Adam is a key figure in Scripture. He is described as the "first Adam," the one who brought sin into the world. He made it necessary for Jesus, the "last Adam," to atone for all humans, and then rise from the grave with the promise of complete redemption for fallen man and fallen creation. If Adam was just a myth, we would not be able to fully understand the work of Jesus. If Adam and Eve were not real, then we ought to doubt whether their children were real too, and their children...and then we ought to doubt the first 11 chapters of Genesis, and so on. All the genealogies accept Adam as being a literal person, so their children Cain and Abel (Genesis 4:9,10; Luke 11:50,51) must be real too. Jesus was descended from Adam, and it is impossible to be descended from a myth.

"And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a quickening spirit" (1 Corinthians 15:45). From, The Evidence Bible -> http:///1bEnd2s

Since you claim Adam never existed, you should be able to tell me whom the first man was. So, who was the first man to have ever lived?

kolawaxxy: Since you claim Adam never existed, you should be able to tell me whom the first man was. So, who was the first man to have ever lived?

Read the op again

BULLSH1T!!!
you don't just wake up,type crap without any genuine reason and expect pple to accept.
u fink adam ain't d first man? den give logical reasons&explanation.
i can't make out any sensible reason y adam ain't d first man frm d above writeup

in d corinthians verse mentioned above,my version says:
"the scriptures tell us the first man,adam,was given a natural,human body..."(LIVING BIBLE)
how does that debunk adam's story? maybe u shud come up wit beta reasons or expantiate dz one!

Logicboy03:


Read the op again

i've read it half a dozen times and seems i'm having issues seeing his point of view would you mind looking for d ans to kola's question{wuz d first man?} in d op's write up?

Logicboy03:


Read the op again

see how dull they are? They just read the topic and rushed to comment without realizing that the OP was making a case FOR the existence of Adam from their silly book. . .

lana_Vello:
i've read it half a dozen times and seems i'm having issues seeing his point of view would you mind looking for d ans to kola's question{wuz d first man?} in d op's write up?

I dont blame you.....the op is crap. It does a poor job of proving that Adam was ever real

Mr Troll: see how dull they are? They just read the topic and rushed to comment without realizing that the OP was making a case FOR the existence of Adam from their silly book. . .

Never understimate christian butthurt


Once they find something slightly offensive about their religion................

Mr Troll:

just as expected.....hmmn...it never gets better,does it?
read the topic again and the write up then check your irrelevant comment! #no offence

kolawaxxy: Since you claim Adam never existed, you should be able to tell me whom the first man was. So, who was the first man to have ever lived?

Did you read the op at all?
Smh
Don't be too quick to type.

Logicboy03:


Never understimate christian butthurt


Once they find something slightly offensive about their religion................

And see the question they're even asking sef. Smh.

For someone who thinks the bible is the best book on human origin and everything in between what do you expect. I don tire for them. . .

Logicboy03:


I dont blame you.....the op is crap. It does a poor job of proving that Adam was eva real

of course u cant,@least,nt yet. ''adam was ever real?''...is that wah u meant there? :S

Joshthefirst:
Did you read the op at all?
Smh
Don't be too quick to type.

i think y'all r mixing dz sh1t up..

Logicboy03:


I dont blame you.....the op is crap.

ikr....i couldn't have agreed any better!

OP OLAADE,would u quit just viewing the topic and say something? @least,defend your crap.
cos to me,the write up is divided into two antagonizing parts which also contradicts the topic! illuminate me plz..

lana_Vello:
i think y'all r mixing dz sh1t up..

read the op. He was just using the title to attract attention. Smh

Joshthefirst: read the op. He was just using the title to attract attention. Smh

lwkmd,thats rily pathetic of him except it was an error.
besides,any need proving adam existed....yet to meet any1 that thinks otherwise sha#peacE!

lana_Vello:
lwkmd,thats rily pathetic of him except it was an error.
besides,any need proving adam existed....yet to meet any1 that thinks otherwise sha#peacE!

Lol. Ignorance is a disease.

lana_Vello:
lwkmd,thats rily pathetic of him except it was an error.
besides,any need proving adam existed....yet to meet any1 that thinks otherwise sha#peacE!

Wow!
It took you NINE posts to figure it out!

Though, i still doubt that you have

david_hume:
It took you NINE posts to figure it out!
Though, i still doubt that you have

der wz notin 2 figure out xept y an op wud giv a writeup a topic contradictin d msg in it.
yes,m yet to figure such a senseless tin out!

kolawaxxy:

Since you claim Adam never existed, you should be able to tell me whom the first man was. So, who was the first man to have ever lived?

Good question.

lana_Vello:

BULLSH1T!!!
you don't just wake up,type crap without any genuine reason and expect pple to accept.
u fink adam ain't d first man? den give logical reasons&explanation.
i can't make out any sensible reason y adam ain't d first man frm d above writeup

What does the Bible say?

"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him" (Proverbs 18:13).

lana_Vello:

in d corinthians verse mentioned above,my version says:
"the scriptures tell us the first man,adam,was given a natural,human body..."(LIVING BIBLE)
how does that debunk adam's story? maybe u shud come up wit beta reasons or expantiate dz one!

Did you see the topic in quote? How do you read?

lana_Vello:

i've read it half a dozen times and seems i'm having issues seeing his point of view would you mind looking for d ans to kola's question{wuz d first man?} in d op's write up?

I'm pretty sure you must have understood the OP by now.

Logicboy03:

I dont blame you.....the op is crap. It does a poor job of proving that Adam was ever real

How have I not proved that Adam was real?

Joshthefirst:


Did you read the op at all?
Smh
Don't be too quick to type.

God bless you my brother. The Scriptures admonishes us to be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to wrath.

lana_Vello:

i think y'all r mixing dz sh1t up..

Has it occurred to you yet that you might be the one who has his facts mixed up?

lana_Vello:

OP OLAADE,would u quit just viewing the topic and say something? @least,defend your crap.
cos to me,the write up is divided into two antagonizing parts which also contradicts the topic! illuminate me plz..

The title in quote is an objection from a skeptic while the OP tends to answer the question objectively.

Joshthefirst:

read the op. He was just using the title to attract attention. Smh

Let's hope that he got the point now.

lana_Vello:

lwkmd,thats rily pathetic of him except it was an error.
besides,any need proving adam existed....yet to meet any1 that thinks otherwise sha#peacE!

Don't be surprised that there are folks here who have a contrary opinion to yours.

lana_Vello:

der wz notin 2 figure out xept y an op wud giv a writeup a topic contradictin d msg in it.
yes,m yet to figure such a senseless tin out!

Have you ever heard of objections and answers?