I know the lucifer means "the light bearer" and he was an angel that fell, but was he the originator of evil or apprentice of satan?
The Bible says satan is from the begining a liar, from the day of his creation. Lucifer is not like that,he was a holy cherub till the day he was found guilty. Please compare and give me an answer.

LLVelly:
I know the lucifer means "the light bearer" and he was an angel that fell, but was he the originator of evil or apprentice of satan?
The Bible says satan is from the begining a liar, from the day of his creation. Lucifer is not like that,he was a holy cherub till the day he was found guilty. Please compare and give me an answer.

from the day he was found guilty, he became a liar and father of it because he created another light for people to see. Satan is an operation of a name he assumed after his fall, what he became- the Accuser

Who is the fucking pleb censoring my post? Satan was the first Lucifer. Fucking retards don't even read their Bibles. If you want censorship, go to the Islamic section.

sukkot:
the first Lucifer on earth was satan. you are correct in a way. although technically i would not call them satan because the spirit and laws of God only got introduced to the earth during the adam and eve era. seeing as satan means being an adversary to God, and the spirit of God and his laws were not on earth then, it means the wickedness they were doing back then was not counted as being adversarial to God. where there is no law there is no transgression, and where there is no laws of God, there can be no satan. so the first lucifer technically were not satan. just carnal men with no celestial laws

romans 4 vs 15 for where no law is, there is no transgression.