₦airaland Forum

SluttanSlayer:
The Jews have won again and they did it with their paid useful agents.

For all the merits and right to agitate for Biafra, you Igbos should be cautious on who you align to.

Nnamdi Kanu is working for the Jewish mafia and in retrospect he is in bed with the jihadist movement led by Buhari.

The Jew rats have been waging a war on the Church since the death of Christ . Every Islamic invasion of European soil had the Jews behind it. Currently the Jew has succeeded in having Arab Muslims invade Europe and they are also behind ISIS in both Shiite Iraq and Syria towards promoting a war against Iran. But the Jews greatest obsession is to start a nuclear war between the US and Russia. They are still mad with the Russians after they were rightly expelled from that country. Virtually all Russian billionaires residing in the UK and US are Jewish. They made their money milking Russia dry by selling all the factories and heavy equipment as scrap to China and India in move meant not only to strip Russia of her wealth but also her industrial capacity . Putin , saw the Jewish hand and plot before hand and rightfully expelled them. In the US, there are well over 450,000 known and documented members of the Russian mafia. These set of criminals fled Russia after the end of the cold war but what you don't know is that to be a member of the Russia mafia, you must have at least 50% Jewish blood. The Russian mafia are the enforcers of the elite globalist Jew whom the latter relies on in carrying out murders, blackmail and gun running. They come in handy when the Jewish lobby needs one of their western puppets to act. The Russian mafia also works closely with Mossad as an Intel gathering and assassination death squad. Heard of Murder Inc? Murder Inc was a wholly Jewish criminal organization headed by the Jew , Maya Lansky which specialized in assassinations and murders during the prohibition era. Murder Inc was not only highly brutal and efficient but also they were notorious in carrying out hits which even the Italian mafioso could not stomach.

The Jew has no conscience and his god , moloch aka Satan needs blood appeasement . The Jew has infiltrated the west in all spheres and the most jewed nation on earth is the United Kingdom . Every individual who has been in position of authority in that kingdom since the end of WW2 was personally handpicked by the Rothschild dynasty . With a stroke of the pen, the Rothschild - who ate in effect the Jewish Mafia treasures - can easily make the UK bankrupt . They not only own the bank of England but also the political establishment and even the Anglican church .

John Welby is the head of the Anglican Church. How did an economic hit man and high level oil man become head of the church of England ? The Jews put him there for the sole reason of destroying the Anglican church to which Welby has been highly successful with his pro homosexual and femininst stance. Same Welby has been promoting the jihadist Buhari. So it wasn't any surprise to me to see the Zionist colony called UK to come out and congratulate Buhari over his rigged election.

Islam is the broom of the Jew which hr intends to sweep out Christianity . The Jews love Buhari for this.

As for the blasphemer , Nnamdi Kanu who like a Jew rat he is as condemned Christ and the church and has so fat deceived many of his Igbo brothers to embrace the satanic star of Solomon and reject the cross, you should all know that any allianxe with the Talmudic Jew is also an alliance with Satan.

Father Mbaka is no different . A Jesuit priest of the Jewish neoliberal movement as spear headed by the pedophille pope, this useful masonic tool is an agent of the same jihadist and Jewish Satanists to usher the flock of Christ to the abbatoir.

Biafra failed for a number of reasons but the most cause for Biafran's failure was sabotage from within the Biafean nation. The Marxist that caused the problem that led to Biafran declaration never wanted an independent Biafra but a powerful Marxist centrist govt . This time around you have so many among you that are willing to sell you to the jihadist .

Don't be fooled .

valuch61:
nice one,if u ar against it try nd go nd make enquiry on hw much doz wheel barrow pushers make in a day,let me tell u to even join Dem is not easy at all,u will pay nd still bring drinks for dem

SluttanSlayer:
The phrase “conspiracy theory” is often used by establishment agencies, the mainstream media and useful idiots as a tool to dismiss legitimate evidence or viewpoints that disagree with their predetermined version of events. This method of propaganda was not always as widespread as it is today. The phrase was not “created” by the CIA, but it was in fact weaponized by them in the 1960's after the assassination of John F. Kennedy with the express purpose of shutting down rational debate.

