₦airaland Forum

Afamed:
Iru iru obe gbegiri

Ko le ye e!

Obinoscopy:
Not true. An APC aspirant/candidate who fully participated in the primaries (other than Modibbo) gets it.

The supreme court. Has ruled it in favour of the candidate that came 2nd in the secondary election having par took in all the stages. That should 1 for PDP.

rummmy:
e pain am....... Coming to power through back door is never the way.....your buhari will be next.

Amen and amen again to the Buhari being next.

NgeneUkwenu:
Conflicting judgements here and there.

Did Yayaha Bello participate in all the stages of the election, when he was awarded the Governorship seat after the death of the actual winner?

Did Rotimi Amaechi participate in all the stages of the election before he was handed the Governorship seat in Rivers State?

Good observation but has been taken over by recent pronouncements.

engineerboat:
O ma to ye e, pele

Ko le ye!

FarahAideed:
But didn't INEC say they don't even have any server ?

They simply ran away from thorough scrutiny at the PEPT and now this! INEC has been busted.

Those apc goons jubilating that inec simply didn't make a defense at the PEPT as a good move will soon see their folly!

I just pray that a technicality hasn't been planted somewhere cos Atiku/PDP has a compelling petition.

Afamed:
Did you find it difficult to understand simple grammar. Accreditation data . How is accreditation similar to transmission of electoral votes and results?. Don't be silly

Ignorance is bliss!

engineerboat:
We now know Why INEC go the honourable way

INEC would have been given a knockout blow had they made any defense.

deji68:
so INEC dont need to counter the claims by their staff that they transmitted results ?.internal memo and Training material are they their documents. They 11 contested state with false entries, no collation officer to testify abi?.....well make we wait for the APC and Bubu defence

Don't mind buharideens they are shallow nothing discerning about them but, sentiments.

Dansuqi:
This tuniski guy na character oh.

You are right.

iloveyou82:
as i told you before, nothing to defend, atiku witness has already done the defence, the case has be concluded that inec did not conduct the election electronically

Sannu CJN.

blacknp:
If wishes were horses,maybe in another life,so please take heart,atiku was a joker right from the start,he was part of the conspiracy to keep his Fulani Brethren in power,everyday in The United Arab Emirates,he is checking his accounts awaiting the Cheque from the Federal Government of Nigeria for his role in the plot the “Fulani Connection”to keep Bubu in power. The more you look the less you see,The Great Baba Fela coined it Army Arrangement.

Lamest

iloveyou82:
you and i knew atiku was not the right candidate of pdp, you had no choice than to support him

He is the best candidate for pdp.

Afamed:
If seun decides to honour someone with that on Nairaland, I don't think you have a rival of being the most ignorant

You are right.

engineerboat:
INEC no witness is highly expected.

Bringing up witnesses will be like nailing their coffin the more

On point! The apc goons here are just sentimental. INEC is already boxed presenting any witness will simply slay them. It is a tactical retreat but, Buharideens feels it is a blow to the petitioners.

I like the profuse thank you of Atiku's counsel.

Let the remaining two defendants too tow same path.

themanderon:
Atiku is just wasting his time. The Sharia chief justice and his group of compromised justices have already written the judgement.
The dullard thinks he has won but of cause there is karma and nature. They can be brutal when they come with their just rewards. Ask IBB he knows better.

Whatever the outcome Atiku would have done well for our democracy. I respect his democratic credential.

engineerboat:
Keep mutipluing monikers

Anyone who can't be consistent on identity is suspect in thought.

Dansuqi:
Most of your pdp colleagues including those grounded in law are missing.why not respect yourself and ignore the thread

Since you always seek validation, why won't you be asking me to do same. Sorry I dont seek validation from anyone.

Hotfreezers:
You lack knowledge of law and legal processes that's why you are advertising your ignorance.

Atiku's witnesses supported INEC's case must especially the recharge card hawker from Kenya that Pdp called an engineer.

Someone somewhere told those witnesses to wreck Atiku. I strongly suspect that Livy Uziukwu of working against Atiku. Who introduced Uzoukwu to Atiku? Saraki and Wike.

Those 2 idiots have sabotaged Atiku to increase their chances in 2023.

Lame

Cajal:
...hmmmmm
Atiku is Cumming ...ATIKU WITNESSES HAVE BURIED THE CASE AGAINST HIM

CJN Tanko! INEC is scared to the marrow. They have no defense QED.

Kudos #teamAtiku two more defenders to go one down.

