PAGAN 9JA:
WRONG ! WRONG! WRONG!

IT HAS NO HISTORICAL CONTEXT OR ANYTHING! IT IS ALREADY PROVEN THAT SKIN-COLOR CAN CHANGE OVER TIME! IT IS TRIBE/ETHNICITY THAT MATTERS! TO HELL WITH RACISM!

MsDarkSkin:

pls. fck off with that.
this is coming from someone who is quick to call Jallobaw white and says she has no place on nl while living IN Europe. "to hell with racism indeed"

grouping by skin color has everything to do with history. Even our ancestors from waay back, as divided as they were knew that other africans existed and looked like them, hence the need to perform tribal markings to differentiate themselves.

i dont care how many tribes there are in africa, the point is all africans have the same origin. just like the "red men" of the americas; etc. we are indeed ALL HUMAN..but don't act like race doesn't exist.

you can call yourself hausa, which in itself IS social classification but your dna says african. period. if not, little ol Jamo/Akata me who has NO TRIBE would not have the same genetic markings as "Hausa" you..which I most likely do.

Antivirus92: you spoke well. I don't really see it as racism because not everybody knows your tribe.

MsDarkSkin:

pls. fck off with that.
this is coming from someone who is quick to call Jallobaw white and says she has no place on nl while living IN Europe. "to hell with racism indeed"

grouping by skin color has everything to do with history. Even our ancestors from waay back, as divided as they were knew that other africans existed and looked like them, hence the need to perform tribal markings to differentiate themselves.

i dont care how many tribes there are in africa, the point is all africans have the same origin. just like the "red men" of the americas; etc. we are indeed ALL HUMAN..but don't act like race doesn't exist.

you can call yourself hausa, which in itself IS social classification but your dna says african. period. if not, little ol Jamo/Akata me who has NO TRIBE would not have the same genetic markings as "Hausa" you..which I most likely do.

PAGAN 9JA:


are you stupi.D!

Our Ancestors didnt even know what is Africa. the term Africa was used only in the NOrth-West Berber regions.

and dont speak about stuff that you dont understand. [size=18pt]Tribal Markings are means of identification between different tribes[/size]. they exist all over the world all the way upto SOuth America and PApua New Guinea.
they are not meant to identify as black. this is absurd!

Africans dont have the same origin. THe Berbers are different, The Nilotes are different, THe Bantus are different, THe Chadic Sahelians are different, etc.

We are Humans and human have sub-species, a.k.a, ethnic groups. and under wider ethnicities as i above mentioned, come the tribes

race exists only under the clasification of the racist west which includes you oyinbos and akatas.

By the Gods! how can dna say African , instead of HAusa??!!!!!

My word, you are foolish! Africa is a continent. a piece of land!

you akatas are half-bred and mixed

so obvioulsy you :"might" have some of my genetics. you will even hav native and european markings. does that mean i as a Hausa am also descended from those people *smh

eGuerrilla: @*Kails*, thanks for setting that dogmatic fellow straight
Not many people know that, by going tribal with embolden fonts as he does on every discussion thread, he projects a form of ethnocentrism inimical in equal measure to what he aims to counter.

Yes, I am referring to the tribal fellow who craves for acceptance in a pluralist society, yet sees no contradiction in his misplaced opposition to multiculturalism.

@OP, while I do not have a problem with being regarded as a Black man, I think it is essentially wrong to stratify people into groups on the basis of skin colour.

When Brown people think they are White

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e6ChgL1EC4

Haplogroup E1b1 which is characterized by a high degree of internal diversity is the most represented Y chromosome haplogroup in Africa. Here we report on the characterization of 12 mutations within this haplogroup, eleven of which were discovered in the course of a resequencing and genotyping project performed in our laboratory.

There are several changes compared to the most recently published Y chromosome tree [2]. Haplogroup E1b1 now contains two basal branches, E-V38 (E1b1a) and E-M215 (E1b1b), with V38/V100 joining the two previously separated lineages E-M2 (former E1b1a) and E-M329 (former E1b1c). Each of these two lineages has a peculiar geographic distribution.

E-M2 is the most common haplogroup in sub-Saharan Africa, with frequency peaks in western (about 80%) and central Africa (about 60%). The same haplogroup is also present in North Africa, although at a lower frequency (usually below 10%) [9]–[11]. Haplogroup E-M329, on the other hand, was observed almost exclusively in eastern Africa [10], [12 and R.S. unpublished data], where E-M2 is virtually absent. The second basal branch of E1b1, E-M215, has a broad geographic distribution from southern Europe to northern and eastern Africa where it has been proposed to have originated [8].

[size=18pt] The new topology here reported has important implications as to the origins of the haplogroup E1b1. Using the principle of the phylogeographic parsimony, the resolution of the E1b1b trifurcation in favor of a common ancestor of E-M2 and E-M329 strongly supports the hypothesis that haplogroup E1b1 originated in eastern Africa, as previously suggested [10], and that chromosomes E-M2, so frequently observed in sub-Saharan Africa, trace their descent to a common ancestor present in eastern Africa.[/size]

*Kails*:

Antivirus92: i love this thread. Kails,msdarkskin, pagan9ja and co,please keep the lesson going. I am really enjoying it.

*Kails*:




i would but pagan has already conceded to defeat babes.

*looking*

Antivirus92: so you mean that he has given *p?

*Kails*:


yup.
but he's too busy reeking havoc elsewhere anyway.

*Kails*:


yup.
but he's too busy reeking havoc elsewhere anyway.

Antivirus92:

mondi_cheeks: It's wrong

Antivirus92: explain now, what makes it wrong?

somalia9: If you were to divide africa it would be horners, berbers, negroid.


Why does negroid claim horners when many horners look more indian/arab.


That is called invading and trying to take and hijack our culture.


You guys all look the same, and so do horners. Why does one claim the other when clearly we speak diffrent language groups.


Why do horners who speak afro asiatic languaes like arab and hebrew and who look quasi indian/arab are being called by u negroids?


Your real problem is you hate yourselfs thus you sold yourselfs and now you try to hide from your past and try to lay claim to hispanics, berbers and Ethiopians/Somalis. Even the long gone ancient egyptians cant find rest in their graves as you try to steal their history. Horners who knew and traded and speak the same afro asiatic language dont even claim ancient egyptians. Why do you?


When u lay claim to everything its diluted thus havin nothing. If i say all of africa is black than the meanin of black becomes useless.


Thus today the meanin of black is worthless while to be called is more exclusive thus not anyone who is not pure can be white.


That is why being Somali is more meaningful than being anything else.

somalia9: Dude so ur sayin 100 million ethios and somalis and sudan are all mixed?




Negro is black. Somali is its own ethnicity. So is amahara and tigrey.


why dont kenyans look like somalis even tho they speak sawahili which is half arab half negroid languaes



also a half somali half arab child looks 100 percent arab. why is this