Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,150,339 members, 7,808,202 topics. Date: Thursday, 25 April 2024 at 08:34 AM |
Nairaland Forum / TAO11's Profile / TAO11's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 202 pages)
Culture / Re: The Real Name Of Igbos by TAO11(f): 3:24pm On Apr 14 |
RedboneSmith:Different tonal markings. Ara [M-M] = Body Ara [M-H] = People |
Culture / The Ada & The Abẹrẹn (ẹbẹn): The Linguistic & Archaeological Evidence by TAO11(f): 8:41pm On Apr 13 |
The ‘ADA’ (See Frame-1): The claim nowadays by Binis (Edos) that this royal emblem originated with them is exposed as a falsehood by linguistics and archaeology. . . As per the linguistic evidence, the verb ‘dá’ (in ‘àdá’) is “to split”, as well as “to judge” as can be seen in the Yoruba dictionary. See Frame-2 Though these two meanings appear different, they actually both have semantic connection. At the very center of ‘judging’ is the concept of ‘separating’ the truth from untruths, the wheat from the chaff, (the head from the body), etc. Thus, ‘àdá’ literally signifies “the splitter”. The royal significance of this is therefore that: The possession of this emblem by a royal does confer on them certain authority to pronounce judgements — including that of life and death. This Àdá has, for this reason, been translated by some as “Sword of Justice”. See Frame-3. It is only in Yoruba language that ‘àdá’ finds its literal and etymological derivation which also aligns with the royal significance of the object. . . The archaeological evidence of the Ifẹ̀ roots of the royal Àdá consist of a classical-era carving of a royal Àdá on a living-rock at Agídí site, Ifẹ̀. Refer to Frame-4 for a photograph of the Àdá petroglyph. (From: Frank Willett, 2004:S145). This is the earliest hard evidence of this object from anywhere within Nigeria. This fact as well as the etymological roots do reaffirm Ifẹ̀ as the origin and source of the royal Àdá emblem. —— Credit: From Ọlá-Bọ́lá (@theolabola) on 𝕏 (Twitter). 4 Likes 2 Shares
|
Politics / Re: Professor Ojikutu - Misrepresentations In Awori History: Need For Urgent Action by TAO11(f): 7:16pm On Mar 01 |
adamusuleiman1:Your Ijaw (Izon) connection to IduMagbo is contrary to the known historical facts about the site. Historically, the Idumagbo wharf was from early times the occupational site of the Ijebu trading group. So if the term “ìdúmàgbò” has its etymology to do with an immigrant trading group, then it is the Ijebu group. Moreover, the term could also simply have to do with some natural/geographic features of the site. Certainly not “Arogbo-Izon”. —— PS: You should also have referenced the writer/source from which the write-ups here on Èkó, Etí-Ọ̀sà, Ìdú and Oṣòdì were taken. It’s plagiarism to leave that out.✌🏾 6 Likes 3 Shares |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 8:02pm On Dec 31, 2023 |
samuk:Okay! Thank you for conceding (by running away from the argument) that your king is “son of Adimula”. Ooni of Ife is Adimula. Adimula is not from Benin. Your king is the son of the Ooni of Ife. 🤭 This fact (among several others)at once debunks the new & modern Bini narrative which tries to hijack the man Oduduwa and make him a Benin man. Historical scholarship has also debunked this newly concocted Benin narrative because it contradicts the ancient & established Benin narratives. Trashed‼️ ——— Now to the new topic you want to bring up as a face-saving grace: If he’s not from Heaven, then he must be from Benin?NO, lol.😅 Let me educate you on words & opposite: The opposite of Heaven is not Benin. Lol. In other words if a human is not from a literal Heaven well he could be an aborigine of Ife amongst 1000s of other possible geographical locations in Yorubaland. The same Ife traditions which holds a Heavenly origin (from a religious & metaphysical standpoint) for Ogun Oduduwa, Ọbatala, Ọṣun, et al. of course also realize (from a earthly & historical POV) that Oduduwa is an Ifẹ native, precisely from one of the surrounding hills. That is, while Jesus Christ is Believed from a religious & metaphysical standpoint to have come down from Heaven (John 6:38); he’s also Known from an earthly & historical POV to be from Bethlehem (Matthew 2:1). Moreover, in Benin classical traditions Ogiso Igodo is believed to have come down from Heaven, & in the same Benin traditions is also said to have being from Ife (per classics) or a native Edo (per the new modern narrative from Edo blogs). 11 Likes 2 Shares |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 5:54am On Dec 31, 2023 |
