TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 7:22am On Feb 03 |
I haven't said this, but the Devil's Kiss isn't a good move. It requires too much cooperation; on top of that it has been gimmicked. It will take a while but it will get boring and this is probably a sign.
On a more positive note, isn't she looking good? She took my advice. Lol.
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 7:19am On Feb 03 |
[quote author=samistry post=138345505]Valee, have you heard what Dementia Dave is saying? ]. he might be on to something though. The crowd was chanting "AEdub" during the post show, of course it was to show dissatisfaction but they're aware. Or maybe the fans don't really care about AEW. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:29pm On Feb 02*. Modified: 7:24am On Feb 03 |
samistry: Whatever happened to Jeff Jarrett's retirement run? the boss called it halts. No momentum. I didn't know about this, had to Google. Must have happened when I stopped watching wrestling. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 6:53am On Feb 02 |
CoolUsername: Then she should've been praising Nia Jax for all these years. she may have, we don't know. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 7:21pm On Feb 01 |
CoolUsername: If she's against compulsion then she shouldn't be glazing Saudi Arabia because that is how Saudi Arabia achieved that. noo. Read it. She says she prefers HOW they dressed there compared to to their norm and insists she doesn't like compulsion. She wants it done freely. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 4:53pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: What is looking better? A church can allow women with trousers in while another will label it as indecent. It's different rules for different folks. at least we can all agree some body parts are too sensitive to be exposed. Even WWE has a limit it can take. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 4:06pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: Tell same girl to migrate to Middle East and she'll refuse. Women there are seen not heard. Haven't you seen Iran girls pre-islamic revolution? Now same Iran women are killed for not wearing hijab. Abi no them Arab immigrants full UK dey complain about women dressing for there? They want every woman garbed in burqa and nothing else. her point is still valid. She's not promoting oppression just saying women should look better. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 3:27pm On Feb 01 |
Who should face Lesnar at Mania between Gunther and Oba? |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 3:26pm On Feb 01 |
CoolUsername: Ask the concerned citizen whether she'd rather live a country that the women are compelled to dress like that by law because that is why this "modesty" is possible. In societies where people have the choice to wear what they want, they wear what they want. Simple as that. if you read it you'll see she is against compulsion. She is only thinking with decency in mind, and there's nothing wrong with that. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:38pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: This is appropriate  😂 Oh come on. Now it's just looks like a gimmick. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:37pm On Feb 01 |
From a concerned citizen. Thank God she's a woman saying it.
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:20pm On Feb 01 |
Out of curiosity, those who watched Royal Rumble; where the commentators shouting "he's here" when Hobbs debuted?😂😂 |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:16pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: My disdain for the bald fraud handling the PLE made me forget. We all knew it was happening weeks ago. What's stopping you from penning a tribute? I don't watch WWE. Besides I'm not sure if he's actually retiring from it completely unlike Cena's. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:14pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: The trunks got skimpier. I'm not saying cover em up in hijabi like Valee but it's glaring there's more cheeks on display abeg o, I didnt say wear hijab o. I'm just saying look like people who are going to work. Meanwhile these are examples of stripper attires; some wrestlers are close to these, some are just right.
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 2:02pm On Feb 01 |
CoolUsername: You're obsessed with this topic, my guy. Wrestling is a PG show, not a kid's show. It's up to parents to choose what they want their kids to see. Besides, if kids can watch beach volleyball then wrestling is a-OK.
I just find it funny that you were glazing Andrade the other day, despite him wearing undersized trunks with his "El Idolo" on full display but you are getting pressed at Stephanie Vaquer in a full bodysuit.
You've been on this moral crusade against against adult female wrestler's clothing choices for months now but you were quick to defend known child predator, Marty Scurll, from criticism.
You need to get your priorities straight. just saw it again. He was indeed trying to be a sex symbol. I didn't see it the first time. Of course I condemn it. It's stupid. You can be entertaining without being immodest. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:49pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: If u mean DQ?it's still in effect. okay. I think it's still in effect. I just wanted to confirm something. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:36pm On Feb 01 |
Samistry2: Gimmick matches are everywhere now even boxing. da hell? |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:35pm On Feb 01 |
Omo una get strong heart for this thread o. A whole AJ Styles retired and no one is mourning him or even mentioning it. Ha! |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:33pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: I don't get please explain I grew up knowing that in a standard wrestling match, whoever gets attacked by outside interference gets declared as the automatic winner. I don't know if it's still so. Because I've heard of matches declared as "no contest" when one person is attacked. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:31pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: How we go do my brother? The Gooner fans are winning. worse part is it sets up the women to be seen as eye candy or unserious athletes no matter how many times they scream "evolution". |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:30pm On Feb 01 |
Is this possible?
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:28pm On Feb 01 |
ValeeLove: Does the "whoever is attacked wins the match by default" rule still apply in WWE? please o, someone should attempt this. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 12:24pm On Feb 01 |
samistry: It cuts across all wrestling promotions and real life. Women always want to show their bodies.
The PG era notably 2010 to 2019 female wrestlers showed skin but were conservative compared to their attires now.
Now I can count how many of them still wrestle in long tights. Seems it's only Bayley sef. Rhea, Natalya, Naomi, Bianca used to wrestle in tights then ditched it for short trunks. I look at Olympic athletes, them sef na short trunks dem dey wear. Yea, there's an over abundance of butt cheeks but na them choose am🤷. and they should do better. Not only is it a sport, kids watch for goodness sake. How come attires of sport athletes look like or at times even same as that of strippers. I can't accept that. This is work, not your social life. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 11:28am On Feb 01 |
Samistry2: Have fun with your superhero doppelganger stories  better superheroes than a fighting Iguana you would agree.😂 |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 11:26am On Feb 01 |
samistry: All of them intentionally dress provocatively. See Skye Blue on last night's Collision. Lola Vice was still whining waist in the Holy land🙄 so? It doesn't make it right. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 6:29am On Feb 01 |
Samistry2: Which kind Drew-Cody Mania? Drew will be losing the title to Cody before mania. You're getting Roman Vs Cody at mania again despite the bald fraud declaring it's a new era every eke market day. in that case I'm seriously confused why Drew was given the belt. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 6:27am On Feb 01 |
samistry: What the heck was that Rumble? 💩💩💩 Will Hobbs debuted, Mr "No pop" Iguana... It's your show, I watch AEW. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 6:24am On Feb 01 |
CoolUsername: This level hatred of for women's bodies is off the charts bro. She wore the halal bodysuit and you're still complaining. Do you now want to say that Saudi Arabia is too liberal for you? never said she isn't well dressed, but having outfits that highlight your sensitive body parts makes me believe she intentionally dresses provocatively. Maybe I'm being too harsh on her, but I want to see a Stephanie match without getting distracted by glutes. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 6:20am On Feb 01 |
They couldn't even give Cody a clean elimination. What's the motive behind Drew's act? He doesn't want Cody winning? So it's Drew-Cody Mania? Questions. |
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 4:52pm On Jan 31 |
samistry: What about the women? let's talk the men. Do you guys feel the same?
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 4:51pm On Jan 31 |
samistry: What about the women? I'll tell you if WWE spoils another number.
|
TV/Movies › Re: Purpl3's WWE (and Pro-wrestling in general) Discussion And Banter House by ValeeLove(m): 1:56pm On Jan 31 |
samistry: What are your Rumble picks? all I know is Breakker is no 1. |