CIA memo 1035-960, circulated within the CIA in 1967 and exposed through a freedom of information act request by the New York Times in 1976, outlines strategies the agency would use to shut down critics of the Warren Commission Report. Specifically, they suggested the accusation of “conspiracy” with negative connotations attached, predominantly in mainstream books and articles. This was indeed done through the CIA's many puppets in the media, and the concept of “conspiracy theory” as a pejorative was born.

Through the use of strawman arguments, red herring fallacies and sophistry, the incredible scale of evidence (exposed by investigators like New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison) suggesting the Warren Commission was either corrupt or ignorant in its findings was buried in a flurry of hatchet jobs and hit pieces. And this was the goal, of course; to attack the messenger and silence the truth without having to go through the ugly process of directly confronting the truth.

Until recently, this strategy was highly effective. Attacking a person as a “conspiracy theorist” was the only tool critics really needed to keep a piece of evidence or a concrete viewpoint from going viral. Conspiracy theory is equated to insanity, or stupidity, or buffoonery. Everyone knows a conspiracy theorist is not to be taken seriously, so why waste time listening to what they have to say in the first place?

It should come as no surprise that conspiracy REALITY is not something these people want entertained by the public. Conspiracies are a fact of history. Governments lie, all the time, and they have been caught doing it. The media lies, constantly, and has been caught doing it. Yet, we are supposed to ignore this and assume that anyone daring to stand contrary to government and media claims is some kind of lunatic?

In the past 5-10 years, however, things have been changing.

Suddenly, anti-establishment views and investigations of corruption are bulldozing the mainstream scripted narrative, and the elites and the media are bewildered. They can see they are losing control of popular thought and they are disturbed, to say the least. A steady stream of articles and essays have been flooding the MSM recently lamenting the rise of “conspiracy culture” and warning of the “death of democracy” if this is allowed to continue.

They seem specifically angered by the idea that their “journalistic” and “professional” status no longer matters to most people. Not long ago, anyone wearing a suit, a uniform, a lab coat, a journalist's badge or collecting a government paycheck was supposed to be immediately taken seriously as a designated “expert”. As Noam Chomsky describes them in his book 'Manufacturing Consent', they were the professional class, the top 10% or less of individuals with “all the answers”. These were the people the establishment sought to indoctrinate most of all, because these were the community leaders that many in the public listened to without question.

Now there is a growing movement of people who could not care less about what kind of degree someone's parents purchased for them from an ivy league university. They don't care about establishment designations and fake accolades and titles and credentials. What they care about are facts and evidence. What they care about are the arguments a person puts forth, rather than how important they purport to be. This is causing some consternation among the elites.

A key figure and gatekeeper in the propaganda war against the alternative media and conspiracy reality is Cass Sunstein, former “Information Czar” in the Obama Administration. Sunstein has written numerous books and articles lamenting the growing influence of the alternative media, including his book 'Conspiracy Theories And Dangerous Ideas'.

The main thrust of Sunstein's position is that conspiracy theories isolate the populace into small groups of like-minded people perpetuating each others “misguided” views. He also suggests that these groups represent a concrete threat to the stability of government and of society by spreading wrong (or perhaps inconvenient) information and civil unrest. In other words, a few decades ago all information was centralized and filtered by the corporate media and government, and now the internet is decentralizing information flow thereby allowing people to think differently and break from the majority narrative, which is unacceptable by Sunstein's standards.

Sunstein sees the creation of a public hive mind as the best outcome for social order. He suggests in his book 'Nudge' the concept of “Libertarian Paternalism” (which is neither libertarian or paternal). He advocates for the control of society through subversive means of influence (nudging) while allowing people to continue believing that their choices are actually their own.