samuk:Trying to prove the “story” is true by pasting a link that simply tells same story? Lol 😂 Doesn’t work that way, at least for those with a brain. As historians have demonstrated, the new Bini story which tries to hijack Oduduwa & make him a Bini is a deliberately unauthentic pseudohistorical narrative. Moreover, the praise-styling of Bini ọbas which name them as “Son of Adimula, ikeji oriṣa” actually destroys the pseudo historical content of your link. (1) Adimula is not from Benin. (2) Your Oba = Son of Adimula. (3) Adimula = Ooni of Ife. (4) Your Oba = Son of Ooni of Ife. 8 Likes 1 Share |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 6:24pm On Dec 30, 2023 |
samuk:Lol. You think you’re clever by writing a reply and carefully avoiding my moniker so I would miss notification 😂 Yes, there’s no personage from Benin called Adimula. Adimula is a title of all Ooni[s] (from Oduduwa to the present Ooni) & they’re not from Benin like you said. If your king was styled as “Acquaintance of Adimula”, well then you might give us the crap of “association”. On the contrary, your king was styled as fvcking “Son of Adimula, Ikeji oriṣa”. And guess what he did when one of his Edo slaves said that to his face: He smiled from ear to ear. There’s no escaping from this, samuk: Adimula is “the Ooni of Ife”. Your ọba is the son of Adimula. Your ọba is the son of the Ooni of Ife. Cheers! 15 Likes 2 Shares |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 1:36am On Dec 29, 2023 |
Thebadpolitican:It’s not about IF, it’s about FACT. Your king is styled to his own face as: “SON of Adimula, ikeji oriṣa” Yes, the phrase “Adimula, ikeji oriṣa” (with which your king is praised) is a pure Yoruba phrase. Lol. More still, that is precisely one of the titles of the Ooni of Ife. Yes, your king grins from ear to ear when he is praised as the SON of the Ooni of Ife. So, it’s beyond being praised in Yoruba (and neglecting Edo language). It’s actually about whose SON your king is & in respect of which he dared not complain. Cheers! 11 Likes 1 Share |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 11:26pm On Dec 22, 2023 |
Thebadpolitican:Lol. It is one thing to praise your king in a language foreign to him. It is another thing that the “praiser” is of the same ethnicity as your king; he praises your king in a language foreign to both him & your king; the praise words say your king is son to a certain Adimula who is king elsewhere; & your king sits right there proud of the praise words. 10 Likes |
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 11:13pm On Dec 09, 2023 |
Thebadpolitican:Even in as recent as the 1930s, etc. the conventional European spelling of “Ooni” was with a single “o”. And the conventional European spelling of “Alaafin” was with a single “a”. Yet this your screenshot is supposed to have come from Lord Lugard in the 1900s/1910s. DeyPlay 😂 9 Likes
|
Culture / Re: Oba Of Benin Went To Ile Ife To See Where They Buried Past Oba's Of Benin by TAO11(f): 10:59pm On Dec 09, 2023 |
Thebadpolitican:“Son of Adimula, Ikeji-oriṣa”! What precisely is your defense?: (1) That this ‘oríkì’ is fictitious, & is unheard of by the Bini kings or the Bini people? (2) That this ‘oríkì’ indeed exists & is recognized by the Bini kings, but it doesn’t mean what it clearly says? —— Which one? 9 Likes |
Crime / Re: Mohbad: Ex-Lagos PPRO Recounts Encounter With Naira Marley by TAO11(f): 3:34am On Sep 24, 2023 |
absoluteSuccess:Lol. What a pity!? |
Crime / Re: Mohbad: Ex-Lagos PPRO Recounts Encounter With Naira Marley by TAO11(f): 5:28pm On Sep 21, 2023 |
absoluteSuccess: absoluteSuccess: Wèrè dùn wò, ṣùgbọ́n kò ṣeé bí lọ́ mọ! 😢 Wait, where are your people? What are they doing about your case? Is this how they’ll be looking at you? I pray God should give you the healing you need o. |
Culture / Re: Did You Know Of Benin by TAO11(f): 11:49pm On Aug 29, 2023 |
AreaFada2:You Binis just lie to yourselves as a coping mechanism. 😂 3 Likes |
