Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,596 members, 7,812,953 topics. Date: Monday, 29 April 2024 at 11:29 PM

PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers - Technology Market - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Science/Technology / Technology Market / PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers (1957 Views)

Brand New 60A Etracer MPPT Solar Charger Controller - ET6415BND For Sale / Solar Charge Controllers For Sale / 40amp Mppt Solar Controller For Sale (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers by Judejibs: 12:36pm On Nov 24, 2015
A lot is being talked about Solar panels, grid tied system, grid interactive system and off grid systems, PWM, MPPT Solar Charge Controllers.

What’s the Difference between MPPT and PWM? that's is our focus for today. I am motivated to write this because of an argument that I had yesterday with a man.

The charge controller is a key component of a solar power system and specifying the best one for the system requires some analysis. Below is a quick overview.

The two types of charge controllers most commonly used in today’s solar power systems are pulse width modulation (PWM) and maximum power point tracking (MPPT). Both adjust charging rates depending on the battery's charge level to allow charging closer to the battery’s maximum capacity as well as optionally monitor battery temperature to prevent overheating.

► Comparing the Two
If maximizing charging current were the only factor considered when specifying a solar controller, everyone would use an MPPT controller. But the two technologies are different, each with it’s own advantages. The decision depends on site conditions, system components, size of pv array and load, and finally the cost for a particular solar power system.

► Temperature Conditions
An MPPT controller is better suited for colder conditions. As solar module operating temperature goes down, the Vmp1 increases. That’s because the voltage of the solar panels operating at their peak power point at Standard Testing Conditions (STC is 25C°) is about 17V while the battery voltage is about 13.5V. The MPPT controller is able to capture the excess module voltage to charge the batteries. As a result, a MPPT controller in cool conditions can produce up to 20 – 25% more charging than a PWM controller.

In comparison, a PWM controller is unable to capture excess voltage because the pulse width modulation technology charges at the same voltage as the battery. However, when solar panels are deployed in warm or hot climates, their Vmp decreases, and the peak power point operates at a voltage that is closer to the voltage of a 12V battery. There is no excess voltage to be transferred to the battery making the MPPT controller unnecessary and negating the advantage of an MPPT over a PWM.

► Array to Load Ratio
In a scenario where the solar array is large relative to the power draw from the batteries by the load, the batteries will stay close to a full state of charge. A PWM controller is capable of efficiently maintaining the system without the added expense of an MPPT controller.

► Size of the System
Low power systems are better suited to a PWM controller because:

A PWM controller operates at a relatively constant harvesting efficiency regardless of the size of the array
A PWM controller is less expensive that a MPPT, so is a more economical choice for a small system
A MPPT controller is much less efficient in low power applications. Systems 170W or higher tickle the MPPT’s sweet spot

► Type of Solar Module
Stand-alone off-grid solar modules are typically 36-cell modules and are compatible with both PWM and MPPT technologies. Some grid-tie solar modules on the market today are not the traditional 36-cells modules that are used for off-grid power systems. For example, the voltage from a 60-cell 250W panel is too high for 12-Volt battery charging, and too low for 24-Volt battery charging. MPPT technology tracks the maximum power point (thus MPPT) of these less expensive grid-tie modules in order to charge the batteries, whereas PWM does not.

► Cost
MPPT controllers are typically more expensive than PWM’s but are more efficient under certain conditions, so they can produce more power with the same number of solar modules than a PWM controller. One must then analyze the site to verify that the MPPT can indeed perform more efficiently when used in that system’s given set of conditions.

When specifying one technology over the other, the cost of the controller becomes less important than the total cost of the system. To specify a controller technology simply based of cost, be sure to perform a close analysis of realized efficiencies, system operation, load and site conditions.

SUMMARY OF COMPARISON
PWM Charge Controller
PV array & battery voltages should match
Operates at battery voltage so it performs well in warm temperatures and when the battery is almost full,
Typically recommended for use in smaller systems where MPPT benefits are minimal

MPPT Charge Controller
PV array voltage can be higher than battery voltage.
Operates above battery voltage so it is can provide “boost” in cold temperatures and when the battery is low.
150W – 200W or higher to take advantage of MPPT benefits.
Enables the use of lower cost/grid-tie PV Modules helping bring down the overall PV system cost.
Off-Grid or Grid-Tie

At Idyllic Technologies, when we select one type of charge controller over another we assess its advantages in the overall system cost. The goal is to power a system efficiently and continuously while preserving the health of the battery bank. To learn more about the solar power systems we design and build, give us a call on 08030675746. www.idyllictechnologies.com

Re: PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers by Nobody: 10:50am On Mar 03, 2022
Judejibs:
A lot is being talked about Solar panels, grid tied system, grid interactive system and off grid systems, PWM, MPPT Solar Charge Controllers.

What’s the Difference between MPPT and PWM? that's is our focus for today. I am motivated to write this because of an argument that I had yesterday with a man.

