Wiegraf's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Wiegraf's Profile › Wiegraf's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 (of 162 pages)
SimonAndal: I'm sorry, but whatIt baffles me as well. I concede it's progress but na by force? They shouldn't be supporting a religion that persecutes them in any way. Shades of stockholm syndrome, brainwashing, etc etc |
Penrose is a well known, respected physicist. Sometimes a collaborator of hawkins. His work on consciousness and also gravity have virtually no support though, and they have been around for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose On a random note I have 'a road to reality', one of the few popular science books I abandoned due to complexity . But it introduced me to a lot of cool things |
@pastor, I never actually noticed your contributions, thanks. What you say sadly brings money laundering to my mind. Then again, most 9ja does not really need to launder money, at least with effort @serialoga, you brought the sword I hope? I concur that the estimates seem reasonable On another note, if someone has some sort records that could perhaps be verified by a 3rd party, mayhaps somewhere like say a wikileaks could help? It's not entirely impossible. |
fellis: Hmm. Just look at how our tolerant and loving Christian brothers are displaying their tolerance and love on this thread.You expect them to be tolerant of your intolerance? Fkforyou: Hmm...funny how d media is manipulating people's feeble mind..it's simple logic,dey tried a film insulting prophet mohammed (s.a.w) it didn't work,now this one,well it's b'cos they knw people like all dis bigots are gullible b'cos they are blinded by their emotions(hate) and can't see any logic..and also there are some muslims who tend to overeact at any slight issue hence making their(the media) assertion seem true.The only gudnews is that with all this,people(with unbiased mind) are still findin out the beauty of islam,one more thing,this western media are hypocrites,Y didn't they report a 9-11 victim who just converted to islam some few days back...(pardon my error am typing from a phone)..Not sure what to make of this. I'm sure it's all one big giant conspiracy by FEAR to slander on the good name of islam. And the irony... This link is relevant. It shows members of FEAR going about their daily business https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dsagflAkJs&feature=relmfu In other news, this zahed guy is being silly. He is clearly not wanted in islamic societies, so why does he persist in trying to fit in? He should discard the whole nonsense, it won't kill him. Must he be religious? |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2012/nov/26/paris-gay-friendly-mosque zaheed: I'm a French Muslim who is gay, and a feminist. I no longer want people in my country to think that it is an impossible blend, and that these different aspects of my identity are incompatible. Today in France, gay teenagers are almost 15 times more likely than those who are straight to kill themselves because of their sexual orientation. Left deeply bruised by this fact, I decided to create an association in support of gay French Muslims, which launched in 2010. |
Amee1: May Allah destroy zahed. He is not a muslim. Hell on to him.
|
okeyxyz: It is astounding how nairalanders who are apparently well educated\literate yet they fail to grasp a simple innocent question.Like I said earlier on, if she wasn't being a bigot she would not have included muslims in that list. Or do you get the impression that there are more muslim programmers than xtian? If you do, name 5 alpha programmers that are muslim. She just grouped all the people she is prejudiced against and tried to make...something, I'm not sure what...out of it. Make it sound as if programming is somehow evil maybe? While using a computer which is largely based on the seminal work of a gay atheist(iirc, can't really remember). Heck, this site is owned by an atheist.... |
fellis: wiegraf would you be kind enough to explain this statement?There's a long list of things that muslims subscribe to that I frankly find inexcusable. I'd rather fry in hell if it existed than be a muslim. The rest of the groups on that list, no, not so much. Also, I can be bigoted as well. |
@okey ![]() I'll think of something that can be taxed... Too much in my brain atm. But yeah, I don't support what they do, at all, but I'm not so quick to jump on their backs. They aren't overtly forcing any one, in a sense. I still think outright 419 should be in prison, and they should be taxed if they cannot show they are not for profit. But it's complicated of course. And true, I certainly cannot justify banning all tithes, but maybe I can justify the taxing dubious npo's and arresting outright conmen. |
I don't particularly think being any of these is bad (except maybe being a muslim) so I don't really care. A few notes though There are more muslim programmers than xtian? This would seem to indicate blind bias. You just lumped all the groups you hate together without giving it much thought Gays, atheists and satanists are anti-xtian? Dohohohohoho |
Indoctrination vs healthy socialization I wonder what their programming would prescribe, hmmmm? What option would the average judeochristians take? Perhaps without even realizing it... |
musKeeto: Isn't he vedaxcool?You pick subtle details a little too well for my liking. Speak up, are you a spy? |
plaetton: So it's really confusing to know who did what and who created what. ![]() Can't tell what is false doctrine these days. We can only rely the remarkably consistent, lucid and undeniably valid scripture to settle these things |