But how would Sunstein go about executing this influence? His solution to the threat of the alternative media was first made clear in his paper titled 'Conspiracy Theories', published in 2008. In it, he argues in favor of government interference or control of alternative media or “conspiracy theory” sources. His primary tactic was the infiltration of alternative media forums and sites by government agents or private actors paid by the government to disrupt discussion, derail activism and sow seeds of doubt or chaos. Effectively, Sunstein wanted the covert destruction of the liberty media by paid agitators.

So, the same man who accuses the alternative media of conspiracy mongering and the destruction of the western world is actively seeking to foment a conspiracy to undermine that movement. Is this irony, or hypocrisy or both? Doesn't this mean that Sunstein is a part of one of the very conspiracies he criticizes people like me for being concerned about?

Sunstein and his elitist ilk want the power to erase or sabotage the alternative media. In fact, there are probably a few of their agent provocateurs attacking this article in the comments below right now. They would prefer that the government eventually take full control of the internet and dictate the terms of media participation directly. This gives rise to one of the most important questions that the establishment does not want to answer – Who gets to decide what is and what is not “dangerous conspiracy theory”?

If pressed, the elites will ultimately suggest that they are the best qualified. Sunstein describes the general public in his books as essentially lazy, unintelligent, impulsive and not to be trusted to make good decisions. He does not seem to include himself and his globalist comrades as being prone to the same weaknesses. They are apparently wise and benevolent enough to make the best decisions for all of us. Imagine that...

This elitism bias and Sunstein's overall methodology for biting at the ankles of the liberty media is being carried over into a new wave of propaganda in the past couple of years, primarily coming from (though not limited to) the political left.

Sunstein's gatekeeping has spawned a cancerous growth of copycats in progressive academics. This is going on everywhere, but one particular example I found recently was on Vox, a leftist rag which shamelessly flaunts its political bias and actively slanders conservatives. Vox's article 'Conspiracy Theories Are Getting More Absurd And Harder To Refute' promotes a new book which regurgitates Sunstein's propaganda model. The article takes special time to reassert the old disinformation narrative by stating that:

“Democracy requires a minimum amount of mutual trust among citizens, and conspiracism destroys it.”

Are you getting the sense yet that there is a repetitive message coming from these people that they want you to embrace? Is there ANYTHING true about the statement above? The fundamental root of their argument is that conspiracy theories (viewpoints outside the mainstream) must be treated as existential threats to society. In other words, some ideas are so dangerous that they must be controlled or outlawed. The basis of this argument, though, is entirely fraudulent.

First, leftists incessantly refer to our society as a "democracy", I think because they believe if they tell the lie enough it will become reality by default. The US was never intended to be a “democracy”, but a Republic, and with good reason. Democracy requires blind and often misplaced faith in the system. A Republic requires constant vigilance and healthy skepticism. In a Republic, we are not supposed to simply “trust” that our leaders are going to do the right thing. We are supposed to put them under a microscope, uncover criminality and corruption, and generally make them uncomfortable at all times. It is our civic duty to become “conspiracy theorists”.

The establishment prefers a democracy because in a democracy 51% of the population can dictate the individual liberties of the other 49%, and they are rightly convinced that they can influence the thinking and decisions of the larger half. Also, in a democracy, society revolves around moral relativism and the ever arbitrary “greater good for the greater number”, instead of governing according to individual liberty, inherent moral compass and human conscience.

The Vox article goes on to make the claim that while there are some correct conspiracy theories, they have all come from the left side of the political spectrum (which they call “progressive” conspiracy theories”). They then assert that there are no verifiable conspiracy theories coming from the political right. This is madness.

When Cass Sunstein describes the tribalist isolation and conspiracy delusions of certain groups, he was clearly trying to mislabel conservative activists and the alternative media, but the REAL conspiracy nutbags have actually been on the left this whole time.