The charge controller is a key component of a solar power system and specifying the best one for the system requires some analysis. Below is a quick overview.

The two types of charge controllers most commonly used in today’s solar power systems are pulse width modulation (PWM) and maximum power point tracking (MPPT). Both adjust charging rates depending on the battery's charge level to allow charging closer to the battery’s maximum capacity as well as optionally monitor battery temperature to prevent overheating.

► Comparing the Two
If maximizing charging current were the only factor considered when specifying a solar controller, everyone would use an MPPT controller. But the two technologies are different, each with it’s own advantages. The decision depends on site conditions, system components, size of pv array and load, and finally the cost for a particular solar power system.

► Temperature Conditions
An MPPT controller is better suited for colder conditions. As solar module operating temperature goes down, the Vmp1 increases. That’s because the voltage of the solar panels operating at their peak power point at Standard Testing Conditions (STC is 25C°) is about 17V while the battery voltage is about 13.5V. The MPPT controller is able to capture the excess module voltage to charge the batteries. As a result, a MPPT controller in cool conditions can produce up to 20 – 25% more charging than a PWM controller.

In comparison, a PWM controller is unable to capture excess voltage because the pulse width modulation technology charges at the same voltage as the battery. However, when solar panels are deployed in warm or hot climates, their Vmp decreases, and the peak power point operates at a voltage that is closer to the voltage of a 12V battery. There is no excess voltage to be transferred to the battery making the MPPT controller unnecessary and negating the advantage of an MPPT over a PWM.

► Array to Load Ratio
In a scenario where the solar array is large relative to the power draw from the batteries by the load, the batteries will stay close to a full state of charge. A PWM controller is capable of efficiently maintaining the system without the added expense of an MPPT controller.

► Size of the System
Low power systems are better suited to a PWM controller because:

A PWM controller operates at a relatively constant harvesting efficiency regardless of the size of the array
A PWM controller is less expensive that a MPPT, so is a more economical choice for a small system
A MPPT controller is much less efficient in low power applications. Systems 170W or higher tickle the MPPT’s sweet spot

► Type of Solar Module
Stand-alone off-grid solar modules are typically 36-cell modules and are compatible with both PWM and MPPT technologies. Some grid-tie solar modules on the market today are not the traditional 36-cells modules that are used for off-grid power systems. For example, the voltage from a 60-cell 250W panel is too high for 12-Volt battery charging, and too low for 24-Volt battery charging. MPPT technology tracks the maximum power point (thus MPPT) of these less expensive grid-tie modules in order to charge the batteries, whereas PWM does not.

► Cost
MPPT controllers are typically more expensive than PWM’s but are more efficient under certain conditions, so they can produce more power with the same number of solar modules than a PWM controller. One must then analyze the site to verify that the MPPT can indeed perform more efficiently when used in that system’s given set of conditions.

When specifying one technology over the other, the cost of the controller becomes less important than the total cost of the system. To specify a controller technology simply based of cost, be sure to perform a close analysis of realized efficiencies, system operation, load and site conditions.

SUMMARY OF COMPARISON
PWM Charge Controller
PV array & battery voltages should match
Operates at battery voltage so it performs well in warm temperatures and when the battery is almost full,
Typically recommended for use in smaller systems where MPPT benefits are minimal

MPPT Charge Controller
PV array voltage can be higher than battery voltage.
Operates above battery voltage so it is can provide “boost” in cold temperatures and when the battery is low.
150W – 200W or higher to take advantage of MPPT benefits.
Enables the use of lower cost/grid-tie PV Modules helping bring down the overall PV system cost.
Off-Grid or Grid-Tie

At Idyllic Technologies, when we select one type of charge controller over another we assess its advantages in the overall system cost. The goal is to power a system efficiently and continuously while preserving the health of the battery bank. To learn more about the solar power systems we design and build, give us a call on 08030675746. www.idyllictechnologies.com

Thanks Bro.
I have 4 panels 310 watts each (Total 1240 watts)
2 batteries 12x200ah ( i have plan to add 2 more batteries making it 4.
60amps pwm
Inverter: power max 5kva

The panels can get sun light from 8am to 6pm
Is there need to charge pwm to mppt?
Re: PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers by Keemie(f): 10:31am On Mar 06, 2022
Can you recommend a good and affordable Mppt charge controller
Re: PWM Vs MPPT Solar Charge Controllers by exclusiveoloori: 11:30pm On Mar 20, 2022
Hello, pls I have a 12v 170ah lithium battery and I'm planning to get 500W inverter, 170W panel and 30A PWM charge controller. My load is just 200W and there will be nepa to support solar charging. I hope this will work fine?

(1) (Reply)

... / Sold!! iPhone 11 Black 64GB With Box And Accessories / Sale: Alienware 15 R3 Gaming Laptop (pix)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 45
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.