Politics / Re: El-Rufai Absent At His Son, Bello’s Wedding (Photos) by TAO11(f): 4:57pm On Aug 13, 2023 |
. 5 Likes 2 Shares |
Culture / Re: Is Ilorin Not A Yoruba Land by TAO11(f): 4:32am On Jul 12, 2023 |
RedboneSmith:True sha.
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 11:16pm On May 02, 2023 |
4 Likes |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 11:10pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221:Do you know that “argumentum ad lapidem” (“appeal to the stone”) is still a fallacy? Lool. In other words, what you should have demonstrated is that the French word “domaine” is not domain” in the English language as shown below. 😘 You need not have resorted to the classical failure of insulting the argument (as opposed to disproving it). Did you do that out of desperation to write a reply? 🤭 5 Likes 2 Shares
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:54pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221:Sorry baldie, this was debunked here: https://www.nairaland.com/7671910/british-bombardment-lagos-1851/2#122890496 And here: https://www.nairaland.com/7671910/british-bombardment-lagos-1851/2#122891033 😂 Cheers baldie 👨🦲 3 Likes 1 Share |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:48pm On May 02, 2023 |
3 Likes |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:43pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: You know projection won’t work, so why even try? Now face the argument you should be defending. 🤭 3 Likes 1 Share
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:40pm On May 02, 2023 |
You must be really convinced that I am a Bini person. In other words, you strongly have the feeling that I’m no different from one of those you manipulate. I wonder why you’re adamant with this hopeless idea despite evidence to the contrary. Listen, I am still me. I haven’t changed. I am still your nemesis. Ghostwon82221: You claimed that the 1845 text is an eye eyewitness account. Do you really understand what an eyewitness text is or you just use words to appear smart to Bini retards? Lemme pretend you don’t, so you have no hiding: An eyewitness account is a documentation of events which the author witnessed by himself/herself. 😝 ✌🏾 6 Likes
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:27pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221:No it means “that’s how they designated it”. Proof-1: The French “désignent” signifies ”designate” in English. Very direct. Proof-2: As at the time when the author was writing this work in c. 1845, EVERY group REFER to “Lagos” as “Eko”. In others words, it is meaningless to single out Ijebu in c. 1845 as the group who REFER to “Lagos” as “Eko” ——— In Conclusion: “Eko” (according to that book which you brought forward to shoot yourself in the head) was a name evolved by the Ijebu group for “Lagos”. The author was clearly describing who named/coined the name “Eko” for “Lagos”. He identified them as the Ijebus — of course based on some received info. No amount of Benin liars can twist away the fact that the French “désignent” is “designate” in English. Take heart baldie! 4 Likes 1 Share |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:19pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: The mad baldie is preparing his exit speech already. As usual when TAO11 shows up, baldie flees never to look back for months or years to come. You lose again! 😎 3 Likes |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:13pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: You had said elsewhere that the author witnessed it tho. Lmao 🤣 See screenshot attached. Do you now want to make up your mind or no still? Lool. 3 Likes
