk55 .

Let's even ignore the fact that his last season for Arsenal was better then his first for United.

Godx:
The question is what are we doing with the 20k testing kits we have on ground. Nigeria has not tested up to 200 people at this very moment.

If we have 20000 testing kits then what are they saving it for exactly . Anybody that complains of more than one symptoms should be tested.