₦airaland Forum

ChristianNorth:
.
Meaning we should now expose everyone to the virus abi?

It doesn't cost anything to produce mask. If we could produce clothes for the entire nation, we can also do the same for masks.

We mustn't produce surgical masks for everyone. We can reserve that for the frontline workers and produce non-surgical masks for the populace.

It will reduce the spread of the virus and it is better than leaving everyone vulnerable.

PoliteActivist:
I wonder why people like u can't think beyond official pronouncements. Here's what WHO said:
1) sick people should wear masks to avoid spreading
2) but we concede people who are not sick can also spread the virus

How on earth can the logical conclusion be:
3) therefore the best way is for only sick people to wear masks.
Also how about the stigma of telling everyone u r sick by wearing a mask?
Clearly, only one logical solution:
EVERYBODY WEARS MASKS!!!
The below is from the same article u quoted[/s]

ChristianNorth:
Which stupid research?

The only study I am interested in is the one that states global mask wearing will reduce the spread to 1.5%

That is over 98.5% prevention rate.

ChristianNorth:
I thought I was dealing with a human.

Fvck off please.

We shall defeat Corona virus to the utter shame of it's sympathizers

ChristianNorth:
so we should stop using the mask abi?

You guys need help.

ChristianNorth:
so we should stop using the mask abi?

You guys need help.

ChristianNorth:
You fullish sha.

Standardized mask? You need help. Any moisture absorbent mask can do.

Even if the mask reduces the spread by 0.000000001%, it is something.

PoliteActivist:
WHO gave a STUPID reason why masks should not be worn. Instead of thinking for yourself and realizing that the reason is stupid, u r stuck on what WHO said! EVEN JUST CLOTH RETARDS SPREAD OF THE VIRUS! Get that into your thick skull!! Also, has cost or scarcity ever been a consideration in mandating use of a life saving item - why are children's car seats mandated, why are bike helmets mandated, etc.??

PoliteActivist:
WHO gave a STUPID reason why masks should not be worn. Instead of thinking for yourself and realizing that the reason is stupid, u r stuck on what WHO said! EVEN JUST CLOTH RETARDS SPREAD OF THE VIRUS! Get that into your thick skull!! Also, has cost or scarcity ever been a consideration in mandating use of a life saving item - why are children's car seats mandated, why are bike helmets mandated, etc.??

PoliteActivist:
WHO gave a STUPID reason why masks should not be worn. Instead of thinking for yourself and realizing that the reason is stupid, u r stuck on what WHO said! EVEN JUST CLOTH RETARDS SPREAD OF THE VIRUS! Get that into your thick skull!! Also, has cost or scarcity ever been a consideration in mandating use of a life saving item - why are children's car seats mandated, why are bike helmets mandated, etc.??

ThinkFreely:
The problem is how do you ensure that everyone wears the mask and it doesn’t cause negative economic effect. How do you make sure mask is available at all times and never gets scarce? We don’t produce standard mask in Nigeria yet. A mask that can’t resist fluid and filter virus is dead on arrival cos asymptomatic people who will use this will still infect people.
Nobody is arguing that the mask will not help, can we make it available so demand don’t exceed supply?
That’s the bone of contention here. Understand my post before commenting.

PoliteActivist:
R u sick in the head or something?? It says right there that people who are presymptomatic and asymptomatic spread the virus - people who don't even know they have it. Seems u have WHO in the brain - same WHO that said travel bans would only spread the virus faster, same WHO that said there was no human to human transmission. R u ok sir?

PoliteActivist:
Read the below then ask yourself why we are told cover our mouth when we sneeze

PoliteActivist:
My man the virus does not hang by themselves. They are in droplets a person ejects. Any type if covering retards how far those droplets can travel. Having on any type of covering is better than having nothing. Do some rsearch b4 confusing people like WHO!

PoliteActivist:
See this one. Something that is clearly not logical he is trying to force it to be logical simply because WHO said it. Oga hasn't anyone told u asymptomatic people also spread the virus?? Why cover when u sneeze since it makes no difference.

