Awwwwww. _{It's lovely (always wanted to do a wedding website )}

Although you would want to remove the scrollbars in the Wedding Bars and correct the misspelling under the navigation of the same page

tundewoods:

[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][color=#000099]
and i'm feeling rather bloomy today in the mood for comments & reviews.

_{Weddings have that aesthetic effect}

Top-quality job! The Video is great too. In my own opinion, it’s simply flawless.

WOW!, very beautiful eye-catching simplify consistency wedding site dynamically!

Also i agreed with @webmonk has said about scrollbars, just little minor annoying me.

The rest of entire site you made is just AWESOME! I am sure you made your friend THEIR DAY when they saw your work!!!

Perfect paperless WEDDING INVITATION sending everyone if they have their own computerlaptop/smartphone! (only if u know how to build WAP/WML-based wedding site for all smartphone only.)

@tundewoods
I am sure you will agree with me that the site could benefit from the following touch-ups:

1) Our story: Rather than provide links to separate pages, I would make this a tab view. Then hide/display the appropriate pages when the tabs are clicked. I am thinking aesthetics and better download times, especially for those who use cybercafes. Tabs alone would eliminate trips to the server

2) Our photos: I would use smaller thumbnails which when clicked would expand to the bigger ones. I would also use lightbox 2 as that has "next" and "previous" buttons. Again, I am thinking about those with low bandwidth. Besides, you get to save some real estate, page-wise.

3) Instead of links to pages like "video" and "guestbook", maybe you can have an icon with the links. This would also help beautify the pages concerned.

4) Guestbook: Maybe it's just my eyes, but the white bubbles seemed to bleed into the cpl's background. I don't know what colour to use but I think the white needs to be a bit deeper.

5) Psquare video: Okay, this is personal preference but one the twin's teeth is really pronounced in the video. Looks more like fangs and are very scary to me (reminds me of dracula). I personally would go for another video but of course, this one might be your client's preference.

Other than the above, good job and use of javascript libraries for some eye candy!

yawa-ti-de:


2) Our photos: I would use smaller thumbnails which when clicked would expand to the bigger ones. I would also use lightbox 2 as that has "next" and "previous" buttons. Again, I am thinking about those with low bandwidth. Besides, you get to save some real estate, page-wise.

@yawa-ti-de

I guess you did not experiment yourself to play with it. @Tundewoods uses lightbox configuration when you click those thumbnails, it will expand with a close button itself.

@uspry1
I actually did. Read my post carefully. Just in case you missed it, I said, "lightbox 2" and not "lightbox". And yes, there is a difference, the main difference being again, that whereas with lightbox 1, you just click on a thumbnail, the photo shows and all you can do is close it, with lightbox 2, you can actually start a slideshow as each photo comes with a "next" and "previous" button. This, I am sure you will agree, is better than opening and closing one photo at a time.

I hope this clarifies things.

Cool website.

Have you considered replicating similar websites for intending couples?

@tunde
Nice site, I was wondering if you have a personal blog so i could follow, or maybe chat on YIM ??