₦airaland Forum

Dayokanu
how can someone say the REF blocked SOL? how he got to be blocked is a wonder

and did u read where someone said Mr. Campbell kicked the ball accidentally?
thats disgusting to read from a grown up

it sounds like a vibe from an epileptic patient with no control over his lips
thts dangerous for this blog; the mod should delete that post

i dont see Rooney winning it in a world cup year cos England might mess up again

if he can replicate this next season, then hes got a chance

debosky:
It's not really solidarity - Arsenal are bound to have a good run sooner or later, and you'll be foolish to ignore the goal scoring possibilities from the midfield of Arsenal that has scored more than the midfield at any other club. No solidarity here.

i agree with Diaby but i dont see anythn good coming out from ramsey even in the short term

lemme check how much hes going for and ill give u better replacements

presido1:
Oboy easy with the guy, if u check he is the only Arse fan that is arguing about the call. Others are on quick free kick while he is rooted on Penalty and accidental back pass. May be Sol want to score own goal, he is angry that AW sold him to Turkish club. Hehehehe.

Meanwhile Yaradua is no longer in Saudi, he was spotted at the emiratiiii two days ago. Dumping ground for retards.

lol, have u seen a doofus exuding confidence in imbecility?
this dude is a renowned example.
no iota of sense

debosky:
I have a long term plan jare, but if I was going to sacrifice points, I'd rather have done it for a player I know will be around for a bit, not one that is injured for an 'unknown' period of time.

Anyways, I have him now - he'll just warm the bench till he becomes fit.

and i agree with Borats post
why arsenal players?

ritchboy:
^^ co-signed by a co-ignoramus

TKB
Rosicky was fouled in the build up to the goal and u are telling me it was an independent incident. Were you born an idi0t?
Campbell was trying to protect the ball from the Porto player, he took one step too many then his foot accidentally came in slight contact with the ball. Only a hardcore m0ron would classify that as a back pass.

use your head once and stop being a classic pederast
a foul can only be deemed a foul when the REF says so, whats the name of the school u attended?

"Cambel was trying to shield the ball from the Porto player and his foot accidentally came in slight contact with the ball"
hehehehehehehe. This is worth saving in me archives; u shd be Yaraduas bedmate in Saudi, no more no less

how do u buy that statement? how should the REF distinguish between an accidental touch and an intentional touch when SOL was facing the goalpost with the ball in his legs? ure a complete nuisance to this blog. Get some adult education man

i think hes probably a lunatic afterall

debosky:
This is daylight robbery - a few minutes ago I was trying to buy Diaby and he was fit, only for the yeye FPL to update AFTER I completed the transfer (costing me 4 points) that he has a knee injury.

Should've bought Ramsey instead who is sure to start for Arsenal now.

Since Tevez is absent, I'll have to change my Capi for this week.

Ramsey ke? arent u gonna sell him after this gameweek?
now i see why ure down the lower rung

u need to stick to a long term plan man

[quote author=~Sauron~ link=topic=373612.msg5544278#msg5544278 date=1266578961]The tarado won't be back until March.
His compassionate leave has been extended so he can look after his premature baby.[/quote]is that a joke? pls o

ritchboy:
Tkb
someone with your appalling level of intelligence couldnt have had a natural birth, so i doubt your death would be any different.
The freekick should have been awarded? I can only assume u were taking your medication when Rosicky was denied a stone wall penalty at the other end. And/Or you are not aware a keeper is ALLOWED to pick up the ball if it comes off his defender as long as it isnt an INTENTIONAL BACK PASS.

But why do i even bother when u would just come back and say Rosicky dived and Sol's touch was intentional?
Lost cause

Sols pass was not intentional? what was he trying to do facing the keeper with the ball? score an own goal?
hehehehehe, i wont exchange words with you. destroy ur certificates and go to an Ivy league school where common sense will be taught
ure an illiterate

ritchboy:
Tkb
someone with your appalling level of intelligence couldnt have had a natural birth, so i doubt your death would be any different.
The freekick should have been awarded? I can only assume u were taking your medication when Rosicky was denied a stone wall penalty at the other end. And/Or you are not aware a keeper is ALLOWED to pick up the ball if it comes off his defender as long as it isnt an INTENTIONAL BACK PASS.

But why do i even bother when u would just come back and say Rosicky dived and Sol's touch was intentional?
Lost cause

Rozzi was denied a penalty? SOL played a backpass to the keeper
2 mutually independent events
how should Rozzis appeal for penalty be a yardstick for Sols/Fabs goof? (edited)
and u call urself intelligent?

HNIC:
**I am just thinking**
Maybe the ref, since the Porto player whispered into his ears that they wanted the kick taken early,shoulda just taken the free kick himself.

hehehehe
go back and watch the game
the Porto player wanted to take the ball from the Keeper and he beckoned to the REF to appeal to the Keeper to release the ball
how did u miss that part? that is enuff to tell you they wanted to play it quickly
im tired. stick to what you believe, you lost the game cos of some bad footballing from ur lads at the back and not cos of the REF
thts ma point

v3:
The REF blocked Sol from making a challenge

Wah did u expect Sol to do, take out (headbutt/push/slide/tackle) the REF?

Jheez mahn!

relax; how did SOL get to the back of the REF and not behind the ball?

look at this; The REF blew for foul ( where was Sol?)
The REF ran to collect the ball from the Keeper ( where was Sol?)
He took the ball and dropped for the Porto player ( Where was Mr. Sol Campbell?)
i dunno how he found himself behind the REF but i think he had the time to block the players but he didnt.
thts ma point

HNIC:
And what does the rule say??
"A referee is allowed to demand for the ball from the offender in a freekick situation and hand it over to the opposition for a quick free kick.
The free kick can be taken quickly even though the referee has stopped passage of play by demanding for the ball.
The referee is also allowed to block the path of the offender and raise his hand to indicate an indirect freekick when the ball has already been played"
***Shakes head***

i know ure smart; ur goalie held on to the ball and the REF demanded for the ball cos the Porto players wanted to take it quickly

the REF didnt block ur player( he didnt hold his legs)

ritchboy:
Tkb
does your brain use a condom when it interacts with the rest of your anatomy?
What does the rubbish u typed have to do with the fact the freekick should never have been awarded in the first place?

I walk into your house and murder your family in cold blood, then in my defense i say "your wife should have tried to seduce me so your son could knock me out while i was distracted". . .

It is unfortunate the Man Utd fans are incapable of understanding such simple things. Lost causes

and u think ill condescend to this level to argue with someone who feels the REF shouldnt have called for a freekick?
and dont do ur intro with me; been there b4, u were never a match so quit


discuss footie if u want to, if u dont want to; die a natural death

HNIC:
@Tkb417
Why we are calling you guys 'names' is your failure not to heap any blame on the ref.
We have dissed sol and fabby, but the referee goofed.
Once you call for the ball, it doesn't make sense to drop it for the opposition to take a 'quick' free kick, 5 yards from goal
How you guys can't see that this negates common sense is shocking?

call us names o; it adds nor remove nothn

as per the REF; the rules of the game is so clear about what happened
Arsenal FC can lodge a complaint and seek for clarifications

is Tevez the tarado back?
abeg oo