Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,499 members, 7,954,912 topics. Date: Saturday, 21 September 2024 at 12:23 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Entertainment / Sports / Chelsea Are Pragmatic - But Who Cares? (593 Views)
Chelsea Transfers: Chelsea are interested in Gotze / Ten Reasons Why Chelsea Are Currently The Best Team In English Premiership / Chelsea Are Pragmatic – But Who Cares? (2) (3) (4)
(1) (Reply)
Chelsea Are Pragmatic - But Who Cares? by baski92(m): 6:58am On Oct 30, 2014 |
As Jon Obi Mikel trotted out onto the Old Trafford pitch in place of Oscar , 67 minutes into Chelsea ’s tense and physical battle against Manchester United on Sunday and with only Didier Drogba’s near-post header separating the teams, one Jose Mourinho quote in particular sprang to mind. It came from November 2010, when Diego Maradona visited Real Madrid’s Valdebebas training complex. The story is recounted in Diego Torres’ book ‘The Special One: The Dark Side of Jose Mourinho’. Explaining the guiding principle of his philosophy to the Argentina legend, Mourinho stated: “I score and I win. And another thing – you score and you don’t know if you win!” On Sunday Chelsea scored and failed to win. Robin van Persie saw to that in injury-time, just as conflicted club legend Frank Lampard had done on the Blues’ previous visit to Manchester a month earlier. The consequences are an unbeaten start, seven wins from nine matches and a four-point lead at the top of the Premier League. But for two goals conceded and the sum total of just under 11 unfortunate minutes, the win record would have been perfect and the gap would have been eight. Whether you consider this the cost of Mourinho’s pragmatism, individual mistakes, dubious refereeing decisions, plain bad luck or a combination of the above depends entirely on your view of the man and the world in which he operates. It is also, in all likelihood, a debate that will prove of little consequence. For unless Manchester City find it within themselves to play with the focus and intensity of champions or an unprecedented calamity strikes at Stamford Bridge, Chelsea will still win this league comfortably. With two of the fixture list’s most difficult away matches in the rear-view, it is even within their reach to win it unbeaten – though it is also, history tells us, highly unlikely. But regardless of the nature and scale of the achievement, there will always be some for whom the influence and ideology of Mourinho presents an insurmountable barrier to true adulation. His first champion Chelsea team won more games, more points, conceded fewer goals and fared better in the Europe than Arsenal’s legendary ‘Invincibles’, yet glorious memories of unbridled artistry at Highbury mean it is Arsene Wenger’s greatest creation that is infinitely more celebrated. Not that Mourinho, a defiant pragmatist, will care. “I am not a fundamentalist in football,” he told Gary Neville during an illuminating interview for the Telegraph earlier this month. “People ask me: what is your model of play? I say: model of what? Model of play against who? When? With which players? Model of play what? I cannot answer to that. Am I too stupid or too smart?” An astonishing collection of winners’ medals over the past 12 years suggests the latter. Mourinho’s approach, underpinned by an innate ability to avoid losing big matches, has served him exceptionally well throughout his stellar career. Last season Chelsea’s unbeaten record against their top-four rivals led them to the brink of a Premier League title their striking options gave them no right to win, and the new campaign has begun in a similar vein. At times last season it felt as though Mourinho was indulging his most puritanical impulses in his attempts to re-mould the team. Free-spirited Juan Mata was ostracised and sold while Eden Hazard and Oscar were publicly castigated for neglecting the defensive arts, even as defeats to Aston Villa, Crystal Palace and Sunderland showcased Chelsea’s chronic lack of inspiration going forward. But time has proved that interpretation false. His new Chelsea team is as ominously efficient as the old one, but possesses fluid moving parts capable of drawing gasps of admiration from even the most ardent away fan. Cesc Fabregas is a player Arsenal supporters would kill to see back in their colours, while Hazard, Oscar and Diego Costa would be prized in almost any team in the world. Together, some of their combination play has been breathtaking, and it is no surprise that Roman Abramovich has never looked happier in his Stamford Bridge executive box. There can be no mistaking pragmatism for negativity. If Chelsea thrill, it is because Mourinho feels he finally has the superiority, resources and team balance to do so. If any of those advantages disappear over the course of the season - as on Sunday at Old Trafford - expect the approach to change. But don’t expect any shame-faced grimaces at Stamford Bridge as long as John Terry lifts the Premier League trophy in May. 1 Like
|
(1) (Reply)
Latest On Liverpool Star Daniel Sturridge Fitness / Woe Mancity Finally Beat Bayern Munich / Man United Fans Suggest Possible United Signings Next Transfer Window
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 14 |