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 10:08pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221:Lmao. Now that your “Lagos was part of Benin” agenda has been debunked, you now have to shift goalpost to: Whether the name “Eko” was truly named by Ijebus as the book claim. Whether the author was an eyewitness to the naming ceremony of ”Lagos” as “Eko” by the Ijebus as claimed. To answer these diversions tactics from what just hit you, I’ll like to refer you to the screenshot below as to show you where you already answered yourself. I am not saying I agree with your answer to yourself, I am only asking you to make up your mind if you agree with yourself or not. Did the author witness what he wrote or not? Please bear in mind that, it was you who brought the book🤭 2) This is the thing with you, you keep trying to give lectures on things you know nothing about.In other words, we must pretend that you will tell the truth because you don’t mind been exposed. 🤣 No baldie! 🤭 Instead, sane people would rather rely on objective verifiable sources who have no horse in this race. Why should that not make sense to you? These French sources maintain that the French word “designént” means “designate”. Even your “refer” does not contradict this. It’s just non-precise. Liars love imprecision. It helps them escape. You go nowhere! 😎 4 Likes
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 9:42pm On May 02, 2023 |
The beginning of the last kicks of a dying horse as usual. We shall debunk them as we love doing. 😎 Ghostwon82221:And what difference does it being a country, or region, or town, or confederacy, etc. make to the argument which debunks your foolery? 😂 Let’s break it down to those you seek to deceive: (I) In the 1400s/1500s, a relatively small region in the extreme western end of West Africa is Guinea. (II) Later on from the ?late-1500s, 1600s; this name of a small region began to be applied to the whole of the West-Africa area from Sierra-Leone to Cameroon. (III) In other words, a foolish dunce will interpret this to mean that all the West-African lands, kingdoms, & states, etc. from Sierra-Leone to Cameroon (including your Benin) were all owned by the original Guinea. (IV) Whereas, the reality is simply that the name of the original Guinea was simply adopted by foreigners (as a matter of acquaintance & convenience) to describe the much wider West Africa from abroad. (V) It is irrelevant whether the original place (i.e. the actual precolonial Guinea) was one town, a group of related towns, a kingdom, a confederacy, etc. What matters is that its name was borrowed & applied to West Africa. The same happened with Takrur. 😉 2) the country named guinea in post colonial Africa wasn't called guinea in precolonial Africa and probably wasn't even a country in precolonial Africa.The confusion you seek to perpetuate has been exposed above. Sorry! In other words, it doesn’t matter if today’s Guinea is a country with President. Doesn’t matter if pre-colonial Guinea wasn’t a country with one President. What matters is that its name (i.e. precolonial Guinea’s name) was borrowed & applied to West Africa. The same happened with Takrur. 😉 3) so the point which you are making which states (or implies) that countries names were used by Europeans to name vast regions is in a word false, and also stupid.Yes your imagination (which you desperately seek to substitute as my argument) is false, stupid & more. Again my argument is: The subset lent their name to the wider superset, while your ridiculous claim on the other hand is that this happens because the subset is the capital of a vast government/dominion. 🤦🏾♂️ 4) Benin kingdom is not a post colonial country, it is a precolonial country. Your comparison is illogical.You should have realized at this point that you’ve been exposed. You need be smart enough to realize it tho. 5) it would be understandable that people might add or remove territory to a region for various reasons, for example the region called Europe keeps changing, but I fail to understand why the boundaries of actual countries would be treated in such a cavalier way.I hope you know circular reasoning is still a fallacy. It is null & void. Please take note of this going forward. I wouldn’t want to repeat myself. In other words, what you intend to prove is that: Benin owned the circumjacent territories outside of its boundaries. What you’re adducing as “proof” is that: Somethings similar happened in Europe. Me: Lol 🙃 6) yet again, you provide your opinions and confuse them with facts.Are we projecting now?? Projection is how to defend & win your argument? Do better! 