PoliteActivist:
Guy do u know the worst hit states in US, like New York, now legally mandate some type of face covering. Stop accepting twisted logic. Think for yourself for a change!

weyreypey:
Your father! I knew you were a buffoon.

Buliwyf:
Dude grow up. This is childish. It wasn't funny when you started. It still isn't funny now. Makes you look very bad actually.

weyreypey:
oga shut up, what yen yen yen are you mumbling. If you want to catch COVID-19 no one is stopping you. Let the mask crew go on. Standard gini? Are you using surgical masks? ..

obi4eze:
Not for me. But for those who can't get. Distribution of face masks may not be sustainable but it can be done initially with the help of the private sector and well-meaning individuals.

obi4eze:
It is. The government should just distribute them free of charge and pass an order that everyone should wear them with punitive measures for those that flout the order.

obi4eze:
LASG is better

Anyone and everyone should wear mask during this period.

mployer:
Increase in demand will ultimately cause increase in supply.

From the onset, WHO wants the spread to continue so they can carry out their evil Vaccination agenda.

JMAN05:
So you among those scientists that fails to tell people the truth, that beneficial mutations are rare. Or you don't even know about that. Well, research has shown that to be true in case you don't know.

My brother change into another specie, what is called macro-evolution is a dream. The Evolutionist are at debates because they know it's true. Some favor gradualism while some favor punctuated equilibrium. The fact is, we don't see new organisms made. All research to do that through breeding failed. Turn a chimp to a man let me see.

JMAN05:
They share 96% of our DNA. They haveare the only ones that have that level of percentage, so that's basically understandable.

However we are strikingly different from them. We have as much as 40 million differences between are nucleotides. It is true that it is only many thousands of those nucleotides that really makes much sense, at least as experts say. However 40 million is pretty much even as we can readily observed when will look at a human and a chimp. Perhaps other things other than the DNA still contribute to the differences between we and chimps.



I agree that there are similarities but there are obvious differences in fact even large ones. Look at a human and a chimp, you would see some similarities. But there are obvious differences that to state that one premate will change to another is something that doesn't make any sense. Series of research has proven that this is true. One species does not change to another. That is what I call macro-evolution. It is true that you don't agree, you believe micro and macro are the same. Well I don't. There are experts that do not agree too.

Yes, we share most of our DNA. The production of a vaccine doesn't in itself mean that we are descended from them since vaccines could also be made from cocker spaniel and even other animals.

Now we share about 25% DNA with dogs however dogs and humans have almost the same number of genes. Now I am talking about a vaccine from that specie.

So, vaccine and closeness in DNA makeup is not a strong factor to support evolution from chimps. After all we humans have about 99.99 percent of DNA yet you observe obvious defferences from one human to another talk about a white and a black. Will know how hard it is for two whites to produce a black. Or for blacks to produce a white. That is just one example. Now think about a difference that is up to 4% in DNA.




You are the only one saying that mutation is largely beneficial, I don't know the source of your information. Research has only shown that at every 1000 you have one beneficial mutation. That is not being highly beneficial from my opinion. So what's the source of your own information?

From what I know, scientists that have been involved in interbreeding have not ended up producing new species. I mean they have not turned a chimp into a human.

So if a controlled research cannot do it I Wonder why mutation that is largely not beneficial can do it.

That is why if you go to the fossil record you will see several missing links. Macro-evolution doesn't work. the examples you provide only supports microevolution, changes within a specie.

Seun:
I remember predicting that the reign of the Coronavirus would come to an end when people started wearing face masks. It is gradually coming to pass. The reason the entire world is in this mess is that the Asians, who produce most face-masks and other personal protection equipment, blocked their manufacturers from exporting them to the rest of the world because they knew that they would be needed to protect their people.

Instead of the West to respond by mobilizing their manufacturers to produce face-masks massively, so that they would be able to protect their people, they started a deceptive campaign to discourage people from using them. The campaign was so effective that people who wore face-masks were mocked and shamed by those who had been brainwashed. People who had face-masks were pressured into giving them away.

Now they grudgingly accept that face-masks are helpful but instead of producing adequate quantities of the quality face-masks that have been proven to be effective - the kind of masks that most Asians are wearing - they are asking people to use less effective home-made masks.