The second list for NICON 1,000 jobs is out today. i saw the list on page 71, of Guardian newspaper of today 30/10/06. they promised to roll out more names.

pls check for ur names.

pls was it for only 2.1 graduates or did they include 2.2 poeple this time around.pls let me no so that i can check it b/c i have 2.2.

they didnt say their grades only published names unlike the first batch.

Somebody shld pls put that list here, Thanx.

sorry, i dont hv scanner in my office, i would hv done that.  howeva, they hv started training today 1/11/06 at Ajah, Lagos State.  i believe if u made the list u would have bn contacted as they said to hv sent out employment letters earlier before the publication.

please you guys should get your info rigfht always.the list that came out is for professionals who were interviewed and have passed their interview.the list for the 1000 names will be out soon.check punch newspaper of monday and read what was written underneath.

thanks

My dear,  u don't only read underneath, but the heading also

the heading read thus:
NICON GROUP OF COMPANIES
1,000 JOB VACANCIES (SECOND BATCH)
LIST OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES

other people could confirm from guardian 30/10/06, page 71.

please stop discouraging people's kind gesture!

the underneath read thus:

NOTE: other candidates who wrote pre-employment examination will have their results published soon.  please bear with us for we have to sort out 1,000 names from 46,000 applicants.


So i don't know 2 of us who is right, i think other readers will judge by themselves.  but your comment is only DISCOURAGING me, i never took part in the Nicon stuff, but am doing this because of the spirit of oneness that reigns in Narialand.

my peace, joimartins is actually right.
If u had read the posting on Punch, i gues u'd av gotin it clearly. twas specified like joimartins ritely said that the list is for professionals who made it thru d interview. In as much as we try to kip ourselves informed we should also try to get it all info clearly rather than getin it al mixed up.

What about the Guardian, I read Guardian and not PUNCH, get this, the PUNCH may have another informatin, I never mentioned PUNCH in my Posting. I only said GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER. and wat i posted above is the heading of the publication. cofnirm it from guradain and not punch pls. the punch may be for antoher thing.