₦airaland Forum

Yyeske:
[s]It is IPOB miscreants and Nnamdi kanu that talk well with no insults, swerve biko[/s]

Yyeske:
[s]Your hate speeches since 2014 from radio Biafra and online is all over the net, remember the internet never forgets, listen to radio Biafra right now and hear Uche Mefor insulting northerners[/s]

BetaThings:
[s]I am challenging you
Prove that APC was guilty of same!

These are your party's deeds

Hate?
Have you forgotten?
- Religious difference
- Ethnic division
- Outright campaign of calumny etc
were unleashed by Jonathan/Sambo's PDP and even Patience Jonathan
And you still persist in your falsehood

http://thewillnigeria.com/news/ait-apologises-over-the-real-buhari-documentary/
http://www.younewsng.com/2016/02/05/150bn-suitdokpesi-apologises-to-tinubu-over-aits-damaging-documentary-during-election/
http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/198019-tinubu-withdraws-suit-ait-apology-embarrassing-documentary.html

Patience Jonathan showing love?



http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/more-news/175617-nigeria-2015-jonathan-visits-oyedepos-winners-chapel.html
http://realnewsmagazine.net/politics/president-jonathans-church-tourism/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abRCnlcQC0I[/s]

Dongreat:
[s]Do you think I care about APC or PDP?
For your information I am not affiliated with any political party in NIGERIA or any country.[/s]

lexy2014:
hahahahahahaha....u are getting emotional again.we aren't fighting are we?y getting personal or am I d FG? hahahahaha hahaha.cos these guys suffered under military rule and not precolonial times hence d need 2 salute their bravery. KANU is even lucky this is a democracy. Just imagine if it was under abach like abiola, obasanjo and Chris anyanwu(who is a lady).i also mentioned dasuki.was his case in d military or pre colonial era?hahahahahaha....I mean let's give 2 them.when we c brave people let's say it. I don't no how u can say abiola&obasanjo are cowards.am interested in how u came 2 that conclusion.standing up 2a military dictator and given d option of life and death. they chose death instead of life with many conditions.thats bravery.but kanu wasnt even faced with that. he just jumped at d slightest opportunity 4 freedom despite what u call d inhumane conditions attached 2 it.u c, it's always good not 2 let ur emotions get d better of u that way u can express urself without mixing facts&fiction.very important my dear brother.like I said I didn't ask KANU not 2 fight 4 his right. D constitution guarantees him that. If he was brave as u say, he should have rejected d bail conditions just like dasuki did. Cos by accepting them he accepted restricted freedom.He should have said unconditional freedom or nothing.that's bravery. then from his prison cell his lawyers will b doing their job.that's how a freedom fighter fights based on principles.am sitting back and am seeing how he will fight.with his Biafra security force, right?this guy u b comedy

lexy2014:
whether they hold no water or they hold no EBA, agreement is agreement. Its not about d system. He knew d system was unfair b4 he accepted d terms of d bail.d contract is binding as long as he accepted it. this isn't about bullying. this about principles and standing by them.dasuki was offered temporary freedom 2go 2 his fathers burial but turned it down cos d terms weren't acceptable 2 him.he had principles. Same 4 abiola.he was begged several times so he could get his freedom as long as he dropped june12.he said those conditions were unacceptable and he said he didn't mind paying 4 it with his life. He had much more to loose than kanu but he kept 2 his principles.Mandela spent 27years in captivity saying no 2d same bail conditions given 2 KANU.these are people with principles who took responsibility and didn't start blaming d system or d constitution. Chris anyanwu, obasanjo, shehu yar'adua all refused 2 accept what KANU accepted. Same with gani fawehimi. So don't blame d system

lexy2014:
u are getting it wrong.am not saying he has no right 2 contest d bail conditions. all am asking u is y did he accept bail conditions that u termed "illegal" and "inhumane" in d first place?y didn't he reject them knowing fully well that by accepting them he will b under legal obligation 2 abide by them?or are u trying 2 tell me kanu doesnt have principlez?by accepting d bail conditions its like entering into a contract that says we will give freedom if u do d following which he accepted to do.has KANU kept his own side of d bargain? NO.Therefore d FG isn't obligated 2 maintain any status quo