plaetton: No.This here is heresy... Wait...let me consult my bible and a few pastors to confirm that. It is my understanding that god made everything, but he didn't make everything as well. Also, officially, anything we don't understand is supposed to be classified as 'mysterious', but my pious xtian friend here says 'devil' is also a good excuse. Maybe we should open a thread to discuss this? We can also discuss which hand should we use to get rid of boogers. It's a great conundrum that has been bothering me for a while... |
Stop being silly op, his ways are mysterious. Also, he planted them there to test our faith. Why did he want to test our faith? For mysterious reasons. What else could it be? |
@okey Well, personally, I'm fairly reluctant to criticize pastopreuners more or else because of the reasons you highlight. It's a free world. But you have to consider the numbers involved (now that I've seen them, whoa) and the considerable amount of goodwill they receive. You also have to consider their motivations. Outright lying/419? Go to prison, simple. If they really do use the cash like non profit charities do (and aid everyone without discriminating) then of course they deserve tax free status. But if not, and when you consider jets they probably don't, well, everyone pays taxes. Why in should they go free? Because of unverified claims? They provide a service, and lots of services are taxed. If they want to appear respectable they can think of it as say taxing psychologist. (Frankly, to outsiders, they look like despots/gangstars) |
Area_boy: I see where you're going with this. And I must say I do agree with you. Morality seem to shaped by the evolutionary process (us in this case). The longer we remain as a species, the better our morals get in dealing with one another. For the greater good maybe?When you consider we've burnt through fossil fuels that took billions of years to form, well. So if anything happens to us, that may pretty much mean that's it for life in this tinyminiscule part of the galaxy. It's hard to imagine another species industrializing without petrol, coal, etc. But that's another discussion... |
musKeeto: Served? Seriously? Did you even read my reply?What are you talking about, it's an awesome post. What's there not to 'like'? |
okeyxyz: There seems to be only one universal morality and from which all other moralities derive. That is the right to life. It is a universal belief of all living beings, whether plant or animal. So when confronted with a threat, this being would automatically exercise this right by either fighting or fleeing. As this being exercises this right, it would also naturally extend such right to it's own "family", because it's survival would also depend on the survival of this family, Therefore they would evolve or device methods to ensure this survival.That's how it works biologically, yes. Altruism has aided many a species. Most life wants to stay alive and the little that doesn't of course dies likely before spreading its genes (a nice exception being those spiders who's males allow themselves to be eaten by the females after s.ex, so they can provide nutrients to the female). So is the preservation of one's life the only near universal good? Or is the preservation of all life regarded as the priority? Note of course that the preservation of all life actually serves the purpose of preserving one's life. For instance, sabre tooth tigers or something similar seem to have evolved 4x. Each time they met their extinction because suitable prey for their hunts dried out (not sure if I digested the article properly though, so I might be mistaken). It was in their best interest that their prey stay alive, so cooperation of some sort would have actually aided them. Tricky |
musKeeto: Tax free as far as I know.This is like a serious ![]() At least tell me there's a way government determines they really are non-profit and put that money to charitable use. Like say via accounting I'm guessing, no? |
musKeeto: I've worked for one of the popular churches. I had access to most of the financial sheets within our church.Lol Can't really argue with that.. Not that I genuinely want to actually Educate my ignorance abeg All this is tax free? How is the money spent, are there comittees? What's accountability like? How many churches are as big as the one in your xase study? |
uj_sizzle: aren't we speaking about good/evil, right/wrong??We are of course, but if you agree they are dictated by society, and can be dramatically different from one culture to the next, why do you call them objective? They won't be subjective to an individual, true, but they will be to the society that created them. |
uj_sizzle: the law was placed to give us a sense of good and evil, there's nothing subjective about that.I'm not following you, in what sense do you mean? Aren't laws dependent largely by society's whims? Or are you talking about something else? |
I wonder if we can settle on this: would every conscious species assert that there is the concept of good and evil? This goes beyond recripocity and kinship, as in, being good just to attain immediate gain. If they were looking beyond kinships, would they all subscribe to some higher purpose? Theists may tell you this purpose is whatever god they subscribe to. Others could say simply the preservation of life. Edit: put in another way, would every conscious being with emotion agree there's a moral good/bad? Can we say that is objective? So long as there's an emotional consciousness present, then there's moral good and bad? If so, is the problem determining what is good and what is bad? Is that the subjective bit? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 (of 162 pages)

. But it introduced me to a lot of cool things


