GloriousGbola:





your average naija experience when one hustler sells you a dodgy confam product.

Don't on fridge with the inverter
Don't use alaba cd with your cd player
Don't connect your TV to internet

na bluray go hear am

They will even stylishly blame your TV upscaling capabilities. Maybe their customers should buy 8kUHD TVs just to use SLTV.

Unlimited22:

SLTV na DSTV from wish.com

Whenever I do locum in Aba and I stay for weekend, e get this manchi wey I dey watch ball for him side. He uses SLTV

Lol you go dey see where live match go dey crack like say na old VCD

They show matches in AFCON quality. Wish I knew a sure website to stream matches in HD. Score808 lags on smart tv.

BlueRayDick:


People are already talking about alternatives. It appears people are tired for them already

Their closest competitor SLTV is not serious. Their poor picture quality will make you start questioning your own TV. Their agents will even gaslight you about your HDMI port. There is also the issue of watching matches which are 2 minutes late. I wonder if it is still live match.

These are issues stopping me from wasting my money on them but then, I doubt Chelsea gives me so much joy these days to pay DSTV exploitative fee. I will have to look into iptv.

popizaino:


When you start scoring goals with minimal chances like man urinated you can now claim your attack is obviously better.

We create more chances than them, score more than them, then we obviously have better attackers.

Numbers don't lie.

popizaino:



The bolded results above was the reason why we suggested that Pochettino needed to improve our attack. Mind you, we created as many big chances as possible in those games but failed to score. How a genuine Chelsea fan would be asking for balenciaga at that period is still a mystery to me.


I remembered using the Man Urinated vs. Nottingham forest match as an example where the Red Devil conceded 2 goals and still came back to win.


Well, what do i expect from people who have sworn never to see sense in anything Airmark says to be looking for their missing balenciaga outfit in Chelsea's attack.

But then, we have outscored man u significantly and our attack is obviously better than theirs.

Does Chelsea have two Colwills? Could it be the same Colwill I know is who will elevate our defence?

How can dumb Chillwell improve us defensively when he is not even better than Cucurella defensively?

Treasonous statements are flying round this thread.

Bluelines69:


E done go barb maybe the spirits go leave am😂

Look at this guy's knees. Seems this guy was a phone snatcher back in Senegal.

Additionally, this dude is nothing less than 35.

Afrodoc2 can give us insight about the condition of that knee and how it relates to his true age.

drisham:


A proper aboki

This guy is not a footballer

How did he score 11 goals this season sef

It means a proper striker will score more then

Cancel out the 4 awoof goals he scored against 9 men spurs and he will have 7.

At this point, only the UK immigration enforcement can help us get rid of Jackson. Boehly will obviously fail us.

Capaldi:

At least Gallagher is running even tho useless.
The overweight argentina we have in midfield doesn't even bother to do that or anything. What exactly is Enzo good at?

Enzo is criminally useless.

Anyone that wants us to keep faith in James, Fofana and Chillwell fitness for next season is retarded.

So you guys robbed innocent Coventry city and moved on like it's nothing.

Thunder will fire everyone here. Thieves!!

Cancelo is a very useless defender

BlueRayDick:


airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses per game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a better position on the league table than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea only failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

Simply not conceeding in the last 10 minutes against 10 man Burnley could have kept us above scummies and in Europa league position.

There's a lot of foolishness going on here.

Griffon:


Attached to this post are the words of your gaffer yesterday.

Key words “clinical and to not concede”. The theory to outscore your opponent is more of a fantasy football approach.

You only need one goal to win. Of which we’ve been returning more than that per game (1.83) - literally two goals scored per game, despite our profligacy. Prior to the City’s game, we’ve been doing a regular Over 1.5 goals per game, so how is the attack the MAJOR problem?

It can’t possibly be yet only six teams have outscored us in the league.

What I don’t understand about una camp is how you all fail to see that conceding 1.73 goals per game for a top side is a disaster. Like, you’re certain these guys are going to concede two or more goals in a game. Have we done up to six clean sheets this season sef?

How that useless defense keeps undoing the little work done on the final third is beyond me. Our defense is the first of the myriad of issues to address at the Club even before that ‘useless’ attack.

If we’re handed a transfer embargo right now, I’ll be very concerned, not because of the attack but because, I’ll be losing a 39-year-old Thiago Silva whilst entering the next season with Disasi and Badiashile. That is high BP loading and waiting.

Having an injury prone defenders is the same as having a very bad defense. We need to clear out James, Fofana, Chillwell and obviously Silva.

Just this alone makes defense a major issue to address.

Caicedobets:
Those guys don't play for passion
They just want the money
Nothing else bothers them

Heard he is on 20k per week wages and on 8 years contract. I doubt he will have anything meaningful to himself after paying taxes and bills.

He is simply a foolish boy with no ambition, just wants to be in the spotlight, hence his selfish plays.

popizaino:


I have issues with people who misuse football terms.

Things are usually judge by what they do when they are in possession of the ball,not what they do without it.

You cannot begin to call any team who decides to conserve his energy without the ball as coward or negative or sitting deep.

Sitting deep is apparent and it is what it is -- factual. Everyone here knows that we sat deep immediately Gusto was subbed except you.

I am not surprised, I observed that you weren't present on the thread during the game which means, you didn't watch the game. But here you are, forming opinion.

popizaino:


Do you have any other football term other than sit-deep?

You just so in love with that word "sit deep".

You also have issues with "parking the bus".

When you don't press high up the pitch, then obviously you are sitting deep. Simple!

While Silva was crying, Mmadueke was laughing with Grealish 30 seconds after full time whistle.

We are doomed.

WhoDeyHause:

What did pochettino do wrong today?
Please tell me, I'm all ears.

Wouldn't have conceded if he didn't cowardly instruct us to sit deep after Disasi sub.

Did you at any point of this game see City sit deep to defend? I hate cowards with passion.

Unlimited22:
Make nobody sha call Poch

He is very stupid to instruct us to defend deep. Same thing he did the last time. This man is just very foolish. An utter idiot.

Mmadueke has finally run Gusto down. Thunder will fire him and his lazy ass.

Ballzproblem2:
Jackson can't score one on one but he thinks he deserves penalty,fool.

You can imagine the imbeciile. Looking for free meal.

Gallagher is a buffon.

NinjaMetahuman:
How old is Jackson again?


Lemme see if he can still improve or just give up.

Late 30's.

Unlimited22:

That kind of pass TO Jackson.

Not enough. He constitues tactical weakness.

This boy is an agent.

Unlimited22:

He does it every time.

Btw Enzo cannot play for Pochettino. He simply doesn't have the legs.

Like I am struggling to see his job in this game. He can't close players down, he can't follow runners, he can't help us control possession or beat press and he is very unlikely to score.

Is that not what being useless means?

Honestly, we don't need Enzo in this game. He has no legs.

Gallagher as a winger

Ibime:


You are still pained, bloody Citizen

God will punish you

airmark:


You unconsciously made a fool of yourself defending nonsense as usual.

.

Na mumu you be if you never know say team wey dey defend deep fit sabi counter attack.