lexy2014:
let's agree that u are right and that everything d federal govt has done with KANU are illegalities OK?if that is d case then it means that d bail conditions offered to KANU are illegal since d process that produced them are also illegal. Now if we agree on that, y did kanu now accept d "illegal" bail conditions since d process that produced them is illegal? Y didn't he refuse d bail conditions and sight illegality of d process as reason 4 refusal?isn't it hypocrisy(if u permit me 2 borrow from ur lexicon,)to accept illegality, enjoy d freedom d illegality has given u and then come back&say d illegality is unacceptable?

sapele914:
[s]Who made the baseless laws for his freedom?not the FG but the same court he is undermining.

You ipob's have not realized you can flaunt an order from an institution and expect that same institution to protect you. [s][/s]

lexy2014:
hahahahahahahahaha....u are already getting emotional. what is d illegality u are talking about?whether he was arrested 4 shop lifting or 4 driving one way or 4 feeding orphans isn't d issue. now let's leave that and all d talk of Yoruba&hausa so u can get into perspective. now bail was set based on kanus request cos he said he was sick, right?d bail came with conditions like every bail does.nobody can force u 2 accept bail.now kanus bail conditions were stringent and like I have said earlier he knew it was stringent. and u urself has raised eyebrows regarding d "inhumane" nature of those conditions. D question which u have refused 2 answer is y would KANU accept such stringent, inhumane bail conditions which he knew will infringe on his rights only 4 him 2 now start contesting it after accepting it?y accept d unacceptable and complain that it is unacceptable? So pls keep 2d discussion

lexy2014:
what is d faulty foundation if I may ask?KANU was arrested 4 treason not self determination. Mandela was also accused of treason but he didnt jump at every bail condition offered him.4 whatever reason kanu was arrested isn't even d issue.whether he is wrongly accused or not isn't d issue. D issue is y would he accept heinous and inhumane bail conditions only 2 come back and say d bail conditions are unacceptable? that's something u haven't been able 2 answer.

lexy2014:
u c whether d Nigerian constitution is fraudulent or not, it still remains d ultimate and supreme law of d federal republic of Nigeria. This constitution guarantees d rights of each and every Nigerian. D UN or AU charter are not in anyway contradictory of d Nigerian constitution or vice versa. Now we aren't discussing constitution or AU charter.we are discussing kanus bail condition and d FGs resolve 2 enforce those bail conditions. My point is this, whether d bail conditions are unconstitutional or draconian, nnamdi KANU accepted it.he agreed to it.if u say his lawyers are contesting d "inhumane" bail conditions, y did they accept it in d first place?y would u accept something inhumane and u are enjoying it at d same time u are complaining?if d bail conditions were inhumane, he should have done d honourable thing by rejecting them and fighting 4a better deal from prison.dasuki did it. Y was KANU so desperate 4 freedom to have accepted thrash instead of upholding his honour?

lexy2014:
nnamdi KANU is literate.he can read and write. D bail conditions were presented 2 him.he read them and he understood them. he took advice from his legal team.he talked about it with his family and friends and he eventually accepted them. now no matter how u choose to c d bail conditions, draconian, undemocratic, infringement on kanus rights, d point is he accepted them not under duress but as a consenting adult.he wasn't forced.and d reason d govt offered him these bail conditions was cos he said he was sick.there are several freedom fighters dead and alive who were given these kind of restrictive bail conditions but they turned them cos of what u are complaining about.they rather stayed in captivity than accept half freedom. Dasuki for instance refused to go 4 his fathers burial cos he said he would rather stay in captivity than go 4 his fathers burial as a prisoner. But KANU was so eager 4 freedom. D man couldn't even stand 4 his own rights & dignity.bros abeg leave matter