A lot of young leftist millennials, professional (I say this with the utmost sarcasm) mainstream media personalities and celebrities foolishly bought into the Russiagate conspiracy theory; a theory based on ZERO concrete evidence and a garbage heap of empty conjecture. For example, how many sessions of Real Time With Bill Maher or Late Night With Stephen Colbert was the Russiagate fantasy propped up as verified fact by a screeching flock of leftist parrots, blanketed in the protective peanut-brained imbecility of the audiences in their Los Angeles and New York echo chambers?

Even today, after the long anticipated Mueller Report led to no indictments, leftists continue to cling desperately like hemorrhoids to the anus that is Russiagate.

Leftists have to this point justified much of their schizophrenic and sometimes violent and criminal behavior on the lie that Donald Trump is a usurper put into office by Russian manipulation of US elections. Now isn't this the epitome of a conspiracy theory that is destructive to society?

Not all conspiracy theories are started by the alternative media. Many are started by the establishment itself, and these are indeed designed to cause the destabilization of the nation.

At the same time, the fabricated Russiagate conspiracy has been very effective at leading the left away from the very real conspiracy of Trump's saturation of his cabinet with banking elites and globalist think tank ghouls like John Bolton, Steven Mnuchin or Wilber Ross. Weren't these the same elites that Trump was going to “drain from the swamp”? Why hasn't the left talking about that for the past two years?

The article also makes no mention of the DNC rigging of the Democratic primaries in favor of Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders. This was a conspiracy conservatives had to help expose, while the left sat idle and ignored it, hyperfocusing on their hatred of Trump while propping up Hillary Clinton, a repeat criminal offender. But, hey, conservative conspiracies are always wrong and leftist conspiracies are often correct according to Vox and friends...

And what about the verified fact of mass digital surveillance by government on the public? This was a conspiracy that conservative groups had been warning about for years. We were called kooks, because why would the government care about what the average person did in their day-to-day life? Our fears were verified by the exposure of classified data by people like Edward Snowden and Julian Assange (who is now facing extradition and prosecution for nothing more than publishing truths on the internet). Both the political left and political right are aggressively hostile to both these men, and are seeking to bury them.

My question is, what is really more dangerous? Conspiracy theories, or the actual conspiracies governments and elitists execute against the people?

The message here is not ambiguous at all. To summarize, the establishment wants control of internet media, by hook or by crook, in the name of protecting people from themselves and from ideas they consider unsettling to the world order. The political left is all on board with this as long as their conspiracy theories are treated with legitimacy; and they will be, because their conspiracy theories are the establishment's conspiracy theories.

The only theories that are being threatened with subjugation are those of conservatives and the alternative media that are contrary to centralization and government power. Not because our theories are dangerous to the fabric of society, but because our theories are dangerous to the people who want to dictate the fabric of society. Our activism and journalism represents decentralized thought which could choke the engine of the globalist agenda. We aren't tearing down the western world, we're the only thing keeping it alive.

SluttanSlayer:
What is a Dhimmi? A Kafir?

These terms have related meanings. Kafir is the broader term. Dhimmi is the legally invoked status of a Kafir.

A Kafir is a non-believer, an infidel, or an ingrate to the Islamic faith. A Dhimmi is alway a Kafir. But a Kafir is not always a Dhimmi.

A Dhimmi is a person who is a non-Muslim in a Muslim dominated society. Dhimmi is the subordinate legal status given to the kafir to "protect" him. Why is protection needed? Because Muslims are called upon to kill infidels as the general rule. The creation of the Dhimmi status was a way to offer protection to the infidel in exchange for fees or taxes, and a reduced level of cultural benefits or freedoms, like voting.

If you are an infidel, it is a good idea to be a Dhimmi in a Muslim culture. Without being a Dhimmi you would be in violation of the rules, and the "other" option would be on the table, so to speak.

