antispexish:
There are facts that a man raided caravans during his own time. The reasons He did so, the purpose or how he did so does not negate the fact that he raided caravans. These man has followers and one of them recently blew up a train in Belgium. The reasons and purpose does not negate the fact that he blew up a train.

The reason for these post is that while watching CNN yesterday , a reporter interviewed an Islam*c cleric who claimed the bomber does not follow Islam*c teachings despite the claims that the bomber is a follower of the religion. He went on to state that the religion states that he who kills an innocent person is as if he had killed the whole world(not sure of his exact words), and the people who died are innocent.

ThE problem now is, who are the innocent, and who determines if those killed are innocent or not?
If those in the caravans are not innocent, it's clear that the bomber is right to bomb those in the train, cus they are also not innocent.

Pyrrho:

Who raided a caravan and for what reasons?

Annunaki:


Mohammed raided the caravan for the simple reason that he was an armed robber.

Pyrrho:
Oh, Muhamed did more grievous crimes than that.

His true followers are ready to do worse...