Virtually everybody born before the invention of the internet must have heard the tale of a nonexistent football match between Nigeria and India that obviously took place in a parallel universe and somehow we got to hear the gory stories of that match.
Though there are many variations of the story, every prevaricator seems to agree on a couple of facts about this fictional football match. Each storyteller agrees that;
1. This match ended with India scoring 99 goals and Nigeria scoring just one goal.
2. Nigerians where unable to kick the ball because the football kept turning to a lion (or something scary) to prevent them from playing the soccer ball.
3. The Indians later agreed that if Nigeria could score a goal, they would concede defeat
4. Samuel Okwaraji scored the winning goal and lost his life in the process.
5. FIFA banned India from soccer because they used black magic in that very game
With the help of common sense (not that it was absent back then), quick access to information and the internet, every right thinking Nigerian has come to realize that such a story should be filled under “Blatant Lies”.

Why Did This Story Thrive For So Long?
Most people like to pass off this story as true with the fact that no one has ever seen India in an International Football Match. Since no one actually saw India participate in most international soccer games, this gave a little credence to the story. India
Another reason this lie could thrive for long was the fact that credible information was not readily available at our finger tips. It not like every Emeka, Audu and Ojo could visit Google in a matter of minutes and tell our ominous fabricators that they should stop spreading toxic lies.
And to be honest we have a tingling feeling that this lie was concocted by an elder of a community because, let’s be honest who questions the words of the elders in Nigeria. Remember, what an adult sees sitting down a child will never see even if he consults Google, Siri or Cortana.
The Element of Truth In This Story
On the 12th of August 1989, Nigeria lost Sam Okwaraji.
Sam Okwaraji was the player rumored to have lost his life in that game when in truth he died during a FIFA World Cup qualifying game against Angola in the 77th minute.
He collapsed and died of cognitive heart failure. May his soul rest in Perfect Peace. AMEN
So that is the only truthful thing about that story, the fact that a Nigerian player died during a football match. That’s it. The match was not against India, we did not lose the match and as you must have guessed, and there were no lions either.
What Is The Deal With India Anyway?
India qualified for the 1950 FIFA world cup as a result of the withdrawal of their scheduled opponents. But the Indian football governing body, the All India Football Federation (AIFF) decided against going to the world cup, being unable to understand the importance of the event at that time.
Some of the Reasons shown by the AIFF included the cost of travel, lack of practice time, team selection issued and valuing the Olympics over the FIFA World cup. It should be noted that FIFA agreed to bear a major part of the travel expenses, but it did not really help their decision making.
Was India Banned For Refusing To Play Barefoot?
No.
The 1948 London Olympics was India’s first major international tournament, where a predominantly barefoot Indian team lost 2 -1 to France.
Following the 1948 Olympics FIFA imposed a rule banning barefoot play.
The belief that the Indian team refused to play because they were not allowed to play barefoot is not entirely true according to the then team captain who said it was just a story to cover the disastrous decision of the AFIF.
After the 1950 fiasco, India has never come close to qualifying for the World Cup.
The reason you do not see India in World Cup competitions is because they do not qualify
So Does The Indian Team Wear Soccer Boots?
Yes.
In the 1952 Olympics, the Indian team lost 10 – 1 to Yugoslavia (talking about taking a beating). As a result of this magnanimous defeat the AIFF made it compulsory for its team members to wear boots
Is it Possible to win a match with a 99 – 1 match margin?
Yes.
It is absolutely possible to rake 99 – 1 from a single football match. Let’s take a walk down memory lane and see how this is even possible. Now allow us to digress.
The highest scoring soccer game was 149-0!
You’re probably wondering how a soccer team could be so bad that they let 149 goals be scored, but the truth is it was a form of protest. The event occurred in 2002 after a 2-2 draw between rival teams Stade Olympique de L’emyrne, or SOE, and AS Adema of Madagascar, which resulted in the referees awarding a penalty causing SOE to lose the game.
During a match fixing debacle in Nigeria, the Feeders scored 72 of their 79-0 victory in 45 minutes of play. Police Machine scored 61 of their 67-0 victory in the second half. At one point, they scored four goals in a minute.
Arbroath won Bon Accord 36 – 0 in 1885. It held the largest margin of victory in professional football where both sides wanted to win.
So, yes, given the “right circumstances”, a team could actually receive 99 – 1 beating without any black magic whatsoever.
Did i miss something? Please be sure to let me know in the comment section below

kai! i'v been a fool

The real story nor sweet jor! I prefer d old fairy tales

CountDracula:
The real story nor sweet jor! I prefer d old fairy tales

Yes oo. hahahaha

I'm sure it's an Ibadan man that started that 99-1 story.

You got one point almost wrong. Why almost yes the sam okwaraji. The story has been around before his death granted he was alleged to have scored the goal he was actually said to have had a broken leg after that lone goal shot. I may be wrong though
Now to ur goal analysys i doubt the 99 and 149 goals preference you made its only possible if there are only eleven players on the pitch with the eleven other in protest. Cos u know if they were to dribble past opponents to score plus celebration delay are u saying the opponent no dey even touch the ball how much time will it take for one to run straight from centre to 18yard box not to talk of dribble where are our historians and mathematical statisticians work don land o

Emyogalanya:
You got one point almost wrong. Why almost yes the sam okwaraji. The story has been around before his death granted he was alleged to have scored the goal he was actually said to have had a broken leg after that lone goal shot. I may be wrong though
Now to ur goal analysys i doubt the 99 and 149 goals preference you made its only possible if there are only eleven players on the pitch with the eleven other in protest. Cos u know if they were to dribble past opponents to score plus celebration delay are u saying the opponent no dey even touch the ball how much time will it take for one to run straight from centre to 18yard box not to talk of dribble where are our historians and mathematical statisticians work don land o

Actually growing up I heard the story too long before okwaraji time.In our own version then Teslim 'thunder' Balogun was the lone goal scorer.

ibrhyme77:

Actually growing up I heard the story too long before okwaraji time.In our own version then Teslim 'thunder' Balogun was the lone goal scorer.

yes its balogun. The man with the terrific shot that earned him the name thunder. It was also said his shot killed queen elizabeth's younger bro his shot dey tear net break wooden post thats why dey now use iron instead

true talk bro

So we've pranked all this while by our parents bla bla bla. Thanks for revealing the truth OP.

Emyogalanya:
yes its balogun. The man with the terrific shot that earned him the name thunder. It was also said his shot killed queen elizabeth's younger bro his shot dey tear net break wooden post thats why dey now use iron instead

your own version of the story eh... Lmao.