In Sharia operated northern Nigeria, non-muslims are "protected" and need timely re-assurances from both Secular and Islamic authorities of their safety and well being as can be discerned from the Sultan's chagrin to his Muslim population not to harm the infidel Igbos residing in the north.

Dhimmitude is a more recently developed broader term implying those in a non-Islamic dominated society who are being intimidated or terrorized in some manner and are accordingly fearful of taking action to counteract their condition.

Bat Yeor's definition of "dhimmitude" (from Wiki):

"As for the concept of dhimmitude, it represents a behavior dictated by fear (terrorism), pacifism when aggressed, rather than resistance, servility because of cowardice and vulnerability. The origin of this concept is to be found in the condition of the Infidel people who submit to the Islamic rule without fighting in order to avoid the onslaught of jihad. By their peaceful surrender to the Islamic army, they obtained the security for their life, belongings and religion, but they had to accept a condition of inferiority, spoliation and humiliation. As they were forbidden to possess weapons and give testimony against a Muslim, they were put in a position of vulnerability and humility."

The Koranic verse which dictates this fundamental character for dhimmitude is Sura 9:29:

"Fight against those who do not believe in Allah nor in the Last Day, and do not make forbidden what Allah and His Messenger have made forbidden, and do not practice the religion of truth, of those who have been given the Book [i.e. Jews and Christians], until they pay the jizya [head tax] readily and are humbled."

Within the Islamic state, all non-Muslims who are not objects of war are considered to be dhimmis - communities who are allowed to exist within the Dar al-Islam by virtue of surrender under the conditions of a dhimmi pact.

These are the permanently conquered peoples of Islam.

The historian Bat Ye'or has documented the social, political, economic and religious conditions of dhimmi communities - Jews and Christians - in the Middle East. It is a sad history of dispossession and decline. Legal provisions applying to dhimmis ensured their humiliation and inferiority, and to this was added the often crippling taxes which were allocated to support the Muslim community.

Under conditions of dhimmitude there was also a constant risk of jihad conditions being reinvoked - of massacre and dispossession - if the dhimmi community is considered to have failed to live up to the conditions of their pact. History records many examples where dhimmis were attacked by their fellow Muslim citizens on such grounds, for example the massacres of the Jews of Granada in 1066, and of the Christians of Damascus in 1860.

Like sexism and racism, dhimmitude is not only manifested in legal and social structures, but in a psychology of inferiority, a will to serve, which the dominated community adopts in self-preservation (see modern day Afonjas of Ilorin).

SluttanSlayer:
The law required from dhimmis a humble demeanor, eyes lowered, a hurried pace.

They had to give way to Muslims in the street, remain standing in their presence and keep silent, only speaking to them when given permission.

They were forbidden to defend themselves if attacked, or to raise a hand against a Muslim on pain of having it amputated. Buhari mader this clear with how he sent the Air Force to bomb christian communities in Numan, Adamawa after they dared to retaliate and protect themselves from Buhari's Fulani jihadists.

Any criticism of the Koran or Islamic law annulled the protection pact. In addition the dhimmi was duty-bound to be grateful, since it was Islamic law that spared his life. We saw this pan out when Buhari condemned a band of coward muslim men who beheaded an octogenarian Igbo woman in Kano. Buhari's condemnation wasn't that they murdered an old woman in cold blood but because they took the laws into their hands. Meaning: Buhari already sided with the cowards that yes indeed the old Igbo woman did in fact slander Islam. Less than a week later, the Kano State Attorney-General will withdraw all charges against their jihadist cowards.

SluttanSlayer:
In the early years of the Islamic conquest, the "tribute" (or jizya), paid as a yearly poll tax, symbolized the subordination of the dhimmi. Later, the inferior status of Jews and Christians was reinforced through a series of regulations that governed the behavior of the dhimmi. In Buhari's Khalifate Nijeriya, southern kafirs do not only bear the tax burden but their resources are what sustains the socialist welfare Islamic north.