😎 Ghostwon82221:Looks like you’ve suddenly realized that your request to show "all the caption of “Van Benin Biafra”" makes no difference to the argument I have adduced. Lool. Anyway, your new comeback here was also debunked where I debunked your weak Guinea comeback. In other words, it is irrelevant if the original place (i.e. the actual precolonial Biafra) was one town, a group of related towns, a kingdom, a confederacy, etc. In so far as it was a different location from your Benin kingdom, the consistent inference which you must draw from the same map is that Benin Kingdom was owned by the then Biafra—whether the then Biafra was one “kingdom”, or a confederacy, or a group of related towns, cities, villages is irrelevant. 2) the reason I did not reply you is because I had already wasted lots of time on you. I expose a lie of yours and you come back with ten more lies, and so on, after a point I got fed up, you have a non ending stream of lies and non logical statements and replying to them would be a full time job, I can't possibly have that much time.I can’t remember asking for your tears at any point in the course of debunking you. Why all these? 🤣 4 Likes |
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 8:38pm On May 02, 2023 |
Precolonial map of the region showing that Lagos (in its currents form) and its environs were part of Benin (see below) According to your rusty brain: “Van Ichoo Benin” means that Lagos is part of Benin. But strangely your dead brain skipped where the same map shows: “van Benin Biafra” Does this not also mean that your beloved Benin was part of, conquered, owned, controlled by Biafra? 🤣 Ghostwon82221:The good thing with respect to your fraud activities & lies on Nairaland is that you seem to have no new lies. In other words, I have personally debunked all your lies on this Nairaland forum. All I need do is to simply mine my prior responses and re-debunk you again. As such you will be forced to deactivate your account again as I always make you do. Anyway, the following reply is adapted from one of my devastating replies to you years ago. You fled!😂 Regarding your translation of that French text, I’ve sometimes ago already pointed out your fraudulent attempt to cover up some very crucial points. (1) The translation which you gave above as “refer to” should actually be given appropriately as “designated” or “named”. You are much aware that the appropriate translation will shatter your age-long, strongly-held Benin myth that Binis named the island as Eko. Whereas, it was the Ijebus (the Yorubas) who named the island as Eko according to this account from ‘your own material’ which was published in 1845. (2) Regarding land ownership: — First of all, the actual area in question is NOT the whole of Lagos as we know it in today’s context. Rather, the area in question (in this passage) refers to a portion of the area now known as Lagos island — that is, a portion of Lagos-island, i.e. the then Curamo. Secondly, the actual word used in the passage is NOT “land” as you’ve cunningly translated it. Rather, the actual translation should have been given correctly as “domain” or “area”. The author is clearly aware of the nuance of using the word “land” and as such have rightfully avoided it. Thirdly, the author was clearly not talking about the aboriginal ownership of that island — which clearly is of the Aworis (i.e. Yorubas) even according to Benin sources. What the author was clearly referring to here is about who has the relative right to that specific area (i.e. the relative right to the Curamo island) between two non-aboriginal immigrant groups — namely the Ijebus and the Benins. In other words, contrary to your misrepresentation, the passage is clearly NOT about aboriginal ownership of land, but rather about two immigrant groups who obviously are in competition with each other over the right to a specific area the island. #TwistDebunked —————— Having debunked your misrepresentation and having clarified the truth from that same passage, one may (out of curiosity) then wonder why two different group of immigrants should compete with each other over an area which aboriginally belongs to a different group entirely — i.e. the Awori-Yoruba group. In answer to this, the indigenous accounts of Lagos history (as well as historical studies) have shown that different immigrant groups began to settling in and around Lagos-island starting from the mid or the late 1500s. This was in order to take advantage of the