Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,194,199 members, 7,953,740 topics. Date: Friday, 20 September 2024 at 02:13 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / A War……against Whom?? (505 Views)
There Is A War Of Attrition In Nigeria – Paul Enenche / The War Against Christianity....by Christians / PMB Will Win War Against Corruption – Kumuyi (2) (3) (4)
(1) (Reply)
A War……against Whom?? by Nobody: 8:39pm On Nov 30, 2015 |
A day after the terrorist attack in Paris, French President Francois
Hollande solemnly declared: We Are At War. It sounds great and
inspiring, but – a war against WHOM? Or against WHAT?
The laws of war are simple, and the first among them is Know Your
Enemy . Until we define an enemy, we cannot fight him- and of
course, we cannot win him. So, who or what is our enemy? Slogans like
“ we are at war against international terrorism” do not convince;
terrorism is not a goal, terrorism is an instrument to reach a goal.
Terrorists do not kill because they are bloodthirsty maniacs; they kill
for the sake of some Idea they consider so important and sublime
that they´ re ready not only to take other people´s lives, but also
sacrifice their own, to reach it.
Mantras about “terrorism has not any nationality or religion” our
politicians chant after every terrorist attack are plain stupid; after
all, it´s not Aliens who blow up our schools, buses, theaters and who
shoot us in the streets of our cities. We could agree with this
politically correct declaration, if the adepts of different religions
perpetrated terrorists attacks by some schedule: on Mondays, Jews
blast a school, on Tuesdays, Muslims blow up a bus , then Christians,
Buddhists… But the reality is different: almost 95% of all terrorist
attacks in the world are perpetrated by Muslims.
They do not interpret Koran correctly, our liberal media and
politically correct politicians tell us. Ok, but that does not cancel the
fact that they consider their Holy Book of Divine Revelation the
KORAN, not The Lord of the Rings; they without any doubt believe in
Afterlife; they say their Prophet is Muhammad, not Justin Bieber;
and the names of their terrorist groups very clearly say that they
are ready to die and kill for Islam, not for Manchester United.
Call them bad Muslims, Fundamentalist Muslim …But they are Muslims.
And those who stand at the source of this “wrong interpretation” are
not ignorant peasants from some Yemen village – but the most
prominent Islamic theologians. If Saudi Arabia in just one month, in
May of 2003, fired 1710 Islamic clerics from their positions for
preaching terrorism, then it´s not just some individual clerics who “do
not interpret Koran correctly”; there are evidently dozens of
thousands of Muslim clerics all over the world who support terrorism
and call their flock “to die for Allah”. Again: they call to die and to
kill “for Allah”, not for Quetzalcóatl, Krishna or Jesus Christ. And
after a terrorist attack perpetrated by such Muslims who “do not
interpret Koran correctly”, Police immediately find links to a mosque
or madrasa; not to St.Peter´s Basilica in the Vatican or to Shotokan
Monastery school.
Koran is difficult for understanding, and can be easily interpreted
erroneously? Yes, it´s true; Koran is VERY difficult for
understanding, it´s vague and unclear.. But if millions of people after
reading the Koran have turned to terrorism or become its supporters,
then there is something in the Koran itself which leaves broad margin
for such “erroneous interpretations”. If a scientist invented a
medication that cures AIDS but provokes cancer, and millions of
people died after using this medication, such a scientist will be sued
and put to jail. Of course, he can say that stupid patients did not
interpret correctly his instructions, but I have serious doubts that the
sentence will be “not guilty”; he had to write the instructions in such
a way which would not leave a margin for “erroneous
interpretations”.
And of course, nobody would call such scientist “ A Saviour of a
Mankind”, or “a Prophet”, and nobody would call to proclaim his
method “Holy” and closed to any criticism.
But – why, exactly, do we say terrorists do not understand Islam and
interpret Koran in some erroneous way?
Islam stands on the Koran. And Koran consists of two blocks: one
“revealed” in Mecca, and another “revealed” in Medina. In Mecca,
Muhammad still hoped his religion could be spread by preaching
peace and love, and Suras of the Koran of that period are really
peaceful. Suras like “to you my religion and to me mine”, or like ” By
killing a man you kill all the Mankind” which Muslim clerics love to
quote to mystified Europeans and Americans as a proof of Islam
being “ a religion of peace” are from Mecca. However, twenty five
years of preaching peace to Pagan Arabs in Mecca brought to
Muhammad just some 50 followers – and Muhammad understood that
at this speed of conversion, he would most probably see a triumph of
his religion only in the Afterlife. So, he and his followers moved to
Medina; that was a first documented Muslim immigration, and its goal
was : to subdue the native residents and make Islam dominant .
http://chersonandmolschky.com/2013/10/02/
goalofmuslimimmigration/ There he sharply changed his
“revelations”, converting Islam in the religion whose aim was a world
domination. The instrument to achieve this goal should be Jihad, Holy
War, one of whose components is Terrorism. In Medina, a second block
of Suras, was “revealed” , and .these Suras had nothing of peace and
tolerance; they called to “kill infidels wherever you find them”,
“fight them until mischief is no more, and religion is for Allah”.
What if one Sura contradicts another? The solution was found by
Muhammad, who informed his followers that Allah sent him a
revelation to change any revelation revealed earlier.
2:106
Nothing of our revelation (even a single verse) do we abrogate or
cause be forgotten, but we bring (in place) one better or the like
thereof.
16:101
And when We put a revelation in place of (another) revelation, – and
Allah knoweth best what He revealeth
Later, Muslim theologians developed this brilliant idea and agreed
that all Suras of the Koran are “ a Word of Allah”, but if one Sura
contradicts another, the one written later is more “Word of Allah”,
like in the Army: in case of two contradictory orders, a soldier has to
fulfill the one given last. This trick is called Nasj, or abrogation.
And which Suras of the Koran were written later?
Calling to violence Suras of Medina.
So, is Islam “a religion of peace”? Yes, when Muslims want it, and it
will be a True Islam. But as soon as they decide it´s time to attack,
they use a second block of Suras of Medina- and that will be also a
True Islam.
Peaceful Suras of Mecca are used by Muslims when they are weak, to
gain time and to lull the enemy with nice words about Islam being a
religion of peace.
Violent Suras of Medina are used when Muslims decide that the
enemy is weak, that his spirit is broken and that they have good
chances to win.
But the goal remains the same: ISLAM MUST RULE THE WORLD.
Until we understand that our enemy is Islam – we shall go on seeing
corpses in the streets of our cities. |
Re: A War……against Whom?? by Nobody: 8:55pm On Nov 30, 2015 |
Did anyone read post above? |
(1) (Reply)
Bishop Oyedepo Is Plans To Build 100,000 Seat Stadium-like Auditorium(pic) / Woman With Small Breasts Got Bigger Breasts After Bishop Oyedepo’s Prayer / Nairalanders Come Prophesy Here
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 18 |