CEOKC:
I feel INEC might know where this whole tribunal thing is leading to and they choose not to loose a sleep over it. ( Knowing the final outcome from the onset owing to who's on power).

They probably knew a technicality has been planted somewhere like the Osun matter.

FarahAideed:
That's the problem with you Buharist , you are all incurable sadist who derive joy from seeing people suffer so much you ascribe every income people make as loot .. since you don't know the meaning of loot I have taken the liberty to screen shot a dictionary for you so you can learn .

Don't mind them, they suffer the most yet glorify their tormentor.

Dansuqi:
Is that what they told you? Why is it that you like talking about democracy but cannot read the electoral act or the constitution? Why always choose to listen to your own childish emotions?

Gutter language.

Dansuqi:
Wake up child

You have started this your gutter language. 100 monikers still low language.

Afamed:
Repeating your lies 200 times do not validate them to be truth

Ignorance is bliss!!!

DonCandido:
Not totally true.

INEC is a creation of the law which is saddled with the conduct of elections. INEC is to follow laid down rules and regulations as contained in the INEC Act.

What a petitioner needs to do is to show by evidence that an election conducted by INEC and in which he was a candidate did NOT comply with the Electoral Act and the regulations made pursuant to it.

The petitioner must call credible witnesses, provide documentary evidence and link ALL together to show how INEC did not follow the law. It is only when a petitioner does this that the onus of proof shifts to INEC.

What INEC needs to show is to demonstrate that it complied SUBSTANTIALLY with the law. No more, no less.

The fulcrum of Atiku and PDP's case before the tribunal is that he won majority of lawful votes and relies on a server's result.

Nigerians who follow political developments avidly know that the 2019 election was conducted based on the old law- 2015 Electoral Act. The are also aware that the last minute attempts by Saraki's Senate to amend the law to allow e-voting failed as the president refused to sign it into law as the purported amendment violate existing law and ECOWAS protocol of which Nigeria is a signatory.

I am of the view that is silly to rely on the evidence of a Kenyan who was told by an INEC whistleblower that Atiku won the election based on result sent to a site allegedly from INEC server.


Common...

The most shocking part of the whole mess of a case was when Atiku's national collation officer abandoned the INEC server claim at the tribunal and admitted that collation was in fact done manually.

That sounds the death knell on Atiku's petition.

Atiku should ask for a refund from his lawyers.

The petitioners have done the needful. INEC simply took a swerve to avoid further damage being done to them.

They must explain what happened to the monies hurriedly approved and disbursed for them, yet, gave us a terrible election.

Anyway, that is done with next is APC and buhari to enter their defense.

murphybo:
What are you saying? Educate yourself more bro, thats not what they are talking about, they are referring to a database where result were transmitted to from polling units, processed and editted before going to public. What you described above is just like surfing the website, same as you are doing right now. Read more on server. On the contrary I doubt if such exists, and if it does PDP should convince us

Surfing the website is only possible cos server exists!

Dansuqi:
Their non presentation of witnesses is not based on neutrality but based on what atiku presented.they cannot be neutral as far as there the first respondents.the only neutral party now are the judges

Their non presentation of witnesses is cos they can't defend the case against them. Leave the lame talk of there was nothing to defend.

That won't inhibits the tribunal anyways.

Dansuqi:
Thats what i have been trying to say.you can see what is happening at akwa ibom.i wont be surprised if buhari and apc also refuse to call witnesses

That is not what you have been trying to say dude.
INEC has no defense and make a face saving submission. They would have been taken to the cleaners from budgeting,disbursement, procurement,training, denial and subsequent admittance of server as well as the weight of conscience.

Now let the remaining one defend themselves. This was exact Osun scenario and tribunal rule in favor of the petitioner.

The trap of technicalities must have been planted somewhere. We are watching.

Dansuqi:
Why do you like uttering nonsense? Can you give an example of the overwhelming evidence pdp dropped?

I remember that was their exact stance in the Osun trial.

Now let the apc and buhari defend theirs as schedule.

For inec to even put up a defense will further put them on the spot.

DonCandido:
I am no legal luminary but I believe INEC is saying that Atiku and PDP have not made out a case known under the extant laws regulating elections in Nigeria and therefore there is no reason to help them make out one or join their comic reliefs of the past weeks.

That was their same position in Osun's case. They should be neutral.

MobilityExpress:
Maybe there's nothing to defend. That shows you how useless and empty Atiku's case has been, so pathetic that they defeated their case by themselves and INEC doesn't even want to waste its time trying to establish its defense.

That was the same Way they didn't call any witness in the Osun trial.