European trading activities along the Atlantic coast of West Africa which began during that period. The aboriginal owners of the land granted permission to land to a number of immigrant groups who came to settle in an around Lagos-island for that purpose. One of such trading groups who came to settle in the area and who was granted permission to land by the natives is the Benin group. This group (as well as the Ijebu group who also came to settle for the same purpose) is well remembered in the Lagos traditions. The relevant section of this indigenous Lagos account is as may be seen in a publication of a British colonial administrator of Nigeria as follows: “Whatever may have been the reason, the Binis arrived with no great show of force, and permission was asked of the Lagos people for them to land. This permission was granted, probably with no very good grace, although at the time Lagos island was very sparsely inhabited and there must have been room for many more settlers.” ~ Sir Alan C. Burns, “History of Nigeria,” 1929, p. 43. Having said that, it is crucial to note that the period of Lagos history described so far is about a century or more prior to the emergence of kingship on Lagos-island. As such, the phrase “gouverneur ou chef politique” in that passage is in respect of the internal political organization of the Benin immigrant group residing on the island within the confines of their Benin community — Just as other immigrant groups residing in different parts of the same island obviously have their own leadership. —————— Folks, for a faithful translation of that passage, refer below: “Captain Horseley called it Eko and that is how it was named by the Ijebus; but it is not their area, it is the Benin[‘s] — who refer to it by the name Korame [which is] recognizably the Curamo of the OLDER Portuguese[’s] accounts, as Eko represents the Dutch hydrographers[’s] Ichoo. Korame and its mainland were linked in the past by a sand-spit between the great lagoon and the sea. However, the Ijebus have, for a long time, seized that sand-spit whose eastern end has also been infiltrated by Ijaw pirates. Korame therefore remained isolated to the extreme of the great lagoon, and continued to be dependent on Benin for its choice of governor or political leader.” ~ M. D’Avezac, “Notice Sur Le Pays Et Le Peuple Des Yébous En Afrique,” 1845, pp. 25-26. Cheers Baldie 👨🦲 Cc: Balogunodua, Maxxim 7 Likes 3 Shares
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 8:13pm On May 02, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221: Ghostwon82221: Replying me but yet scared of mentioning me🤣 How am I supposed to be notified of your reply? 🤦🏾♂️😂 Make up your mind & stop being stuck between your urge to spread lies & your incurable fear of TAO11. You’re one of the few remaining hardened fraudulent folks alive who strongly trust in their skills of deceit. Anyway, trust me (as always) to ensure that your fraud & deceit is exposed and you are forced out of shame to deactivate your moniker again. (1) On Guinea: The delineation labeled “Guinea” in the upper part of my attached image is the country as it is today. Yes the name “Guinea” did not originally apply to that very same exact/precise limited boundaries of today. However, the name “Guinea” applied originally to the lands below the Senegal River — in that same region. Later on (still in the pre-colonial ara), this region called “Guinea” (in this extreme-west of Western Africa) then lent its name to much of West Africa as is seen in the precolonial map in the lower part of my image. This old practice whereby foreign traders adopt place names (with which they are acquainted) for the wider region is well known by those who read. “Takrur” is another example. This ancient West African state (located in western most West Africa) later lent its name (via foreign agency) to the whole West Africa. (2) On Benin: In a vein similar to the foregoing examples, “Benin” too lent its name (via the agency of some foreign traders) to circumjacent locations outside Benin’s boundaries. In other words, at some early periods in the history of West Africa, some foreign traders borrowed the name of specific locations, viz. “Guinea” or “Takrur”, etc. (in the extreme west of Africa) & applied these