Dhimmis, on pain of death, were forbidden to mock or criticize the Koran, Islam or Muhammad, to proselytize among Muslims or to touch a Muslim woman (though a Muslim man could take a non Muslim as a wife). Under Buhari, we have read severally of how Christian girls are being abducted and forced into an unholy union by Muslim men whom have the full endorsement and backing of not only the muslim populace, Amirs but the state itself.

Dhimmis were excluded from public office and armed service, and were forbidden to bear arms. This has already become institutionalized by the highly lopsided appointments of security chiefs favouring northern Muslims and the purging of Southerners/ Christians from the military by the Buhari Islamic govt.

They were not allowed to ride horses or camels, to build synagogues or churches taller than mosques, to construct houses higher than those of Muslims or to drink wine in public.

They were not allowed to pray or mourn in loud voices-as that might offend the Muslims.
This is what El Rufai is pushing in Kaduna with his diabolical religious bill.

The dhimmi had to show public deference toward Muslims-always yielding them the center of the road.

The dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence in court against a Muslim, and his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court.

To defend himself, the dhimmi would have to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense. This left the dhimmi with little legal recourse when harmed by a Muslim. The case of the elderly Igbo woman murdered in Kano and whose killers have all since been released by the Kano State govt comes to mind.

Dhimmis were also forced to wear distinctive clothing. In the ninth century, for example, Baghdad's Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany.

GamalNasser:
You think you are deceiving Baba Buhari ko?

dukeprince50:
Look at this one.
Just because you do not like PMB doesn't mean you should call him a dauran goat, he may not be the best human but people still like him.

Seun lalasticlala, mynd44, dominique I suggest you close this thread and start banning people like this.
Just look at his threads.
Mods attend to me

vic17:
Kebbi state I guess, bordering Niger state.

MudRaker:
There has never been a more stupid idiot to be elevated to such high position of authority than the autistic dunce known as Mumudu.

You topple a duly elected civilian adminstration claiming corruption fighting .

You then loot the treasury dry within days to pay off the MI6 and CIA goons so as to lobby their respective govts to see your treason as necessary . You also stash some of that loot in swiss vaults and in the Cayman Islands.

As expected the highly import dependent manufacturing sector is denied access to forex because you and your band of criminal officers had looted the treasury dry.

Manufacturing companies that were growing in both capacity and numbers begin to fold and relocate out of the country.

The nation witnesses its first avoidable recession.

With local manufacturing capacity shutting down , imports are desperately needed to augment the loss of production.

But there is still no money since you and your band of criminals looted the treasury dry.

Hyperinflation peaks. Business men and traders adjust their prices to bear the loss due to the collapsing currency .

You then roll out a price fixing mechanism that you drew from your haemriod arsehole.


You then send your goons to markets across the land to arrest any erring business man who refuses to comply with your stupidity.

Merchants resort to hoarding from where inflation continues to soar.

The nation never recovered from Mumudu's stupidity. All companies and franchise that closed under his stupid reign never came back.

We only experienced a lull in mumudu's foolishness after a spike in oil pricing.

How one man who happens to be one of the most ignorant and most stupid person in the entire world can get his autism to affect millions is a testament to never ever underestimate the extent of damage a stupid person in position of power can cause.

MudRaker:
[img]https://1.bp..com/-Ot7iB-BXiyk/V-KDTSFW7bI/AAAAAAAKgmk/tKhElljobW8ms-oS_08rYxdxM3pRlVigwCLcB/s1600/t.png[/img]

This parasitic family no get shame

Well, it might have been strategic because when the autistic dunce mounted the podium, the hall was nearly empty .

MudRaker:
I will soon get the video and post it here.

The woman nah agberoe!

Aidejay:
As if I knew they will go for this man, na Dino melaye remain now.
Asset declaration after how many years. Dem no dey shame for themselves?