names to the wider region of West Africa—including the land of your actual Benin kingdom among others. In light of this exposition, only an irredeemable dunce will for example infer from all the foregoing that: (A) The classical reference to West-Africa as Takrur implies that the actual West African state by that name (in the extreme west of Africa) actually ruled the whole of West Africa at some point in the course of history. (B) The classical references (in precolonial maps) to a vast region of West Africa as Guinea implies that the original places by that name (in the extreme west of Africa) actually ruled a larger region of West Africa (from “Sierra-Leone” to “Cameroon”) at some point in the course of West African history. (C) The references, in some precolonial maps, to Benin itself and the circumjacent areas outside Benin by the label “Benin” implies that Benin kingdom ruled such places covered by the name Benin on the maps. Cheers baldie 👨🦲 Cc: Balogunodua, Maxxim 4 Likes 3 Shares
|
Education / Re: British Bombardment Of Lagos 1851 by TAO11(f): 3:35pm On May 01, 2023 |
Ghostwon82221:how to read maps according to the bald clown i’m quoting here: Benin Kingdom was owned & controlled by Guinea 👇🏾 Cc: Balogunodua 4 Likes 1 Share
|
Culture / Re: Fredrick Obateru Akinruntan: I Am The Leader Of All Obas In Yorubaland by TAO11(f): 7:41am On Apr 06, 2023 |
fatiaforreal:Actually, Oshodi (historically speaking) was a title and not a personal name. Although it has now evolved in modern times to be sometimes used as a name. In fact, Oshodi (Oṣòdì) is NOT a Yoruba adaptation of Tsoede. We know this because Yorubas still preserve and use the Yoruba adaption of Tsoede till date, and it is: Shado (Ṣàdó) or sometimes (Ìṣàdó); not Oshodi. The Yoruba adaptation “Shado” (from: “Tsoede”) is a Tapa-Yoruba religious title which is many worlds apart from the Yoruba title “Oshodi” (Oṣòdì) — a different and completely separate title/office. The title “Oshodi” (Oṣòdì) is a title of Yoruba origin. It appears in different form in different Yoruba areas & kingdoms. The key term in this chieftain title is “òdì”. The title comes in the form of: “òdì-ọba”, “oṣòdì”, “òsì” (a synonym of “òdì”), etc. The term “òdì” (as applied to a person) translates literally as: “alter-ego”. As such, “òdì-ọba” translates as “the king’s alter-ego”, “oṣòdì” is “one who acts as [the] alter-ego”, etc. This title (in Yorubaland) is that of a chamberlain who is both the king’s aide & the king’s stand-in. A Nupe held this title at Èkó. Oshodi (Oṣòdì) is not his name. Oshodi is the Yoruba title of his Yoruba office. His actual name is Landuji. Finally, the screenshot below shows what Bini sources say about this title, which they articulate as “óṣòdìn”. Bini sources note that this title is “Of Yoruba origin”. Culled from Bini-English dictionary, published 1937. ✌🏾 cc: baby124 17 Likes 6 Shares
|
Politics / Re: Just In: Lagos Is Not A Yorubaland – Oba Akiolu by TAO11(f): 8:39am On Mar 09, 2023 |
okoloto:Ọba Akiolu has long debunked those who invent these so-called “interviews” that actually never happened. https://dailypost.ng/2017/12/11/never-said-bini-owned-lagos-oba-akiolu/?amp=1 Rest! 🥳 8 Likes 3 Shares |
Culture / Re: History Of Ogori And Magongo In Kogi State by TAO11(f): 4:50pm On Feb 04, 2023 |
samuk:You’re actually not well, are you? Now go tell that to your brother whom you lied to: Tell him it was you in desperate need of my attention and not the other way round. For the umpteenth time, bring [only] one link for this consolation you’re forcing down upon yourself. Drop link to comments where you performed these wonders in an exchange with me. That shouldn’t be hard to do. Should it? In contrast, I can drop multiple links for folks to read where you were beaten black & blue as I showed that your Kings are of Ifẹ-Yoruba ancestry, roots, & origin. I can also drop links showing where some non-Yoruba readers (Igbos, Binis, et al.) on the culture section have expressed their conviction of this historical fact on the basis of my past engagements with you. Do you see how it’s done? Now help yourself with the links, or take your “L”. ✌🏾 6 Likes |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 202 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 154 |